Showing posts with label "centering prayer". Show all posts
Showing posts with label "centering prayer". Show all posts

2022/06/14

Contemplative Practices in Action 5] Centering Prayer: A Method of Christian Meditation for Our Time


 5] Centering Prayer: A Method of Christian Meditation for Our Time  


Jane K. Ferguson


Thousands of people from a variety of backgrounds and ethnicities are gradually becoming aware of the Christian tradition of contem- plative prayer as a quieting practice in a fast-paced world. Having been exposed in the 1960s and 1970s to the value of meditation from Eastern religious practices, a steadily growing number of Christians are often surprised to learn that a meditation practice exists in their own faith tradition, based on the classical mystical theology of the church.1

This chapter focuses on a contemporary form of contemplative prayer known as Centering Prayer, which is based on the ancient Christian tradition of resting in God. The chapter explores the reli- gious context in which Centering Prayer arose, its historical roots in early Christianity, the method of the prayer, and its distinctive qual- ities and accompanying practices. Emerging empirical research about the spiritual and health effects of Centering Prayer is highlighted, including a study in progress on Centering Prayer’s effects on the brain’s neural networks and a published account of the prayer’s impact on stress. Everyday applications of Centering Prayer are reviewed within a variety of settings, from churches to prisons, hospitals to


Sections of Chapter 5 are reprinted with kind  permission  from  Springer  Science+Business Media:  Pastoral  Psychology,  “Centering  Prayer  as  a  Healing  Response  to  Everyday  Stress: A Psychological and Spiritual  Process,” June 9, 2009, Jane K. Ferguson, Eleanor W. Willemsen, and MayLynn V. Castaneto. Copyright (c) Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009.

 

psychotherapy sessions, and 12-step recovery workshops to college classrooms. Cross-cultural considerations of the practice in different settings also are touched upon.

Of course Centering Prayer is not the only form of Christian meditation. Modern teachers and authors who have helped advance understanding of a practical method to access the Christian mystical path are Benedictine monks and priests John Main and Laurence Freeman of the World Community for Christian Meditation, as well as Episcopal priest Tilden Edwards and psychiatrist and spiritual director Gerald May of the Shalem Institute. The contemplative prac- tice of the Jesus Prayer that grew out of Eastern Christianity in the early sixth century endures today. This chapter focuses on Centering Prayer because of my own familiarity with it as a trained presenter and my personal daily prayer practice the past nine years. I helped establish two Centering Prayer groups in my professional ministry at St. Mary Parish in Los Gatos, California, and conducted a doctoral study on the prayer’s spiritual and health effects in the lives of parishioners, discussed below.



RELIGIOUS CONTEXT


Centering Prayer’s emphasis on a personal relationship with God distinguishes it from some Eastern approaches to meditation that seek still-mind or observation of the present moment. While acknowl- edging this distinction, the terms contemplative prayer and meditation are used interchangeably in this chapter to recognize their similarity as a quieting practice.

Importantly, the Centering Prayer movement encourages dia- logue with the contemplative dimension of other religions and sacred traditions. In this climate, Centering Prayer developed in the mid- 1970s when Fr. Thomas Keating, then abbot of St. Joseph’s Abbey in Spencer, Massachusetts, became engaged in interreligious dialogue with Buddhist and Hindu teachers and their students. What impressed Keating during these dialogues was a psycho-spiritual wisdom presented in Buddhist meditative disciplines that was not as readily available in the Christian contemplative framework in the same detailed and prac- tical way.2 Keating believed that he and his fellow Trappist monks, Basil Pennington and William Menninger, might be able  to  distill the essence of the Christian contemplative tradition into an accessible method, too, based on the Egyptian Desert experience that was the

 

basis of St. Benedict’s Rule. They were responding to Pope Paul VI’s request of monastics to share the contemplative life with the laity to encourage the spirit of church renewal promoted by Vatican II.

The method became known as Centering Prayer to reflect the classical contemplative experience of interior silence described in the sixteenth century by St. John of the Cross: “We are attracted to God as to our center, like a stone toward the center of the earth.”3 When through ongoing surrender to God we reach the very core of our being, there remains one more center that is deeper and greater than us, Keating adds. “This center is the Trinity, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, who dwells at the inmost center of our being. It is out of that Presence that our whole being emerges at every moment.”4

An estimated 150,000 people are now practicing Centering Prayer individually and in hundreds of small prayer groups throughout the United States and in 39 countries in Latin America, Africa, the Asia Pacific, Europe, and the Middle East. Keating’s books have been translated from English into French, Korean, Spanish, Croatian, Czech, and Polish. The Centering Prayer movement has grown largely through the grassroots efforts of laity and religious who are affiliated with Contemplative Outreach, the nonprofit organization Keating founded in 1984 to support the growing ecumenical base of practi- tioners from mainstream denominations, principally Roman Catholic, Episcopalian, Methodist, and Presbyterian. Centering Prayer introduc- tory workshops are being offered on the Internet internationally, and Fr. Keating can be found on YouTube teaching the method of Center- ing Prayer.

While interest and practice of Centering Prayer is steadily growing, it generally is perceived as a peripheral practice within mainstream Christianity today, even though contemplative prayer was commonly practiced by devout lay men and women, as well as clergy, during the first 16 centuries of the church. Today’s ordained clergy and their congregants generally have not been introduced to the Christian con- templative prayer tradition in seminaries and churches, and so it is not well understood. Some fundamentalist sectors remain to be con- vinced that Centering Prayer is authentically Christian, viewing it as a New Age knock-off of Eastern meditation practices. Yet it is a rich and living vein of the Christian experience. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, for example, likens contemplative prayer to entering into the Eucharistic liturgy to abide in the dwelling place of the Lord: “We let our masks fall and turn our hearts back to the Lord who loves us, so as to hand ourselves over to him as an offering to be purified

 

and transformed. .. . Contemplative prayer is silence, or  ‘silent love.’ ”5 Rev. Cynthia Bourgeault, PhD, an Episcopal priest, author, and teacher of contemplative prayer, sees theological congruence between Centering Prayer and the biblical concept of kenosis (Greek for “to let go” or “to empty oneself”), which describes the very nature of Christ, who emptied himself to become human, and again in the Garden of Gethsemane turned his will over to God. This is the ges- ture of Centering Prayer: “It’s a surrender method, pure and simple, a practice based entirely on the prompt letting go of thoughts as they arise. I often think of it as kenosis in meditation form, a way of patterning into our being that continuously repeated gesture of, ‘let go,’ ‘let go,’ ‘let go,’ at the core of the path that Jesus himself walked.”6


HISTORICAL ROOTS OF CENTERING PRAYER


The biblical basis of Centering Prayer is Jesus’s intimate experience of God as Abba (Mark 14:36), his teaching of the prayer in secret (Matthew 6:6), and the final discourse of the Gospel of John describ- ing the divine indwelling (John 17:21–23a). Centering Prayer also is rooted in the spirituality expressed in the third and fourth centuries by the Desert Fathers and Mothers in Egypt, Palestine, and Syria who informed mainstream Christianity. The essence of desert spirituality is expressed by the term hesychia, the Greek word for rest as well as stillness or silence in prayer. This rest, however, has little to do with the absence of conflict or pain. It is a rest in God in the midst of intense daily struggle. Desert spirituality as an effective response to the tensions of daily existence came not through escape but from cultivating an interior “peace of the heart”7 during one’s trials. This spirituality is particularly fitting for contemporary Christians who seek respite from daily turmoil because “the real desert lies within the heart.”8 Here, one learns from the Desert Mother Syncletica of Egypt (380 to ca. 460) that “it is possible to be solitary in one’s mind while living in a crowd, and it is possible for one who is a solitary to live in a crowd of personal thoughts.”9

This awareness that one’s thinking has a profound effect on the body, mind, and soul is characteristic of the desert spirituality that was exported to Western Christendom by the desert monk John Cassian in the fifth century when he moved from Egypt to France and founded two monasteries near Marseilles. Cassian’s instructions on silent prayer, drawn from his interviews of other desert monks and chronicled in his

 

influential Conferences, focus on the prayer in secret that informs the method of Centering Prayer:

We need to be especially careful to follow the gospel precept which instructs us to go into our room and to shut the door so that we may pray to our Father. And this is how we can do it.

We pray in our room whenever we withdraw our hearts com- pletely from the tumult and the noise of our thoughts and our worries and when secretly and intimately we offer our prayers to the Lord.

We pray with the door shut when without opening our mouths and in perfect silence we offer our petitions to the One who pays no attention to words but who looks hard at our hearts. Hence, we must pray in utter silence.10


Contemplative spirituality became the norm for the devout Christian and for clergy. This slowly began to change over the centuries with a continuing shift in emphasis from the experiential to the intellectual in spirituality beginning with the rise of Scholasticism in Western Europe in the thirteenth century. With the suppression of monasteries in many European countries during the Reformation, and the Inquisition’s pros- ecution of individuals who practiced certain forms of quiet prayer that were deemed suspect by the church, contemplative prayer faded into a rarefied practice appropriate for cloistered monks well advanced on the spiritual journey but not for laity.



THE METHOD OF CENTERING PRAYER


To revive the Christian contemplative tradition within the wider church, Keating and his fellow monks developed an accessible method for modern-day seekers. The method of Centering Prayer is recom- mended for 20 minutes, two times a day to deepen one’s intimacy with God and to manifest the prayer’s healing effects in one’s life. These are the four guidelines:


1. Choose a sacred word as the symbol of your intention to consent to the presence and action of God within.

2. Sitting comfortably and with eyes closed, settle briefly and silently introduce the sacred word as the symbol of your consent to God’s presence and action within.

 

3. When engaged with your thoughts, return ever so gently to the sacred word.

4. At the end of the prayer period, remain in silence with eyes closed for a couple of minutes.


Guideline 1. The sacred word is a one- or –two-syllable word selected beforehand. It may be a word of scripture, like “Jesus,” “Peace,” “Abba,” “Mary,” “Shalom,” or some other word that is meaningful but does not stimulate thought—for example, “let go,” “calm,” or “be.” The sacred word is “sacred” not because of its meaning but because it sym- bolizes one’s intention to consent to God’s presence and action within.11 Generally, one does not change the sacred word after it has been chosen because with use over time it becomes infused in the depths of one’s being, leading one to enter more willingly into contemplative prayer.

Guideline 2. The posture is relaxed yet aware. One sits upright. The eyes are closed to reduce external stimulation. The basic disposition is receptive and diffuse. One silently introduces the sacred word, without using the lips or vocal cords. “The sacred word comes from the heart and reverberates in the imagination only momentarily.”12 The method of Centering Prayer is not a technique that can be used to automatically produce either a relaxation response or a mystical experience. Instead, it is both a method and a form of prayer in itself to help dispose the prac- titioner to receive the divine gift of contemplation by quieting the mind through the use of a sacred word.

Guideline 3. Thoughts refer to any perception. This might be a feeling, sensation, emotion, image, memory, reflection, concept, com- mentary, or even spiritual experience. When one becomes aware of “engaging,” that is to say, becoming overly interested in, any kind of thought other than the original intention to consent to God, one renews the intention by returning to the sacred word ever so gently. The loving attitude toward oneself in this prayer is based on advice given to spiritual seekers 400 years ago by St. Francis de Sales: “Act with great patience and gentleness toward ourselves. We must not be annoyed by distrac-

tions or our failures but start over without further ado.”13

Guideline 4. The additional two minutes serve as a bridge to ease back into ordinary awareness and sustain the effects of silence into the day.14

For those interested in exploring the method more deeply, read Keating’s Open Mind, Open Heart and Bourgeault’s Centering Prayer and Inner Awakening (referenced).

 

THREE DISTINGUISHING FEATURES


1. Centering Prayer is often called a prayer of intention rather than attention, making it a receptive as opposed to a concentra- tive form of meditation. The only “action” on the part of the practitioner is to consent to one’s intention to open to God by returning to the sacred word as necessary. The sacred word does not function as a mantra in that it is not constantly repeated or used to focus one’s attention. Instead, it is introduced only on those occasions when one is “engaged” in thoughts. Otherwise, one simply lets the thoughts drift by as one continues to rest in God.

2. Centering Prayer is an apophatic (Greek for negative), as opposed to cataphatic (positive) form of prayer within the two classic streams of Christian theology. Cataphatic prayer is positive because it is everything that can be said or imagined of God, typical of the prayers recited in church. Apophatic prayer, by contrast, is a prayer of “no-thinking,” that is, without images or ideas of  any kind,  asserting  the  ultimate incomprehensibility of God, the mystery of mysteries whom we meet in a cloud of unknowing like Moses did on Mount Sinai. Though distinct, cataphatic and apophatic forms of prayer are profoundly comple- mentary. Centering Prayer, for example, can enhance one’s expe- rience of spoken prayer and overall faith commitment.

3. Keating has developed a conceptual framework of Centering Prayer called the divine therapy to offer an understanding of the classical spiritual path of purification that is accessible to today’s laity. He uses the jargon of popular psychology to unpack the spiritual insights of Thomas  Aquinas,  Teresa  of  Avila,  and St. John of the Cross in light of the modern theory of the uncon- scious and developmental psychology. This has helped many people incorporate the Christian spiritual tradition more easily into their twenty-first-century lives.


Thus, while Centering Prayer may promote deep relaxation as a side effect it does not stop there: the deep rest one experiences in the prayer encourages the healing of an individual’s emotional wounds of a lifetime through the purification of the unconscious. This process of purification is itself prayer, “not a preparation for the (divine) rela- tionship but the relationship itself,”15 leading to one’s true self in

 

God, as St. Paul describes, “It is no longer I who live but it is Christ who lives in me” (Galatians 2:20).

Those interested in a more extensive presentation of the divine therapy may reference Keating’s Intimacy with God as well as a lecture he delivered at Harvard Divinity School on The Human Condition: Contemplation and Transformation.16 As an individual progresses in a regular practice of Centering Prayer, both psychotherapy and spiritual direction may be supportive adjuncts in helping to integrate this transformational process. While Centering Prayer does not appeal to everyone because of its radically receptive method it is available to all who are attracted to it.


ACCOMPANYING PRACTICES


The positive effects of Centering Prayer are to be found not so much in the actual prayer period but rather in the transformation of one’s attitudes and behaviors in daily life. Friends and co-workers often notice these changes before the practitioner does, for example, greater peacefulness, patience, kindness, wisdom, compassion, and a desire to serve others. To help extend the effects of the prayer into daily life, several other spiritual practices have been elaborated by Contemplative Outreach to accompany a Centering Prayer practice.


1. Cultivation of Silence, Solitude, and Service

These traditional values of Christian monks are translated in practi- cal ways for lay people who live and work in the world. Silence means avoiding making a lot of noise when one is walking, sitting, or work- ing, and refraining from unnecessary chatter or gossip in order to be tranquil and open to God’s presence. Solitude is not a withdrawal from ordinary life but taking moments apart like Jesus did when he withdrew from crowds to be with God, for it is in solitude that God renews one. Contemplative service is prayer in action. It is comprised of forming an intention to be open to God’s will as the “why” of one’s activity at a business meeting, for example, teaching a class, or reach- ing out to the homeless; and paying attention to “how” one is doing the activity through listening and presence, which allows one’s rela- tionship with God to be developed at the contemplative level even as one is actively engaged.17

 

2. Lectio Divina

One of the classical sources of Centering Prayer is the monastic practice of lectio divina, Latin for “sacred reading,” characterized by four interwoven moments: lectio (reading), meditatio (reflecting), oratio (praying), contemplatio (resting). The process involves a deep listening from one’s heart to the word of God in scripture, leading to moments of simply resting in God, beyond words and thoughts.

Practitioners of Centering Prayer often use lectio divina as a way to end a prayer period. The quiet time spent in Centering Prayer pre- pares one to savor scripture, or even a poem, more deeply, either indi- vidually or in small groups. At the small prayer group at my parish, for example, we practice lectio divina for a half hour after a 20-minute Centering Prayer period. The scriptural passage is selected from the lectionary for the upcoming Sunday Gospel, linking the prayer prac- tice to participants’ overall worship life.18


3. Welcoming Prayer

The Welcoming Prayer is a nonsitting practice known as “consent on the go.” It describes a way to surrender to God in the present moment during the activity of daily life, inspired by the eighteenth-century spiritual classic, Abandonment to Divine Providence, by Jean-Pierre de Caussade. The method of the Welcoming Prayer includes noticing the feelings, emotions, thoughts, and sensations in one’s body, welcoming them, and then letting them go. Practicing the Welcoming Prayer helps a person respond instead of react to the present moment. I have found it to be useful in transforming inner turmoil to greater peace and accep- tance when I am emotionally upset. Here is the method:


Focus, feel, and sink into the feelings, emotions, thoughts, sensa- tions, and commentaries in your body.

Welcome the divine indwelling in the feelings, emotions, thoughts, commentaries or sensations in your body by saying, “Welcome, welcome, welcome.”

Let go by repeating the following sentences:

“I let go of my desire for security, approval, and control.” “I let go of my desire to change this situation or person.”

Repeat the prayer as often as you need it.

 

4. Active Prayer Sentence

The active prayer is also a nonsitting practice involving a phrase or short sentence drawn from scripture and comprised of five to nine sylla- bles, which one says aloud or silently in harmony with one’s heartbeat. Examples include, “O Lord, come to my assistance”; “Abide in my love”; “Jesus, my light and my love.” The advantage of repeating the active prayer phrase frequently during the day is that, “it eventually becomes a ‘tape’ similar to the ‘tapes’ that accompany one’s upsetting emotions. When this occurs, the aspiration has the remarkable effect of erasing the old tapes, thus providing a neutral zone in which common sense or the Spirit of God can suggest what should be done.”19


EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES


While extensive research exists on the health benefits of Eastern religious practices, only a small number of experimental studies have explored the bio-psycho-social correlates of Judeo-Christian prac- tices. Empirical research is beginning to emerge on the promising impact of Centering Prayer, exemplified in three instances:


1. The subtle but distinguishing feature of intention in Centering Prayer is being studied by Michael Spezio, a social neuroscientist at Scripps College and the California Institute of Technology. Spezio, who is also an ordained Presbyterian minister, is investi- gating the effects of Centering Prayer on the brain’s neural net- works, using magnetic resonance imaging and other methods to discover how the brain contributes to such complex activities as returning to one’s intention to be with the divine in Centering Prayer and how this compares to an attentive practice. Spezio’s hypothesis is that the brain activation in Centering Prayer is statis- tically different than an attentive practice. Experimental research is in progress.

2. A study funded by the Templeton Foundation and the Fetzer Insti- tute is investigating how involvement in spiritual practices such as Centering Prayer—and the lay communities that support them— influence people’s health, life, and well-being over a one-year period. The study, called the “Spiritual Engagement Project,” is directed by psychologists John Astin and Cassandra Vieten of the Mind-Body Medicine Research Group at California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco. It involves 50 practitioners of

 

Centering Prayer, as well as 100 practitioners from two other groups, Religious Science/Science of Mind, and Contemplative Non-Dual Inquiry.

3. A published study based on a doctoral dissertation by this author, in collaboration with Eleanor Willemsen, PhD, professor of psy- chology and advanced statistics at Santa  Clara University,  and May Lynn Castan˜ eto, a PhD candidate in psychology at Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, reports the impact on Catholic parishioners (n = 15) of a three-month program focused on Cen- tering Prayer.20 The study explores the  connection  between health, stress, and the unconscious  using Keating’s paradigm of the purification of the unconscious and psychologist Richard Lazarus’s theory of stress.  It hypothesizes that a  regular practice of resting in the arms of a loving God may inspire an unburdening of emotional wounds from the past, which in turn may lower a per- son’s susceptibility to stress.


To test this hypothesis, participants received guidance in twice-daily Centering Prayer. The project used quantitative and qualitative mea- sures to assess the prayer’s effects. The quantitative measures included Kenneth Pargament’s Relationship-With-God Coping Styles (Col- laborative, Self-Directing, Deferring). Qualitative measures involved open-ended questionnaires and observation of participants by  the author and an interdisciplinary team. A comparison group of other parishioners (n = 15) filled out pre- and postmeasures but did not have a Centering Prayer experience.

The study concludes that participants in the first three months of their introduction to a twice-daily Centering Prayer practice experienced:


(a) Change in their style of relationship to the divine as measured by an increased Collaborative Style. The Collaborative Style is based on an interactive relationship with God that is consis- tent with Centering Prayer’s theological grounding where those praying establish an increasingly intimate relationship with God. It is associated with reduced stress and the greatest overall sense of well-being among the three styles.

(b) Healing of stress through the effects of this relationship, corroborated by qualitative results indicating signs of purifica- tion of the unconscious and positive coping behavior. For example, unexpected tears emerged “all of a sudden” for one participant—“I just needed to let go and let it flow.” Several

 

participants said thoughts “came up, and were let go,” of child- hood flashbacks and of people and events that they had not entertained in years.


Participants relayed that their detachment from thoughts during the prayer period also became a habit in daily life as they disengaged from reactive patterns of behavior with their children, co-workers, and spouses. This resulted in less conflict and greater intimacy in their interactions with others, which indicates an overall reduction in stress since interpersonal relationships are a  prime  source  of  source.21 For example, one participant reported the experience of a double awareness of her outward behavior on the one hand, and her inward, observing self, on the other: “I’m not as ‘engaged’ in my children’s dramas like I used to be. I can step back more, and if I do start arguing unproductively with my kids, I can catch myself sooner, and stop.”

Many of the participants found that in letting go of their expectations for stress relief or other goals, they were better able to relax by surren- dering to God, which brought them rewards beyond their expectations. This included a desire for a relationship with God in and of itself.


APPLICATIONS


It is primarily laity who practice the prayer and have found ways to share it in a variety of settings as church members and as psychothera- pists; volunteers in prisons and 12-step recovery workshops; health professionals in hospitals and educators in high schools, universities, and seminaries. Here are some examples:


TEACHING MODEL IN A UNIVERSITY CLASSROOM


Vincent Pizzuto, PhD, professor of theology and religious studies at the Jesuit University of San Francisco, teaches Centering Prayer in his semester-long course, “Mystery of God.” The course involves thirteen three-and-a-half-hour sessions that revolve around the theology of Keating with references to his inspiration from the scriptural and tradi- tional roots of Christian mysticism. Each class opens with a 10-minute Centering Prayer group practice. This is followed by lecture and dia- logue on required readings that include Keating’s books and texts by other authors such as Martin Laird’s Into the Silent Land and selections from Harvey  Eagan’s Anthology of Christian Mysticism. A series of

 

20-minute DVDs featuring interviews with Thomas Keating sets the weekly class themes of Centering Prayer, the human condition, the pur- suit of happiness, sin, suffering, redemption, Trinitarian love, divine indwelling, and divine transformation. The course also invites students to attend a day-long field trip in nearby Marin County to hike in meditative silence on nature trails leading to a mountaintop. The point of the trip is to get students away from cell phones and text messaging in order to experience nature as a sacred place to encounter the divine. Grading is based on class participation (40%), written critical reflec- tions on all of the readings (50%), and a final exam (10%) in which stu- dents are observed practicing Centering Prayer for 15 minutes in order to demonstrate their “skill set” of being able to quiet the body, mind, and emotions—to “be” instead of “do.” Students especially appreciated integrating Centering Prayer meditation into the classroom experience because it helped them experience the theological concepts and ideas that they were studying, and appropriate the course material on a deeper

level contributing to their own personal development and learning.


CENTERING PRAYER SUPPORT GROUPS


There are Centering Prayer groups worldwide to support individ- uals in the daily practice of the prayer. Most of them meet in churches, generally for an hour a week, but Centering Prayer groups also gather in prisons, hospitals, and other locations. Typically, groups range from 6 to 12 participants, with chairs arranged in a circle in a quiet place. Formats include a 20-minute period of Centering Prayer followed by either lectio divina (described above) or a walking meditation in which participants walk slowly and mindfully before returning to a second Centering Prayer period.


IN A PRISON


Prison outreach has been integral to the Centering Prayer movement for decades, currently involving 187 volunteers who teach contemplative prayer to inmates in 69 state, county, and federal prisons across the United States. Reduced recidivism and a lessening of violent behavior among inmates who practice Centering Prayer has been observed by prison staff, but firm statistics have not been compiled to corroborate this. Savario Mungo began volunteering in prisons after his retirement as a college professor. He now leads a Centering Prayer group attended

 

by 180 inmates of different ethnicities and religious backgrounds who gather each week and sit together in silence in the gym at the McConnell Prison Unit in Beeville, Texas: “It’s amazing how they respond to silence because it gets them away from the chaos. This is a private prayer they can do on their own.” Prisoners themselves have written about the inner freedom and healing they have found through a Centering Prayer practice.


IN A HOSPITAL


At Santa Fe’s Christus Saint Vincent Regional Medical Center, hospital chaplain Susan Rush leads a weekly Centering Prayer group on Wednesday evenings for patients, their caregivers, hospital staff, and the wider community.  Participants have found  the practice to be restorative on all levels in a hectic medical setting. The chaplain also teachers the prayer to her hospice patients: “In Centering Prayer, we consent to God’s presence and action within. In dying, it is the same consent, the very same surrender. We do the prayer in life, we become the prayer in death.” At the final stages of death, Rush does not teach Centering Prayer to patients, but through her own practice of the prayer she is able to extend to the dying her own compassionate and contemplative presence.


AS AN ADJUNCT IN PSYCHOTHERAPY


Len Sperry, clinical professor of psychiatry and behavioral medicine at Florida Atlantic University, used Centering Prayer and other spiritual interventions in his treatment of a 45-year-old Roman Catholic woman with chronic depression and an eating disorder.22 The focus of the therapy was reducing the stressors related to the patient’s symptoms. Several spiritual disciplines were employed during the three-year psychotherapeutic treatment process, including Centering Prayer, a focusing body awareness practice, journaling, and participation in a faith community. Sperry attributes the spiritual practices to the quieting effect that helped derail his patient’s ruminative, internal mental chatter. At the beginning of therapy, the woman indicated that her image of God was, “judge and taskmaster .. . emotionally withholding, unsupportive, and critical.”23 By the end of therapy this image gradually changed to that of a “smiling, caring grandmother.”24 Her depression and eating disorder lessened considerably and she stopped taking antidepressants.

 

12-STEP RECOVERY


Contemplative Outreach offers Centering Prayer workshops for people in 12-Step Recovery groups. The 11th Step seeks “through prayer and meditation to increase our conscious contact with God.” Workshop presenters are people in recovery themselves, and their vocabulary is tailored to the culture of Alcoholics Anonymous, for example, surrendering to God as a Higher Power. The purpose is to integrate the 12 Steps with the Christian contemplative tradition of Centering Prayer in order to elaborate a journey of healing. Recom- mended further reading is Keating’s Divine Therapy and Addiction: Centering Prayer and the Twelve Steps.



CROSS-CULTURAL CONSIDERATIONS


While the method of Centering Prayer itself remains the same across cultures, it sometimes is contextualized differently depending on the country or denomination. For example, a Pentecostal pastor found that his congregation did not like the term Centering Prayer and so he renamed it “Abiding Prayer,” which they embraced. In France Center- ing Prayer is called Prier dans le Secret (Prayer in Secret).

The choice of language in conveying the theology of the prayer can be crucial in making it “tasty” enough to try, observes Hee-Soon Kwon, professor of pastoral care and counseling at the Methodist Theo- logical University in Seoul, Korea, where Kwon has offered Centering Prayer to seminary students and the wider community. Kwon consid- ered the first Korean translation of Open Mind, Open Heart to be abrasive to some South Korean Protestants because of its Catholic terminology. So she translated a second version with a Protestant sensibility. For example in South Korea, the Catholic name for God is “God in Heaven” (Hanunim), while the Protestant name is “Only One God” (Hananim).

At a workshop in the Philippines, Fr. Carl Arico, cofounder of Contemplative Outreach, remembers needing to use the affective practice of lectio divina first in order to engage participants in Centering Prayer; whereas in Great Britain, his audience preferred a more intel- lectual theological discussion of the prayer’s value before they warmed up to the prayer.

One has to be open-minded in teaching the prayer in order to meet people where they are, concludes Isabel Castellanos of Exten- sio´ n  Contemplativa  Internacional,  the  Spanish-speaking  arm  of

 

Contemplative Outreach. Latin America has a strong charismatic move- ment and sometimes people come to the Centering Prayer workshops looking for experiences when they begin the prayer: “ ‘I see these clouds and angels,’ they say. ‘Well if you see clouds and angels, you let them go and return to the sacred word,’ ” Isabel responds. “ ‘What?!’ ” partic- ipants incredulously ask. “Yes,” Isabel replies, ever so gently.


CONCLUSION


Centering Prayer is a form of Christian meditation that provides a practical way to rest in God in a hectic world and offers a psycho- spiritual healing paradigm that has been embraced by thousands of individuals from a variety of backgrounds, ethnicities, denominations, and countries. Centering Prayer’s ancient biblical and theological sources prove it to be an integral Christian practice that is easily acces- sible using four guidelines, with recommended accompanying daily practices. Promising empirical research into the prayer’s beneficial bio-psycho-spiritual effects include its healing impact on stress. The relevance of Centering Prayer to today’s world is shown in examples of its applications inside the church setting and outside in a university classroom, psychotherapeutic treatment plan, prison, hospital, and 12-Step recovery workshop.

The cross-cultural aspects of this prayer, while lightly touched upon in this chapter, open a vista to research that remains to be done in this area, for example, looking at the importance of cultural context in the appeal of beginning and sustaining a contemplative prayer practice. Another promising area is exploration of the similarities of the theologies that undergird the meditation practices of different mystical traditions, for example the emptying practices in Buddhist

S´ u¯ nyata¯, Jewish Ayin, and Christian Kenosis.25 What implications does

a shared experience of silence through different meditation methods have in healing a world broken by wars and theologies?


REFERENCES


1. For a scholarly treatment of the ancient origins of Christian mysticism, see McGinn, B. (2007). The foundations of Christian mysticism: Vol. 1. The presence of God: A history of Western Christian mysticism. New York: Crossroad. For a pas- toral treatment of the subject, see Arico, C. (1999). A taste of silence: A guide to the fundamentals of centering prayer. New York: Continuum.

 

2. Miles-Yepez, N. (Ed.) (2005). The common heart: An experience of interre- ligious dialogue (p. 41). New York: Lantern Books.

3. Kavanaugh, K., & Rodriguez, O. (Trans.) (1991). The collected works of St. John of the Cross (p. 645). Washington, DC: Institute of Carmelite Studies.

4. Keating, T. (1981). The heart of the world: An introduction to contemplative Christianity (p. 233). New York: Crossroad.

5. Catechism of the Catholic Church. (1997). 2nd ed. (pp. 651–652). United States Catholic Conference. Washington, DC: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

6. Bourgeault, C. (2008). The wisdom Jesus: Transforming heart and mind— a new perspective on Christ and His Message (p. 142). Boston: Shambhala.

7. Wong, J. (2005). The Jesus Prayer and inner stillness. Religion East and West, 5, 86.

8. Ibid., 88.

9. Swan, L. (2001). The forgotten desert mothers: Sayings, lives, and stories of early Christian women (p. 58). New York: Paulist Press.

10. Cassian, J. (1985). Conferences (pp. 123–124). C. Luibheid, Trans. New York: Paulist Press.

11. Keating, T. (1986). Open mind, open heart: The contemplative dimension of the Gospel (p. 43). New York: Continuum.

12. Keating, T. (1994). Intimacy with God (p. 68). New York: Crossroad.

13. Keating, T. (2008). A traditional blend. In Spirituality, contemplation, & transformation: Writings on centering prayer (p. 5). New York: Lantern Books.

14. Keating, T. (n.d.). The method of centering prayer: The prayer of consent. [Brochure]. Butler, NJ: Contemplative Outreach. Available online at http://www.contemplativeoutreach.org/site/PageServer?pagename

=about_practices_centering.

15. Bourgeault, C. (2004). Centering prayer and inner awakening (p. 94). Cambridge: Cowley.

16. Keating, T. (1999). The human condition: Contemplation and transfor- mation. The Harold M. Wit Lectures, Harvard University Divinity School. New York: Paulist Press.

17. Frenette, D. (Speaker). (n.d.). Contemplative service: Intention/ attention. In The practices that bring the fruits of centering prayer into daily life (CD recording available at http://www.contemplativeoutreach.org/site/ PageServer?pagename=store). Butler, NJ: Contemplative Outreach.

18. A brochure published by Contemplative Outreach outlining a format for both individual and group practice of lectio divina may be found online at http://www.contemplativeoutreach.org/site/PageServer?pagename

=about_practices_lectio.

19. Keating, Open mind, open heart (pp. 133–134).

20. Ferguson, J., Willemsen, E., & Castan˜ eto, May Lynn V. (2009). Centering prayer as a healing response to everyday stress: A psychological and spiritual process. Pastoral Psychology, DOI: 10.1007/s11089-009-0225-7. See also J. K. Ferguson. (2006). Centering prayer as a healing response to everyday

 

stress at a Roman Catholic parish in Silicon Valley. Unpublished doctoral disserta- tion, Pacific School of Religion, Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley.

21. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophic living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness (p. 368). New York: Dell.

22. Sperry, L. (2004). Integrative spiritually oriented psychotherapy: A case study of spiritual and psychosocial transformation. In P. Scott Richards (Ed.), Casebook for a spiritual strategy in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 141–152). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

23. Ibid., 144.

24. Ibid., 146.

25. Cynthia Bourgeault is  exploring  the  similarities  of  contemplative prayer practices from different world religions in her work at Spiritual Paths Institute in Santa Barbara, California, http://www.spiritualpaths.net/.

 

CHAPTER 6


Contemplative Practices in Action 0 Content

 0] Contents


Foreword by Huston Smith vii

Preface ix

Acknowledgments xi

Chapter 1 Introduction: Contemplative Practices in Action Thomas G. Plante, Adi Raz, and Doug Oman

PART ONE: INTEGRATED CONTEMPLATIVE PRACTICE SYSTEMS 5

Chapter 2 Similarity in Diversity? Four Shared Functions of Integrative Contemplative Practice Systems 7  Doug Oman

Chapter 3 Managing Stress Mindfully 17 Hooria Jazaieri and Shauna L. Shapiro

Chapter 4 Translating Spiritual Ideals into Daily LifeThe Eight-Point Program of Passage Meditation 35 Tim Flinders, Doug Oman, Carol Flinders, and Diane Dreher

Chapter 5 Centering Prayer: A Method of Christian Meditation for Our Time 60 Jane K. Ferguson

Chapter 6 Mantram Repetition: A “Portable Contemplative Practice” for Modern Times 78 Jill E. Bormann

PART TWO: CONTEMPLATIVE TRADITIONS 101

Chapter 7 “The Eternal Is with Me, I Shall Not Fear”: Jewish Contemplative Practices and Well-Being 103 Zari Weiss and David Levy

Chapter 8 A Comprehensive Contemplative Approach from the Islamic Tradition 122 Aisha Hamdan

Chapter 9 The Path of Yoga 143 T. Anne Richards

Chapter 10 Zen and the Transformation of Emotional and Physical Stress into Well-Being 159 Sarita Tamayo-Moraga and Darlene Cohen Roshi

PART THREE: CONTEMPLATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION: APPLICATION 181

Chapter 11 The Impact of Meditation Practices in the Daily Life of Silicon Valley Leaders 183 Andre L. Delbecq

Chapter 12 “Shaking the Blues Away”: Energizing Spiritual Practices for the Treatment of Chronic Pain 205 Amy B. Wachholtz and Michelle J. Pearce

Chapter 13 A Pilgrimage from Suffering to Solidarity: Walking the Path of Contemplative Practices 225 Gerdenio Manuel, SJ, and Martha E. Stortz

Chapter 14 Contemplative Practices in Action: Now What? 243 Thomas G. Plante and Adi Raz

Index 247

About the Editor and Contributors 257

 




Foreword


If I ask myself why it is I who has been asked to write the Foreword to this important book, I suspect that it is because it is in line with my own book, The World’s Religions, which is, like this one, ecumenically inclusive. In its 14 chapters, Contemplative Practices in Action introduces a broad array of contemplative practices drawn from Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. No faith or religion is accorded privileged status above others.

However, towering above the virtue (which I consider it to be) of ecumenism, is this book’s persuasive conviction that the world’s reli- gions house inexhaustible resources for transforming and augmenting the human spirit, a conviction with which I concur.

There is another and somewhat more personal connection, however, which has to do with the fact that the Eight-Point Program of Passage Meditation developed by the late Eknath Easwaran figures importantly in several chapters of Contemplative Practices in Action. Easwaran was a professor of English from Kerala, in South India, who came to this country on a Fulbright fellowship in 1959  and became  a widely read and deeply respected teacher of meditation who lived out his days in an ashram in Northern  California.  I  had  the  privilege  of  meeting him more than once and held him in high regard.

On several occasions, friends drove me to Easwaran’s ashram to participate in the evening gatherings of the community that sprang up around him. After supper, residents would join their teacher to lis- ten to his short homilies, ask questions about their spiritual practice, or simply sit quietly in the community’s soothing, collective peace. Those evenings made me think of Mahatma Gandhi’s ashram, where, after their simple suppers, villagers would gather around their leader for brief prayer meetings. Gandhi always made sure those services included prayers and scriptural readings from all the great religious traditions, and so did Easwaran.

That is half of the story, and the book in hand tells the other half. Contemplative evenings with a great spiritual teacher are not ends in themselves. It would not be amiss to think of them as times when com- municants recharge their batteries for the next day’s work. The title of this book, Contemplative Practices in Action, splices the two halves together. Like Gandhi, like the Buddha, like all great spiritual teach- ers, Easwaran had no use for beliefs unless they generated actions. Doing, not saying, is what counts.

Welcome to this book, which ought not to leave any serious reader unchanged.

Huston Smith Berkeley, California

January 2010

 ===

Goodreads Reviews:


Apr 08, 2012Jill rated it really liked it

Picked this up in the recommended book section of the library. An excellent exploratory book for anyone as new to comparative religion as I am. And this book is helpful because it gives you action points, ways of practicing mindfulness, for example, instead of just barking religious dogma at you. I imagine this would be a useful book to have around if you're looking to change your life in a positive way. Suggestion: I found it best to skip around to chapters that grabbed my attention rather than reading it beginning to end.


"According to Buddhist psychology, suffering comes from our wanting things to be different from what they really are, whether that is wishing for another job, for more money, for a different appearance, or even to be happier...Though we are presenting mindfulness meditation here as a means of stress management, it is important to note that in Buddhism, the intention of mindfulness training is not for "stress management" but to achieve complete liberation from suffering and compassion for all beings."


On Observing the Breath: "Some find it helpful to set an intention before beginning this sitting exercise by silently speaking something that resonates for them in the moment. "May I be nonjudgmental," or "May I be gentle with myself" are examples of such intentions."


Mindful Eating: "First, simply observe how you eat, without changing anything about it. Do you eat with someone? Do you eat standing up or sitting down? Perhaps while doing something else? where do you eat--on a couch, in bed, at a table, in front of the computer? How much do you eat? How long does it take you to eat? How do you feel before and after you eat? How do you determine what to eat?"


Mindful Eating: "As a mindful eating exercise, try sitting down to a meal and pausing before you begin eating. Set an intention for this meal, for example, "May this food nourish me"; "My I be present for this meal"; "May I appreciate all that was involved in providing this meal". And it goes on to explain how to observe your eating, how you feel during and after, paying close attention to your body.


"Recent surveys show that as many as one-third of Americans place themselves in the category of "spiritual, but not religious," rejecting traditional organized religion as the sole means of furthering their spiritual growth."


Source: Rumi

Passage:

"Everything you see has its roots.

In the unseen world.

The forms may change,

Yet the essence remains the same.

Every wondrous sight will vanish,

Every sweet word will fade.

But do not be disheartened,

The source they come from is eternal."




(less)

flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review

Gloria

Apr 22, 2011Gloria rated it really liked it

Shelves: for-the-spirit

I can see this book being used as a textbook for a class on spiritual practices. It is rather dry like a textbook, but is also quite thorough in presenting viewpoints and practices among all the major faiths. Not particularly inspiring, but certainly educational. Lots of resources included.

flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review

Mila Gamaiunova

Aug 11, 2018Mila Gamaiunova rated it it was amazing

The book makes an introduction of different types of contemplative practices rooted in various traditions.












Contemplative Practices in Action 2] Similarity in Diversity? Four Shared Functions of Integrative Contemplative Practice Systems

 2] Similarity in Diversity? Four Shared Functions of Integrative Contemplative Practice Systems



Doug Oman


The reader of this volume, impressed by the rich descriptions of many diverse systems of spiritual practice, may start to wonder, “What are the shared themes? What patterns emerge amidst this inspiring profu- sion of perspectives?” In this chapter, I sketch one possible answer— one way of characterizing shared themes and functions that appear in many different systems of practice. Along the way, I propose using the term integrated contemplative practice to describe systems of practice that meet a certain functional threshold.

Four common elements or themes can be found, I suggest, in most of the practice systems described in the next eight chapters. These commonalities exist even though some chapters describe com- prehensive and clearly defined systems, whereas others present instruc- tively selected highlights from venerable traditions. More specifically, the next four chapters in Part One examine well-defined systems of interrelated practices that are challenging, but can be undertaken by individuals in their entirety. Three systems partly or wholly tran- scend individual faith traditions (e.g., Mindfulness, Passage Medita- tion, Mantram), whereas the fourth (Christian-derived Centering Prayer) arose within a particular faith tradition. In contrast, all four chapters in Part Two explore venerable schools (yoga, Zen) or major traditions ( Judaism, Islam)1 that constitute storehouses of wisdom

 

8 Contemplative Practices in Action: Spirituality, Meditation, and Health


accumulated over many centuries. Each of these schools or tradi- tions, viewed in its entirety, has accumulated a richer repertoire of techniques than any one individual can fully implement.

One shared function of many spiritual practice systems was described in the 1980s by Daniel Goleman. He surveyed more than a dozen methods of meditation, both East and West, and reported that “the need for the meditator to retrain [his or her] attention ... is the single invariant  ingredient  in  the  recipe  ... of  every  meditation  system” (p. 107).2 Indeed, it seems quite likely that almost all of the practices dis- cussed in this book, when undertaken regularly over time, will affect— and may sometimes transform—how people habitually deploy their attention. But can we identify any specific and concrete forms of resem- blance between traditions?

Several concrete resemblances can indeed be identified. Recently, my colleagues and I at the Spirituality and Health Institute (SHI) observed several elements in common between two paradigmatic sys- tems of practice.3,4 More specifically, we found four distinct functions that were each accomplished, in slightly different ways, by these two integrated contemplative practice systems: Passage Meditation (PM) (Flinders et al., this volume) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) (Jazaieri and Shapiro, this volume).

Both PM and MBSR, we noted, require setting aside time—substantial

time—approximately half an hour daily—for undertaking a powerful attention-training activity. For this purpose, PM and MBSR each use a form of sitting meditation. Similarly, PM and MBSR each recommend specific mental centering/stabilizing practices to be used throughout the day to stabilize and balance the mind in conditions of stress or boredom (PM uses mantram repetition, and MBSR uses informal mindfulness practices). These analogous elements do not perform functions that are fully identical matches—rather, to borrow a phrase from positive psychology, these analogous elements, and the precise functions they perform, may be said to share a “coherent resemblance” (p. 35).5

Table 2.1 shows that with few exceptions, variants of these four elements are prevalent not only in PM and MBSR, but in each set of contemplative practices covered in the next eight chapters. These four shared elements, or features, are as follows:


1. Set-aside time—time that is set aside regularly, usually daily, for a disciplined activity or exercise that has a comparatively

 

Similarity in Diversity? 9


powerful effect on training attention.2 Variants of sitting medi- tation are commonly used. Some systems in this book also use prescribed postures (e.g., yoga, Islam). Such attention training can support optimal performance in all spheres of life, since “attention is the first and often most effective line of defense in nearly every sphere of self-control” (p. 1172).6 Most attention training fosters concentration, and “powerful concentration amplifies the effectiveness of any kind of activity” (p. 168).2 The attention-training functions of meditation are supported by recent neuroimaging evidence.7

2. Virtues and character strengths—qualities of character and behavior, such as compassion, forgiveness, or fearlessness. In many sys- tems, such qualities are to be cultivated throughout the day by making appropriate choices in thoughts, words, and actions. Typically, the recommended qualities involve subsets of six cross-culturally prevalent classes of virtues recently identified by positive psychologists—wisdom, courage, humanity, justice, temperance, and transcendence.5

3. Practices for centering/stabilizing that are usable throughout the day— such as during occasions of stress, anxiety, or unstructured time. Examples include returning the mind to the breath (MBSR), or returning the mind to repeating a mantram or holy name.8,9 Here, the contemporary word “center” (small c) is used to designate recovery of a sense of inner strength and balance. (This contrasts with the term “Centering Prayer,” which designates a specific sys- tem of Christian-derived practices,10 described elsewhere in this volume by Ferguson.)

4. Spiritual models—attending to individuals whose behavior reflects desired spiritual qualities—provide a unique resource for spiri- tual growth. Spiritual and religious educators have long viewed spirituality as primarily “caught, not taught” (p. 149),11 since so much of human learning is social. Spiritual and religious tradi- tions, and many of the practice systems described in this book, transmit words of revered or instructive spiritual models, such as Jesus, the Buddha, Muhammad, or various sages and saints.12 Attending to spiritual models’ words and actions can motivate sustained practice, and guide or inspire implementation of other spiritual practices (e.g., #1–#3).

 





Table 2.1. Presence and Naming of Features by Contemplative Practice Type

1 2 3 4

 


Practice System

 

Set-Aside (/Dedicated) Attention Training

 

Virtuous/Mindful Attitudes

 

Centering Practice Usable Throughout Day

 

Spiritual Models/ Exemplarsa

 


 

Integrated Contemplative Practice Systems (Part One)


 

Mindfulness (/Vipassana)b

 

Sitting meditation (on breath)

 

Mindfulness attitudes Informal practices Poetry

 


 

Passage Meditationb Sitting meditation

(on a passage)

 

Put others first;

+ additional

 

Mantram repetition Passages; reading

 


 

Centering Prayer Sitting meditation

(with sacred word)

 

Implicit;c silence, solitude, service

 

Prayers: active; welcoming

 

Implicitc

 


Mantramd Focus; slow Mantram repetition


Contemplative Traditions (Part Two)


 

Judaism Sabbath;e prayer; meditation

 

Implicit;c peace, calm, equanimity

 

Repeat verse (liturgy/ scripture)

 

Implicit;c teachers/ Rebbesf

 


 

Islam Five daily prayers Many (justice, gentleness, etc.)

 

Dhikr (remembrance); supplication

 

The Prophet/aha¯dı¯th

˙

 


 

Yoga Asanas +meditation Yamas (truth, nonviolence, etc.)

 

Lineage of teacher

 


 

Zen Sitting meditation (Zazen) Brahma Viharas (compassion, etc.)

Others Combinations or Systems—Yours, Your Client’s, or Your Student’s


1. 

 

Mindfulness; letting go

 

Teaching stories; teacher

 


2. 


3. 


Note: For a fuller explanation of each practice system, see corresponding chapter in this volume; lists of practices contained in each cell may be incomplete. aThe final column describes learning from traditional or prominent models, but most systems also encourage spiritual fellowship to foster learning from positive models in the local community.

bMindfulness and Passage Meditation are the two paradigms used to develop the four categories.

c“Implicit” practice categories are typically enacted when an individual engages in traditional observance, especially communal worship. For example, Jewish and Christian services in synagogues and churches often include scripture readings about virtuous conduct and spiritual models such as Moses or Jesus. dMantram/holy name repetition as presented by Bormann lacks the full set of four elements that comprise an integral contemplative practice system, but it is extracted from such a system (Passage Meditation).

eThe Sabbath cycle is weekly (not daily).

fSee Silberman25 on Rebbes as spiritual models.

 

Figure 2.1 shows how these four elements of practice can work together in concert to foster spiritual growth and related outcomes. In every system, these elements are intended for integration into one’s daily and weekly routines of life,13 through which they may gradually transform “character, conduct and consciousness” (p. 37).14 As tools for retraining attention, they reinforce each other. They address multiple needs and opportunities that arise in the ordinary rhythms and textures of daily living. Like a well-designed course of instruction or a healthy physical exercise routine, they provide for periods of heightened intensity and immersion (#1, set-aside time), application of skills in diverse contexts (#2 character strengths and #3 centering/ stabilizing), and overall guidance and inspiration (#4 spiritual models). The model in Figure 2.1 suggests that these four elements function synergistically, by reinforcing each other. Like the nutritional contri- butions of complementary food groups,15 these four types of practice together may generate greater benefits than obtainable separately from individual practices. Of course, the model in Figure 2.1 is far from complete in representing all of the psychological and spiritual processes that operate in real time. Other factors include an



Figure 2.1. Elements Function Dynamically in Concert.


 

individual’s need for a valid and coherent worldview,16 and the influ- ence of spiritual fellowship.11,17 For this reason, forms of “spiritual shopping” (p. 126)18 that are blind, that incoherently mix and match incompatible elements from discordant practice traditions, will rarely be optimal. Spiritual benefits, one might hypothesize, are maximized when the elements interface and cohere harmoniously with each other, like pieces of a well-constructed musical instrument, or threads in a well-crafted tapestry. How to best evaluate the coherence of a set of prac- tices is, of course, a perennially controversial and important issue— and one that cannot be resolved here.

Practical applications flow from recognizing the synergistic interre- lation of elements in these four categories. For example, an individual could use the four categories as a checklist to review the complete- ness of his or her own practice, from the standpoint of the model in Figure 2.1. More broadly, the four elements might function as a checklist for a psychotherapist to help a client in reviewing his or her practice, or for an educator to lead students in reviewing or aug- menting their own practices. To distinguish it from something less complete, my SHI colleagues and I propose that a system of practices that encompasses elements from all four categories should be desig- nated an integral contemplative practice system.

In the practice systems examined in this book, centering activities (#3) are perhaps most commonly missing, or underemphasized in real-world implementations. A useful resource to redress this neglect is offered by Bormann’s chapter (this volume). She highlights mantram/holy name repetition, a cross-culturally common practice that produces centering. When sought, variations of mantram repetition can be found in many faith traditions and practice systems, including several described in this volume.

For individuals who are interested or engaged in some form of spiri- tual practice—about 80 percent of U.S. adults, according to a recent national survey (p. 79)19—the following questions may prove practically beneficial:


1. Do I currently draw spiritual support, strength, and reinforcement through engaging in practices in each of the four categories listed earlier? That is, do I enjoy the spiritual support of an integral contemplative practice?

2. If not, can I expand my practice in ways that are personally appropriate and consistent with my tradition and beliefs?

 

3. How can I extend my practice in a way that is most harmonious and complementary to my existing practices?


Such questions may also be relevant to the growing roster of for-profit and nonprofit organizations seeking to systematically integrate spir- ituality into the workplace20,21 (see also Delbecq, this volume, whose executive seminars have addressed all four elements).

Even beyond its relevance to spiritual practice, of course, many ben- efits can flow from identifying commonalities across faith traditions. Recognizing similarities may facilitate intercultural understanding, foster improved communication between human service professionals and diverse clients, and contribute to better education and health care. This chapter has described similarities in daily spiritual practices. Similarities also exist at other levels, ranging from the institutional22 to the philosophical.23 Comparatively few earlier writers, such as Walsh24 and Easwaran,14 have examined similarities in practices. Yet daily practice is at the core of applying spirituality to address real- world problems. Our analyses suggest that diverse faith traditions have recommended similarly integrated systems of contemplative practice. I encourage readers to consider how these four categories may apply to their own practices, and that of their clients, students, fellow congregants, and organizations, as well as to the practice sys- tems described in the next eight chapters in this book.


REFERENCES


1. Hamdan (this volume) describes practices from Islamic Sunni tradi- tion; also within Islam is Shia tradition, as well as Islam’s mystical side, Sufism, a phenomenon “so broad [and with] appearance so protean that nobody can venture to describe it fully” (p. 3), according to Schimmel, A. (1975). Mystical dimensions of Islam. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

2. Goleman, D. (1988). The meditative mind: The varieties of meditative experience. New York: Tarcher.

3. Oman, D., Shapiro, S. L., Thoresen, C. E., Plante, T. G., & Flinders, T. (2008). Meditation lowers stress and supports forgiveness among college students: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of American College Health, 56, 569–578.

4. Oman, D., Shapiro, S. L., Thoresen, C. E., Flinders, T., Driskill, J. D., & Plante, T. G. (2007). Learning from spiritual models and meditation: A ran- domized evaluation of a college course. Pastoral Psychology, 55, 473–493.

 

5. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC, and New York: American Psychological Association and Oxford University Press. “To say that particular virtues ... converge ... is not to argue that all their features line up perfectly, but rather that they have a coherent resemblance to one another, sharing more features than not” (p. 35).

6. Baumeister, R. F., & Exline, J. J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67, 1165–1194.

7. Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., Rawlings, N. B., Francis, A. D., Greischar, L. L., & Davidson, R. J. (2009). Mental training enhances attentional stability: Neural and behavioral evidence. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 13418–13427.

8. Oman, D., & Driskill, J. D. (2003). Holy name repetition as a spiritual exercise and therapeutic technique. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 22, 5–19.

9. Baesler, E. J. (2001). The prayer of the holy name in Eastern and Western spiritual traditions: A theoretical, cross-cultural, and intercultural prayer dialogue. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 38, 196–216.

10. The term “Centering Prayer” was adopted in the 1970s by three Trappist monks to describe a system of practices they had codified; and one of its earliest published uses was in Pennington, M. B. (1980). Centering prayer. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

11. Oman, D., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003). Spiritual modeling: A key to spiritual and religious growth? International Journal for the Psychology of Reli- gion, 13, 149–165.

12. Oman, D., & Thoresen, C. E. (2007). How does one learn to be spiri- tual? The neglected role of spiritual modeling in health. In T. G. Plante &

C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Spirit, science and health: How the spiritual mind fuels physical wellness (pp. 39–54). Westport, CT: Praeger.

13. Fiese, B. H., Tomcho, T. J., Douglas, M., Josephs, K., Poltrock, S., & Baker, T. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring fam- ily routines and rituals: Cause for celebration? Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 381–390.

14. Easwaran, E. (1978/2008). Passage meditation: Bringing the deep wisdom of the heart into daily life. Tomales, CA: Nilgiri Press (full text: http://www

.easwaran.org).

15. Robertson, L., Flinders, C., & Ruppenthal, B. (1986). The new laurel’s kitchen: A handbook for vegetarian cookery & nutrition. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.

16. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

17. Oman, D., Thoresen, C. E., Park, C. L., Shaver, P. R., Hood, R. W., & Plante, T. G. (2009). How does one become spiritual? The Spiritual Modeling Inventory of Life Environments (SMILE). Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 12, 427–456.

 

18. Wuthnow, R. (2005). America and the challenges of religious diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

19. Gallup, G., & Lindsay, D. M. (1999). Surveying the religious landscape: Trends in U.S. beliefs. Harrisburg, PA: Morehouse.

20. Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2003). Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

21. Duerr, M. (2004). The contemplative organization. Journal of Organi- zational Change Management, 17, 43–61.

22. Smart, N. (1996). Dimensions of the sacred: An anatomy of the world’s beliefs. Berkeley: University of California Press.

23. Smith, H. (1976/1992). Forgotten truth: The common vision of the world’s religions. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.

24. Walsh, R. N. (1999). Essential spirituality: The 7 central practices to awaken heart and mind. New York: Wiley.

25. Silberman, I. (2003). Spiritual role modeling: The teaching of meaning systems. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 13, 175–195.

 






CHAPTER 3


Contemplative Practices in Action 1] Introduction: Contemplative Practices in Action


 1] Introduction: Contemplative Practices in Action

Thomas G. Plante, Adi Raz, and Doug Oman



Several decades ago in his book The Meditative Mind,1 Daniel Goleman reviewed more than a dozen major Eastern and Western methods of contemplative practice, ranging from Christian hesychasm and Jewish Kaballah to  Transcendental  Meditation  and  Tibetan  Buddhism. He reported that two major approaches or strategies to meditation were incorporated: One recurrent approach was concentration, that is, focused attention on a single object, such as the breath, a mantram, or a prayer. The other recurrent approach was mindfulness (the detached observation of one’s thinking process). Sometimes concentration and mindfulness were used separately, and sometimes they were combined in various ways. Goleman argued that both mindfulness and concentra- tive meditation have been directed to a single objective, the retraining of attention, a skill that he believed “amplifies the effectiveness of any kind of activity” (p. 168). Goleman also reported that “the need for the meditator to retrain his attention, whether through concentration or mindfulness, is the single invariant ingredient in the recipe for altering consciousness of every meditation system” (p. 107). Nearly a century earlier, William James, one of the founders of modern psychology, had argued that “the faculty of voluntarily bringing back a wandering attention, over and over again, is the very root of judgment, character, and will.    An education which should improve this faculty would be

the education par excellence” (p. 424).2

 

2 Contemplative Practices in Action: Spirituality, Meditation, and Health


In modern health promotion, psychotherapy, and other human service interventions, these contemplative practices have largely been taken out of their religious and spiritual contexts and then secularized and repackaged.3,4 For example, the health and mental health care community has incorporated mindfulness meditation in recent years with numerous books, workshops, conferences, and trainings being offered. Yoga studios can be found in many strip malls, and meditation workshops are offered by human resource departments in many diverse companies.5

The currently popular mindfulness meditation approach stems from Zen Buddhism and Hindu yogic practices, and it is a common miscon- ception that only by borrowing from these Eastern traditions can one secure any benefits from contemplative practices. Many Christians and Jews, for example, who identify and engage with their religious tradi- tion, are often not aware of the long history of contemplative practices within their own faith tradition. As many in our culture have become more familiar and comfortable with the Eastern contemplative prac- tices, the Western practices have been largely ignored, even though they also often offer contemplative approaches that can provide effective stress management, well-being, and healing.6,7

All of the major religious and spiritual traditions have developed specific principles and techniques to help their members assimilate con- templative perspectives and behaviors aimed at fostering a fuller experi- ence of wisdom, wholeness, and enlightenment.1,7,8 Research studies have reported many physical and mental health benefits from regular contemplative practices, as well as confirming their stress management functions.4,5,9,10 Benson,11 for example, has documented that meditation helps to promote a “relaxation response.” He argues that when medita- tion is associated with one’s religious or spiritual convictions, it further enhances relaxation, leading to greater psychological and physical health benefits. Recent well-controlled research studies have further supported Benson’s arguments, reporting advantages for spiritually based medita- tion over otherwise nearly identical secular forms of meditation.12,13

There are a number of books available on contemplative practices. However, almost all focus on one particular religious or spiritual tradi- tion and most are practice oriented without solid research grounding. Usually, they highlight the Eastern traditions and overlook the Western ones. This is especially true among books that target the health and mental health care communities.6,7

The purpose of this book is to examine contemplative practices from a wide variety of both Eastern and Western religious and

 

Introduction: Contemplative Practices in Action 3


spiritual traditions and to examine their commonalities and unique approaches to improved well-being, health, healing, wholeness, and stress management. Chapters are written by experts in their fields, most of whom are affiliated with the Spirituality and Health Institute at Santa Clara University in Santa Clara, California. Each chapter will discuss the state-of-the-art science, practice, and general applications of contemplative practices in the professional workplace, educational settings, pastoral care, and medical, psychological, or other health care environments. This book hopes to be inclusive in coverage of contemplative practices, and integrate science and practice in a bal- anced manner and from a variety of Eastern and Western sources.

This book will discuss several different contemplative approaches to stress management and achieving well-being. Some chapters highlight approaches from Western traditions while others highlight contempla- tive approaches from Eastern traditions. Others are integrative of both Western and Eastern traditions. Some are more closely connected to religious traditions and practices while others are not. Several chapters will highlight application to business and health care as well.

Oman (Chapter 2) has pointed out that four similar functions are performed in diverse ways by elements within many of the contempla- tive systems discussed in this book. Most approaches involve setting aside time for practices that reshape and train attention; most also include elements for centering oneself throughout the day, cultivating personal character strengths, and drawing inspiration and guidance from spiritual exemplars. Oman suggests using the phrase “integrated contemplative practice system” for systems of practice that encompass all four of these elements that are highlighted in this volume.

Sadly, it is impossible to include a discussion of every contemplative practice and practice system in one book. We cannot do justice to the numerous practice systems or isolated spiritual techniques that are not represented here. For example, the role of the rosary in the Roman Catholic tradition, shamanism, and the role of chanting in Hindu Bhakti traditions are just some of the many contemplative practices that are not presented here. Rather than presenting an exhaustive review of the contemplative practices among the various religious and spiritual traditions, our hope is to provide a helpful selection by leading figures in their respective fields to assist with stress manage- ment, healing, wholeness, and well-being. The contributors met for an all-day conference with university and health care community members during October 2009. This allowed all of the authors to lis- ten to and consult with each other as well as with diverse professionals

 

4 Contemplative Practices in Action: Spirituality, Meditation, and Health


in the local San Francisco Bay Area professional community in order to hopefully create a more thoughtful, seamless, and comprehensive book project. We hope that our efforts will encourage the reader to have a better understanding and appreciation of contemplative practices in action.


REFERENCES


1. Goleman, D. (1988). The meditative mind: The variety of meditative experience. Los Angeles: Tarcher.

2. James, W. (1890/1923). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.

3. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living. New York: Delacorte Press.

4. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Research and Practice, 10, 144–156.

5. Walsh, R., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). The meeting of meditative disci- plines and Western psychology: A mutually enriching dialogue. American Psychologist, 61, 227–239.

6. Plante, T. G. (2008). What do the spiritual and religious traditions offer the practicing psychologist? Pastoral Psychology, 56, 429–444.

7. Plante, T. G. (2009). Spiritual practices in psychotherapy: Thirteen tools for enhancing psychological health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

8. Walsh, R. (1999). Essential spirituality: The seven central practices. New York: Wiley.

9. Borman, J. E., Gifford, A. L., Shively, M., Smith, T. L., Redwine, L., Kelly, A., et al. (2006). Effects of spiritual mantram repetition on HIV out- comes: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 359–376.

10. Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Cresswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211–237.

11. Benson, H. (1996). Timeless healing. New York: Scribner.

12. Wachholtz, A. B., & Pargament, K. I. (2005). Is spirituality a critical ingredient of meditation? Comparing the effects of spiritual meditation, sec- ular meditation, and relaxation on spiritual, psychological, cardiac, and pain outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28, 369–384.

13. Wachholtz, A. B., & Pargament, K. I. (2008). Migraines and meditation: Does spirituality matter? Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 351–366.

 



PART ONE

INTEGRATED CONTEMPLATIVE PRACTICE SYSTEMS




PREFACE TO PART ONE


Part One, “Integrated Contemplative Practice Systems,” focuses on systems of practice from both East and West that are well defined and sufficiently limited in scope that they can be undertaken in their entirety by a single individual. First, Oman’s short introductory chap- ter offers a conceptual analysis and overview, unique in this volume, that describes four shared elements that are present in many of these practice systems. His chapter includes a table that shows the specific names used to describe these elements in each of the additional chap- ters in this section, as well as the names used in chapters in Part Two (“Contemplative Traditions”).

Each of the remaining four chapters in this part examines a single contemplative practice system. Attention is directed in turn at Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction ( Jazaieri and Shapiro), Passage Meditation (Flinders, Oman, Flinders, and Dreher), Centering Prayer (Ferguson), and repetition of a mantram or holy name (Bormann). Most of these practices can be undertaken within any major faith tra- dition, although Centering Prayer is essentially Christian. Bormann’s mantram/holy name repetition practices were extracted from the Passage Meditation system by its developer, and contain only two of

 

6 Contemplative Practices in Action: Spirituality, Meditation, and Health


the four elements described by Oman. But as Bormann points out, the mantram/holy name is noteworthy for its portability, power, and uni- versality. It highlights powerful but oft-forgotten practices that can be found within each major faith tradition, and which can complement these traditions’ better-known elements.

 

CHAPTER 2