2019/01/05

07 Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being By Paul Hawken

Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being, and Why No One Saw It Coming By Paul Hawken | World of Books




Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being, and Why No One Saw It Coming By Paul Hawken



Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being, and Why No One Saw It Coming
by Paul Hawken
In Stock
$13.09
Condition:
Very Good
Only 4 left
Qty:Update cartAdd to Wishlist

Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being, and Why No One Saw It Coming SummaryN/A

Why buy from World of Books

Our excellent value books literally don't cost the earth
YEAR PUBLISHED
2007-06-30

NUMBER OF PAGES
288
Paul Hawken has spent more than a decade researching organizations dedicated to restoring the environment and fostering social justice. From billion-dollar nonprofits to single-person dot.causes, these groups collectively comprise the largest movement on earth, a movement that has no name, leader, or location and that has gone largely ignored by politicians and the media.

Blessed Unrest explores the diversity of the movement, its brilliant ideas, innovative strategies, and centuries of hidden history. A culmination of Hawken's many years of leadership in the environmental and social justice fields, it will inspire all who despair of the world's fate, and its conclusions will surprise even those within the movement itself.
----
Editorial Reviews
Review
?"Blessed Unrest" is exciting, compelling and very important. . . . It will inspire and encourage millions more to take action.?
?Jane Goodall

?Writing with zest, clarity, and a touch of wonder . . . Hawken offers a fascinating history of our perception of nature and human rights. Hawken also presents an unprecedented map to this new ?social landscape.
?"Booklist" (starred review)





"Blessed Unrest" is exciting, compelling and very important. . . . It will inspire and encourage millions more to take action.
Jane Goodall
Writing with zest, clarity, and a touch of wonder . . . Hawken offers a fascinating history of our perception of nature and human rights. Hawken also presents an unprecedented map to this new social landscape.
"Booklist" (starred review)


a"Blessed Unrest" is exciting, compelling and very important. . . . It will inspire and encourage millions more to take action.a
aJane Goodall
aWriting with zest, clarity, and a touch of wonder . . . Hawken offers a fascinating history of our perception of nature and human rights. Hawken also presents an unprecedented map to this new asocial landscape.aa
a"Booklist" (starred review)
--This text refers to the paperback edition.
About the Author
Paul Hawken is an environmentalist, entrepreneur, journalist, and author. Starting at age 20, he dedicated his life to sustainability and changing the relationship between business and the environment. His practice has included starting and running ecological businesses, writing and teaching about the impact of commerce on living systems, and consulting with governments and corporations on economic development, industrial ecology, and environmental policy. --This text refers to the paperback edition.
Product details
ASIN : B000QCSA40
Publisher : Penguin Books (May 10, 2007)
Publication date : May 10, 2007
Language : English
File size : 730 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 356 pages
Lending : Not Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #382,824 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
#111 in Non-Governmental Organization Policy
#157 in Ecology (Kindle Store)
#241 in Nonprofit Organizations & Charities (Kindle Store)
Customer Reviews: 4.4 out of 5 stars    64 ratings
Videos
Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!
Upload video
More about the author
› Visit Amazon's Paul Hawken Page
Paul Hawken
 Follow
Biography
Paul Hawken has written eight books published in over 50 countries in 30 languages including five national and NYT bestsellers, The Next Economy, Growing a Business, The Ecology of Commerce, Blessed Unrest, and Drawdown, The Most Comprehensive Plan Every Proposed to Reverse Global Warming. Natural Capitalism, co-authored with Amory Lovins, was read by several heads of state including Bill Clinton who called it one of the five most important books in the world. He has appeared on numerous media including the Today Show, Larry King, Talk of the Nation, Charlie Rose, and been profiled in articles including the Wall Street Journal, Newsweek, Washington Post, Business Week, and Esquire. His writings have appeared in the Harvard Business Review, Resurgence, New Statesman, Inc, Boston Globe, Christian Science Monitor, Mother Jones, Orion, and other publications. He founded several companies including Erewhon, the first food company in the U.S. that relied solely on sustainable agricultural methods. He has served on the board of several environmental organizations including Point Foundation (publisher of the Whole Earth Catalogs), Center for Plant Conservation, Trust for Public Land, and National Audubon Society. He lives with his wife, flocks of nuthatches, red tail hawks, and coyotes in Cascade Canyon watershed in Northern California. Go to www.drawdown.org to see upcoming speaking events, and www.paulhawken.com for a more extensive biography. Go to www.drawdown.org for a list of upcoming speaking events and www.paulhawken.com for a more extensive biography.
 Show Less


How would you rate your experience shopping for books on Amazon today





Very poor Neutral Great
Customer reviews
4.4 out of 5 stars
4.4 out of 5
64 global ratings
5 star
 72%
4 star
 7%
3 star
 13%
2 star
 5%
1 star
 3%
How are ratings calculated?
Review this product
Share your thoughts with other customers
Write a customer review

Sponsored 
Read reviews that mention
paul hawken blessed unrest social justice grace justice social movement justice and beauty largest social book blessed movement in history human environmental organizations process ecological society thoughts groups planet inspiring local

Top reviews
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
Pizzo
5.0 out of 5 stars A MUST READ!
Reviewed in the United States on October 3, 2015
Verified Purchase
Honestly, this work should be a MUST READ for all human beings, no matter race, color or creed! Why? Because it simply presents interconnectedness and sustainability in true perspective! Okakura Kakuzō once stated, “The concept of totality must not be lost in the individual.” Blessed Unrest exemplifies the very essence of Okakura’s wisdom and love for collective human health, fellowship and continuity.

I’ve gone as far as purchasing additional copies, and sharing them with friends and strangers who seem to be at the threshold of realizing that there is something wrong with our current collective thinking. WE MUST join the ranks of not philosophers, but DOERS if we are to course-correct our present and thus our future. Blessed Unrest is not about politics or finances. Instead, it is about the hidden POWER of HUMANITY, and how our CHOICES impact the quality of LIFE of EVERYONE near and far, known and unknown!

I am a professor at a local college, and I am trying to convince the faculty, to allow me to build a Humanities’ curriculum, based on this book. I firmly believe that it should be a fundamental teaching in all disciplines spanning from the arts, to technology, and especially business. Why especially business? It is my unwavering belief that no business leader, should ever sit in the chair of “power,” without thoroughly examining the contents of Blessed Unrest.

I highly recommend this book. Please give it a chance, it just may change your life, the lives of those you love, and the lives of those you may never come to know.
Read less
16 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
white cloud blue sky
5.0 out of 5 stars Bless yourself with these insights
Reviewed in the United States on July 7, 2016
Verified Purchase
Crawl inside the mind of a genius who sees the world with clear eyes and a clear conscious. Paul Hawken changes hearts and lives by just arranging words and telling stories that expand your worldview. The amount of research that went into this book is nothing short of amazing and yet it is so enjoyable to read.
3 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Allan Stellar
4.0 out of 5 stars Granola Heads With Values...
Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2011
Verified Purchase
Much is made about the new "Green Economy". Obama and Hillary both mention the promise of millions of Green jobs, as we move to a more sustainable society. For the past thirty years, there have been those who have been struggling (and succeeding) to make a living as they pioneered this new economy.

These guys (and gals) are all pretty much the same. Last fall I had the privilege to hear Paul Hawken speak. Paul (a Green Entrepreneur) has written an excellent book: "Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being and Why No One Saw it Coming" (quite the title) in which he describes and defends this new environmental movement based on love of the land and also people. When you meet these folks, they almost always dress the same. Blue Jeans. Either a T-shirt or a Flannel shirt. Hiking boots (the old leather kind). And they tend to be thin. Energetic. Healthy. They look like they live their values.

Politically it's hard to pin them down, as they promote both capitalism and environmentalism. They aren't socialists (but they have morals and a community ethic); they aren't capitalists (but they promote sustainable living and products). Frankly, they befuddle me. I'm thinking of Michael Pollan, Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins and Bill McKibben. Granola heads with values and a functioning checkbook, they seem to be.
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Matt
5.0 out of 5 stars So Amazing! Really Opens Your Eyes!
Reviewed in the United States on February 10, 2014
Verified Purchase
This book is such a Revelation! The way Paul Hawken writes is almost poetic. I actually bought the kindle version, realized that I since I bought the kindle version I could download the Audible version for only a few dollars more and listen to it on my daily commute, then pick up where I left off once I got home! I also like listening to it and then going back and highlighting what I liked in the kindle!

I will recommend this to anyone who is interested in a healthy planet, "the movement", action plans, ideas, or even just the history of sustainability...
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Nancy P. Greenleaf
5.0 out of 5 stars This book is a great antidote to the nightly news
Reviewed in the United States on July 23, 2014
Verified Purchase
This book is a great antidote to the nightly news. Putting together environmental, social justice and indigenous movements local grassroots efforts is a great way to see through all the fragmented disaster plans the major media feed us every day.
We just had a major victory in South Portland Maine where the city council passed a city ordinance that will ban the exporting of crude oil and tar sands from the port. We need to tell other people with similar local efforts that they are not alone. This book, BLESSED UNREST, encourages us to not give up because we are "only one little town."
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
TLee
5.0 out of 5 stars Must Read
Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2020
Verified Purchase
Book came as advertised.
Helpful
Report abuse
Lisa
5.0 out of 5 stars great summary of the history of social movements
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2017
Verified Purchase
Very relevant today...great summary of the history of social movements. Highly recommend
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
See all reviews
Top reviews from other countries
Translate all reviews to English
GE Mitchell
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 2, 2014
Verified Purchase
Brilliant
Report abuse
Theo T.
5.0 out of 5 stars Ein hoffnungsvolles Buch
Reviewed in Germany on October 31, 2013
Verified Purchase
Endlich mal ein Buch, das zeigt, was im Weltmassstab gesehen an zukunftsträchtigen Aktivitäten alles am Werk ist. Unverzichtbar, wenn man die geistigen Wurzeln der NGOs kennen will.
Report abuse
Translate review to English
CC
5.0 out of 5 stars MOST IMPORTANT BOOK OF OUR TIME
Reviewed in Canada on January 18, 2013
Verified Purchase
I have been giving the book as gifts since I first read it. It should be required reading for everybody.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
irene
5.0 out of 5 stars Blessed Unrest
Reviewed in Canada on April 19, 2013
Verified Purchase
An Excellent and I would say essential read for any one interested in improving the quality of life on this planet.
Report abuse
=====
Goodreads Review
====
COMMUNITY REVIEWS
Showing 1-30
 Average rating3.93  ·  Rating details ·  1,726 ratings  ·  223 reviews

Search review text


English ‎(218)
More filters | Sort order
Sejin,
Sejin, start your review of Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came Into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming

Write a review
Robert McDonald
Dec 10, 2007Robert McDonald rated it liked it
Recommends it for: people into the World Social Forum process
Paul Hawken’s new book, entitled Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming, makes a simple argument in a straightforward fashion. This makes the book infinitely more readable than another book that makes a similar argument in incomprehensible poetic prose, Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire by Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt . The only problem with the clarity of Hawken’s argument is that it brings into full relief its deficiencies.

The book begins by chronicling the rapid rise of the NGO, both in sheer numbers and in political power. Somehow, this multitude of NGOs is part of “The Movement”, heading toward a consistent vision of a better world. Hawken makes an analogy to an immune system, where thousands of different cells each do one tiny thing and together the whole system creates a collective property called “immunity.” Another analogy (which Hawken doesn’t make) would be the similarity to free market economies, where thousands of firms each independently just try to make money but overall the system achieves “efficiency”. The clear message of the book is that even if only a small percentage of NGOs achieve their goals, they will help further “The Movement”.

In a sense, this kind of argument is motivated by the desire of progressives to believe we can win in the absence of a single unifying ideology. The principle problem with the argument is the fuzzy concept of a “Movement”. The diversity of NGOs is staggering, and I don’t see any real coherent goal that they all share. In fact, many more conservative NGOs (which presumably express at least somewhat real desires by real people) are working at cross-purposes with more liberal NGOs.

It’s much better to think of this explosion of NGOs as simply the birth of a global civil society. Just as we don’t expect consensus in a republic among all the elected representative, since their constituents are too diverse, neither should we expect consensus among NGOs. There’s a word for this explosion of NGOs, and it’s not “Movement”, it’s “Democracy”.
(less)
flag12 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Allison Myers
Apr 28, 2008Allison Myers rated it it was ok
I forced my way through this book because its written by Paul Hawken, one of the authors of Natural Capitalism (one of my very favorites). But man, it was hard to get through. Overly emotional and too historical. The bits about the civil rights movement were interesting though. Anway, I was about half way through when I realized I couldn't sludge on any further. So I peeked ahead to see if there was anything else I wanted to read- and realized that I wasn't half way through, but nearly done! The ...more
flag7 likes · Like  · comment · see review
jeremy
Jan 21, 2008jeremy rated it it was amazing
Shelves: gen-nonfiction
as a friend pointed out, the blurbs alone deem this a must-read (jane goodall, bill mckibben, barry lopez, terry tempest williams, david james duncan, & david suzuki). at the beginning of blessed unrest, hawken succinctly remarks, "in total, the book is inadvertently optimistic, an odd thing in these bleak times." indeed. refreshingly propitious, hawken counters prevailing disillusionment and listlessness with numerous examples of innumerable organizations acting to effect beneficial, lasting change. invigorated by an ardent prose, blessed unrest offers an essential reorientation of both perspective and priority.

the appendix may be the most thorough of its kind in print, a resource of immeasurable opportunity, understanding, & potential beneficence.


(less)
flag5 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Kevin
Oct 15, 2017Kevin rated it it was ok
Shelves: z-questionable-reformist
The author teetered on a tightrope between solidarity on one side, and status quo post-Cold-War “non-ideology” illusions on the other. Must I perform this circus act with my review?

The Good:
--If we can set aside the rampant cognitive dissonance for a moment, there were some positive moments. The eulogy to Rachel Carson was heartfelt, and the framing of the Luddites movement as a workers protest against deskilling and loss of worker autonomy stood out (Progress Without People: In Defense of Luddism). So there it is, an attempt at solidarity.

The Bad:
--I came into this with the awareness that Hawken has written books sounding suspiciously like Green Capitalism. But it’s always worth seeing how various ideologies placate to the public, and I would not mind going through the details of some green capitalist ventures. Alas, such details were sparse; the majority of this book attempted to connect environmentalism with “non-ideological” social justice.

The Abyss of Non-ideology
The purpose of this book is to inspire beginners to environmentalism and social justice, so we should expect incomplete ideas and stress the direction. The direction of non-ideology is abysmal. Social justice is a challenge to dominant ideologies; this is difficult enough when most are compelled to participate in (and thus perpetuate) dominant ideologies, often without realizing it. Capitalism has thrived on abstraction, sprawling the entire globe with its international division of labor, commodification of relations, externalization of costs, and one-dollar-one-vote reforms.

Hawken frames Marx as rigidly ideological, and basically espouses the horseshoe theory of non-ideology center with atrocities to the left-and-right. Okay, historical context takes work, history is long and the world is big. But it is curious how, despite a precursory warning against market fundamentalism (the ideology most responsible for climate inaction, after all), Hawken keeps resorting to market crusader Hayek when trying to explain anti-State bottom-up decision-making. ( The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump has a good piece on Hayek).

For someone who espouses a plethora of ideas, how can this be? Does Hawken the entrepreneur have the utopic ideology that fancies a world of shopkeepers, where being anti-State equates to a vanguard of individualist businessmen, because who else would move society along? His use of "social entrepreneurs" reveals his confusion towards private profit-seeking and the capitalist world system. Perhaps worst of all (for readers), his rigid Cold War ideology forces him to equate socialism with complete State control, completely negating socialism as production for social needs (as opposed to profits) and its wide array of practicalities:
-prevalence in healthcare, education/training/welfare, infrastructure, research and development
-democratizing the workplace, i.e. worker cooperatives, federations
-democratizing finance/distribution, i.e. public banking, international cooperation addressing the predatory global division of labor

Enough with this dead end. There are plenty of accessible intros:
-Capitalism: Talking to My Daughter About the Economy: or, How Capitalism Works - and How It Fails
-Bottom-up decision-making:
-Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky
-The Democracy Project: A History, a Crisis, a Movement
-Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism

And it may be time to look into that historical context, particularly from a global perspective (imperialism, global division of labor). It will really make you reconsider your ideologies:
https://youtu.be/O8k0yO-deoA?t=26 (less)
flag3 likes · Like  · 2 comments · see review
Michael
Jan 12, 2009Michael rated it it was ok
My copy of this book has a different subtitle than the one listed above. Mine is "How the Largest Social Movement in History is Restoring Grace, Justice, and Beauty to the World." The change is for the better since I am hard-pressed to imagine a world where grace has been restored; is there even a dance floor that can handle such smooth gesticulations? I am on-board with the use of justice, though beauty kills it for me. Subtitles should be an art form, but, ultimately, have to be the boring half of the colon.

Morphing subtitle aside this book possesses many organs, but little interstitial tissue. The book is amorphous, yet very well-written with often surprising connections between disciplines and sources of knowledge. Hawken even, for a short period of time, disentangled Thoreau and Emerson (Thoremerson)in my mind. He takes the position that the earth can be considered a single organism, a position which has obvious ramifications for the ways that humans conceptualize place and effect. Hawken, then, is in good company as ecological principles are gradually being wedged into urban planning and politics. The idea that the earth will begin buckling as we exceed its carrying capacity means many more empty condom wrappers on the bedroom floor or a trip to the doctor (depending on who has the onus of reproductive responsibility in your relationship).
(less)
flag3 likes · Like  · 1 comment · see review
Carol
Jan 03, 2010Carol rated it liked it
Shelves: social-concerns, earth
I think the main idea of the book is summed up on page 162:
"Ideologies exclude openness, diversity, resiliancy, and multiplicity, the very qualities that noursih life in any system, be it ecosystem, immune system, or social system. Hundreds of thousands of small groups are trying to ignite an array of ideas in the world, fanning them like embers. Ideas are living things; they can be changed and adapted, and can grow. Ideas do not belong to anyone, and require no approval. This may sound ethereal but it is in fact the essence of praxis, the application of grassroots democracy in a violent and exploitative age."
The point is networking, sharing information finding ways for these diverse small local groups to work together to address system problems.
My favorite parts of the book: 1) The chapter on indigenous rights, how cultural diversity as essential as biodiversity. 2) Comparison of the diverse groups to the human immune system, how a variety of roles are needed to identify threats to health, isolate those threats, and heal the body. (less)
flag3 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Erika RS
May 13, 2013Erika RS rated it it was ok
This book is about... well, I am not completely sure what. Nominally, it is about "the movement" which is the joint effect of the various diverse and dispersed environmental and social justice groups throughout the world. However, the book tends to ramble all over, so it is hard to get a point from the book beyond these groups exist, they encompass lots of people, and they are a source of hope, even as things seem grim.

So the book gets only an "okay" from me for being rambly, but it does have lots of inspiring quotes. "The movement", as Hawken calls it, is very diverse, and throughout the book Hawken discusses why this is a healthy tendency. Many of the inspiring quotes have to do with the nature and importance of diverse, dispersed decision making. I have included my favorites below.

Bottom of page 16:
Ecologists and biologists know that systems achieve stability and healthy through diversity, non uniformity. Ideologues take the opposite view.
I like this quote because it brings to the fore that not only does everyone have a right to their own opinion; everyone having diverse opinions may very well make for a healthier system. By drawing the parallel to ecological systems, it makes one think about how uniform belief systems are more susceptible to sudden massive failures.

Page 21-22:
he was one of the first to recognize the dispersed nature of knowledge and the effectiveness of localization and of combining individual understanding. Since one person's knowledge can only represent a fragment of the totality of what is known, wisdom can be achieved when people combine what they have learned. ... viable social institutions had to evolve ... to confront the problems at hand rather than reflect theories at mind. ... a remedy for the basic expression of the totalitarian impulse: ensuring that information and the right to make decisions are co-located. To achieve this, one can either move the information to the decision makers, or move decision making rights to the information.
This quote emphasizes how top down decision making has a fatal flaw: there is no way that the centralized decision maker can have all of the relevant information. Furthermore, the centralized decision maker, because they are often far from the scene the decision applies to, may be applying rigid, incorrect theories in their decision making. Better decisions can be made if the power to make decisions is given to those who have the information to make decisions. Having many informed groups make smaller, more localized decisions is likely to produce more relevant results.

Page 131:
You can try to determine the future, or you can try to create conditions for a healthy future. To do the former, you must presume to know what the future should be. To do the latter, you learn to have faith in social outcomes in which citizens feel secure, valued, and honored.
Openness, freedom, and democracy require great trust and great humility. They require the ability the admit that a dispersed and uncontrolled set of people may be right and the decision you would make may be wrong. You also have to learn to trust that this decentralized process will come to decisions that are appropriate.

Page 132:
Just as democracies require an informed and active citizenry to prevent abuse, markets require constant tending to prevent them from being diverted or exploited. A free market, so lovely in theory, is no more feasible in practice than a society without laws. Democracies can sustain freedom because their citizens and representatives continually adjust, maintain, and as necessary enforce standards, rules, and laws. Markets are unequaled in providing feedback, fostering innovation, and allocating resources. Market competition is ultimately a matter of financial capital: those activities that most efficiently accrete and concentrate money gain market advantage; those that don't are marginalized. But there is no comparable competition to improve social or natural capital, because markets for such commodities simply don't exist. The only way those issues are dealt with is through legislation, regulation, citizen activity, and consumer pressure. Removing the laws and regulations that create market constraints leaves the body politic with very few means to promote economic democracy.
This quote is a good summary of why I do not believe the market alone is enough to make a good world. The market is good at what it does. It efficiently moves around money. Certainly, it might be even more efficient at doing so if it were unregulated. However, the market does not efficiently deal with everything. In particular, what Hawkens calls social and natural capital. This is not to say the market ignores such things, but sometimes it needs a push to be reminded that money is not the most important thing there is. What I like about this quote is that Hawkens acknowledges that the checks on the market can and should come from a variety of forces.

Page 154-155:
"If you have children, I don't see how you can fail to do everything in your power to ensure that you win your bet, and that they, and their grandchildren, and their grandchildren's grandchildren, will inherit a world whose perfection can never be accomplished by creatures whose imagination for perfecting it is limitless and free"
Hawkens quotes this from an article by Michael Chabon called "The Omega Glory". I like this quote because the attitude is not that we ought to save the planet for future generations, but that our connection to future generations makes leaving a livable planet for them a desirable end.

Page 162 near the top:
Ideologies exclude openness, diversity, resiliency, and multiplicity, the very qualities that nourish life in any system, be it ecosystem, immune system, or social system. ... Ideas are living things; they can be changed and adapted, and can grow. Ideas do not belong to anyone, and require no approval.
More about the importance of letting ideas reflect reality rather than only accepting reality in so far as it conforms to your ideas.

Page 171-172:
By definition, evolution produces creatures and systems that have the greatest ability to persist over time, and resilience allows an organism to withstand the greatest range of disturbances. This is as true for social systems as it is for environmental ones, for governments and corporations as it is for fisheries and reefs. The more resilient a system, the more shocks and impacts it can withstand and still recover. Conversely, as systems lose diversity and thus functional redundancy, they become vulnerable to disruption or collapse.
This quote promotes diversity in organizations as well as in ideas. Having a variety of organizations makes the overall system stronger in the face of crises (the recycling business is great when the environment gets weak). Hawken sees diversity as one of the strengths of "the movement". People in the various organizations that make up this movement disagree on means so they are always trying different things, making someone more likely to find something that works.

Page 179:
The opposite of learning is a runaway system where mistakes are relegated to file cabinets and ignored. When a government, corporation, financial institution, or religious organization insulates itself, its initiatives, however well intended, create uncontrolled outcomes and second-order effects that generate newer problems.

If mistakes are hidden, they cannot be learned from. Ideas that seem good may have unexpected negative side effects. That is okay. No one could have anticipated them, and they should be treated as a learning experience. Note that laws that are useless and just make things worse just so as not to be seen as soft on crime is not the way to learn from mistakes. (less)
flag2 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Gina
Jan 20, 2020Gina rated it really liked it
I am pretty surprised by the 2 star reviews for this book, though I acknowledge the validity of those arguments. My copy is the softcover with a different subtitle ("How the Largest Social Movement in History is Restoring Grace, Justice, and Beauty to the World") and it is with this notion in mind that I went into reading this book.

Perhaps it's because of the time I read this--the climate crisis is a household term, many of us are living and breathing environmental problems and solutions--and from my own background as an environmentalist, but for me this book put a name to the hope I think many of us so desperately seek in the face of climate disasters. Each chapter outlined so much of what is going wrong in the word, both environmentally and in social justice issues, but then articulated what is being done to combat these ills. Drawing from many different schools of thought and how they are interrelated, Hawken makes a case for seeing smaller efforts as part of a larger symbiotic whole. A main takeaway is that we cannot see social and environmental issues as separate--they are part of the same organism. In thinking about what is happening today (this book was published in 2007), I have learned there is a network that has been developing for decades to make the world a better place, and therefore it must continue to develop and evolve today.

In the back of the book is an extensive appendix with definitions used in this "movement without a name" that may be very helpful to those new to activism. I appreciated that Hawken was thorough with his sources, and am walking away with a whole new list of books and essays to read in the future.

There were times I had to put the book down and take a break because the long list of woes could be soul crushing, but the response to these woes was uplifting and felt actionable and relevant. If you are struggling to see the hope in today's world, this book may help you to ultimately find that place of resilience and optimism, and feel motivated to continue the work you do in your every day life. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Glen Grunau
Feb 19, 2014Glen Grunau rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I really needed to read this book! If for no other reason than because I was raised under the influence of a fundamentalist ideology fueled by the political right, which so often promotes the unrestrained growth of capitalism while disregarding the environment as anything more than a means to this end. After all, the earth is going to be burned up anyways when all the good people disappear! Hawken quotes C.S. Lewis: "What we call Man's power over Nature turns out to be a power exercised by some men over other men with Nature as its instrument".

This ideology became known as "free enterprise". In reality, there is very little that is "free" about it. Under its rule, the gap between the privileged minority and the enslaved majority, between the rich and the poor, grows at an ever-increasing rate. Hawken provides example after example of the tragic effects of the unrestrained progress of such corporate led globalization - that is imposing its "market-based rules and precepts on the entire planet, regardless of place, history, or culture, in the belief that economic growth is an unalloyed good, and that it is best accomplished with the minimization or elimination of interference from government".

One such telling example is ExxonMobil - a company with a $40 billion profit in 2006, "enough money to permanently supply pure clean drinking water to the one billion people who lack it" while all the while sharing responsibility for the 85 million barrels of petroleum that are pumped out of the ground each day and then burned up into the atmosphere (a figure that is no doubt considerably higher now than when this book was published 7 years ago).

One of the disturbing parallels that is frequently made in this book is between the fundamentalism of the Christian right and the fundamentalism of free economic enterprise. Both forms of fundamentalism believe that ordinary citizens cannot be entrusted with the reins of power and that a small group of superior individuals should rule over the majority of inferiors.

Although this book does cite many such horrors and injustices, Hawken is primarily optimistic. This appears to have happened by accident: "In total, the book is inadvertently optimistic, an odd thing in these bleak times. I didn't intend it; optimism discovered me". His focus, as the subtitle of this book reveals, is "How the largest social movement in history is restoring grace, justice, and beauty to the world".

A particularly impressive example of Hawken's optimism is the one of philanthropist Muhammad Ibrahim, the founder of Africa's largest cell phone network. Ibrahim believes that one of Africa's main problems is its leaders, often providing corrupt and incompetent governance in Africa. He created "The Ibrahim Prize" - awarded annually to African leaders who have developed their countries, lifted people out of poverty and paved the way for sustainable and equitable prosperity. At US $5 million over ten years and US $200,000 per year for life thereafter, it is the largest annually awarded prize in the world.

As impressive as this single example is, Hawken focuses instead on the many thousands of non-profit organizations in 243 countries, territories and sovereign islands that represent the ultimate strength of this movement of Blessed Unrest. In keeping with his emphasis, one third of his book is composed of an appendix that lists many of these organizations.

Hawken asks "How could something so important as this movement grow so much and be largely unseen?" He answers his question by providing three examples, each of which represent the timeless metaphor of the hidden, invisible mass of ice beneath the water that can only be seen by the tip of the iceberg that is visible above the waterline.

"When Wangari Maathai (the first woman in East and Central Africa to earn a doctorate degree, internationally recognized for her persistent struggle for democracy, human rights and environmental conservation) won the Nobel peace prize, the wire service stories didn't mention the network of 6000 different women's groups in Africa that were planting trees. When we hear about a chemical spill in a river, it is never reported that more than 4000 organizations in North America have adopted a river, creek, or stream (a local example is A Rocha - a worldwide Christian environmental movement - that has adopted such a river in South Surrey - the Little Campbell River). We read that organic agriculture is the fastest-growing sector of farming in America, Japan, Mexico, and Europe, but no connection is made to the more than 3000 organizations that educate farmers, customers, and legislators about sustainable and biological agriculture" (A Rocha also emphasizes and devotes itself to the importance of such education).

In recognizing that the Christian religious establishment (thankfully A Rocha is one of many exceptions) has been more often than not responsible for perpetuating these economic and environmental injustices, Hawken knows that we need to look farther to grasp the essence of this mysterious movement: "Something operates us, but what? Is it not the free flow of brilliant and ancient information . . .? This is a system in which we should place our faith, because it is the only one that has ever worked eternally. If this enlightening, enlivening pulse is God, then may we get on our knees and give thanks night and day. If it is Allah, may we face the east five times between sunup and sundown and humble ourselves. If it is Yahweh, may we touch the holy wall and shed tears of gratitude. If it is biology, may science touch the sacred. I believe it is all of these, but whatever it may be to each person, and however we name it, it is not knowable".

I have been ignorant of many of these economic and environmental injustices and so am grateful that my eyes are being opened, however slowly. This is thanks to people like Paul Hawken and organizations like A Rocha that are devoted to educating the likes of me and doing their part to extend this vital world-wide movement of Blessed Unrest. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Adam
Feb 12, 2010Adam rated it it was amazing
Shelves: mudd-library, non-fiction, the-problem-of-civilization, environmental-history
Blessed Unrest purports to be about the “movement of movements” that is currently upwelling on a local, case-by-case basis against the symptoms of civilization's depredations. The book went far beyond that, however, and fulfilled promises I didn't realize it had made. Hawken doesn't spend much time giving history or anatomy of the “movement” in question, and the only specific examples he gives occur in the context of larger points.

Instead, the thesis is of the book is an effective, elegant, and concise synthesis of crucial ideas from landmark books on the subject of civilization: that environmental collapse threatens the economic basis for our civilization (Jared Diamond's Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed/William Catton's Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change), and that our civilization has been doing some of the most reprehensible things in history with the power it's had (Derrick Jensen's Endgame: Volume 1: The Problem of Civilization, E.O. Wilson's The Diversity of Life). He makes these points cogently, without relying on emotional entreaties, and with an interesting breadth of evidence. On top of this crucial background (stated here as concisely and with as much interesting information as I've ever seen it done), he articulates the unique idea of the book: that millions to hundreds of millions of small organizations are arising to act as civilization's “immune system,” as he styles it, against its own self-destructive bent. In the midst of all this, he even finds time for a dubiously relevant but interesting tangent on Thoreau, Emerson, and the Civil Rights Movement.

In the simplicity of his explanations of the Problems of Civilization, Hawken's book is remarkably similar to "The Story of Stuff."



One paragraph in the epilogue sums up the unbearable frustration of our current situation:

“Over the years the ingenuity of organizations, engineers, designers, social entrepreneurs, and individuals has created a powerful arsenal of alternatives. The financial and technical means are in place to address and restore the needs of the biosphere and society. Poverty, hunger, and preventable childhood diseases can be eliminated in a single generation. Energy use can be reduced 80 percent in developed countries within thirty years with an improvement in the quality of life, and the remaining 20 percent can be replaced by renewable sources. Living-wage jobs can be created for every man and woman who wants one. The toxins and poisons that permeate our daily lives can be completely eliminated through green chemistry. Biological agriculture can increase yields and reduce petroleum-based pollution into soil and water. Green, safe, livable cities are at the fingertips of architects and designers. Inexpensive technologies can decrease usage and improve purity so that every person on earth has clean drinking water. So what is stopping us from accomplishing these tasks?”

The solutions are at our fingertips, and only problems of social structure and the dissemination ideas prevent us from saving ourselves. Grassroots groups that fix local problems with an international mindset are the only hope we have of lasting through the next few centuries. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Emma
Dec 27, 2014Emma rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Hmm. I don't think this is what I expected, but I'm also not sure what I expected. I appreciate Hawken's position that "the movement" is more than just environmentalism, more than just social justice, more than just the rights of indigenous people to live and thrive -- but all of these, together. I also appreciate that he chronicles the histories of many aspects of "the movment", and is often able to look critically upon them (especially the sections on Thoreau, Ghandi, King, Carson).

I'm not really sure who Hawken's intended audience is or why he wrote this book. I don't see anyone who's not already involved in "the movement" picking this up, but sometimes it seems like that's what Hawken wanted (although he is clearly writing for an audience educated on these issues). I'm also not sure what the point is, although he does offer a good description of the multitude of people and organizations working to further the causes of "the movement", adequately describing that their differences are precisely what, if anything, will make "the movement" successful. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · see review
Linda Robinson
Jul 08, 2010Linda Robinson rated it it was amazing
There are a lot of really big words in the reportage of the movement that no one saw, but this is a remarkably adept condensing of how commerce was allowed to trump humans, how humans trampled the earth (and continue to do so) and how many organizations there are trying to stop the stampede, one little NGO at a time. The story of climate change, the pillage of indigenous lands and culture, and the grim tale of the search for cheaper labor is heart-stopping in one volume, but Hawken finds the yin side of that awful yang, always just in time to let the reader take the next breath. I've read double fistfuls of books with a little of this information in each, and Hawken must have worked years to get so much all in one volume. Masterful! I'm going to buy this book because it's a great source for organizations doing good in the world, and then I can remove about 100 bookmarks in several folders on my browser. Yeah! (less)
flag1 like · Like  · 5 comments · see review
Katherine
Sep 30, 2009Katherine rated it it was ok
Shelves: international-development-reads
Even though this book was only 190 pages it took me quite a while to get through - the book starts out quite dry, but it starts to show potential in the second chapter when the author talks about the emergence of the environmental movement and how it becomes related to health thanks to the influence of Rachel Carlson.

His book goes into ups and downs in grabbing the reader's attention. The moments that were exciting was when he was talking about the movements and the different work of NGOs, but it was when he went into a zone of biology and his analogy to how movements come along where he would lose me.

I know his efforts were well-intentioned, but the book doesn't really inspire. Especially if you work in the field and know about these movements, it really doesn't make it a worthwhile read. This might mean something different to another kind of reader. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Hannah Debelius
Jan 27, 2017Hannah Debelius rated it liked it
This is a book designed to reassure and slightly realign the "choir." Perhaps if I had read it when it first came out or any other time except the week Trump became president it would be a 4, but it's a tough time to push through this. That said, it offers phenomenal historical context for the movement, strong reason for optimism, and a good perspective on social justice and resilience. Definitely thought provoking in the light of the Women's March this week. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Susan
Jul 02, 2007Susan rated it it was amazing
At last! A hopeful book! Seeing the emergence of grass-roots organizations committed to social and environmental justice, and knitting together these observations with commentary of the trends, the author has a compellingly positive message - we ARE pulling together to save the world. Now, we "just" have to make it happen and it truly WILL be a hopeful time again. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Kathy Truman
Jul 12, 2008Kathy Truman rated it it was amazing
This is the book for all the people in the trenches of justice work, feeling discouraged about changing the world, feeling alone, powerless. It provides a picture of hope and optimism to keep on moving mountains, one shovelful at a time. It is full of web links to assist in connecting the global network of change agents.
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Kohl Gill
Jul 26, 2008Kohl Gill rated it really liked it
Recommended to Kohl by: Allison Coleman
I was surprised and impressed with BU. Since reading this, I've definitely approached social and environmental justice with a new outlook. NB: a large chunk of this text is a list of relevant organizations that works better on the web. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Nathan
Apr 23, 2010Nathan rated it it was amazing
The Movement of Movements - the self-organizing, powerful and natural force of mankind forming a new paradigm of conscious co-creation!
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Julie
Nov 28, 2011Julie rated it it was ok
Shelves: non-fiction
Very dry read, almost like a textbook, but not very informative. Not at all what I expected from such an inspiring public speaker.
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Shasta McBride
Jun 17, 2011Shasta McBride rated it really liked it
whew! excerpt:

While so much is going wrong, so much is going right. Over the years the ingenuity of organizations, engineers, designers, social entrepreneurs, and individuals has created a powerful arsenal of alternatives. The financial and technical means are in place to address and restore the needs of the biosphere and society. Poverty, hunger, and preventable childhood diseases can be eliminated in a single generation. Energy use can be reduced 80 percent in developed countries within 30 years with an improvement in the quality of life, and the remaining 20 percent can be replaced by renewable sources. Living-wage jobs can be created for every man and woman who wants one. The toxins and poisons that permeate our daily lives can be completely eliminated through green chemistry. Biological agriculture can increase yields and reduce petroleum-based pollution into soil and water. Green, safe, livable cities are at the fingertips of architects and designers. Inexpensive technologies can decrease usage and improve purity so that every person on earth has clean drinking water. So what is stopping us from accomplishing these tasks?
It has been said that we cannot save our planet unless humankind undergoes a widespread spiritual and religious awakening. In other words, fixes won't fix until we fix our souls as well. So let's ask ourselves this question: Would we recognize a worldwide spiritual awakening if we saw one? Or let me put the question' another way: What if there is already in place a large-scale spiritual awakening and we are simply not recognizing it?
In a seminal work, The Great Transformation, Karen Armstrong details the origins of our religious traditions during what is called the Axial Age, a 700-year period dating from 900 to 200 BCE, during which much of the world turned away from violence, cruelty, and barbarity. The upwelling of philosophy, insight, and intellect from that era lives today in the works of Socrates, Plato, Lao-tzu, Confucius, Mencius, Buddha, Jeremiah, Rabbi Hillel, and others. Rather than establishing doctrinaire religious institutions, these teachers created social movements that addressed human suffering. These movements were later called Buddhism, Hinduism, Confucianism, monotheistic Judaism, democracy, and philosophical rationalism; the second flowering of the Axial Age brought forth Christianity, Islam, and Rabbinical Judaism. The point Armstrong strongly emphasizes is that the early expressions of religiosity during the Axial Age were not theocratic systems requiring belief, but instructional practices requiring action. The arthritic catechisms and rituals that we now accept as religion had no place in the precepts of these sages, prophets, and mystics. Their goal was to foster a compassionate society, and the question of whether there was an omnipotent God was irrelevant to how one might lead a moral life. They asked their students to question and challenge and, as opposed to modern religion, to take nothing on faith. They did not proselytize, sell, urge people to succeed, give motivational sermons, or harangue sinners. They urged their followers to change how they behaved in the world. All relied on a common principle, the Golden Rule: Never do to anyone what you would not have done to yourself.
No one in the Axial Age imagined that he was living in an age of spiritual awakening. It was a difficult time, riddled with betrayals, misunderstandings, and petty jealousies. But the philosophy and spirituality of these centuries constituted a movement nevertheless, a movement we can recognize in hindsight. Just as today, the Axial sages lived in a time of war. Their aim was to understand the source of violence, not to combat it. All roads led to self, psyche, thought, and mind. The spiritual practices that evolved were varied, but all concentrated on focusing and guiding the mind with simple precepts and practices whose repetition in daily life would gradually and truly change the heart. Enlightenment was not an end--equanimity, kindness, and compassion were.
These teachings were the original source of charities in the ancient world, and they are the true source of NGOs, volunteerism, trusts, foundations, and faith-based charities in the modern world. I suggest that the contemporary movement is unknowingly returning the favor to the Axial Age, and is collectively forming the basis of an awakening. But it is a very different awakening, because it encompasses a refined understanding of biology, ecology, physiology, quantum physics, and cosmology. Unlike the massive failing of the Axial Age, it sees the feminine as sacred and holy, and it recognizes the wisdom of indigenous peoples all over the world, from Africa to Nunavut.
I have friends who would vigorously protest this assertion, pointing out the small-mindedness, competition, and selfishness of a number of NGOs and the people who lead them. But I am not questioning whether the human condition permeates the movement. It does so, most surely. Clay feet march in all protests. My question is whether the underlying values of the movement are beginning to permeate global society. And there is even a larger issue, the matter of intent. What is the intention of the movement? If you examine its values, missions, goals, and principles, and I urge you to do so, you will see that at the core of all organizations are two principles, albeit unstated: first is the Golden Rule; second is the sacredness of all life, whether it be a creature, child, or culture. The prophets we now enshrine were ridiculed in their day. Amos was constantly in trouble with the authorities. Jeremiah became the root of the word jeremiad, which means a recitation of woes, but like Cassandra, he was right. David Suzuki has been prescient for 40 years. Donella Meadows was right about biological limits to growth and was scorned by fellow scientists. Bill McKibben has been unwavering and unerring in his cautions about climate change. Martin Luther King was killed one year after he delivered his "Beyond Vietnam" address opposing the Vietnam War and berating the American military for "taking the young black men who have been crippled by our society and sending them 8,000 miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem." Jane Goodall travels 300 days a year on behalf of the earth, speaking, teaching, supporting, and urging others to act. Wangari Maathai was denounced in Parliament, publicly mocked for divorcing her husband, and beaten unconscious for her work on behalf of women and the African environment. It matters not how these six and other leaders will be seen in the future; for now, they are teachers who try or have tried to address the suffering they witness on earth..
I once watched a large demonstration while waiting to meet a friend. Tens of thousands of people carrying a variety of handmade placards strolled down a wide boulevard accompanied by chants, slogans, and song. The signs referred to politicians, different species, prisoners of conscience, corporate campaigns, wars, agriculture, water, workers' rights, dissidents, and more. Standing near me a policeman was trying to understand what appeared to be a political Tower of Babel. The broad-shouldered Irishman shook his head and asked rhetorically, "What do these people want?" Fair question.
There are two kinds of games--games that end, and games that don't. In the first game, the rules are fixed and rigid. In the second, the rules change whenever necessary to keep the game going. James Carse called these, respectively, finite and infinite games. We play finite games to compete and win. They always have losers and are called business, banking, war, NBA, Wall Street, and politics. We play infinite games to play; they have no losers because the object of the game is to keep playing. Infinite games pay it forward and fill future coffers. They are called potlatch, family, samba, prayer, culture, tree planting, storytelling, and gospel singing. Sustainability, ensuring the future of life on earth, is an infinite game, the endless expression of generosity on behalf of all. Any action that threatens sustainability can end the game, which is why groups dedicated to keeping the game going assiduously address any harmful policy, law, or endeavor. With no invitation, they invade and take charge of the finite games of the world, not to win but to transform finite games into infinite ones. They want to keep the fish game going, so they go after polluters of rivers. They want to keep the culture game going, so they confront oil exploration in Ecuador. They want to keep the home game alive in the world, so they go after the roots of poverty. They want to keep the species game happening, so they buy swaths of habitat and undeveloped land. They want to keep the child game going; consequently, when the United States violated the Geneva Conventions and bombed the 1,400 Iraqi water and sewage treatment plants in the first Gulf War, creating sewage-, cholera-, and typhus-laden water, they condemned it as morally repugnant. When the same country that dropped the bombs persuaded the United Nations to prevent shipments of chlorine and medicine to treat the resulting diseases, the infinite-game players thought it hideous and traveled to the heart of that darkness to start NGOs to serve the abandoned.
People trying to keep the game going are activists, conservationists, biophiles, nuns, immigrants, outsiders, puppeteers, protesters, Christians, biologists, permaculturists, refugees, green architects, doctors without borders, engineers with borders, reformers, healers, poets, environmental educators, organic farmers, Buddhists, rainwater harvesters, meddlers, meditators, mediators, agitators, schoolchildren, ecofeminists, biomimics, Muslims, and social entrepreneurs.
To answer the policeman’s question, “These people” are reimagining the world.
(less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Brian Griffith
Jan 01, 2021Brian Griffith rated it really liked it
Shelves: ecology, cultural-social-change
As a speaker on environmental issues, Hawken always found it difficult to balance honesty about bleak realities with a need to inspire hope. But after each speech, he kept meeting groups of dedicated activists, till he had a small mountain of their business cards. Slowly it dawned on him that these organizations represented something enormous -- maybe greatest movement of hope in world history. And perhaps this mushrooming movement was gonna be the greatest story of his life. Though the well over 1,000,000 activist groups he found were focused on many different issues, there were some things tying them together:

"Just as ecology is the study of relationship between living beings and their environment, human ecology examines the relationship between human systems and their environment. Concerns about worker health, living wages, equity, education and basic human rights are inseparable from concerns about water, climate, soil and biodiversity. The cri de coeur of environmentalists in {Rachael} Carson's time was the same as that of the Lancashire weavers, the same as in the time of Emerson, the same as in the time of Nobel Peace Prize winner Wangari Maathi of Kenya. It can be summed up in a single word: life. Life is the most fundamental human right, and all of the movements within the movement are dedicated to creating the conditions for life, conditions that include livelihood, food, security, peace, a stable environment, and freedom from external tyranny. Whenever and wherever that right is violated, human beings rise up. Today they are rising up in record numbers, and in a collective body that is often as not more sophisticated than the corporate and governmental bodies they address" (p 67-68)

According to Hawken, the first recorded organization devoted to the welfare of more than its own members was a small anti-slavery group which started meeting in London during the late 1700s. And from the Abolitionist movement he sketches a partial lineage of thinkers and leaders including Emerson, Thoreau, Gandhi, Rachael Carson, Chico Mendes, Vandana Shiva, Muhammad Yunus ...

Keeping his balance, Hawken often writes most passionately about wrongs to be changed, such as Chevron's record of abuse for lands and native cultures in Ecuador. But later he gets lost in amazement at the magnitude and diversity of humanity's rising immune-system response: Keeper groups like the Waterkeeper Alliance, watch organizations like the Kurdish Human Rights Watch, Coalitions like the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women or the India Alliance for Child Rights, or friends organizations like the Friends of North Kent Marshes:

"The incongruity of anarchists, billionaire funders, street clowns, scientists, youthful activists, indigenous and native people, diplomats, computer geeks, writers, strategists, peasants and students all working toward common goals is a testament to human impulses that are unstoppable and eternal." (p.163)

Capping his fragmentary account, Hawken gives a 102-page appendix as a mere introduction to the swelling database of activists and innovators, which he and his colleagues at the Natural Capital Institute have launched. Their Wikipedia-like database is called WiserEarth (with "Wiser" standing for World Index of Social and Environmental Responsibility). It is arranged both alphabetically and by a taxonomy of services, which allows updating by user organizations, networking, collaborative fundraising, sharing of innovations or job searches. It is also multisectoral -- including far more than just non-government or non-profit efforts. To enable application of insight in every type of organization, the database has several linked URLs:
wiserearth.org
wiserbusiness.org
wisergovernment.org
naturalcapital.org

Maybe this is the real gift of Hawken's work, which could help you find the network or vocation of your dreams. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Hannah Brislin
Sep 24, 2019Hannah Brislin rated it it was amazing
This book covers the history of Environmentalism as a movement like no other movement. Certain highlights I took from this book:
-Although the movement to end Climate Change is different from other social justice movements, it can still be riddled with the common issues found in activism that ends up harming or ruining movements. The common issues in activism are self-righteousness associated with the savior complex. Cliques, gossiping, and backbiting that harms movements but is very prevalent. Vandalism and other illegal activity which can deter away from the movement's mission and cause, and over-saturation of media focus on the illegal activity (vandalism and violence) associated with movements, rather than the real issues the movements are trying to bring into focus.
-Environmentalism and Conservation were created by indigenous populations around the world. They are the communities fighting against climate change the most and they are the communities that are victims of climate change as well as the most common victims of the negligence of the corporations that perpetuate climate change such as the fossil fuel industry.
-The exploitation and victimizing of indigenous people, impoverished populations, and people of color is not only left to the industries perpetuating Climate Change but also wealthy "activists" who use and exploit these communities as a way to bring attention to Climate Change. They do this by not raising the voices of these communities but rather stealing their experience and using it as their own and then using them as a way to garner further financial support and popularity.
- Climate change is a direct result of Greed, White Supremecy, and Toxic Masculinity. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Summer Kartchner Olsen
May 03, 2016Summer Kartchner Olsen rated it liked it
Shelves: science-and-environment, non-fiction
I don't know why it took me so long to read this one. There were a lot of opinions and assumptions in the book that I disagreed with, but there were also a lot of really great ideas and reading this book has definitely impacted me for the better.

My two biggest complaints: 1) The author seemed to attack Christianity a lot, but then later on would include Christians in "the movement". I know that Christians have committed great atrocities throughout history, but if they have done it in the name of religion they are not truly followers of Christ. He seems to think that Christianity is purely a belief rather than a call to action (with the action being to love others as you love yourself). 2) The chapter about indigenous people took the stance that all native cultures are inherently good and right. I found this annoying and simplistic. Yes, I believe that we should protect native cultures and give native peoples the same rights as others, but that doesn't mean that they always have the right answers or that they always did the right thing historically.

I loved the chapter about the history of the environmental movement and I loved the overall positive tone of the book on a topic that can often be presented in a rather depressing light. I think the Paul Hawken is a great voice in the environmental movement because he doesn't alienate the business world, but rather invites anyone who wants to to join in. Because ultimately how we treat our environment and each other affects us all. (less)

Blessed Unrest Paul Hawken Interview + Last chapter



Microsoft Word - paulhawken4

Blessed Unrest In his new book, Paul Hawken looks at the history of the environmental movement and predicts its future. 


By Elizabeth A. Evitts Posted April 18, 2007 

Paul Hawken has always been ahead of his time. In 1966, he co-founded Erewhon Trading Company, the country’s first natural foods business. Later he launched several successful sustainability-focused companies, including the garden-tool boutique Smith & Hawken, often cited for its environmental awareness. Hawken continued breaking new ground with several books on socially responsible business. His 1993 release The Ecology of Commerce went on to become a cornerstone of business-school curricula. In his new book, Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came in to Being and Why No One Saw it Coming (Viking), Hawken deciphers the history of the environmental movement and predicts its future. Contemporary environmentalism, he argues, is nothing less than the fruition of a long global uprising to reclaim basic human rights. The book’s May release will coincide with the launch of a website, Wiser Earth, an open source social network with a database of more than 100,000 organizations. Recently Elizabeth A. Evitts talked to Hawken about the book, contemporary environmentalism, and how designers are playing a pivotal role in its evolution. 

In Blessed Unrest you go back to the start of the environmental movement. You analyze Emerson and Thoreau, bring us through slavery and abolition to Civil Rights and the impact of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring. What inspired this approach? 

My work involves giving a lot of speeches and after every one people would come up, ask more questions, and give me their card. Over the years they just piled up until I had literally a huge shopping bag of business cards from nonprofit organizations. I began to wonder how many groups there were. It’s amazing; you just assume somebody knows. But nobody does. So I began to ploddingly try to figure it out. As I did so, I discovered that there were more than 100,000 (there’s in fact over a million, but at the time I only thought more than 100,000). I started to wonder how this compared to other humanitarian or social movements, both past and present. And I couldn’t find anything comparable to it. Then the question was: where did it come from? The easy answer is, well, it’s recent or it’s Earth Day. But it didn’t work that way. It was like pulling a string on a flour bag that went on and on. It was fascinating to see that there is this history that we don’t access. Or if we do, it doesn’t include the idea that there is a cumulative movement of humanity that wants to address the suffering of other forms of life, and specifically now, ecological degradation, economic disease, political corruption, and all of the cascading effects of that. I was surprised at how broad, deep and ancient it really is. What’s happening now is it’s spreading like crazy. 

Thus the subtitle of your book: How the Largest Movement in the World Came in to Being and Why No One Saw it Coming. 

Exactly. Climate change is certainly a big driver in the last few years, but there’ve been others—poverty, water issues, environmental refugees, war. The other driver is modern communication technologies, which allow groups to organize more easily. Smaller groups can have a much bigger effect than they could have prior to the onset of the internet. They’re connecting better, collaborating better, working as swarms, as some people say. 

You write about how this evolving movement will look very different from movements of the past. 

There’s no charismatic leader, no center. It’s not ideological. That’s often lost in the reporting of it, because what’s reported is the resistance point of a group saying, “Stop. Don’t.” That becomes an interesting event from a media point of view. What goes unreported is the innovation, design, engineering, and social technologies. This is a movement of ideas. And sometimes ideas don’t work and you try another one and that works, and then you try and figure out how to make it work better. It’s an iterative, evolutionary process. It’s tens of thousands of ideas with respect to water, buildings, cities, poverty, women, education, climate and carbon neutrality. You can’t sum them up because they appear all over the place. But they actually do all point north toward a very different world than the one we live in now. You suggest that the politics of the future are really about fostering unusual alliances that revolve around ideas. Strange bedfellows—evangelicals aligning with environmentalists, for example. Are you seeing this elsewhere? Yes. At the same time, we find out that we’re not strange bedfellows. We’re human beings and what estranged us is far less important and almost meaningless compared to what is meaningful now. You’re seeing Wal-Mart, for example, quite authentically—and I don’t care what someone else says about them—they’re very committed to 100% renewable energy and a lot of other things that they have not talked about yet. Well, who would’ve thought it? Is that a strange bedfellow or just the American people awakening to core values that now need to be expressed? This goes back to what you wrote about in The Ecology of Commerce. At the time it seemed an oxymoron to combine those two ideas of nature and business. You were among the first writers who tied sustainability to commerce. I was and I didn’t get a lot of support at the time. But this week’s cover story of Business Week is called “Beyond the Green Corporation” and the first line is, “Imagine a world in which eco-friendly and socially responsible practices actually help a company’s bottom line.” That’s the opening line of the lead story of Business Week. Fourteen years after The Ecology of Commerce was published. When it was published, not a single business publication here would review it. It was reviewed, by the way, but editors wouldn’t publish the reviews. Why did it take so long for American business to catch on? They saw it as a threat: “We have a business to run and this is the government’s responsibility.” This is the same businessperson that would vote against the government doing anything. They would offload the responsibility, they had a very narrow sense of responsibility. It was to the bottom line, to shareholders. “If we obey the law than that’s all we have to do.” That has pretty much been abolished. In the book you write that green, safe, livable cities are at the fingertips of architects and designers. What do you mean by that? In the last fifteen years, architects and designers and planners have come up with an array of design technologies. They have started to put them together in ways that drastically reduce the footprint of the city, making it safer and much more livable. The reason you’re not seeing it sooner is simply the way that cities evolve. They’re not clean slates. You don’t just erase a city and put a new one where it was. The rate of change is not as fast as the rate of technical and design innovation. Design is a technology, but you can’t just fix things with technology. You need people who see the world in a different way and then put it together in new ways. The book talks about the U.S. Green Building Council. You reference architect Edward Mazria for his Architecture 2030 project, which aims to make all buildings carbon neutral by that year. Sometimes it feels as if the industrial design community is the last design discipline to catch on to the idea of sustainability. Why? The last to catch on are clients, the manufacturers. Look at Ford. They went and designed a green factory, that’s great. They didn’t change the cars that were coming out of the factory and they got walloped by sales, the stock market, energy prices. They had it upside down and backwards. They should have gone to designers for green cars first. How would you counsel an industrial designer on navigating that conversation with clients? How do they make the case for sustainable design? When you’re a designer you can be no better than your client. But you’re always in the job of educating them, and part of that education is about perception, costs, positioning. It’s about the future. Are you designing for yesterday, today or tomorrow? The idea of tomorrow has always been the slate, brushed aluminum projectile—if you could take something that was blocky and clunky and make it look like it could be a suppository, than somehow that was supposed to be great design. That paradigm really has to shift. That’s a difficult thing because we’re all kind of primitive. We’re all entranced by baubles. I’m talking about consumers now. Some of the new PDA’s and phones are brilliant—except from a materials and waste point of view they’re not. From that perspective they’re poorly designed. Here you have a system in which the designer is supposed to reposition or redo something so that a product stands out in the marketplace, like the Motorola Razr, and he or she may succeed in that, but they’re not given the full agenda, the full charge, which is: Can you design a product that will be valuable when it comes back to us as well? I remember years ago when HP was forced by pending legislation in Germany to design their printers for disassembly for reuse and recycling. They discovered that assembly time was reduced by, I forget exactly, but about 70 to 80%. A huge savings. Engineers asked, “Why didn’t you do this before?” And the designers said, “Well, you never asked.” The talent is there, but the question isn’t there. They have to be asked to design things that fully embody what is possible in terms of material cycles, which is to say that it can be reused continuously and the value goes up. It’s not just about recycling, but it’s about upcycling, which is you design something, you use a material, and then when it’s reused it’s even more valuable than it was before. You write that it’s time for us to have our Rosa Parks moment, to have someone refuse their seat on the bus so to speak, and upset business as usual. You actually mention Ray Anderson of Interface. Yeah, I said, maybe he’s the one in hindsight. We don’t know. Rosa Parks wasn’t seen at the time as precipitating a whole movement. But there were women before her as I mention in my book who did the same thing and nothing happened. Then something did happen; there was a convergence because of Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy. A whole bunch of things converged at that point. Whether Ray is that person is for history to decide looking back. But certainly in terms of understanding, comprehending, and then meticulously implementing it piece by piece throughout his company, Ray is definitely a leader. You designed many of the tools and products sold during your twelve years at the helm of Smith & Hawken. Your Monet bench is still the most popular outdoor bench in America. How has your approach to design changed over the years? From a systems perspective, if you optimize a component, you pessimize the system. It’s hard for people to get their arms around because we think that if you make all of the pieces better, the whole gets better. That’s not necessarily true. You could say, well, every single thing in the U.S. that we use today, except for some SUVs, uses less energy. Except when you add it all up together, we’re less efficient today than we were 50 or 100 years ago. To me when you design something that is good design, it’s not about how it looks, it’s about what it does. It will appear beautiful if you understand its total impact on the system. That’s one way it’s changed for me. I think of designing systems now. How important is materials research to breakthrough products? Absolutely critical. And there are two sides to materials research. First, there are new materials. The second is taking the materials that are everyday, plebian, and redesigning those as well. I saw a hardwood flooring design by a company in Oklahoma and it is made of the pallets that are piling up by the tens of thousands at Ford Motor Company. Owner Joy Nunn is an expert on fiber and so much of our material is fiber if it’s not metallic. With this flooring, you would never know it came from ash or oak pallets. It’s bulletproof, it’s so hard, so tough, and you can do anything with it in terms of textures and appearance. It’s like a new material. This is an example of upcycling where you’re taking fairly hard but not great grades of wood, and then you’re using it until it’s no good anymore and then you’re making beautiful hardwood flooring at a lower cost than regular flooring. It’s kind of elegant. What would you tell industrial designers about how to be more effective, more creative, while negotiating the realities of the marketplace? What resources would you suggest they tap? I would say to go to the other design school that they didn’t go to yet—nature. Go to biology and immerse themselves in biomimicry, in biomass. It’s a huge field that’s growing. I have a company, the Pax Group, and our work is based on how fluids flow in nature, not how they flow in a pipe, or how they’re forced to flow by pumps, fans, turbines, or compressors. We’ve taken those flow forms and made fan designs based on them. These designs are more efficient, they save energy, they’re quieter, and there is less or no cavitation in the case of marine propellers. All we’ve done is bow to Mother Nature, which always moves in the path of least resistance. We were talking earlier about design removing stress from the system. Well, there’s a system that has the least amount of stress: it’s called nature. The reason nature does it that way is because it has no choice, it has no V8 engines, no coal-fired plants. We have a motto that nature sucks, and what we mean by that is that nature always draws water or flows to it; it never pushes, never forces. And good design is never forced. You write about the loss of the public commons and the rise of the creative intellectual commons. Much of this activity is coming from young designers who are sharing software, sharing research, sharing design. Still, the marketplace seems to foster manufacturer paranoia about being knocked off. How would you change this? I don’t know how I would change it, but it certainly is changing. There’s just a different ethos arising. We’re moving from a world created by privilege—which is a top down world—to one created by community, which is a bottom up world. And that’s going to be true for everything—money, design, planning cities, information, politics. It’s an amazing threshold that we stand upon. The rate of change right now fosters and foments the open source model, because it’s evolutionary. The proprietary model is not. We’re moving to a period, in ecological terms, called perturbation. One hundred twenty five mile per hour winds in Poland and Czechoslovakia last night. That’s so bizarre as to be unthinkable and yet at the rate we’re going that will be 160 miles per hour ten years from now. In a period of perturbation you get a rapid rate of evolution. And that’s what we’re going into. It is exciting, dynamic, hair-raising. It’s the stroke of midnight for the rest of our lives. You said that you went into this project not knowing how you would feel, but that you came out feeling hopeful. Very much so. If you look at the data about Poland and Czechoslovakia and you’re hopeful, then you’re not understanding the data. But if you meet and hang out and see the groups and people and organizations, and watch their brilliance, innovation, and creativity and you’re not hopeful, then you don’t have a heart. Both are true and I put my faith on people.

---------------
Concluding passage from Paul Hawken’s Blessed Unrest  on the global movement for a sustainable future 

I once watched a large demonstration while waiting to meet a friend. Tens of thousands of people carrying a variety of handmade placards strolled down a wide boulevard accompanied by chants, slogans, and song. The signs referred to politicians, different species, prisoners of conscience, corporate campaigns, wars, agriculture, water, workers’ rights, dissidents, and more. Standing near me a policeman was trying to understand what appeared to be a political Tower of Babel. The broadshouldered Irishman shook his head and asked rhetorically, “What do these people want?” Fair question. There are two kinds of games—games that end, and games that don’t. In the first game the rules are fixed and rigid. In the second, the rules change whenever necessary to keep the game going. James Carse called these, respectively, finite and infinite games. We play finite games to compete and win. They always have losers and are called business, banking, war, NBA, Wall Street, and politics. We play infinite games to play; they have no losers because the object of the game is to keep playing. Infinite games pay it forward and fill future coffers. They are called potlatch, family, samba, prayer, culture, tree planting, storytelling, and gospel singing. Sustainability, ensuring the future of life on earth, is an infinite game, the endless expression of generosity on behalf of all. Any action that threatens sustainability can end the game, which is why groups dedicated to keeping the game going assiduously address any harmful policy, law, or endeavor. With no invitation, they invade and take charge of the finite games of the world, not to win but to transform finite games into infinite ones. They want to keep the fish game going, so they go after polluters of rivers. They want to keep the culture game going, so they confront oil exploration in Ecuador. They want to keep the hope game alive in the world, so they go after the roots of poverty. They want to keep the species game happening, so they buy swaths of habitat and undeveloped land. They want to keep the child game going; consequently, when the United States violated the Geneva Conventions and bombed the 1,400 Iraqi water and sewage treatment plants in the first Gulf War, creating sewage-, cholera-, and typhus-laden water, they condemned it as morally repugnant. When the same country that dropped the bombs persuaded the United Nations to prevent shipments of chlorine and medicine to treat the resulting diseases, the infinite-game players thought it hideous and traveled to the heart of that darkness to start NGOs to serve the abandoned. People trying to keep the game going are activists, conservationists, biophiles, nuns, immigrants, outsiders, puppeteers, protesters, Christians, biologists, permaculturists, refugees, green architects, doctors without borders, engineers without borders, reformers, healers, poets, environmental educators, organic farmers, Buddhists, rainwater harvesters, meddlers, meditators, agitators, schoolchildren, ecofeminists, biomimics, Muslims, and social entrepreneurs. David James Duncan penned a response to the hostile takeover of Christianity by fundamentalists, with advice that applies to all fundamentalisms: the people of the world do not need religious fanatics to save them any more than they need oleaginous free-trade hucksters to do so; they need us for their salvation, and us stands for the crazy-quilt assemblage of global humanity that is willing to stand up to the raw, cancerous insults that come from the mouths, guns, checkbooks, and policies of ideologues, because the movement is not merely trying to prevent wrongs but actively seeks to love this world. Compassion and love of others are at the heart of all religions, and at the heart of this movement. “When small things are done with love it’s not a flawed you or me who does them: it’s love. I have no faith in any political party, left, right, or centrist. I have boundless faith in love. In keeping with this faith, the only spiritually responsible way I know to be a citizen, artist, or activist in these strange times is by giving little or no thought to ‘great things’ such as saving the planet, achieving world peace, or stopping neocon greed. Great things tend to be undoable things. Whereas small things, lovingly done, are always within our reach.” Some people think the movement is defined primarily by what it is against, but the language of the movement is first and foremost about keeping the conversation going, because ideas that inform it never end: growth without inequality, wealth without plunder, work without exploitation, a future without fear. To answer the policeman’s question, “these people” are reimagining the world. To salve the world’s wounds demands a response from the heart. There is a world of hurt out there, and to heal the past requires apologies, reconciliation, reparation, and forgiveness. A viable future isn’t possible until the past is faced objectively and communion is made with our errant history. I suspect that just about everyone owes an apology and merits one, but there are races, cultures, and people that are particularly deserving. The idea that we cannot apologize to former enslaved and first peoples for past iniquities because we are not the ones who perpetuated the evil misses the point. By receiving sorrow, hearing admissions, allowing reparation, and participating in reconciliation, people and tribes whose ancestors were abused give new life to all of us in the world we share. Making amends is the beginning of the healing of the world. These spiritual deeds and acts of moral imagination lay the groundwork for the great work ahead. The movement is not coercive, but it is relentless and unafraid. It cannot be mollified, pacified, or suppressed. There can be no Berlin Wall moment, no treaty to sign, no morning to awaken to when the superpowers agree to stand down. This is a movement away from the maximization of anything that is not conducive to life. It will continue to take myriad forms. It will not rest. There will be no Marx, Alexander, or Kennedy to lead it. No book can explain it, no person can represent it, no group can stand at its forefront, no words can encompass it, because the movement is the breathing, sentient testament of the living world. The movement is an outgrowth of apostasies and it is now self-generating. The first cells that assembled and metabolized under the most difficult of circumstances deep in the ocean nearly 40 million centuries ago are in our bodies now, and we are, in Mary Oliver’s words, determined, as they were then, to save the only life we can.29 Life can occur only in a cell, and a cell is where all disease starts, as well. In Franklin Harold’s book The Way of the Cell, he points out that for all its hard-bitten rationalism, molecular science asks us to accept a “real humdinger…that all organisms have descended…from a single ancestral cell.” This quivering, gelatinous sensate mote is the core of everything we cherish, and places us in direct relation to every other form of life. That primordial connection, so incomprehensible to some yet so manifest and sacred and incontestable to others, links us inseparably to our common fate. The first gene was the password to all subsequent forms of life, and the word gene has the same etymological root as the words kin, kind, genus, generous, and nature. It is our nature to cultivate life, and this movement is a collective kindness produced over the course of 4 million millennia. I believe this movement will prevail. I don’t mean it will defeat, conquer, or create harm to someone else. Quite the opposite. I don’t tender the claim in an oracular sense. I mean that the thinking that informs the movement’s goals will reign. It will soon suffuse most institutions, but before then, it will change a sufficient number of people so as to begin the reversal of centuries of frenzied selfdestructive behavior. Some say it is too late, but people never change when they are comfortable. Helen Keller threw aside the gnawing fears of chronic bad news when she declared, “I rejoice to live in such a splendidly disturbing time!” In such a time, history is suspended and thus unfinished. It will be the stroke of midnight for the rest of our lives. My hopefulness about the resilience of human nature is matched by the gravity of our environmental and social condition. If we squander all our attention on what is wrong, we will miss the prize: In the chaos engulfing the world, a hopeful future resides because the past is disintegrating before us. If that is difficult to believe, take a winter off and calculate what it requires to create a single springtime. It’s not too late for the world’s largest institutions and corporations to join in saving the planet, but cooperation must be on the planet’s terms. The “Help Wanted” signs are everywhere. All people and institutions, including commerce, governments, schools, churches, and cities, need to learn from life and reimagine the world from the bottom up, based on first principles of justice and ecology. Ecological restoration is extraordinarily simple: You remove whatever prevents the system from healing itself. Social restoration is no different. We have the heart, knowledge, money, and sense to optimize our social and ecological fabric. It is time for all that is harmful to leave. One million escorts are here to transform the nightmares of empire and the disgrace of war on people and place. We are the transgressors and we are the forgivers. “We” means all of us, everyone. There can be no green movement unless there is also a black, brown, and copper movement. What is most harmful resides within us, the accumulated wounds of the past, the sorrow, shame, deceit, and ignominy shared by every culture, passed down to every person, as surely as DNA, a history of violence, and greed. There is no question that the environmental movement is critical to our survival. Our house is literally burning, and it is only logical that environmentalists expect the social justice movement to get on the environmental bus. But it is the other way around; the only way we are going to put out the fire is to get on the social justice bus and heal our wounds, because in the end, there is only one bus. Armed with that growing realization, we can address all that is harmful externally. What will guide us is a living intelligence that creates miracles every second, carried forth by a movement with no name.
-----------
http://www.ecosmagazine.com/?act=view_file&file_id=EC145p8.pdf

Blessed Unrest - Wikipedia



Blessed Unrest - Wikipedia
Blessed Unrest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search
For other uses, see Blessed Unrest (disambiguation).
Blessed Unrest
Author Paul Hawken
Publisher Viking

Publication date 2007
Pages 342 pp.
ISBN 978-0-670-03852-7
OCLC 76961323


Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming is a 2007 New York Times bestseller[1] by Paul Hawken.[2] 

The book is about the many non-profit groups and community organizations, dedicated to many different causes, which Hawken calls the "environmental and social justice movement".[3] Hawken explains that this is a diverse movement with no charismatic leader. The movement follows no unifying ideology, and is not recognized by politicians, the public and the media. But, Hawken argues, it has the potential to benefit the planet.[1]

A New York Times reviewer states that Blessed Unrest is "about a movement that no one has noticed, not even the people involved". For this reviewer, the "high point of the book is Hawken's excellent critique of the chemical industry's attack on Rachel Carson's Silent Spring in 1962", at a time when she was fighting cancer.[4] Hawken also tells the stories of other people who have endured hardship and difficulty as they stood up to large corporations.[1]
See also[edit]

Social movements portal
Environmental movement
Leaderless resistance

The Starfish and the Spider
Unorganisation
Wiser.org


References[edit]

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c Healing by the community spirit ECOS, Oct-Nov 2008, pp. 145-146.
  2. ^ Paul Hawken (2007). Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming. Viking Press. ISBN 978-0-670-03852-7
  3. ^ James M. Sheehan. Blessed unrest: how the largest movement in the world came into being and why no one saw it coming (book review) The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development, (2008) 1(2), p. 56.
  4. ^ Robert Sullivan. Grass Roots Rising The New York Times, August 5, 2007.