Showing posts with label Hans-Georg Moeller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hans-Georg Moeller. Show all posts

2022/05/08

Genuine Pretending: On the Philosophy of the Zhuangzi: Moeller, Hans-Georg, D'Ambrosio, Paul J.

Genuine Pretending: On the Philosophy of the Zhuangzi: Moeller, Hans-Georg, D'Ambrosio, Paul J.: 9780231183994: Books: Amazon.com




Genuine Pretending: On the Philosophy of the Zhuangzi Paperback – October 17, 2017
by Hans-Georg Moeller (Author), Paul J. D'Ambrosio (Author)
4.4 out of 5 stars 48 ratings

eTextbook
from $27.42



Genuine Pretending is an innovative and comprehensive new reading of the Zhuangzi that highlights the critical and therapeutic functions of satire and humor.

 Hans-Georg Moeller and Paul J. D’Ambrosio show how this Daoist classic, contrary to contemporary philosophical readings, distances itself from the pursuit of authenticity and subverts the dominant Confucianism of its time through satirical allegories and ironical reflections.

With humor and parody, the Zhuangzi exposes the Confucian demand to commit to socially constructed norms as pretense and hypocrisy.
The Confucian pursuit of sincerity establishes exemplary models that one is supposed to emulate.
 In contrast, the Zhuangzi parodies such venerated representations of wisdom and deconstructs the very notion of sagehood. 
Instead, it urges a playful, skillful, and unattached engagement with socially mandated duties and obligations. 
The Zhuangzi expounds the Daoist art of what Moeller and D’Ambrosio call


“Genuine pretending”: the paradoxical skill of not only surviving but thriving by enacting social roles without being tricked into submitting to them or letting them define one’s identity. 

A provocative rereading of a Chinese philosophical classic, Genuine Pretending also suggests the value of a Daoist outlook today as a way of seeking existential sanity in an age of mass media’s paradoxical quest for originality.

<진정한 척>: 타인의 속임수에 굴복하거나 자신의 정체성을 타인이 정의하지 않게 하며 사회적 역할을 수행함으로써 생존뿐만 아니라 번성하는 역설적인 기술. 


중국 철학 고전을 도발적으로 재해석한 <진정한 척>은 또한 매스미디어가 독창성을 추구하는 역설적인 시대에 실존적 건전성을 추구하는 방법으로서 오늘날 도교적 관점의 가치를 시사한다.


Read less

240 pages
Columbia University Press
Publication date
October 17, 2017
===


===
Editorial Reviews

Review
[The book's] scholarship is first rate and the contribution original and timely. The authors offer genuinely illuminating and original readings of many of the widely discussed parts of the Zhuangzi. -- Barry Allen, author of Striking Beauty: A Philosophical Look at the Asian Martial Arts

A highly insightful new reading of the Zhuangzi that is exceptionally sensitive to both philosophical and textual subtleties, highlighting the key theme of genuine pretending―the adoption of multiple roles while maintaining a form of radical flexibility that prevents full identification, thereby allowing all roles to be at once fulfilled and transcended. -- Brook Ziporyn, author of Emptiness and Omnipresence: An Essential Introduction to Tiantai Buddhism

Without ignoring the many and varied eccentricities found throughout the composite text of the Zhuangzi, D'Ambrosio and Moeller have presented an appropriately contextualized whole that is text-sensitive, highly original, and deeply incisive, satisfying for readers lay and expert alike. It is a new benchmark for the field. -- Henry Rosemont, author of Against Individualism: A Confucian Rethinking of the Foundations of Morality, Politics, Family, and Religion

Genuine Pretending is one of the best books, if not the best book, on the Zhuangzi,
since A.C. Graham's analysis of the text in Reason and Spontaneity. The book restores humor to the Zhuangzi. It moreover liberates whole Zhuangzi passages from dense thickets of Buddhist, Christian, and Freudian interpretations. And while I suspect that some of the dividing lines between Confucians and Daoists that Genuine Pretending draws were rather less clear in early China, Genuine Pretending surely constitutes a firmer basis for vigorous debate for years to come. -- Michael Nylan, editor of The Norton Critical Edition of “The Analects”

This book presents a novel reading of the Zhuangzi that illuminates its humor and presents it as responding to philosophical concerns of its day. To the extent that these philosophical concerns are also those of the present day -- the search for a sane and healthy response to the impossible demands of sincerity -- we can, through the discussion here, gain an understanding of an alternative to the unsatisfying ethical approaches of both sincerity and authenticity. . . . This book is one to which I will return for its insights into the Zhuangzi and its place in traditional and contemporary thought. -- Susan Blake ― Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

An exemplary work of scholarly exegesis, and an unquestionably significant contribution to Zhuangzi studies worldwide. . . . I highly recommend it to those interested in ancient Chinese philosophy, comparative philosophy and urging for a brand new (and maybe sometimes antitraditional) interpretation. -- Guo Chen ― Monumenta Serica

This is a book with which serious students of Daoist philosophy will need to grapple. “Grapple,” perhaps, is not the right word, for the book is written in a clear, buoyant style. -- David Cooper ― Los Angeles Review of Books

Moeller and D’Ambrosio’s delightful work will be of interest to anyone interested in learning more about Daoist thought, and the Zhuangzi in particular. A light-hearted work that is expertly researched, Genuine Pretending allows us to saunter amongst its pages as easily as its authors hop and skip through the Zhuangzi. . . . Genuine Pretending succeeds in expanding the methodological approaches to reading this most difficult text. A laudable effort indeed! ― Reading Religion

Hans-Georg Moeller and Paul J. D’Ambrosio have crafted and presented a truly innovative and refreshing take on Zhuangist thought and narrative technique. ― Journal of Chinese Religions

The book is greatly recommended not only for specialists of Chinese culture, but also to anyone keen on witnessing how an inventive and inspiring reinterpretation of a short, yet highly influential antique text could possibly be a game changer in the field. ― Religious Studies Review


About the Author
Hans-Georg Moeller is professor of philosophy at the University of Macau. His books include The Philosophy of the Daodejing (2006); The Moral Fool: A Case for Amorality (2009); and The Radical Luhmann (2011), all from Columbia University Press.

Paul J. D’Ambrosio is assistant professor of Chinese philosophy at East China Normal University, where he serves as dean of the Center for Intercultural Research, Teaching, and Translation. He is the coeditor (with Michael Sandel) of Encountering China: Michael Sandel and Chinese Philosophy (2017).

4.4 out of 5 stars 48 ratings

Top reviews from the United States


Marked Wayne

5.0 out of 5 stars The Zhuangzi as Subversive ComedyReviewed in the United States on October 19, 2017
Verified Purchase
I confess that I went into this book a skeptic, having been burnt one too many times by scholarship promising some new "hot take" on the Daoist canon—only to find that it's just more of the same trendy deconstructionist pap. 
Refreshingly, that isn't the case here. The authors are attentive to the historical contexts of the texts, and as such are careful not to ground their arguments in the anachronisms that keep most studies like this from ever reaching liftoff (see, e.g., the fruitless endeavors of the "Daoism-as-Heideggerian-authenticity" school). Even better: the titular concept is actually *useful* for better understanding the Zhuangzi! Imagine that.

But the concept of genuine pretending is not *merely* consonant with the historical texts of the Zhuangzi; even more crucially, it manages to both amplify the points of disagreement between it and its main rival school, Confucianism, while highlighting the rival schools' subtler (but no less important) points of convergence by framing them against the backdrop of the pre–established historical context. Those who teach advanced courses on Chinese thought ought to take note of this strength in particular, since one of the central difficulties involved in teaching such courses is getting the students the nature of Daoist/Confucian relations.

Lastly, while this is without a doubt an academic book, it is not as dry as typical academic publications, stylistically speaking. In keeping with their "humoristic" take on the Zhuangzi, the authors themselves drop the occasional joke or funny observation into the pot, and this serves to make the book significantly less of a chore to read.

In sum, I see this as being a truly *productive* entry into the study of Daoism. By "productive," I mean to say that I can see many of the concepts introduced herein being adopted by the larger community of East Asian scholarship.

I certainly hope they will be, in any case.

16 people found this helpful


Jason Gregory (Author of Effortless Living, Fasting the Mind, Enlightenment Now, & The Science and Practice of Humility)
Reviewed in the United States on January 16, 2018

Chinese philosophy (alongside Indian philosophy) is always my central focus because of my dedication to to delivering ancient Eastern thought for modern minds. And when it comes to the ancient Daoist (Taoist) sage Zhuangzi (Chuang-tzu) I'll read anything about his philosophy. When people speak about Daoism they often look to Laozi (Lao-tzu) for its gems. But if you have not encountered the genius of Zhuangzi then it is hard to get a complete picture of the depth of Daoism. As soon as I laid my eyes on Genuine Pretending it was immediately on my hit list. And I can tell you that Hans-Georg Moeller and Paul D'Ambrosio did not disappoint. 

They explain how the classic Zhuangzi text is not a one dimensional text. A lot of people believe the text is either a book on metaphysics, spirituality, strategy, or politics. But the authors believe it is all of the above and much more, especially when we take seriously (or not seriously) the humor component of the text. Genuine Pretending goes into the science behind humor and what that has to do with the spiritual depth of the Zhuangzi text. They have a thorough study of sincerity and authenticity, and how that relates to Confucian thought and Zhuangzi. 

This book explains that even though Zhuangzi is criticizing Confucian thought somewhat, he is really poking fun at it because of the sincere people we are supposed to become through high moral values and ideals that Confucius believes we should live up to. Zhuangzi skillfully knows these high rationalistic goals are not possible. Zhuangzi explains that in trying to create sincere people we actually create the opposite. Most importantly they introduce the Genuine Pretender, the joker in the pack, which in their opinion is a state of being Zhuangzi recommends for us to be in if we want to be a healthy and sane individual and live in a healthy and sane world. "A genuine pretender develops a capacity to playfully and skillfully enact social personae by looking at things, including oneself, from a 'zero perspective.'"

10 people found this helpful

HelpfulReport abuse

ssysmall

5.0 out of 5 stars Great BookReviewed in the United States on October 15, 2018
Verified Purchase
With all the works written on the Zhuangzi over the past decades, it is not easy to come across a book that gives new insights and perspectives on the Ancient text. This book is not only innovative in bringing new perspectives, but also well scholarly based providing an overview of previous and noteworthy interpretations and brings the Zhuangzi into a conversation not only with other Ancient Chinese texts, but also with Modern Western views. Each claim in the book is thoroughly based in research and thought. The book is clear, written well, in a way that keeps the reader attuned and interested even if one is not well versed in Chinese philosophy. Although this book takes Chinese philosophy seriously, it is not limited to Chinese philosophy, but brings the Chinese text into the international philosophical scene, becoming a world philosophy without geographical restrictions. Not only professional readers will enjoy this book, but anyone interested in philosophy in general. Without depriving it from its seriousness, It is a refreshing and fun book to read, thus warmly recommended for both the academic and lay reader.

2 people found this helpful


Top reviews from other countries
Translate all reviews to English

Walter Braun
2.0 out of 5 stars True to its title
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 18, 2020
Verified Purchase

Definitely a genuine academic exercise - a quote feast and endless historicising, one seventh of the book are references, and the text itself is mostly referencing. The rest is pretending that this exercise in academic navel-gazing amounts to anything at all.
I genuinely regret the waste of money and time. Perhaps we should close the Humanities departments for, say, a generation and then ask the citizens whether they have missed them? Self-satisfied scholasticism, even in liberal disguises, is definitely something for pensioners and private scholarship...
Report abuse

Andrea Martinez
5.0 out of 5 stars Five StarsReviewed in the United Kingdom on January 6, 2018
Verified Purchase

Brilliant, accesible and comprehensive.
Report abuse


giampaolo de amicis
5.0 out of 5 stars Essere "faceless"Reviewed in Italy on January 3, 2018
Verified Purchase

Interessante l'assunto che occorra restare 'faceless' senza irrigidirsi. Ciò è considerato foriero di sanità e di libera evoluzione nel proprio girovagare. Forse sarebbe stato da evidenziare maggiormente come l'essere 'faceless' sia condizione dell'adesione al circostanziale. Comunque chiaro e ottimo.
Report abuse
Translate review to English
See all reviews


===
Helen  Luo
May 15, 2021rated it really liked it
This volume is constructed for the devoted student of the Zhuangzi, and advances a philosophical methodology I am largely sympathetic to: that Classical Chinese philosophy is funny. Indeed, one wonders if the Zhuangzi can ever aptly be interpreted in the absence of its signature quick wit and whimsy. Notwithstanding, the specifics of this thesis were lost on me: I was left unconvinced by the distinction between the Confucian notion of "sincerity" and the contrasting Zhuangzian notion of "authenticity" that propels much of the analysis in the opening chapters, as the argumentative structure of the text was so deeply invested in dense, comparative accounts. 
Perhaps what was missing in this account was a coherent modern framework on the philosophy of emotion - and moreover a more accessible explanation of what kind of psychological or sociological content 'performativity' has as an ethical system.

The most persistent issue I find in in this work is an issue I see frequently in western approaches to Asian philosophies overall: that they can sometimes entrench an unjustified division between East and West by appealing uniquely to analogical arguments existing within a delimited western canon. In this case, "Genuine Pretending" appeals to classical Greek plays, Freud, German continental thinkers, and so on, without ever really making an effort to situate the Zhuangzi within its sinological context (and thereby also excludes interesting comparatives from every other non-western philosophical tradition). 
(less)
NosNos
I've always loved characters that were "stupid" or "dumb", and now that I can call all of them Daoist sages, my life has been changed for better. I've set myself up the ideal of the wise bimbo, and this was the book that opened up that possibility for me (less)
Ietrio
Oct 22, 2018rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: junk
Another dry scholastic text from some academic paper pusher who needs to justify some wages. The text is also dishonest. It is not a read of Zhuangzi, but the usual what other scholastic writes have assumed on the given theme.
Yun Rou
Feb 04, 2020rated it it was amazing
This is a work of scholarship and as such not to be undertaken either lightly or by the casual reader. It has a particular place in writings about Zhuangzi, at least in my view, in that there is this deep and defining juxtaposition between Zhuangzi (as insurgent) and Confucian teaching and culture. If you think about Confucianists as Imperial folks in the Star Wars universe and Taoists as Jedi, you can inform yourself deeply with this work.
Seamusin
Nov 09, 2021marked it as unfinished
Love the idea presented of the genuine pretender, but the intro is enough to see it's dryness will leave me a desert. (less)

The Mutual Cultivation of Self and Things by Yang Guorong, Hans-Georg Moeller - Ebook | Scribd

The Mutual Cultivation of Self and Things by Yang Guorong, Hans-Georg Moeller - Ebook | Scribd

The Mutual Cultivation of Self and Things: A Contemporary Chinese Philosophy of the Meaning of Being

The Mutual Cultivation of Self and Things: A Contemporary Chinese Philosophy of the Meaning of Being

582 pages
20 hours

Included in your membership!
at no additional cost

Description

Yang Guorong is one of the most prominent Chinese philosophers working today and is best known for using the full range of Chinese philosophical resources in connection with the thought of Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Heidegger. In The Mutual Cultivation of Self and Things, Yang grapples with the philosophical problem of how the complexly interwoven nature of things and being relates to human nature, values, affairs, and facts, and ultimately creates a world of meaning. Yang outlines how humans might live more fully integrated lives on philosophical, religious, cultural, aesthetic, and material planes. This first English translation introduces current, influential work from China to readers worldwide.

Philosophy
All categories





2022/01/23

Luhmann Explained: From Souls to Systems by Hans-Georg Moeller | Goodreads

Luhmann Explained: From Souls to Systems by Hans-Georg Moeller | Goodreads

Luhmann Explained: From Souls to Systems

 4.28  ·   Rating details ·  50 ratings  ·  3 reviews
What are systems? What is society? What happens to human beings in a hypermodern world? Niklas Luhmann addressed these questions in depth. This book introduces his social systems theory which explains specific functions like economy and mass media from a cybernetic perspective, integrating various schools of thought including sociology, philosophy, and biology. Luhmann Explained explores the great thinker’s radical analysis of “world society.” The book gives special attention to the present-day relevance of Luhmann's theory with respect to globalization, electronic mass media, ethics, and new forms of protest. (less)

GET A COPY

Paperback312 pages
Published August 30th 2006 by Open Court
Original Title
Luhmann Explained: From Souls to Systems (Ideas Explained)
ISBN
0812695984  (ISBN13: 9780812695984)
Edition Language
English
...Less DetailEdit Details
Review ofISBN 9780812695984
Rating
Shelvesto-read 
1273rd )
FormatPaperback edit
Status
January 22, 2022 – Shelved as: to-read
January 22, 2022 – Shelved
ReviewWrite a review
 

FRIEND REVIEWS

Recommend This Book None of your friends have reviewed this book yet.

READER Q&A

Ask the Goodreads community a question about Luhmann Explained
54355902. uy100 cr1,0,100,100

Be the first to ask a question about Luhmann Explained

COMMUNITY REVIEWS

Showing 1-30
 Average rating4.28  · 
 ·  50 ratings  ·  3 reviews


 | 
Sejin,
Sejin, start your review of Luhmann Explained: From Souls to Systems
Trevor (I sometimes get notified of comments)
So many sociologists, so little time… The problem is that my memory for names is so bad that I might have heard about this guy a dozen times before, but as far as I know I first really heard about him about a week ago. He became a bit urgent to read as he has a pretty influential theory of media – and my thesis has to sorta, kinda do a kinda sorta nodding acknowledgement towards media theory.

The problem is that he is also reputed to be insanely difficult to read – so, I thought I would just start with a how-to Luhmann, rather challenge him to an arm wrestle with no other background information than his name. This was good, but Luhmann’s ideas are so out of the ordinary – and so opposed to our standard prejudices – that I’ve a feeling no matter how they are expressed they are unlikely to really be heard by many people.

Our main prejudice is that we are individuals and this is something at the very core of Luhmann’s ideas and it is something he denies. This sounds like it might be just the sort of daft things you might expect from a sociologist and basically wrong as it is going against Descartes and his idea that the one thing we cannot doubt is our own consciousness (I think, therefore I am), but Luhmann’s point is a bit more subtle than this.

Individual derives from Medieval Latin meaning indivisible. Now, we may well like to imagine that we are indivisible, but Luhmann’s point is that we live in a society where we adopt roles that rely on the functions we are called upon to perform in that society. We have economic roles, family roles, political roles, roles related to our work and entertainment, educational roles – and so the list goes on. The people that we are while performing any or each of these roles could hardly be said to be ‘indivisible’. In fact, for some of them they are more than likely to be actually contradictory. And it isn’t as if we necessarily perform these roles like an actor, peeling off one mask just in time to pop on another. The author gives a wonderful example of a man paying the cashier at a restaurant, but as the transaction is about to happen both men receive mobile phone calls which both of them then answer. Their economic transaction continues while they are simultaneously a lover to the person on the end of one phone and perhaps a parent on the end of the other. Does it really make sense to talk about these two people as being indivisible? Are they two people or four? To Luhmann they are defined by the roles they are playing in all their complexity, rather than assuming some ‘essential element’ that exists somewhere beneath it all.

There was a time when people could be defined more or less once and for all time – in the pre-modern age people were allocated a position in society prior to their birth and there was no escaping that role except by death. A peasant was a peasant and a lord, a lord. That world no longer exists. In a functionally differentiated world, you get to be what you do – but no one really gets to do only one thing, everyone has multiple functions to perform and so have multiple identities.

Luhmann’s key vision of society comes from biology and the structure of the cell. The essential part of a cell is the cell wall. It is this that divides what is cell from what is not cell and therefore allows the cell to be something. Cells can then start to differentiate and start to have different functions from other cells that can then coordinate to make a more complex organism – but they can’t do that if they have not created a border around themselves defining what is in and what is out. For Luhmann society is made up of functional units that are much the same. So that there is a legal function within society and this is different from the economic function or the political ones. And in some ways similar to Saussure’s arbitrary nature of the sign, many of these functions are also somewhat arbitrary too. We know this because there are many ways societies can organise their legal and political structures, but once an organising principle has been applied, once a structure has been built upon those foundations, they are no longer arbitrary but, to all intents and purposes, necessary.

What is particularly interesting here is that each of these functional systems, each of these necessary components of a fully working social order, are based on communication. The example given is economics – where an economic exchange means entering into a communicative relationship with someone else and playing by the rules of the economic functional system. If I do not recognise the use of money – a key component in the communication system of economics – I am hardly likely to exchange my goods for your grotty little bits of paper. Each of the functional systems within society are likewise based on communicative exchanges, but Luhmann stresses that the communication systems are primary and the actors secondary – that is, it isn’t humans that communicate within these roles, rather the other way around, we humans are made via the roles we play within these communicative functions. (I did warn you that you weren’t going to like this)

I guess you can see why Luhmann might be interesting in the mass media. The mass media is something we immediately associate with communication – so we are not likely to react negatively when someone tells us that its central purpose is communicative in the way we might for say dentistry. But it is important to remember that Luhmann is only seeing the media as a hyper-example of the fundamental role of all functional roles in society.

Before I go on, I want to mention Luhmann’s view of political activisms. He discusses the Green movement – a movement dedicated to conservation of the environment. However, Luhmann did not believe that to be the case. The Green movement became a political movement and as such its real point was to create politicians, which it did with abandon. Our functionally differentiated society reproduces itself, his term for this is that it is an autopoietic system. Autopoiesis is made up of the Greek words meaning ‘self-production’. For Luhmann it is almost impossible to truly act outside of the functional units a society creates. There is no ‘outside’ and all positions reproduce the relationships that already exist – this is the tragedy of the modern, the tragedy of living in a functionally differentiated society. This is also why Luhmann doesn’t believe we are living in a post-modern world – because what was true about society two hundred years ago is still true of it today.

What is particularly interesting is that issues such as Native American rights, Civil Rights, Gay Rights, Women’s Rights and their relationship to social change. Let’s pretend for a second that all of these were granted – Luhmann’s point isn’t that this would be a bad thing, but rather that all it would achieve would be an extension of the already existing order. This isn’t a bad thing, in fact, more strength to your elbow – it just also isn’t a ‘revolutionary overthrow of the existing order’. It is the existing order. None of the existing functional units would be overthrown if gay marriage rights were granted.

Now, onto the media. What is particularly important about the media is that it functions in somewhat similar ways to how the board game ‘trivial pursuit’ functions. To play the game you need to know a series of background facts about how your society exists. These facts are the common knowledge of anyone actively engaged in that society. The media provides a similar function because it delineates what is worth knowing from what is not. As the New York Times reminds us, the media provides – All the news that’s fit to print. Luhmann’s media is quite different to Chomsky’s media model. Chomsky proposes that since the media are increasingly held in the hands of fewer and fewer media interests – huge corporations – it is inevitable that they will present a picture of the world that is in the interests of those corporations. Chomsky’s model is one of manipulation. This doesn’t need to be explicit manipulation – there is no need for a Rupert Murdoch to tell a Bill O’Reilly what to say or think. Bill is employed because he can be assured to say and think the right things. Chomsky’s model is based on selective promotion of people certain to think the ‘right way’ and of the self-editing of everyone else so as to keep their jobs. Luhmann doesn’t agree or disagree with this, per se, he just doesn’t believe it is necessary in the way Chomsky suggests. To Luhmann this idea is based on a false premise, that there is an underlying truth that is both simple and can be uncovered if the manipulation is removed.

This book refers to the Communist Manifesto here – which had me going to check and it seems he is probably right. Interestingly, Part III of the Manifesto is called Socialist and Communist Literature. The author says, “One can find in the Communist Manifesto the belief that the newspapers would finally emancipate the masses and liberate the workers.” It does seem that Marx and Engels did have a belief that when communist newspapers became available to the masses the masses would realise the true nature of their position in society and overthrow their oppressors. In a sense this is the role of any manifesto that must at some level believe in the power of words to affect change.

In this sense then, Luhmann sees both Marx and Chomsky as naïve. The media has both more and less power than they assert in their beliefs. The media doesn’t merely justify power, it enters into a dialogue with the various functional units of power and thereby creates the narratives that help to explain these structures, as much to themselves as to the world. One of the things the media does – perhaps its most important role – is to create the illusion of personal agency. We believe things like President Bush launched the Gulf War, but if push came to shove we would probably have to concede that it took one or two more people than just this one guy to do such a thing. In fact, so many more people that any rational interpretation of what happened would probably only see President Bush as a kind of media figure head and representative of the various socially functional units whose interactions made the Gulf War happen. The media also turns us into individuals, constantly reaffirming our essential individuality. Hell, how could you think for a minute I’m not an individual, I drink Coke rather than Pepsi and I prefer Apple to IBM – I make choices, if that doesn’t make me an individual, what would? His point, of course, is that the choices are so constrained that the differences they make are virtually meaningless.

The media are interested in information. But this means something a little different from what we take information to generally mean. Here it means the eternally new. As the book points out, as soon as we learn that the president has had sex with someone we immediately want to know who? Then we want to know how often? Then we want to know what kind of sex? Did she enjoy it? Is she prepared to tell us what he was like? But this obsession with the new implies the media’s role as the trivial pursuit game of our lives. There is no time for detailed background for any stories, there is only room for what is new, what is information, and assumed common knowledge. What is interesting about this is that after decades of watching news programs documenting the conflicts in the Middle East few of us could say anything meaningful about the differences between Shiites and Sunnies. There is no background track – the background is either assumed as the price you are supposed to have already paid to be a part of our society, or it is irrelevant. If you don’t know, hide the fact as well as you can, if you do know, assume everyone else does too.

As I’ve become less and less interested in popular culture there are a whole class of people I sort of see about the place, but can’t quite work out who they are or what they do. My favourite being Kim Kardashian. I’ve no idea what she is famous for, literally haven’t a clue, surely it can’t be ‘having breasts and a surname that sounds like a Soviet Asian Republic’ – but when I’ve said that to people they have told me that is actually pretty accurate description. I figure they are taking the piss.

The point being you are not really allowed to not know this stuff. Knowing these ‘individuals’ and keeping up to date with the improbable twists and turns of their lives confirms ourselves too as individuals in waiting.

What I like about all this is that it doesn’t require a malevolent superhuman force manipulating everyone from afar – although, that said, I’m going to go on hating Murdoch all the same. If I'm not an individual I can't see why I have to be consistent. In fact, the problem is much more frightening than mere manipulation – it is that the matrix exists without the need for machines programming our dreams. It exists because of the interactions we are compelled to enter into. And worse yet, we are created out of those interactions – not the other way around. They existed before us, and will continue after us – seeing them as ‘our creation’, as extensions of our wills, is to completely mess up the order of horse and cart.
(less)
Yahya
Jan 13, 2020rated it it was amazing
I had stumbled upon this book after reading some Luhmann directly. I tried reading 'Theory of society' and 'Introduction to systems theory' of Niklas Luhmann. Those books were really difficult to comprehend. Moeller does an awesome job of explaining Luhmann's theory. The five stars given to the book go to his style of writing which makes really complex ideas easily comprehensible. Coming to Luhmann's theory of society itself, it has a huge shortcoming. By placing humans and material culture outside the society/social system, Luhmann's theory falls short of explaining various phenomenons in society satisfactorily. What Luhmann provides isn't actually a comprehensive theory of society, its a theory of communication. (less)
Michael
May 06, 2016rated it really liked it
Yes, very nice. I thought I had a comprehensive understanding of Luhmann already but Moeller's book does a splendid job of giving philosophical and sociological contexts for Luhmann's work which much enhanced my appreciation for that work's ambition and its accomplishment. Very readable; recommended. (less)

===





Follow the Author

Hans-Georg Moeller
+ Follow


Luhmann Explained: From Souls to Systems (Ideas Explained Book 3) Kindle Edition
by Hans-Georg Moeller (Author) Format: Kindle Edition


4.4 out of 5 stars 16 ratings



See all formats and editions



Kindle
$43.17Read with Our Free App
Paperback
$50.43
14 New from $50.43


What are systems? What is society? What happens to human beings in a hypermodern world? This book is an introduction to Niklas Luhmann's social system theory which explains specific functions like economy and mass media from a cybernetic perspective. Integrating various schools of thought including sociology, philosophy and biology Luhmann Explained results in an overall analysis of "world society". Special attention is given to the present-day relevance of Luhmann's theory with respect to globalization, electronic mass media, ethics, and new forms of protest.




Print length

314 pages
Language

English
Publisher

Open Court
Publication date

15 April 2011


File size ‏ : ‎ 963 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 314 pages

Customer Reviews:
4.4 out of 5 stars 16 ratings

Follow

Hans-Georg Moeller


Customer reviews
4.4 out of 5 stars
4.4 out of 5
16 global ratings




Top reviews

Top review from Australia


Mark N Gibson

4.0 out of 5 stars Good clear exposition of Luhman's main ideasReviewed in Australia on 14 April 2014
Verified Purchase

Seemed to me a good outline of the main ideas. Clearly presented and with good examples. I wouldn't pretend that I fully understand Luhmann from this, but enough at least to have some idea.

HelpfulReport abuse

See all reviews


Top reviews from other countries
Translate all reviews to English


Cliente de Amazon
5.0 out of 5 stars Saúl Trejo RodríguezReviewed in Mexico on 11 February 2017
Verified Purchase

Excelente libro que muestra de forma muy clara el giro comunicacional que Luhmann da en el análisis sistémico de la sociedad y cómo de ese giro se obtiene una ganancia teórica de gran alcance y refinamiento para abordar los temas sociales de alta complejidad.
Report abuse
Translate review to English


testaduovo
3.0 out of 5 stars Un'introduzione alla teoria sociologica di N. LuhmannReviewed in Italy on 22 July 2013
Verified Purchase

Una buona e chiara introduzione alla teoria di uno dei più grandi sociologi e intellettuali del XX secolo (e forse anche di questo, almeno per adesso e per i prossimi anni).
Report abuse
Translate review to English


kogonil
3.0 out of 5 stars 英米圏での情報収集にReviewed in Japan on 30 March 2008
Verified Purchase

まことに偉大な(と私は思う)ドイツの社会学者ニクラス・ルーマンの難解な理論を
わかりやすく再構成し解説した哲学者による紹介。

すんげー簡潔にまとまってます。簡潔すぎ、って感じはありますが。
大きな構成は、実際のルーマンの論述内容のあれこれに踏み込んでいくに先立って、
いわゆる「旧ヨーロッパ的」な社会認識を超克することの重大性を訴えるところが
ポイント。つまり、他の多くの社会論者を尻目に、「なぜルーマンか」を強調する
ところがポイント。

しかしながら、この構成ではすでにわが国には長岡克行氏の大部で入念な論考
(『ルーマン/社会の理論の革命』)があるので、あえてこの本を読む特筆すべき
必要はないのかも。

日常の具体的な場面での描写に時折「ハッと」させられること、後半で、カント・ヘーゲル・
マルクス・フッサールらとの関連性を要領よくまとめているところ、巻末資料として英語圏
での文献リストがついていること、こんなところが有用でした。
Read less

5 people found this helpfulReport abuse
Translate review to English

D. Spivak
5.0 out of 5 stars Profound ideas, beautifully explicated.Reviewed in the United States on 19 February 2017
Verified Purchase

This is the best book I've read in years. First of all it's beautifully written by Moeller; but it's also my first introduction to Luhmann, and I'm blown away.

Reading the book, so much begins to makes sense. Every page—maybe every few paragraphs—I get the feeling, "oh... I see. Of course!" What does this feeling signify?
• Every few paragraphs, Moeller explains a new concept or perspective, or expands on a previous one. These concepts are ones I've never heard anything like before.
• Without having to reread, I understand this new concept. "Oh..."
• It's a profoundly different way to understand society, but once I hear it, I don't have to swallow it or take it on faith. "I see."
• But I further get the feeling that it's in fact obvious in retrospect. "Of course!" I lose the ability to see how any previously-imagined theory was even viable.

Profound stuff. Thank you Luhmann, and thank you Moeller!!

5 people found this helpfulReport abuse

Marten K
5.0 out of 5 stars Does what it sets out to doReviewed in the United States on 2 January 2011
Verified Purchase

Hans-Georg Moeller's book is a relatively easy entry into Luhmann's work. Not having read anything on Luhmann before I now feel that I have a reasonable grasp of Luhmann's ideas. Others with a more thorough knowledge of Luhmann would be better placed to comment on the integrity of Moeller's interpretation.

While the book is short, it is not an 'easy' book as such; this is not a pop culture book. The book covers what seems to be Luhmann's essential elements in a distilled form.

Towards the end there are chapters that locate Luhmann relative to Kant, Hegel, Marx and Habermas as well as postermodernims and deconstruction. While a good idea in some respects, I found this coverage a little scant and not completly satisfying, particularly Kant and Hegel who I have not read. The others I had some prior exposure to so was able to grasp but I would have preferred more.

The translated extracts included as appendices seem to be well selected, and provide welcome substance to Moeller's substantive text. Again, somebody who has read Luhmann more widely would be better placed to comment on whether this selection is reflective of Luhmann's work.

The book provides a solid basis for further reading, and on this I would have liked a suggested list of further readings, although the bibliography at the end of the book is very extensive.

Five stars because the book fulfilled the expecations it evoked with a reasonable investment of my time and at a reasonable price.
Read less

2 people found this helpfulReport abuse