2024/01/14

Kshitimohan Sen - Wikipedia

Kshitimohan Sen - Wikipedia

Kshitimohan Sen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kshitimohan Sen
Photo of Kshitimohan Sen with Rabindranath Tagore
Kshitimohan Sen with Rabindranath Tagore
Born30 November 1880
Died12 March 1960 (aged 79)
NationalityIndian
Occupation(s)Professor, writer

Kshitimohan Sen (2 December 1880 – 12 March 1960) was Indian scholar, writer, a Sanskrit professor and an M.A. in Sanskrit from Queen's College, Benares. He was born in a family hailing from Sonarang in Bengal Presidency (now in Bangladesh). He started his working life at the Department of Education, Chamba State. In 1908, at the call of Rabindranath Tagore, he joined Brahmacharyashram. Later he performed responsibility of Adhyaksha of Vidyabhaban. He was the first Deshikottam (1952) of Vishwa Bharati. He was an acting Upacharyas of Visva-Bharati University (1953–1954).[1] He is the maternal grandfather of Amartya Sen.[2]

Books[edit]

  • Kabir (1910–11)
  • Bharatiya Madhyayuger Sadhanar Dhara (1930)
  • Dadu (1935)
  • Bharater Sangskrti (1943)
  • Banglar Sadhana (1945)
  • Yuga Guru Rammohan (1945)
  • Jatibhed (1946)
  • Banglar Baul (1947)
  • Hindu Sangskrtir Svarup (1947)
  • Bharater Hindu-Mussalman Yukta Sadhana (1949)
  • Prachin Bharate Nari (1950)
  • Chinmay Banga (1957)
  • Hinduism (1961)
  • Sadhak O Sadhana (2003)

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Kshitimohan Sen (1880-1960)". Visva-Bharati University. Archived from the original on 1 July 2011. Retrieved 18 October 2012.
  2. ^ "Honorary Degree Citation: Amartya Sen". University of the Witwatersrand. Archived from the original on 13 August 2012. Retrieved 18 October 2012.

External links[edit]

Hinduism: Sen, Kshiti Mohan, Sen, Amartya

Hinduism: Sen, Kshiti Mohan, Sen, Amartya:  Amazon.com: Books

https://www.scribd.com/document/380144962/Hindusim





K. M. SenK. M. Sen




Hinduism Paperback – International Edition, May 31, 2005
by Kshiti Mohan Sen (Author), Amartya Sen (Author)
4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 49 ratings
3.8 on Goodreads
195 ratings


K. M. Sen discusses the evolution of Hinduism's central systems of belief and codes of conduct, as well as popular cults and sects such as Bhakti, Tantrika and the mystics of North India, and describes the varying incarnations of its supreme deity, Krishna and Rama among them. He recounts its history from the Indus Valley civilization c 2500 BC and the Vedic age nature gods to its relationship with Buddhism and Jainism and the impact of western culture. And he describes the day-to-day practice of Hinduism - customs, festivals and rituals; the caste system; and its philosophies and exponents.





 In a new foreword, the author's grandson Amartya Sen brings his work right up to date, examining the role of Hinduism in the world today.

208 pages
May 31, 2005


JRC

5.0 out of 5 stars A basic, yet elegant account of Hinduism.Reviewed in the United States on September 8, 2013
Verified Purchase

This is a classic book written by an eminent scholar of Hinduism and rendered into English by a non-observing Nobel-Laureate economist, who has presented the facts neutrally in an engaging, but non-judgmental manner. 

The initial chapters would be informative to newcomers to the study of Hinduism, but not to those who already have some knowledge of this religion/culture.

 However, the later chapters chronicle the evolution of Hinduism from the prehistoric times through the middle ages to the present time. 

This journey through the periods of history is educative, inspiring and even startling to even those who were raised as Hindus in modern India and are reasonably knowledgeable about Hinduism. 

The author has consciously kept the book short, which is good.

 The only regret is that more quotations from the Sanskrit scriptures were not used in support of the conclusions made by the author. 

This is a slight disappointment in view of the author's vast and deep scholarship in this field.

Overall, this is a historical account of a religion, which is as captivating as a classic novel. In the opinion of this reader, this book is not to be missed, whether one is an observing Hindu or merely curious about the great cultural-spiritual phenomenon known as Hinduism.

One person found this helpful


Amazon Customer

5.0 out of 5 stars Easy to read - explains all concepts clearly and a ...Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2018
Verified Purchase
Easy to read - explains all concepts clearly and a non biased expose on the foundations, history and development of Hinduism and Hindu thought in India and the world.



HelpfulReport

adea

5.0 out of 5 stars A Definitive Book.Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2013
Verified Purchase
A definitive book on Indian Philosophy. It is really not a book on religion rather the cultural synthesis in India.


Top reviews from other countries

Abredjones
5.0 out of 5 stars Five StarsReviewed in Canada on January 19, 2017
Verified Purchase

The book is very informative and removes too many mis-conception about Hinduism.
Report

Dr Asoke Chakraborty
5.0 out of 5 stars An invaluable book to understand and know about Hinduism.Reviewed in India on November 14, 2015
Verified Purchase

My knowledge and idea about Hinduism would have remained incomplete and distorted without reading this book.This book helped me to develop a very broad and comprehensive notion about Hinduism.

One person found this helpfulReport

j tattersall
5.0 out of 5 stars excellent bookReviewed in the United Kingdom on November 13, 2012
Verified Purchase

As I am off to India again I thought I would read a little on Hinduism - beautifully written and is easy to read
Report

Dr.Kaushik Roy
5.0 out of 5 stars Precise to HinduismReviewed in India on June 10, 2018
Verified Purchase

A precise and short outline sketch oh Hindu religion.



MST
4.0 out of 5 stars A remarkable book on Hinduism in 100 pagesReviewed in the United Kingdom on November 6, 2016
Verified Purchase

I am not an atheist. but mu parents are Hindus. I chose to read this book because I have great respect for Amartya Sen. This book is by his grandfather and the grandson has translated it. It is a short book (thankfully!), but gives the essentials. 

One is struck by the fact that there is not 'Hinduism', but many. 
Over time its philosophy and world view has need challenged from within resulting in many different trends, versions and editions. Who is to tell which of these is the 'correct'' one? 

I guess this is so with all religions, but many hang on to what they claim is the 'true version' of it and others argue endlessly about it. 

Hinduism gives you a choice. There has been a school of thought called Saangiam that is atheistic. The book covers the various schools of thought that come under the umbrella of Hinduism. With the Modi government espousing the the cause of Hinduism as the official philosophy of the country and the push to recognise the Gita holy book, it is important that people take the message of this book seriously, viz. Hinduism is not a monolithic philosophy, but embraces a multitude of faiths.

One major criticism of this otherwise laudable book is it is soft on the caste system that is an integral part of Hinduism. And Hindu apologists cannot duck this issue. It has had, and continues to have, terrible consequences for Indian society. The domination of the priestly class, the Brahmins (the author is one, I presume) over Indian society over the last millennium or more has been understated in the book.

In spite of these short comings, it is readable book, written by a Sanskrit scholar with a broad outlook and, in my view, gives a complete picture of Hinduism and not the bits that the author believes in. 

Undoubtedly it a liberal interpretation of Hinduism. If one wants an introduction to Hinduism, this is the book for you. Those who are of the Hindu faith may have to suspend their previous judements before embarking on the task of reading the book 

Sen has summarised Hinduism in a little more that 100 pages and at the same time given samples from the Vedas so that the reader gets a feel for the origin writings.  What more does one want?

‘The Animals: Love Letters Between Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy’ - The New York Times

‘The Animals: Love Letters Between Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy’ - The New York Times


Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy, from the 2007 film “Chris and Don: A Love Story.”Credit...Michael Childers




By Henry Giardina
Aug. 29, 2014


In 1956, Christopher Isherwood wrote from Cheshire, England, to his partner, the artist Don Bachardy. It is the first entry in a 14-year correspondence: a brief, eccentric document that mentions, in a short space, Alexander Korda’s memorial service, incest between two cats and Courbet’s “Diligence in the Snow.”

“I think about you all the time,” he writes in closing, “and about times I might have been kinder and more understanding, and I make many resolutions for the future — some of which I hope I’ll keep.”

Their relationship began on Valentine’s Day of 1953 and was in an important sense defined by its many periods of separation. The world of the letters lived inside the broader, coded world of midcentury homosexuality. Within it, Isherwood and Bachardy were able to express themselves through a more personal kind of code, in what would become the prolonged metaphor of the Animals. Bachardy was Kitty, and Isherwood was a horse called Dobbin. In this collection of the existing letters, edited and introduced by Katherine Bucknell, it never becomes quite clear why two grown men would want to write to each other in the guise of a horse and a cat. But if we don’t get a sense of how the Animals came to be, we do see how they endured through the years, and in such embarrassing variations as “Beloved Catkin,” “Angel Sweetcat,” “Dearest Raggledub” and “Worshiped Glossyhoof.”

It’s a far cry from the madness of ­kisses, but then it’s not exactly fair to judge: Isherwood’s love letters may be the only things he wrote without a broader readership in mind.

“The Animals” gives us a half-glimpse into the 33-year relationship that would end with Isherwood’s death in 1986. Most of the correspondence takes place in the 1960s, a fertile decade for two artists at almost diametrically opposed points in their careers. For the much younger Bachardy, they were years of doubt, existential crisis and extramural activity. For Isherwood they were professionally prolific, and saw the development of his Berlin stories into the musical “Cabaret”; the writing of “A Single Man,” “Down There on a Visit” and “A Meeting by the River”; and the research and development of “Kathleen and Frank,” his book about his parents. The years 1956-70 found the two often on separate coasts engaged in separate projects, usually at Bachardy’s instigation and in service of finding his own voice. When he received his first serious commission — to draw lobby portraits for the American production of “A Taste of Honey” in 1960 — he gained entry into the dazzling world of artists, entertainers and expats in which Isherwood was already something of an institution. This world was what they shared, and also, as Bachardy’s ambition and Isherwood’s anxiety make clear, what kept them so often apart.


The letters provide the best and worst of what we’ve come to expect from Isherwood’s diaries of the same period, offering the same cast of characters showcased in the same, usually unflattering light. Isherwood’s well-documented anti-­Semitism, for instance, reaches its nadir in a bizarre remark about Lincoln Kirstein: “Every time he says I’m an American, I’m a Harvard boy, I’m a Bostonian,” he writes in 1965, “I think No you aren’t, you’re a Jew.” We get fresh portraits of Paul Bowles and Cecil Beaton (who, in a surreal moment, offers to take Bachardy to see “Mondo Cane”); E. M. Forster, who, according to Isherwood, “still thinks” of sex at age 88; and Frank O’Hara, whose erotic entourage provokes Bachardy’s disdain (“Their world is quite a tight circle made up of people who reinforce each other’s standards and beliefs”). Vanessa Redgrave and Franco Nero are dismissed by Ba­chardy as “pod-born replacements for real humans,” while Charles Laughton at one point loses visiting privileges at the house of Isherwood because he “sits and sits.”

But this is de rigueur for the Animals, for whom cruelty is often the better part of honesty. The stories they tell each other usually come at the expense of others, as the two lovers illustrate in writing what a mocking, ridiculous spectacle the world becomes when the loved one is missing from it. In 1958, Bachardy gives a lengthy report of the attempted suicide of the father of Marguerite Lamkin, a mutual friend. Isherwood responds by saying he enjoyed the report so much that he “quite forgot to feel sorry for anybody. Honestly, this is literature!” The letters feed on such reports from the frontier: In them, weight is fixated on, bisexuality disparaged (there’s no trusting Tony Richardson because of it), lives and deaths are constantly under review, and newspaper clippings of cats frequently enclosed.

“The Animals” is marketed as a collection of love letters, yet to define them in only this way might be putting too fine a point on it. The language is not forthrightly amorous and hardly ever beautiful, and the letters at times are dull and listlike. For what is ostensibly a private and intimate correspondence, it’s surprising how little of anything emotional, inconvenient, intimate — indeed private — comes across.

Though perhaps surprising isn’t the word. In fiction, a type of self-imposed distance is Isherwood’s forte — the trick of his genius. The letters present us with an aspect of Isherwood’s life that must have felt, at times, a bit further out of his control than he would have liked. Both men sought sex outside the relationship; for Isherwood this was more a concession to Bachardy’s needs than a desire to satisfy his own. When it comes to calling each other to account, the letters offer up a strange silence, at best a slight passive aggression on the older man’s part. “None of the Isherwoods feel things much,” he writes at one point, quoting his mother. When he later refers to himself — rather, to “Dobbin” — as “a thing that can’t feel,” one imagines it is wishful thinking. If truth is what these letters are in search of, it is often at the expense of feeling. At one point Isherwood suspects Bachardy of being “franker than I am. Is that because you can afford to be? Am I scared of you? Yes, in a way. But I really almost wish I could be more scared. How can I explain that?” In the world of “The Animals,” the charge of truthfulness could sometimes seem like an accusation.

Bucknell has been exhaustive in her quest to present us with the complete Isherwood, having brought forth all four volumes of his diaries in recent years, now capped off with the letters. But the complete person, when it comes to a writer who so famously wrote as if he had nothing to hide, is still very much a construct: Isherwood as created by Isherwood and determined by the expectations of his audience; in the case of the letters the most important audience of all, his life partner until death. If nothing else, “The Animals” gives us a stranger and at times more accessible point of entry. There is, after all, something nice about seeing the cleareyed Christopher Isherwood as yet another person whom love makes inscrutable and even a bit unbearable, a lover sending pictures of cats in the mail to the one other person who will understand their true ­significance.



THE ANIMALS


Love Letters Between Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy

Edited by Katherine Bucknell

Illustrated. 481 pp. Farrar, Straus & Giroux. $30.
A correction was made on
Sept. 21, 2014:

A picture on Aug. 31 with a reviewof “The Animals: Love Letters Between Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy,” edited by Katherine Bucknell , carried an erroneous credit . The photograph of Isherwood and Bachardy is by Michael Childers , not from Zeitgeist Films.

The Animals: Love Letters between Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy

The Animals: Love Letters between Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy eBook : Isherwood, Christopher, Bachardy, Don: Amazon.com.au: Books




Kindle
$18.99
Available instantly
Hardcover
$28.64

Paperback
$45.00



Roll over image to zoom in

Read sample


Follow the authors

Christopher IsherwoodChristopher Isherwood
Follow

Don BachardyDon Bachardy
Follow




The Animals: Love Letters between Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy Kindle Edition
by Christopher Isherwood (Author), Don Bachardy (Author) Format: Kindle Edition


4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 18 ratings



Book description
Editorial reviews



Christopher Isherwood was a celebrated English writer when he met the Californian teenager Don Bachardy on a Santa Monica beach in 1952. They spent their first night together on Valentine’s Day 1953. Defying the conventions, the two men began living as an openly gay couple in an otherwise closeted Hollywood. The Animals provides a loving testimony of an extraordinary relationship that lasted until Chris’s death in 1986 – and survived affairs (on both sides) and a thirty-year-age-gap.

In romantic letters to one another, the couple created the private world of the Animals. Chris was Dobbin, a stubborn old workhorse; Don was the playful young white cat, Kitty. But Don needed to carve out his own identity – some of their longest sequences of letters were exchanged during his trips to London and New York, to pursue his career as an artist and to widen his emotional and sexual horizons.

Amidst the intimate domestic dramas, we learn of Isherwood’s continuing literary success –the royalty cheques from Cabaret, the acclaim for his pioneering novel A Single Man – and the bohemian whirl of Californian film suppers and beach life. Don, whose portraits of London theatreland were making his name, attends the world premiere of The Innocents with Truman Capote and afterwards dines with Deborah Kerr and the rest of the cast, spends weekends with Tennessee Williams, Cecil Beton, or the Earl and Countess of Harewood, and tours Egypt and Greece with a new love interest. But whatever happens in the outside world, Dobbin and Kitty always return to their ‘Basket’ and to each other. Candid, gossipy, exceptionally affectionate, The Animals is a unique interplay between two creative spirits, confident in their mutual devotion.

Read more



Print length

528 pages
Language

English
Sticky notes

On Kindle Scribe
Publisher

Vintage Digital












Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B00CYONMXC
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Vintage Digital (12 September 2013)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 2126 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 528 pagesCustomer Reviews:
4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 18 ratings




About the authors
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.


Follow

Christopher Isherwood



Christopher Isherwood (1904–1986) was one of the most prominent writers of his generation. He is the author of many works of fiction, including All the Conspirators, The Memorial, Mr. Norris Changes Trains, and Goodbye to Berlin, on which the musical Cabaret was based, as well as works of nonfiction and biography.

See more on the author's page

Follow

Don Bachardy



Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs, and more

See more on the author's page




How would you rate your experience shopping for books on Amazon today?







Top reviews

Top reviews from Australia

There are 0 reviews and 0 ratings from Australia


Top reviews from other countries

Richard Lottridge
5.0 out of 5 stars Two Interesting GentlemenReviewed in the United States on 30 June 2014
Verified Purchase

Fascinating exchange of personal letters. You keep reading because you want to know what they are going to do next.

7 people found this helpfulReport

Mummy
5.0 out of 5 stars Fascinating!!Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 10 July 2015
Verified Purchase

Very long but very intriguing!

Through this series of letters between Don Bachardy and Christopher Isherwood we get to witness the true love and devotion between the two men.

Their's is an improbable relationship but one that showed the depth and resilience of their love for each other. And it is a love that survived ups and downs over thirty long years until Christopher Isherwood's death.

Christopher met Don when he was 48 and Don was 18. They began a relationship despite the disapproval of friends and the disapproval of Don's parents but their love survived and thrived over thirty long years.

I found this fascinating and very very long. They started their relationship in the 1950s at a time when most gay people remained in the closet fearing for their livelihoods and reputations, but not so this couple. They totally defied convention.

I wanted to learn more about this couple because in the light of the reality of the age gap and the attitude towards homosexuality at the time I wouldn't have thought the relationship would survive but the two men survived against the odds and their relationship was one of compromise and great devotion. They had times when their relationship was open to others and there were times of difficulty between the two of them, but thirty years is a life time commitment.

It was a real life and enduring love.

The book reveals the relationship through a series of letters the two men wrote to each other. They had pet names for each other and referred to themselves as Dobbin, a work horse (Christopher) and Kitty, a young white cat (Don). And their world together was that of 'The Animals'.

The book reveals their love for each other, their careers and how they supported each other, and it shows how they interacted with their friends and other well known actors and actresses from the States and from Europe.

What is amazing is that the two men were obviously openly together at a time when gay men in Hollywood were closeted and hidden, many of them marrying women and having affairs with men. Don and Chris don't seem to have had any doubts about being together openly and being a couple. Perhaps Christopher Isherwood just didn't care and Don Bachardy was too young to care. Obviously being so young he must have been influenced by Isherwood and so didn't care either.

The two men wrote many letters to each other over the course of their years together especially when they travelled separately for work, or for Don's studying at art school. At those times the little world they had created imbibed them with strength and the commitment to keep going.

My favourite parts are where they present 'us against the world'. And they reveal to each other who has annoyed them or who they are not too happy with. Thankfully many of those people have passed on because I am not sure they would be so happy to see these revelations in print. I of course found it fascinating and a real fly on the wall experience. Despite the fact that these letters are about everyday bills, chores, friends, love and life they are fascinating because they show the inner life of the relationship. Also there is just such good gossip here!!

They did complain about things a lot to each other. Don visits Cairo and Europe on his own. He describe the Egyptians as Arabs and untrustworthy. Travelling through Greece he writes to Isherwood and complains that the Greeks cannot be trusted either. Ok it was 1964 and not a time known for political correctness, but still in some places they are down right rude labelling one man's wife fat and stupid, and sly!! The man passed away in 2011 so hopefully he never knew - this book was published in 2014.

When travelling to Egypt and Greece, Bachardy makes scathing comments about his travelling companions and then eventually the group go their separate ways. I was hardly suprised.

Isherwood and Bachardy created a world which only had space for the two of them despite the fact that both of them had affairs. Just like the foreign travel the affairs seemed to be a way of Don testing his relationship with Isherwood. Given the fact that both men could be quite scathing of others and adoring towards each other I am not surprised none of the affairs lasted. I don't think any of the other men would have measured up to Isherwood or Bachardy, and I am not sure Bachardy would have found it easy to kindle with someone else, the kind of singleminded, intense, focused devotion he had from Isherwood. Some of these affairs could have threatened the relationship but Don always found his way back to Christopher. In the documentary Don speaks about these times, recognising the affairs that both of them had placed strain on the relationship but he acknowledges that it was something they went through only to realise that they loved each other. Perhaps some of this was a way for Don to grow into his own person.

In any case it couldn't have been easy and it is fascinating that their relationship survived this and went from strength to strength.

I think the documentary is a very good introduction to the book. I particularly enjoyed the part in the documentary when Bachardy complains about the attitude of his father who didn't approve of his homosexuality or his relationship with Isherwood. I wanted to remind him that he was only 18 and Isherwood was 48 when their relationship started, and homosexuality was illegal at the time. Hello?? Which parent wouldn't be worried?? If my son introduced me to a partner who was 30 years his senior I would be rather alarmed. It was funny how the two of them together knew their relationship was disapproved of but they just didn't give a damn!!

At all!!

There is very little about the politics or social changes of the time in the memoirs, but there are comments about Isherwood having a different opinion on Vietnam to WH Auden who felt the US whould remain in Vietnam until the North was taken. Comments are made about associates who join the civil rights movement so there is some acknowledgement of societal events. Bachardy also defends his black housekeeper to his parents who as he desrcibes 'have deep prejudice against negroes'.
But these letters are not supposed to be political commentaries. They are love letters to fill in the gap between two lovers missing one another and to let each man know about the day to day activities of the other.

This book is very long but I didn't find it boring, just intriguing and encouraging. It is good to know that such deep love exists and that it can bridge the age gap. There are no barriers to love, only the ones which we place ourselves.

Subject: The Animals: Love Letters between Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy - Reading 1
http://youtu.be/JpgoZf-rpP0

Depicts the remarkable life of artist Don Bachardy and his relationship with the distinguished Christopher Isherwood
www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6q-YnuBo00
Read less

2 people found this helpfulReport

andrew sandler
5.0 out of 5 stars Five StarsReviewed in the United States on 29 December 2016
Verified Purchase

Unabashedly romantic.

2 people found this helpfulReport

Miss F
5.0 out of 5 stars Great book of letters!Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 1 June 2017
Verified Purchase

A wonderful exchange between two lovers. Interesting, captivating and wonderful.
Report

Fitz
4.0 out of 5 stars Four StarsReviewed in the United Kingdom on 17 September 2016
Verified Purchase

Ideal bedside reading: humane, true, humourous about life on Adelaide Rd ...
Report

Homosexuality | Meaning, History, & Facts | Britannica

Homosexuality | Meaning, History, & Facts | Britannica

homosexuality
Print Cite Share Feedback

Written and fact-checked by


The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Last Updated: Dec 28, 2023 • Article History

LGBTQ+ Pride Flag
See all media
Category: History & Society
Key People: Frederick William Rolfe Magnus Hirschfeld George Weinberg John Addington Symonds Harry Hay(Show more)
Related Topics: same-sex marriage gay rights movement homophobia lesbianism male homosexuality
See all related content →

Recent News
Dec. 28, 2023, 12:37 AM ET (AP)Stigma against gay men could worsen Congo's biggest mpox outbreak, scientists warn
Dec. 22, 2023, 11:15 AM ET (AP)For years, he couldn't donate at the blood center where he worked. Under new FDA rules, now he can
Show More


Gay (male) Pride Flag
The pride flag for gay men was created in 2019 by gayflagblog.

Lesbian pride flag
The lesbian pride flag was created in 2018 by Emily Gwen.

Homosexuality, sexual interest in and attraction to members of one’s own sex. The term gay is frequently used as a synonym for homosexual; female homosexuality is often referred to as lesbianism.

At different times and in different cultures, homosexual behaviour has been variously approved of, tolerated, punished, and banned. Homosexuality was not uncommon in ancient Greece and Rome, and the relationships between adult and adolescent males in particular have become a chief focus of Western classicists in recent years. Judeo-Christian as well as Muslim cultures have generally perceived homosexual behaviour as sinful. Many Jewish and Christian leaders, however, have gone to great lengths to make clear that it is the acts and not the individuals or even their “inclination” or “orientation” that their faiths proscribe. Others—from factions within mainstream Protestantism to organizations of Reform rabbis—have advocated, on theological as well as social grounds, the full acceptance of homosexuals and their relationships. The topic has threatened to cause outright schisms in some denominations.

Modern developments



Why is Pride Month in June?
Gay Pride commemorates the Stonewall riots, which began on June 28, 1969, after police raided the Stonewall Inn bar in New York City.(more)See all videos for this article

Attitudes toward homosexuality are generally in flux, partially as a result of increased political activism (see gay rights movement) and efforts by homosexuals to be seen not as aberrant personalities but as differing from “normal” individuals only in their sexual orientation. The conflicting views of homosexuality—as a variant but normal human sexual behaviour on one hand, and as psychologically deviant behaviour on the other—remain present in most societies in the 21st century, but they have been largely resolved (in the professional sense) in most developed countries. The American Psychiatric Association, for example, declassified “ego-syntonic homosexuality” (the condition of a person content with his or her homosexuality) as a mental illness in 1973. Nonetheless, some religious groups continue to emphasize reparative therapy in the attempt to “cure” homosexuality through prayer, counseling, and behaviour modification. Their claims of success, however, are controversial. Wherever opinion can be freely expressed, debates about homosexuality will likely continue.

Selected theories of homosexuality

Psychologists in the 19th and 20th centuries, most of whom classified homosexuality as a form of mental illness, developed a variety of theories on its origin. The 19th-century psychologist Richard von Krafft-Ebing, whose Psychopathia Sexualis (1886) included masturbation, sado-masochism, and “lust-murder” in its list of sexual perversions, saw it as originating in heredity. His contemporary Sigmund Freud characterized it as a result of conflicts of psychosexual development, including identification with the parent of the opposite sex. Others have looked at social influences and physiological events in fetal development as possible origins. It is likely that many instances of homosexuality result from a combination of inborn or constitutional factors and environmental or social influences.

By the 21st century, many societies had been discussing sexuality and sexual practices with increased candour. Together with a growing acceptance of homosexuality as a common expression of human sexuality, long-standing beliefs about homosexuals had begun to lose credence. The stereotypes of male homosexuals as weak and effeminate and lesbians as masculine and aggressive, which were widespread in the West as recently as the 1950s and early ’60s, have largely been discarded.


In the 20th-century United States, a field known as sex research was established among the social and behavioral sciences in an effort to investigate actual sexual practice. (See sexology.) Researchers such as Alfred Kinsey reported that homosexual activity was a frequent pattern in adolescence, among both males and females. The Kinsey report of 1948, for example, found that 30 percent of adult American males among Kinsey’s subjects had engaged in some homosexual activity and that 10 percent reported that their sexual practice had been exclusively homosexual for a period of at least three years between the ages of 16 and 55. About half as many women in the study reported predominantly homosexual activity. Kinsey’s research methods and conclusions have been much criticized, however, and further studies have produced somewhat different and varying results. A range of more recent surveys, concerning predominantly homosexual behaviour as well as same-gender sexual contact in adulthood, have yielded results that are both higher and lower than those identified by Kinsey. Instead of categorizing people in absolute terms as either homosexual or heterosexual, Kinsey observed a spectrum of sexual activity, of which exclusive orientations of either type make up the extremes. Most people can be identified at a point on either side of the midpoint of the spectrum, with bisexuals (those who respond sexually to persons of either sex) situated in the middle. Situational homosexual activity tends to occur in environments such as prisons, where there are no opportunities for heterosexual contact.
Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content.Subscribe Now

Contemporary issues

As mentioned above, different societies respond differently to homosexuality. In most of Africa, Asia, and Latin America, both the subject and the behaviour are considered taboo, with some slight exception made in urban areas. In Western countries, attitudes were somewhat more liberal. Although the topic of homosexuality was little discussed in the public forum during the early part of the 20th century, it became a political issue in many Western countries during the late 20th century. This was particularly true in the United States, where the gay rights movement is often seen as a late offshoot of various civil rights movements of the 1960s. After the 1969 Stonewall riots, in which New York City policemen raided a gay bar and met with sustained resistance, many homosexuals were emboldened to identify themselves as gay men or lesbians to friends, to relatives, and even to the public at large. In much of North America and western Europe, the heterosexual population became aware of gay and lesbian communities for the first time. Many gay men and lesbians began to demand equal treatment in employment practices, housing, and public policy. In response to their activism, many jurisdictions enacted laws banning discrimination against homosexuals, and an increasing number of employers in America and European countries agreed to offer “domestic partner” benefits similar to the health care, life insurance and, in some cases, pension benefits available to heterosexual married couples. Although conditions for gay people had generally improved in most of Europe and North America at the turn of the 21st century, elsewhere in the world violence against gay people continued. In Namibia, for example, police officers were instructed to “eliminate” homosexuals. Gay students at Jamaica’s Northern Caribbean University were beaten, and an anti-gay group in Brazil by the name of Acorda Coracao (“Wake Up, Dear”) was blamed for murdering several gay people. In Ecuador a gay rights group called Quitogay received so much threatening e-mail that it was given support by Amnesty International.


Even in parts of the world where physical violence is absent, intolerance of homosexuality often persists. There are, however, some signs of change. In one such instance, Albania repealed its sodomy statutes in 1995, and gay couples in Amsterdam in 2001 were legally married under the same laws that govern heterosexual marriage (rather than under laws that allowed them to “register” or form “domestic” partnerships). In the late 20th century gay men and lesbians proudly revealed their sexual orientation in increasing numbers. Still others, notably those in the public eye, had their sexual orientation revealed in the media and against their will by activists either for or against gay rights—a controversial practice known as “outing.”

One of the issues that loomed largest for gay men in the last two decades of the 20th century and beyond was AIDS. Elsewhere in the world AIDS was transmitted principally by heterosexual sex, but in the United States and in some European centres it was particularly prevalent in urban gay communities. As a result homosexuals were at the forefront of advocacy for research into the disease and support for its victims through groups such as Gay Men’s Health Crisis in New York City. Novelist and playwright Larry Kramer, who believed a more aggressive presence was needed, founded the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP), which began promoting political action, including outing, through local chapters in such cities as New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and Paris. The disease also took a heavy toll on the arts communities in these centres, and virtually none of the artistic output of gay men in the late 20th century was untouched by the topic and the sense of great loss.



Lesbians, especially those uninvolved with intravenous drugs and the sex trade, were probably the demographic group least affected by AIDS. However, most shared with gay men the desire to have a secure place in the world community at large, unchallenged by the fear of violence, the struggle for equal treatment under the law, the attempt to silence, and any other form of civil behaviour that imposes second-class citizenship.The Editors of Encyclopaedia BritannicaThis article was most recently revised and updated by Alison Eldridge.

Understanding sexual orientation and homosexuality

Understanding sexual orientation and homosexuality



Understanding sexual orientation and homosexuality


Sexual orientation refers to an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attractions to men, women, or both sexes
Date created: 200819 min read
LGBTQ
42







Since 1975, APA has called on psychologists to take the lead in removing the stigma of mental illness that has long been associated with lesbian, gay, and bisexual orientations. The discipline of psychology is concerned with the well-being of people and groups and therefore with threats to that well-being. The prejudice and discrimination that people who identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual regularly experience have been shown to have negative psychological effects. This page provides accurate information for those who want to better understand sexual orientation and the impact of prejudice and discrimination on those who identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual.

What is sexual orientation?


Sexual orientation refers to an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attractions to men, women, or both sexes. Sexual orientation also refers to a person’s sense of identity based on those attractions, related behaviors, and membership in a community of others who share those attractions. Research over several decades has demonstrated that sexual orientation ranges along a continuum, from exclusive attraction to the other sex to exclusive attraction to the same sex.

However, sexual orientation is usually discussed in terms of three categories:heterosexual (having emotional, romantic, or sexual attractions to members of the other sex)
gay/lesbian (having emotional, romantic, or sexual attractions to members of one’s own sex)
bisexual (having emotional, romantic, or sexual attractions to both men and women)

This range of behaviors and attractions has been described in various cultures and nations throughout the world. Many cultures use identity labels to describe people who express these attractions. In the United States the most frequent labels are lesbians (women attracted to women), gay men (men attracted to men), and bisexual people (men or women attracted to both sexes). However, some people may use different labels or none at all.

Sexual orientation is distinct from other components of sex and gender, including biological sex (the anatomical, physiological, and genetic characteristics associated with being male or female), gender identity (the psychological sense of being male or female),* and social gender role (the cultural norms that define feminine and masculine behavior).

Sexual orientation is commonly discussed as if it were solely a characteristic of an individual, like biological sex, gender identity, or age. This perspective is incomplete because sexual orientation is defined in terms of relationships with others. People express their sexual orientation through behaviors with others, including such simple actions as holding hands or kissing. Thus, sexual orientation is closely tied to the intimate personal relationships that meet deeply felt needs for love, attachment, and intimacy. In addition to sexual behaviors, these bonds include nonsexual physical affection between partners, shared goals and values, mutual support, and ongoing commitment.

Therefore, sexual orientation is not merely a personal characteristic within an individual. Rather, one’s sexual orientation defines the group of people in which one is likely to find the satisfying and fulfilling romantic relationships that are an essential component of personal identity for many people.

* This page focuses on sexual orientation. Answers to your questions about transgender individuals and gender identity addresses gender identity.

How do people know if they are lesbian, gay, or bisexual?


According to current scientific and professional understanding, the core attractions that form the basis for adult sexual orientation typically emerge between middle childhood and early adolescence. These patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction may arise without any prior sexual experience. People can be celibate and still know their sexual orientation—be it lesbian, gay, bisexual, or heterosexual.

Different lesbian, gay, and bisexual people have very different experiences regarding their sexual orientation. Some people know that they are lesbian, gay, or bisexual for a long time before they actually pursue relationships with other people. Some people engage in sexual activity (with same-sex and/or other-sex partners) before assigning a clear label to their sexual orientation. Prejudice and discrimination make it difficult for many people to come to terms with their sexual orientation identities, so claiming a lesbian, gay, or bisexual identity may be a slow process.

What causes a person to have a particular sexual orientation?


There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation.

What role do prejudice and discrimination play in the lives of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people?


Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in the United States encounter extensive prejudice, discrimination, and violence because of their sexual orientation. Intense prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people was widespread throughout much of the 20th century. Public opinion studies over the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s routinely showed that, among large segments of the public, lesbian, gay, and bisexual people were the target of strongly held negative attitudes. More recently, public opinion has increasingly opposed sexual orientation discrimination, but expressions of hostility toward lesbians and gay men remain common in contemporary American society. Prejudice against bisexual people appears to exist at comparable levels. In fact, bisexual individuals may face discrimination from some lesbian and gay people as well as from heterosexual people.

Sexual orientation discrimination takes many forms. Severe antigay prejudice is reflected in the high rate of harassment and violence directed toward lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals in American society. Numerous surveys indicate that verbal harassment and abuse are nearly universal experiences among lesbian, gay, and bisexual people. Also, discrimination against lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in employment and housing appears to remain widespread.

The HIV/AIDS pandemic is another area in which prejudice and discrimination against lesbian, gay, and bisexual people have had negative effects. Early in the pandemic, the assumption that HIV/AIDS was a “gay disease” contributed to the delay in addressing the massive social upheaval that AIDS would generate. Gay and bisexual men have been disproportionately affected by this disease. The association of HIV/AIDS with gay and bisexual men and the inaccurate belief that some people held that all gay and bisexual men were infected served to further stigmatize lesbian, gay, and bisexual people.

What is the psychological impact of prejudice and discrimination?


Prejudice and discrimination have social and personal impact. On the social level, prejudice and discrimination against lesbian, gay, and bisexual people are reflected in the everyday stereotypes of members of these groups. These stereotypes persist even though they are not supported by evidence, and they are often used to excuse unequal treatment of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people. For example, limitations on job opportunities, parenting, and relationship recognition are often justified by stereotypic assumptions about lesbian, gay, and bisexual people.

On an individual level, such prejudice and discrimination may also have negative consequences, especially if lesbian, gay, and bisexual people attempt to conceal or deny their sexual orientation. Although many lesbians and gay men learn to cope with the social stigma against homosexuality, this pattern of prejudice can have serious negative effects on health and well-being. Individuals and groups may have the impact of stigma reduced or worsened by other characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, religion, or disability. Some lesbian, gay, and bisexual people may face less of a stigma. For others, race, sex, religion, disability, or other characteristics may exacerbate the negative impact of prejudice and discrimination.

The widespread prejudice, discrimination, and violence to which lesbians and gay men are often subjected are significant mental health concerns. Sexual prejudice, sexual orientation discrimination, and antigay violence are major sources of stress for lesbian, gay, and bisexual people. Although social support is crucial in coping with stress, antigay attitudes and discrimination may make it difficult for lesbian, gay, and bisexual people to find such support.

Is homosexuality a mental disorder?


No, lesbian, gay, and bisexual orientations are not disorders. Research has found no inherent association between any of these sexual orientations and psychopathology. Both heterosexual behavior and homosexual behavior are normal aspects of human sexuality. Both have been documented in many different cultures and historical eras. Despite the persistence of stereotypes that portray lesbian, gay, and bisexual people as disturbed, several decades of research and clinical experience have led all mainstream medical and mental health organizations in this country to conclude that these orientations represent normal forms of human experience. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual relationships are normal forms of human bonding. Therefore, these mainstream organizations long ago abandoned classifications of homosexuality as a mental disorder.

What about therapy intended to change sexual orientation from gay to straight?


All major national mental health organizations have officially expressed concerns about therapies promoted to modify sexual orientation. To date, there has been no scientifically adequate research to show that therapy aimed at changing sexual orientation (sometimes called reparative or conversion therapy) is safe or effective. Furthermore, it seems likely that the promotion of change therapies reinforces stereotypes and contributes to a negative climate for lesbian, gay, and bisexual persons. This appears to be especially likely for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals who grow up in more conservative religious settings.

Helpful responses of a therapist treating an individual who is troubled about her or his same sex attractions include helping that person actively cope with social prejudices against homosexuality, successfully resolve issues associated with and resulting from internal conflicts, and actively lead a happy and satisfying life. Mental health professional organizations call on their members to respect a person’s (patient’s) right to self-determination; be sensitive to the patient’s race, culture, ethnicity, age, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, socioeconomic status, language, and disability status when working with that patient; and eliminate biases based on these factors.

What is “coming out” and why is it important?


The phrase “coming out” is used to refer to several aspects of lesbian, gay, and bisexual persons’ experiences: self-awareness of same-sex attractions; the telling of one or a few people about these attractions; widespread disclosure of same-sex attractions; and identification with the lesbian, gay, and bisexual community. Many people hesitate to come out because of the risks of meeting prejudice and discrimination. Some choose to keep their identity a secret; some choose to come out in limited circumstances; some decide to come out in very public ways.

Coming out is often an important psychological step for lesbian, gay, and bisexual people. Research has shown that feeling positively about one’s sexual orientation and integrating it into one’s life fosters greater well-being and mental health. This integration often involves disclosing one’s identity to others; it may also entail participating in the gay community. Being able to discuss one’s sexual orientation with others also increases the availability of social support, which is crucial to mental health and psychological well-being. Like heterosexuals, lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people benefit from being able to share their lives with and receive support from family, friends, and acquaintances. Thus, it is not surprising that lesbians and gay men who feel they must conceal their sexual orientation report more frequent mental health concerns than do lesbians and gay men who are more open; they may even have more physical health problems.

What about sexual orientation and coming out during adolescence?


Adolescence is a period when people separate from their parents and families and begin to develop autonomy. Adolescence can be a period of experimentation, and many youths may question their sexual feelings. Becoming aware of sexual feelings is a normal developmental task of adolescence. Sometimes adolescents have same-sex feelings or experiences that cause confusion about their sexual orientation. This confusion appears to decline over time, with different outcomes for different individuals.

Some adolescents desire and engage in same-sex behavior but do not identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual, sometimes because of the stigma associated with a nonheterosexual orientation. Some adolescents experience continuing feelings of same-sex attraction but do not engage in any sexual activity or may engage in heterosexual behavior for varying lengths of time. Because of the stigma associated with same-sex attractions, many youths experience same-sex attraction for many years before becoming sexually active with partners of the same sex or disclosing their attractions to others.

For some young people, this process of exploring same-sex attractions leads to a lesbian, gay, or bisexual identity. For some, acknowledging this identity can bring an end to confusion. When these young people receive the support of parents and others, they are often able to live satisfying and healthy lives and move through the usual process of adolescent development. The younger a person is when they acknowledge a nonheterosexual identity, the fewer internal and external resources they are likely to have. Therefore, youths who come out early are particularly in need of support from parents and others.

Young people who identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual may be more likely to face certain problems, including being bullied and having negative experiences in school. These experiences are associated with negative outcomes, such as suicidal thoughts and high risk activities, such as unprotected sex and alcohol and drug use. On the other hand, many lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths appear to experience no greater level of health or mental health risks. Where problems occur, they are closely associated with experiences of bias and discrimination in their environments. Support from important people in the teen’s life can provide a very helpful counterpart to bias and discrimination.

Support in the family, at school, and in the broader society helps to reduce risk and encourage healthy development. Youth need caring and support, appropriately high expectations, and the encouragement to participate actively with peers. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth who do well despite stress—like all adolescents who do well despite stress—tend to be those who are socially competent, who have good problem-solving skills, who have a sense of autonomy and purpose, and who look forward to the future.

In a related vein, some young people are presumed to be lesbian, gay, or bisexual because they don’t abide by traditional gender roles (i.e., the cultural beliefs about what is appropriate “masculine” and “feminine” appearance and behavior). Whether these youths identify as heterosexual or as lesbian, gay, or bisexual, they encounter prejudice and discrimination based on the presumption that they are lesbian, gay, or bisexual. The best support for these young people is school and social climates that do not tolerate discriminatory language and behavior.

At what age should lesbian, gay, or bisexual youths come out?


There is no simple or absolute answer to this question. The risks and benefits of coming out are different for youths in different circumstances. Some young people live in families where support for their sexual orientation is clear and stable; these youths may encounter less risk in coming out, even at a young age. Young people who live in less supportive families may face more risks in coming out. All young people who come out may experience bias, discrimination, or even violence in their schools, social groups, work places, and faith communities. Supportive families, friends, and schools are important buffers against the negative impacts of these experiences.

What is the nature of same-sex relationships?


Research indicates that many lesbians and gay men want and have committed relationships. For example, survey data indicate that between 40% and 60% of gay men and between 45% and 80% of lesbians are currently involved in a romantic relationship. Further, data from the 2000 U.S. Census indicate that of the 5.5 million couples who were living together but not married, about 1 in 9 (594,391) had partners of the same sex. Although the census data are almost certainly an underestimate of the actual number of cohabiting same-sex couples, they indicate that there are 301,026 male same-sex households and 293,365 female same-sex households in the United States.

Stereotypes about lesbian, gay, and bisexual people have persisted, even though studies have found them to be misleading. For instance, one stereotype is that the relationships of lesbians and gay men are dysfunctional and unhappy. However, studies have found same-sex and heterosexual couples to be equivalent to each other on measures of relationship satisfaction and commitment.

A second stereotype is that the relationships of lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people are unstable. However, despite social hostility toward same-sex relationships, research shows that many lesbians and gay men form durable relationships. For example, survey data indicate that between 18% and 28% of gay couples and between 8% and 21% of lesbian couples have lived together 10 or more years. It is also reasonable to suggest that the stability of same-sex couples might be enhanced if partners from same-sex couples enjoyed the same levels of support and recognition for their relationships as heterosexual couples do (i.e., legal rights and responsibilities associated with marriage).

A third common misconception is that the goals and values of lesbian and gay couples are different from those of heterosexual couples. In fact, research has found that the factors that influence relationship satisfaction, commitment, and stability are remarkably similar for both same-sex cohabiting couples and heterosexual married couples.

Far less research is available on the relationship experiences of people who identify as bisexual. If these individuals are in a same-sex relationship, they are likely to face the same prejudice and discrimination that members of lesbian and gay couples face. If they are in a heterosexual relationship, their experiences may be quite similar to those of people who identify as heterosexual unless they choose to come out as bisexual; in that case, they will likely face some of the same prejudice and discrimination that lesbian and gay individuals encounter.

Can lesbians and gay men be good parents?


Many lesbians and gay men are parents; others wish to be parents. In the 2000 U.S. Census, 33% of female same-sex couple households and 22% of male same-sex couple households reported at least one child under the age of 18 living in the home. Although comparable data are not available, many single lesbians and gay men are also parents, and many same-sex couples are part-time parents to children whose primary residence is elsewhere.

As the social visibility and legal status of lesbian and gay parents have increased, some people have raised concerns about the well-being of children in these families. Most of these questions are based on negative stereotypes about lesbians and gay men. The majority of research on this topic asks whether children raised by lesbian and gay parents are at a disadvantage when compared to children raised by heterosexual parents. These are the most common questions and answers:Do children of lesbian and gay parents have more problems with sexual identity than do children of heterosexual parents?
For instance, do these children develop problems in gender identity and/or in gender role behavior? The answer from research is clear: sexual and gender identities (including gender identity, gender-role behavior, and sexual orientation) develop in much the same way among children of lesbian mothers as they do among children of heterosexual parents. Few studies are available regarding children of gay fathers.
Do children raised by lesbian or gay parents have problems in personal development in areas other than sexual identity?
For example, are the children of lesbian or gay parents more vulnerable to mental breakdown, do they have more behavior problems, or are they less psychologically healthy than other children? Again, studies of personality, self-concept, and behavior problems show few differences between children of lesbian mothers and children of heterosexual parents. Few studies are available regarding children of gay fathers.
Are children of lesbian and gay parents likely to have problems with social relationships?
For example, will they be teased or otherwise mistreated by their peers? Once more, evidence indicates that children of lesbian and gay parents have normal social relationships with their peers and adults. The picture that emerges from this research shows that children of gay and lesbian parents enjoy a social life that is typical of their age group in terms of involvement with peers, parents, family members, and friends.
Are these children more likely to be sexually abused by a parent or by a parent's friends or acquaintances?
There is no scientific support for fears about children of lesbian or gay parents being sexually abused by their parents or their parents’ gay, lesbian, or bisexual friends or acquaintances.

In summary, social science has shown that the concerns often raised about children of lesbian and gay parents, concerns that are generally grounded in prejudice against and stereotypes about gay people, are unfounded. Overall, the research indicates that the children of lesbian and gay parents do not differ markedly from the children of heterosexual parents in their development, adjustment, or overall well-being.

What can people do to diminish prejudice and discrimination against lesbian, gay, and bisexual people?


Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people who want to help reduce prejudice and discrimination can be open about their sexual orientation, even as they take necessary precautions to be as safe as possible. They can examine their own belief systems for the presence of antigay stereotypes. They can make use of the lesbian, gay, and bisexual community, as well as supportive heterosexual people, for support.

Heterosexual people who wish to help reduce prejudice and discrimination can examine their own response to antigay stereotypes and prejudice. They can make a point of coming to know lesbian, gay, and bisexual people, and they can work with lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals and communities to combat prejudice and discrimination. Heterosexual individuals are often in a good position to ask other heterosexual people to consider the prejudicial or discriminatory nature of their beliefs and actions. Heterosexual allies can encourage nondiscrimination policies that include sexual orientation. They can work to make coming out safe. When lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people feel free to make public their sexual orientation, heterosexuals are given an opportunity to have personal contact with openly gay people and to perceive them as individuals.

Studies of prejudice, including prejudice against gay people, consistently show that prejudice declines when members of the majority group interact with members of a minority group. In keeping with this general pattern, one of the most powerful influences on heterosexuals’ acceptance of gay people is having personal contact with an openly gay person. Antigay attitudes are far less common among members of the population who have a close friend or family member who is lesbian or gay, especially if the gay person has directly come out to the heterosexual person.

Where can I find more information about homosexuality?


American Psychological Association
Office on Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
750 First Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20002
Website
Email

Mental Health America (formerly the National Mental Health Association)
2000 N. Beauregard Street, 6th Floor
Alexandria, VA 22311
Main Switchboard: (703) 684-7722
Toll-free: (800) 969-6MHA (6642)
TTY: (800) 433-5959
Fax: (703) 684-5968
Website

American Academy of Pediatrics
Division of Child and Adolescent Health
141 Northwest Point Boulevard
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007
Office: (847) 228-5005
Fax: (847) 228-5097
Website

Suggested bibliographic citation


American Psychological Association. (2008, October 29). Understanding sexual orientation and homosexuality. https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/orientation

Other versions


Pamphlets in English and Spanish may be purchased in bundles of 25 for $4.00 plus shipping by calling (800) 374-2721 or by email (the others are only available electronically at this time).


This material may be reproduced and distributed in whole or in part without permission provided that the reproduced content includes the original bibliographic citation and the following statement is included: Copyright © 2008 American Psychological Association