2021/08/02

The Politics of Climate Change eBook : Giddens, Anthony: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store

The Politics of Climate Change eBook : Giddens, Anthony: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store

The Politics of Climate Change 2nd Edition, Kindle Edition
by Anthony Giddens  (Author)  Format: Kindle Edition
4.1 out of 5 stars    36 ratings
See all formats and editions
Kindle
$20.42
Length: 281 pages Word Wise: Enabled Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
----

"A landmark study in the struggle to contain climate change, the greatest challenge of our era. I urge everyone to read it."
—Bill Clinton, 42nd President of the United States of America

Since it first appeared, this book has achieved a classic status. Reprinted many times since its publication, it remains the only work that looks in detail at the political issues posed by global warming. This new edition has been thoroughly updated and provides a state-of-the-art discussion of the most formidable challenge humanity faces this century.

If climate change goes unchecked, the consequences are likely to be catastrophic for human life on earth. Yet for most people and for many policy-makers too, it tends to be a back-of-the-mind issue. We recognize its importance and even its urgency, but for the most part it is swamped by more immediate concerns.

Political action and intervention on local, national and international levels are going to have a decisive effect on whether or not we can limit global warming as well as how we adapt to that already occurring. However, at the moment, argues Giddens, we do not have a systematic politics of climate change. Politics-as-usual won't allow us to deal with the problems we face, while the recipes of the main challenger to orthodox politics, the green movement, are flawed at source. Giddens introduces a range of new concepts and proposals to fill in the gap, and examines in depth the connections between climate change and energy security.

-----
Product description
Review
"Remarkable for its range and scope. Concise, yet comprehensive, it examines the climate problem from a variety of standpoints; historical, scientific, financial and geo-political. Always calm and reasonable in tone, Giddens resists the urge to scapegoat and condemn the most offending countries and industries."
Irish Examiner

"This timely updated reissue of Anthony Giddens' ground breaking book reminds us that the problems he discusses have not gone away."
Diplomat
Acclaim for the first edition:

"One of those rare seminal works that will likely influence policy-makers over the next several generations."
Journal of World Energy Law and Business

"Giddens' is a simple message, argued with great clarity and power, that brings a new dimension to the debate."
Book of the week in the Times Higher Education

"A very useful introduction to the issues, and crucially shifts the focus away from targets and environmentalist frames towards the substance of economic and energy security interests, technology, state intervention and the limitations of the formal international climate negotiations."
Public Policy Research

"As well as providing a useful summary of a number of current debates in climate change policy - from the robustness of carbon markets and green taxes through to the role of government in fostering new technological solutions - Giddens makes a powerful contribution to the emerging debate."
Progress

"The Politics of Climate Change stands out in the crowded terrain of climate change publications by placing politics - rather than science or economics - at the center of the analysis ... there is much to recommend this book. It is up to date, with discussions of the recent global financial crisis and the change of leadership in the US. It takes a multilevel governance perspective on climate change governance and attempts to think about how the various components relate to one another. The book is accessible for the nonspecialist, making it appropriate for use in the classroom."
Environment and Planning C

"How do you create, maintain and renew majorities that encourage people, organisations and institutions to behave responsibly and well, especially when they have become accustomed to behaving irresponsibly and badly? This key question ... underlies everything in Anthony Giddens' important new book, The Politics of Climate Change. Giddens is clear that politicians make things worse by the tactic - much used by Brown in the economic field too - of simultaneously dramatising the threat and then pretending to have the unique measure of it, as the G20 may show."
Martin Kettle, The Guardian

"In challenging the standard criteria used by policy-makers to think about climate change, and by offering an alternative set, Giddens shows how a real national and European debate can finally occupy the political foreground."
Times of Malta

"The prospect of disruptive climate change should be high on the international agenda: it raises issues of politics, economics and equity that are even more complex than the science. This balanced and comprehensive assessment by a distinguished author should be widely read by politicians and policymakers."
Martin Rees, President of the Royal Society and Master of Trinity College, Cambridge

"An incisive and highly original contribution."
Ulrich Beck, University of Munich

--This text refers to the paperback edition.
Review
"Remarkable for its range and scope. Concise, yet comprehensive, it examines the climate problem from a variety of standpoints; historical, scientific, financial and geo-political. Always calm and reasonable in tone, Giddens resists the urge to scapegoat and condemn the most offending countries and industries."
Irish Examiner

"This timely updated reissue of Anthony Giddens' ground breaking book reminds us that the problems he discusses have not gone away."
Diplomat
Acclaim for the first edition:

"One of those rare seminal works that will likely influence policy-makers over the next several generations."
Journal of World Energy Law and Business

"Giddens' is a simple message, argued with great clarity and power, that brings a new dimension to the debate."
Book of the week in the Times Higher Education

"A very useful introduction to the issues, and crucially shifts the focus away from targets and environmentalist frames towards the substance of economic and energy security interests, technology, state intervention and the limitations of the formal international climate negotiations."
Public Policy Research

"As well as providing a useful summary of a number of current debates in climate change policy - from the robustness of carbon markets and green taxes through to the role of government in fostering new technological solutions - Giddens makes a powerful contribution to the emerging debate."
Progress

"The Politics of Climate Change stands out in the crowded terrain of climate change publications by placing politics - rather than science or economics - at the center of the analysis ... there is much to recommend this book. It is up to date, with discussions of the recent global financial crisis and the change of leadership in the US. It takes a multilevel governance perspective on climate change governance and attempts to think about how the various components relate to one another. The book is accessible for the nonspecialist, making it appropriate for use in the classroom."
Environment and Planning C

"How do you create, maintain and renew majorities that encourage people, organisations and institutions to behave responsibly and well, especially when they have become accustomed to behaving irresponsibly and badly? This key question ... underlies everything in Anthony Giddens' important new book, The Politics of Climate Change. Giddens is clear that politicians make things worse by the tactic - much used by Brown in the economic field too - of simultaneously dramatising the threat and then pretending to have the unique measure of it, as the G20 may show."
Martin Kettle, The Guardian

"In challenging the standard criteria used by policy-makers to think about climate change, and by offering an alternative set, Giddens shows how a real national and European debate can finally occupy the political foreground."
Times of Malta

"The prospect of disruptive climate change should be high on the international agenda: it raises issues of politics, economics and equity that are even more complex than the science. This balanced and comprehensive assessment by a distinguished author should be widely read by politicians and policymakers."
Martin Rees, President of the Royal Society and Master of Trinity College, Cambridge

"An incisive and highly original contribution."
Ulrich Beck, University of Munich

From the Publisher
Anthony Giddens is the former director of the London School of Economics and Political Science. He is now a member of the House of Lords. His many books include The Third Way and Europe in the Global Age.
About the Author
Anthony Giddens is the former director of the London School of Economics and Political Science. He is now a member of the House of Lords. His many books include The Third Way and Europe in the Global Age. --This text refers to the paperback edition.
Read less
Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B00CIRIWIK
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Polity; 2 edition (22 April 2013)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 3605 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 281 pages
Best Sellers Rank: 1,043,952 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
916 in Environmental Policy
1,044 in Public Policy Textbooks
1,099 in Professional Environmental Science
Customer Reviews: 4.1 out of 5 stars    36 ratings

Top reviews from Australia
There are 0 reviews and 0 ratings from Australia
Top reviews from other countries
Atif Iqbal
5.0 out of 5 stars Very Good Book
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 7 March 2019
Verified Purchase
Anthony Giddens book is fantastic. He presents a lot of credible evidence, to prove that human endured climate change is rapidly threatening the world and our species.
Report abuse
Thomas A. Regelski
4.0 out of 5 stars A little dated
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 11 August 2018
Verified Purchase
Adds little to what is already known. The writing is stiff and academic. But a reliable source of the information and ideas it covers.
Report abuse
Dr Traeen
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 27 July 2015
Verified Purchase
Good value for money, quality of paper was excellent.
Report abuse
RobinL
3.0 out of 5 stars and a little counter intuitive to some - nuclear is bad for us
Reviewed in Canada on 12 July 2014
Verified Purchase
Ignoring the fact that it's a bit of a dry read, the primary critique of this book, I have found, is its espousal of the use of nuclear energy as a deterrent to climate change. Although anti-nuclear camps will argue that it is irresponsible of Giddens to suggest nuclear, it is important to keep in mind that he is dealing with the argument not in an attempt to save the planet - which will undoubtedly continue on without us - but in an attempt to ensure the survival of the human race. This seems grandiose in scale, and a little counter intuitive to some - nuclear is bad for us, we say. However, considering the fate of the humankind, to Giddens, is to burn up in global heating, a few patches of radiation is small potatoes. It is important to keep this in mind, whether you are pro or anti nuclear (or even a fence sitter).
Report abuse
Hiranniya Kalesh P
5.0 out of 5 stars Must read
Reviewed in India on 29 October 2019
====

The Politics of Climate Change
 Want to Read
Rate this book
1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
The Politics of Climate Change
by Anthony Giddens
 3.43  ·   Rating details ·  169 ratings  ·  21 reviews
"A landmark study in the struggle to contain climate change, the greatest challenge of our era. I urge everyone to read it."
Bill Clinton, 42nd President of the United States of America Climate change differs from any other problem that, as collective humanity, we face today. If it goes unchecked, the consequences are likely to be catastrophic for human life on earth. Yet for most people, and for many policy-makers too, it tends to be a 'back of the mind' issue. We recognise its importance and even its urgency, but for the most part it is swamped by more immediate concerns. Politicians have woken up to the dangers, but at the moment their responses are mainly on the level of gesture rather than being, as they have to be, both concrete and radical.


Political action and intervention, on local, national and international levels, is going to have a decisive effect on whether or not we can limit global warming, as well as how we adapt to that already occurring. At the moment, however, Anthony Giddens argues controversially, we do not have a systematic politics of climate change. Politics-as-usual won't allow us to deal with the problems we face, while the recipes of the main challenger to orthodox politics, the green movement, are flawed at source. Giddens introduces a range of new concepts and proposals to fill in the gap, and examines in depth the connections between climate change and energy security.


This book is likely to become a classic in the field. It will be of appeal to everyone concerned about how we can cope with what amounts to a crisis for our civilisation. (less)
GET A COPY
KoboOnline Stores ▾Book Links ▾
Paperback, 264 pages
Published May 1st 2009 by Polity Press (first published 2009)
Original TitlePolitics of Climate Change
ISBN074564693X (ISBN13: 9780745646930)
Edition LanguageEnglish
Other Editions (10)
La politica del cambiamento climatico 
The Politics of Climate Change 
The Politics of Climate Change 
A Política da Mudança Climática 
İklim Değişikliği Siyaseti
All Editions | Add a New Edition | Combine
...Less DetailEdit Details
EditMY ACTIVITY
Review of ISBN 9780745646930
Rating
1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
Shelves to-read edit
( 800th )
Format Paperback edit
Status
March 13, 2021 – Shelved as: to-read
March 13, 2021 – Shelved
Review Write a review
 
comment
FRIEND REVIEWS
Recommend This Book None of your friends have reviewed this book yet.
READER Q&A
Ask the Goodreads community a question about The Politics of Climate Change
54355902. uy100 cr1,0,100,100 
Ask anything about the book
Recent Questions
what is 'climate change' ? ; :)
Like  6 Years Ago  Add Your Answer
See 1 question about The Politics of Climate Change…
LISTS WITH THIS BOOK
The Republic by PlatoThe Prince by Niccolò MachiavelliPolitics by AristotleCapital, Vol. 1 by Karl MarxThe Concept of the Political by Carl Schmitt
Politics
427 books — 478 voters
Meditations by Marcus AureliusThe Republic by PlatoThe United States of Elfin by The Silver ElvesPolitics by AristotleThe Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli
Theory, Politics, etc
105 books — 12 voters


More lists with this book...
COMMUNITY REVIEWS
Showing 1-30
 Average rating3.43  ·  Rating details ·  169 ratings  ·  21 reviews

Search review text


All Languages
More filters | Sort order
Sejin,
Sejin, start your review of The Politics of Climate Change

Write a review
Displaying 1-30 of 57 reviews rated 4 stars.  Clear filters
Giovanni Cappiello
Aug 11, 2017Giovanni Cappiello rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Una panoramica abbastanza completa delle possibili conseguenze delle nostre azioni, condita da interessanti correzioni possibili e già effettuate per migliorare la situazione drammatica in cui ci troviamo.
Lettura fondamentale per prendere coscienza del guaio in cui ci siamo ficcati, ma da cui possiamo, seppur con sforzo immane, ancora salvarci.
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Matthias Moeser
Nov 15, 2020Matthias Moeser rated it really liked it
Helpful and in 2020 still relevant overview of political concepts, interdependencies and constellations concerning climate change. Some parts of it I found less than well structured and with an unclear message.
I enjoyed most reading the last two chapters.
flagLike  · comment · see review


Leah
May 23, 2013Leah rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A clear and accessible summary…

In this book, Giddens firstly urges us to accept the overwhelming consensus of opinion amongst scientists that climate change is real and caused by the actions of humanity, and then goes on to consider what actions will be required if we are to overcome this global threat.

Over the first few chapters, Giddens looks at where we are now. He starts by giving an overview of the scientific evidence and discusses the counter-arguments of sceptics and radicals, concluding that the science strongly supports the position that climate change is happening, is caused by human activity and is likely to have catastrophic consequences if action is not taken quickly. He looks at the availability of oil, gas and coal and how their production and use have shaped and changed international relationships and policy since the Second World War. He goes on to discuss the rise of 'green' politics and whether they offer any real solutions to the problems facing us.

In the next few sections, Giddens lays out his stall for the approaches he thinks are required. He argues strongly for a lead to be taken by governments of nation states individually (rather than waiting for the outcome of lengthy international negotiations) to develop policies that will encourage reductions in emissions - particularly through the use of the tax system and the encouragement of technological innovation. He highlights that climate change questions have, to some degree, become seen to be a 'left-wing' concern and points out that it is essential to success that all-party support is given to measures if they are to be accepted by those who will be affected. He urges strongly the principle of 'polluter pays' and suggests this should be extended to look at the developed world's responsibility to ensure support for developing and undeveloped countries in combatting climate change and in adapting to its effects.

Finally, Giddens looks at how international co-operation has developed to date and how he sees it progressing. He suggests that, as well as the various groupings of countries that are coming into being to tackle the issues regionally, the UN still has a vital role to play in monitoring and holding states to internationally agreed targets.

The book is well written and aimed at a general audience. It is a succinct account of where we are now and provides food for thought on how we might progress. I would recommend it to anyone with an interest in the on-going climate change debate (and, as this book makes clear, it affects us all). I found it a clear and accessible summary of the main arguments.

NB This book was provided for review by Amazon Vine UK.

www.fictionfanblog.wordpress.com (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review




Sep 01, 2018Nicholas Whyte rated it liked it
https://nwhyte.livejournal.com/3069817.html

This book was published in 2009 and is already very dated. Climate change is a topic that I orbit around a bit at work (more so in my last job) and it’s striking to realise just how much the debate has moved on in the last nine or ten years. Most obviously, carbon markets fell way out of fashion with the 2008 crash, and the big focus now is on renewables (Giddens just missed the German Energiewende). But also the Paris climate accord looks even more remarkable from the 2009 perspective than from the 2018 perspective; 

the points of reference of the global debate have completely changed. Another crucial development, which Giddens barely hoped for but is now a fundamental part of the dynamic, is the shift of Chinese policy in favour of environmental issues. This is enough to make the US federal government much less relevant, thought perhaps not much less dangerous (Gidddens spends some time agonising about Bush and post-Bush policies; we did not know we had it so good).

There are good questions to be asked about whether vaguely democratic and vaguely capitalist systems will find the necessary impetus to implement the massive changes that are needed. The scale of the problem is even starker now than it was a decade ago. But I was cheered by reading this book and realising that the debate does move on. I hope it will move fast enough. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Don
May 07, 2019Don rated it liked it
Shelves: 2017, non-fiction, politics, science, 2019
Comprehensive, lucid, insightful but, unfortunately already somewhat overtaken by events. It covers a great deal of ground, both metaphorically and (as its scope is global) literally, moving fluently from theme to theme. If you need a text that shows you both the extreme urgency for action on climate change and the extraordinary difficulty of doing so effectively, here it is.

The weakness of the book is that it pre-dates the increase of populism and the appearance of reactionary, climate-change denying governments, in the USA and Brazil, for example, which compound the difficulties that the human species faces. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Sarah
Feb 18, 2012Sarah rated it liked it
Shelves: politics, climate-change, environment
A good one volume introduction to the debate, the skeptics, the Green movement and possible agendas for change at a nation-state, European and international level. While I do to some extent agree that macro-level policy change is going to be necessary, Giddens' focus on this, to the extent that he excludes any discussion of local government or community initiatives, seems a bit out of touch with the broader politics of climate change. There's plenty going on, and lots of possibilities at a local and regional level, but you'd never know it from reading this text. (less)
flagLike  · 3 comments · see review
Jean-François Lisée
Jan 28, 2016Jean-François Lisée rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: environnement
Inventeur de la "troisième voie", Anthony Giddens s'est recyclé dans l'environnement, dont il présente ici tout ce qu'il faut savoir (du moins en 2011, ça change vite) de la science elle même, puis des rapports de force politiques pour arriver -- ou ne pas arriver -- à agir résolument.
Extrêmement utile. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Tod
Feb 19, 2016Tod rated it liked it
Worth reading but take it with a grain of salt. In personal experience it's getting warmer and storms are getting bigger, coffee is more expensive because the crop is failing, I can see warming happening. As to what we can do about it I'm not sure. If everyone does a little, there are so many of us on the planet that that becomes a lot. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review

The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies eBook : Giddens, Anthony: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store

The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies eBook : Giddens, Anthony: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store

The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies Kindle Edition
by Anthony Giddens  (Author)  Format: Kindle Edition
3.9 out of 5 stars    18 ratings
See all formats and editions
Kindle
$29.22
Read with Our Free App
 
Hardcover
$314.97 
1 Used from $43.95
1 New from $314.97
 
Paperback
$33.41 
9 New from $33.41

Read less
Word Wise: Enabled Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled Page Flip: Enabled 
Language: English

Save on select Books
Discover deals on fiction, non-fiction, children's books and more Shop now
Product description
Review
'It is difficult to imagine social-scientific thought and practice in Britain and much of Continental Europe without the distinctive contribution of Anthony Giddens. His prolific work has the unique merit of tying together the rich tradition of modern social thought with the challenges of whatever is new and unprecedented in what he has called the 'late modern' or 'post-traditional' world.' Times Literary Supplement
'The major achievement of Professor Giddens is to have written a book which is both politically correct and interesting ... an immensely enjoyable book.' Political Studies

'Interesting and informative, thoughtful and thought provoking, concise and to the point.' Contemporary Sociology

'A powerful, and often brilliantly provocative, theory of how sexuality and gender are reproduced and transformed ... a model of theoretically informed, empirically based sociological analysis that will be of great interest to all those concerned with the trajectory of sexuality, gender, and identity in modern social processes.' The Times Higher Education Supplement

About the Author
Anthony Giddens is Director of the London School of Economics and Political Science.
From the Back Cover
“Giddens, a towering figure in Anglo-American sociology, has now extended his analyses of modernity to include the area of intimacy in this thoughtful and provocative book.”—Choice
“This is a short book that differs in style from Giddens’s others. He strives here for accessibility and readability. . . . The chapters are all interesting and informative, thoughtful and thought-provoking, concise and to the point.”—Contemporary Sociology
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From the Inside Flap
The sexual revolution: an evocative term, but what meaning can be given to it today? How does “sexuality” come into being, and what connections does it have with the changes that have affected personal life more generally? In answering these questions, the author disputes many of the dominant interpretations of the role of sexuality in modern culture.
The author suggests that the revolutionary changes in which sexuality has become cauth up are more long-term than generally conceded. He sees them as intrinsic to the development of modern societies as a whole and to the broad characteristics of that development. Sexuality as we know it today is a creation of modernity, a terrain upon which the contradictory tendencies of modern social life play themselves out in full. Emancipation and oppression, opportunity and risk—these have become a part of a heady mix that irresistably ties our individual lives to global outcomes and the transformation of intimacy.
We live today in a social order in which, for the first time in histroy, women are becoming equal to men—or at least have lodged a claim to such equality as their right. The author does not attempt to analyze the gender inequalities that persist in the economic or political domains, but instead concentrates on a more hisdden personal area in which women—ordinary women, in the course of their day-to-day lives, quite apart from any political agenda—have pioneered changes of greate, and generalizable, importance. These changes essentially concern an exploration of the potentialities of the “pure relationship,” a relaitonship that presumes sexual and emotional equality, and is explosive in its connotations for pre-existing relations of power.
The author analyzes the emergence of what he calls plastic sexuality—sexuality freed from its intrinsic relation to reproduction—in terms of the emotional emancipation implicit in the pure relationship, as well as women’s claim to sexual pleasure. Plastic sexuality is decentered sexuality, freed from both reproduction and subservience to a fixed object. It can be molded as a trait of personality, and thus become bound up with the reflexivity of the self. Premised on plastic sexuality, the pure relationship is not exclusively heterosexual; it is neutral in terms of sexual orientation.
The author speculates that the transformaion of intimacy might be a subversive influence on modern institutions as a whole, for a social world in which the dominant ideal was to achieve intinsic rewards from the company of others might be vastly different from that which we know at the present.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From the Publisher
Anthony Giddens is Director of the London School of Economics and Political Science. --This text refers to the paperback edition.
Review
'It is difficult to imagine social-scientific thought and practice in Britain and much of Continental Europe without the distinctive contribution of Anthony Giddens. His prolific work has the unique merit of tying together the rich tradition of modern social thought with the challenges of whatever is new and unprecedented in what he has called the 'late modern' or 'post-traditional' world.' Times Literary Supplement
'The major achievement of Professor Giddens is to have written a book which is both politically correct and interesting ... an immensely enjoyable book.' Political Studies

'Interesting and informative, thoughtful and thought provoking, concise and to the point.' Contemporary Sociology

'A powerful, and often brilliantly provocative, theory of how sexuality and gender are reproduced and transformed ... a model of theoretically informed, empirically based sociological analysis that will be of great interest to all those concerned with the trajectory of sexuality, gender, and identity in modern social processes.' The Times Higher Education Supplement

--This text refers to the paperback edition.
Read less
Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07M9CXB75
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Polity; 1st edition (23 April 2013)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 549 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 224 pages
Customer Reviews: 3.9 out of 5 stars    18 ratings


How would you rate your experience shopping for books on Amazon today





Very poor Neutral Great
Customer reviews
3.9 out of 5 stars
3.9 out of 5
18 global ratings
5 star
 43%
4 star
 31%
3 star
 8%
2 star
 12%
1 star
 6%
How are ratings calculated?
Review this product
Share your thoughts with other customers
Write a customer review

Top reviews
Top reviews
Top reviews from Australia
There are 0 reviews and 0 ratings from Australia
Top reviews from other countries
Translate all reviews to English
jo
3.0 out of 5 stars ok
Reviewed in Germany on 4 February 2019
Verified Purchase
Ok
Report abuse
七海光一
4.0 out of 5 stars 読み返すにたる価値を有する
Reviewed in Japan on 19 April 2005
Verified Purchase
近代社会における性愛概念の変容をあとづけ、今後人間にとっての性愛が如何にあるべきかを説く、この分野でも特に著名な書物。フーコーの、権力の管理下にある身体という解釈を部分的には認めるが、消費社会における、恋愛マニュアルなどが、生活習慣や性愛観念の相互浸透性に与える影響を無視できないとする著者の立場は、より時代に即した考え方であると思う。所謂、性の二重基準や性の人格原則などに見られる男権主義的性愛観念を超えた、コミュニケーションとしての性のあり方の進展は、広義の社会の民主化の進展と無関係ではない、という著者の指摘は的を得たものと思う。議論がやや抽象的で、平易な英語にも関わらずやや解りづらいところもあるが、読むのに妨げになるほど大きな問題ではない。だが、こうした大学系の出版物によくある、編集の甘さから生じる綴りの誤りが散見され、この点に関しては、出版社の反省を促したい。
15 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Translate review to English
kaminsky
4.0 out of 5 stars moralistic. but...
Reviewed in the United States on 16 November 2020
Verified Purchase
a rather moralistic view of female promiscuity.
despite this issue this book is very influential. Giddens concept of "pure relationship" is widely cited -
examples - Enrique Gil Calvo "EL NUEVO SEXO DEBIL" -
Oscar Guasch "LA CRISIS DE LA HETEROSEXUALIDAD".
Report abuse
Alex Nelson
5.0 out of 5 stars Essential theory in the sociology of love
Reviewed in the United States on 27 April 2015
Verified Purchase
Giddings is as acceptable as pure theory gets which is probably why he is popularly assigned in classrooms. It's also a nice quick read.
Report abuse
Marc
1.0 out of 5 stars A Stunningly Flawed Work from a Legitimate Giant
Reviewed in the United States on 18 March 2016
Verified Purchase
Giddens' attempt at micro-sociology and a venture into psychological theory and gender studies is an amazing failure. The question of agreement aside, he takes the most uniformly rejected components of Freud, rejects discourse on essentialism, and oversteps his foundation and evidence to create a perplexing argument that male dominance and aggression are resultant from female abandonment, most specifically the loss of control over women. This book, if popularly known, would be an excellent reinforcement for men's rights groups, as it essentially argues that everyone's social problems are the result of men caught in a culture gap, whereby the natural order they expect has evaporated, so the frustration of not being able to dominate women or have complicit women in their lives, causes them to "reasonably" dominate them. In once example, a discussion on pornography as evidence of how men suffer no sexual enjoyment compared to women, he characterizes the participants as the women being grateful and satisfied, while the men plod on silently without joy or expression. It's stunning that someone could interpret something so inversely. I'm guessing most people read this for a class. If you don't have to, don't read this unless you want to be mad at insulting and lazy scholarship, or if you are an insecure man who wants to blame women's attempts for equality for their own rapes.
7 people found this helpful
Report abuse
See all reviews

Write a review
Therese
Jul 07, 2020Therese rated it really liked it
Shelves: research-authoritarianism, dating-and-relationships, politics-and-society, philosophy, psychology, womens-issues
This is a sociologist's perspective on how concepts of intimacy and relationships have changed since the sexual revolution of the 1960s. I was interested in it because I'm trying to understand authoritarianism at both the political and personal level, and part of my thinking is that there is a relationship between authoritarian attitudes and intimacy, since authoritarianism revolves around control, and controlling another person is arguably a form of intimacy, in which there's a breaking down of barriers between two wills to enable the intrusion of one will into another.

I think it was Giddens who first introduced the concept of "pure relationships" in sociology. This refers to consensual relationships people have just for the sake of their own happiness and fulfillment, which they can leave at will. Giddens idea is that such relationships have become more common and more of an ideal since the sexual revolution, particularly for women and GLBTQ folks. The idea of the pure relationship differs from e.g. traditional marriage, which was more of a practical economic arrangement, or the notion of romantic love or sexual license that was driven by emotional or physical compulsion. A lot of people have struggled with this shift, for example, straight men and women in cases where the women have moved away from ideals of chastity and see sex as a prelude to an egalitarian relationship, but where the men don't want commitment and just want sex.

I mostly skimmed the chapters in the beginning and middle, because even though Giddens was doing important work by putting into words a lot of the changes that had been wrought by modernity, viewed from today's perspective it didn't feel very new or surprising to me. Where things got interesting was the last two chapters, where he discusses ideas from the philosopher Wilhelm Reich about repression and from Herbert Marcuse about "eros and civilization." (I haven't read Reich or Marcuse, so can't judge how accurately Giddens represents their thinking, but found the ideas interesting.) Reich was against bourgeois marriage as a repressive, authoritarian institution. He believed that traditional monogamous marriage served to develop authoritarian traits of character, which in turn supported an exploitative social system. Despite Reich's reputation as a wackadoodle crackpot, there's clearly some truth to this.

Marcuse's idea was that sexual emancipation should not be considered the same thing as just hedonism. Sexual love becomes liberating in combination with respect for the other as an equal, which disrupts the old traditional patriarchalist (authoritarian) family structure and also paves the way for broader egalitarian social citizenship. However, when sexual permissiveness turns into objectifying others as commodities of pleasure, it becomes just another form of oppressiveness.

In the last chapter of the book, Giddens expands on these ideas to talk about how egalitarian relationships between people can both follow a model of democracy at the personal level and reinforce egalitarian democracy at the political level. For me, this all goes toward showing how humanist ethics is foundational for democracy and how healthy interpersonal relationships based on mutual respect model healthy democracy as a system of governance. This contrasts with domestic abuse and violence, which models authoritarian governance - a point also made in a book I read about the mindset of domestic abusers, Why Does He Do That?: Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men. The latter book was written by a clinical psychologist who had spent decades working with abusers, and has an insightful chapter where the author argues that the mindset of abusers is also reflected in systems of social and political oppression.

Giddens's book can also be considered in combination with another book I panned in a review a while back, Mark Regnerus's Cheap Sex: The Transformation of Men, Marriage, and Monogamy. Regnerus, as I pointed out, reveals himself as anti-individualist and authoritarian in his thinking, and his book revolves around contrasting Giddens's idea of the pure relationship with the "exchange" model of relationships - the more traditional idea of marriage as economic exchange. Regnerus loves the exchange model, is clearly nostalgic for the days when people could be said to "own" each other, and can't seem to get out of the dehumanizing idea of human beings as useful goods; Regnerus argues (obliquely, not directly) that the pure relationship model inevitably devolves into this commoditization of sex as consumption, and that the exchange model at least has the dignity of focusing on sexual exchange from a producer perspective instead of the consumer perspective.

I find Regnerus's views horrible, as I think real feminist emancipation is to treat women as human beings, not as objects, and it doesn't help to consider intimate relationships through the lens of economic production instead of as a consumer activity - the goal should be to go beyond such a limited view. Even while we recognize and concede that human beings will always see each other to some degree as useful means to various practical ends, there's also a humanist, ethical imperative to see each other as more than merely this, as ends in ourselves. Without this humanist respect for the sacredness of others' autonomy, it is all too easy to fall into authoritarian forms of relationship and governance in both the public and private spheres. (less)
flag4 likes · Like  · comment · see review

The Consequences of Modernity eBook : Giddens, Anthony: Amazon.com.au: Books

The Consequences of Modernity eBook : Giddens, Anthony: Amazon.com.au: Books

The Consequences of Modernity Kindle Edition
by Anthony Giddens  (Author)  Format: Kindle Edition
4.5 out of 5 stars    30 ratings
In this major theoretical statement, the author offers a new and provocative interpretation of the institutional transformations associated with modernity. We do not as yet, he argues, live in a post-modern world. Rather the distinctive characteristics of our major social institutions in the closing period of the twentieth century express the emergence of a period of 'high modernity,' in which prior trends are radicalised rather than undermined. A post-modern social universe may eventually come into being, but this as yet lies 'on the other side' of the forms of social and cultural organization which currently dominate world history.
In developing an account of the nature of modernity, Giddens concentrates upon analyzing the intersections between trust and risk, and security and danger, in the modern world. Both the trust mechanisms associated with modernity and the distinctive 'risk profile' it produces, he argues, are distinctively different from those characteristic of pre-modern social orders.

This book build upon the author's previous theoretical writings, and will be of fundamental interest to anyone concerned with Gidden's overall project. However, the work covers issues which the author has not previously analyzed and extends the scope of his work into areas of pressing practical concern. This book will be essential reading for second year undergraduates and above in sociology, politics, philosophy, and cultural studies.
Top reviews from Australia
There are 0 reviews and 0 ratings from Australia
Top reviews from other countries
Helge Loebler
5.0 out of 5 stars trust isn't a personal matter anymore
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 2 June 2013
Verified Purchase
Everybody knows trust as a property of personal relationships. However Giddens shows how trust has lost its original reference which was based in personal relationships. Trust is demanded in the case of ignorance. Division of labor has created abstract systems which Giddens distinguishes into expert systems and symbolic tokens. Lawyers, medical doctors, Pilots etc. are expert systems which layman either have to trust in or to avoid. Symbolic tokens are media of interchange which can be passed around independent from their references. Examples are money, ratings and gradings. An A at school doesn't need any further explanation. Everybody knows what it means without knowing the school, the teachers etc. Abstract system dis-embed from face-to-face situations. This is one of the fundamental changes in modernity as compared to premordern societies. Giddens book goes much further than just describing and explaining abstract systems. He describes and explains how other areas of day to day live are fundamentally influenced by modernity. For me the Value of this book is that Giddens gives us the concepts and words to describe and understand a world we live in; a complex world we are experiencing in most parts intuitively.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
============
The Consequences of Modernity
by Anthony Giddens
 3.79  ·   Rating details ·  799 ratings  ·  35 reviews
In this major theoretical statement, the author offers a new and provocative interpretation of institutional transformations associated with modernity. What is modernity? The author suggests, "As a first approximation, let us simply say the following: 'modernity' refers to modes of social life or organization which emerged in Europe from about the seventeenth century onwards and which subsequently became more or less worldwide in their influence."

We do not as yet, the author argues, live in a post-modern world. The distinctive characteristics of our major social institutions in the closing years of the twentieth century suggest that, rather than entering into a period of post-modernity, we are moving into a period of "high modernity" in which the consequences of modernity are becoming more radicalized and universalized than before. A post-modern social universe may eventually come into being, but this as yet lies on the other side of the forms of social and cultural organization that currently dominate world history.

In developing a fresh characterization of the nature of modernity, the author concentrates on the themes of security versus danger and o trust versus risk. Modernity is a double-edged phenomenon. The development of modern social institutions has created vastly greater opportunities for human beings to enjoy a secure and rewarding existence than in any type of pre-modern system. But modernity also has a somber side that has become very important in the present century, such as the frequently degrading nature of modern industrial work, the growth of totalitarianism, the threat of environmental destruction, and the alarming development of military power and weaponry.

The book builds upon the author's previous theoretical writings and will be of great interest to those who have followed his work through the years. However, this book covers issues the author has not previously analyzed and extends the scope of his work into areas of pressing practical concern.

(less)
GET A COPY
KoboOnline Stores ▾Book Links ▾
Paperback, 188 pages
Published 1991 by Stanford University Press (first published 1988)
Original TitleThe Consequences of Modernity
ISBN0804718911 (ISBN13: 9780804718912)
Edition LanguageEnglish
Other Editions (31)
Modernliğin Sonuçları 
پیامدهای مدرنیت 
As Conseqüências da Modernidade 
The Consequences of Modernity 
Le conseguenze della modernità: fiducia e rischio, sicurezza e pericolo
All Editions | Add a New Edition | Combine
...Less DetailEdit Details
EditMY ACTIVITY
Review of ISBN 9780804718912
Rating
1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
Shelves to-read edit
( 798th )
Format Paperback edit
Status
March 13, 2021 – Shelved as: to-read
March 13, 2021 – Shelved
Review Write a review
 
comment
FRIEND REVIEWS
Recommend This Book None of your friends have reviewed this book yet.
READER Q&A
Ask the Goodreads community a question about The Consequences of Modernity
54355902. uy100 cr1,0,100,100 
Ask anything about the book
Be the first to ask a question about The Consequences of Modernity

LISTS WITH THIS BOOK
Discipline and Punish by Michel FoucaultThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. KuhnDistinction by Pierre BourdieuThe Constitution of Society by Anthony GiddensFoundations of Social Theory by James Samuel Coleman
Books of the Century - International Sociological Association
64 books — 10 voters
Moral Tribes by Joshua D. GreeneHillbilly Elegy by J.D. VanceThe Righteous Mind by Jonathan HaidtStrangers in Their Own Land by Arlie Russell HochschildThe Big Sort by Bill Bishop
Coping with the Election
48 books — 13 voters


More lists with this book...
COMMUNITY REVIEWS
Showing 1-30
 Average rating3.79  ·  Rating details ·  799 ratings  ·  35 reviews

Search review text


All Languages
More filters | Sort order
Sejin,
Sejin, start your review of The Consequences of Modernity

Write a review
Trevor
Jun 02, 2014Trevor rated it it was amazing
Shelves: social-theory
This guy has been loitering in a series of other books I’ve been reading over the last few years. I’ve been meaning to read him, and now I have. Most notably, he has quite a role in Beck’s Risk Society – which is fairly obvious why, when you have read both books.

In some ways this book probably should be called ‘The Consequences of Post-Modernity’ – except that people have connotations about what post-modern means and these connotations would distract from what the author is really trying to do. This guy isn’t really a post-modernist – you know, if that term is taken to mean post-structuralist – but he does think we live in a time that is after the modern, in that the Enlightenment project needs to be abandoned if by that we think we can 'understand' and control society.

One of the things I often do in these reviews is explain people’s views with reference to Marx. In this case, this guy does much the same, so I feel more justified. Marx basically said that Capitalism was trouble. He said this for many of the reasons that Capitalism has ended up being trouble – crisis prone, unequal, savage to the poor, those sorts of things. But Marx believed in a kind of teleology, that if you got rid of the bad bits of Capitalism you could have a pretty nice society. Socialism – Communism – something directed at human needs, anyway – you know, Marx was never terribly specific about any of this. The point was that overthrowing Capitalism was meant to bring about good times. The point of this book is to look at ideas like risk and mistrust, not as categories that are by-products of the evils of Capitalism, but as products of post-modernity. That risks and issues of trust are not really by-products of Capitalism that can be wished away with the glorious victory of Socialism – but that they are fundamental to the modern condition and not likely to go away under any conceivable set of circumstances.

A lot of this book looks at the problem of trust. The simplest things in our society require a remarkable amount of trust. The example given is flying to LA. There are lots of things we need to know to get to LA on a plane – I would need to know what an airline ticket was, have my passport, how to get to the airport, what is appropriate to wear (you know, no t-shirts with God is Great written on them) or to say to the customs people – but what I wouldn’t need to know even the first thing about is how to fly the plane. I wouldn’t even need to know how the plane flies. There are other people that we call experts that can worry about those sorts of things. But this isn’t quite the same as ‘faith’. Obviously, there is a kind of faith involved, however, in the case of the plane at least, that faith doesn’t really amount to the same sort of thing as believing in the virgin birth, say.

Or does it? We like to think that if we wanted we could go off and learn enough physics to understand how a plane flies and then learn how to fly one. But we certainly couldn’t really do all of that – learn how to make a plane and so on - eventually we come back to having to have trust in someone. And the way science is taught it is generally presented as a series of givens – it is transmitted as a series of truths that must be accepted whole. It is only towards the end of a science degree that the first glimmers of the limits of what we know start to become clear. Faith is a necessary companion of trust, I guess. But trust is difficult to sustain in a post-modern world.

Take global warming, the example given in the book is nuclear war, but for some daft reason we seem to imagine this risk has disappeared. Global warming is hardly a ‘side-effect’ of Capitalism. If Capitalism is inconceivable without constant growth, it is hard to see how global warming isn’t then also a necessary consequence of Capitalism. And if, rather than our hopes that the rise in temperatures will be at the bottom end of predictions, it ends up at the top end – what then? I’ve read estimates that the world will only be able to sustain a population of about half a billion people. Given there is over seven billion here now, that means an over supply of about six and a half billion people. This is truly nightmare stuff. Clearly there is some level of risk that this might happen – but it is in the future and it is a relatively small risk as far as we humans as individuals are able to assess such things. So, we either ignore these risks as much as we can or we make ourselves sick in worrying about things we have no power to fix.

And here is one of the fundamental conditions of late modernity. There are all of these risks and they call into question our trust in those around us, but we can do virtually nothing to address that lack of trust. You know, if you catch your husband in bed with another woman, there is something you can do. Your trust is probably shattered, and so you can leave him. Okay, but you can’t really leave society if you lose trust in it. Where would you go? As he points out brilliantly here – the opposite of trust isn’t really mistrust, that is far too gentle a term – the opposite of trust is anxiety.

Think about that for a while. Think of all of the people who spend so much time in some form of therapy or have some sort of anxiety disorder – how much can that be blamed to a fundamental lack of trust and one we can do literally nothing to avoid?

He makes the point that society isn’t really a car we have control over, but rather a juggernaut. We can sometimes guide where it goes, but it is always on the verge of careening off course or crashing to bits. We want to believe that with a few more modification the whole thing will come under our control – that society is essentially a product of the individual actions of humans and so all that is required is an exercise of our will or free agency and all will be well. But the problem is that society is literally bigger than all of us – even all of us added together.

There is much more to this book than I’ve covered here. I really can recommend this book as well worth reading and thinking about.
(less)
flag28 likes · Like  · 14 comments · see review
Pooya Roohi
Mar 30, 2014Pooya Roohi rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
گیدنز ویژگی های مدرنیته، مخاطرات و پیامدهای آن و نیز راه حل هایی را که به عقیده او برای فائق آمدن بر این مخاطرات می توان اتخاذ کرد را مورد بحث و بررسی قرار داده است.

یکی از مهم ترین خصوصیات مدرنیته دو لبه بودن آن است. به عقیده گیدنز باید هر دو روی پرخطر و پرامکانات مدرنیته را مطالعه کرد. مدرنیته در همان حال که برای انسان ها امنیتی به ارمغان آورده که در گذشته میسر نبود، خطراتی نیز به وجود آورده که در طول تاریخ حتی تصور آن نیز محال بود. مارکس، وبر و دورکیم به جنبه های پرخطر مدرنیته همچون محیط زیست، ...more
flag17 likes · Like  · 5 comments · see review
Amirsaman
Oct 03, 2018Amirsaman rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
قبل از این‌که قرن هفده بشود و سرعت رشد صنعت بترکاند و مدرنیسم شروع شود، «سرنوشت» داشتیم. ولی در دوره‌ی مدرن، «ریسک» داریم؛ حالتی که منافع و ضررهای احتمالی را در نظر می‌گیریم و بر مبنای این اعتماد، نهایتا خودمان را ملامت می‌کنیم. یعنی انسان مدرن پذیرفته است که «بیشتر احتمال‌هایی که بر فعالیت بشری تاثیر می‌گذارند زاییده‌ی انسان‌اند و نه خدا یا طبیعت.»

بخش عمده‌ی کتاب، صرف تشریح ترس انسان از مخاطرات دنیای مدرن، و اعتماد او به این ابزارهای نو شده است.

کتاب بقدری «کلی» بحث می‌کرد که چیز زیادی دستم را ن ...more
flag8 likes · Like  · comment · see review
M&A Ed
Dec 28, 2018M&A Ed rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
کتاب بسیار خوبی بود که آنتونی گیدنز درباره ی پیامدهای مدرنیت نوشته است! از جمله پیامدهای مدرنیت جنگ های هسته ای هست که در این کتاب بسیار به آن اشاره می کند. ترممه سلیس و روان مترجم در درک مطالب به خواننده بسیار کمک می کند.
flag5 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Andrew
Nov 07, 2012Andrew rated it it was amazing
Shelves: sociology
This relatively short book, based on a series of lectures Giddens gave over twenty years ago, still contains fresh insights - although I think it may be difficult to use this an introduction to his thinking, since it rehearses some ideas as well as a theory of modernity that he outlined in greater detail in earlier works, especially his book 'The Nation State and Violence,' which might be my favorite of his writings because it's grounded in history as much as history. Still I liked his discussion here of symbolic tokens and trust and risk (arguments that I think owe a lot to Niklas Luhmann), as well as his multdimensional reading of modern society as formed through a conjunction of overlapping forces - in particular, industrialism, capitalism, militarism, and democracy. It's still a vision of modern society that deserves to be revisited periodically. (less)
flag3 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Tuncay Özdemir
Dec 23, 2020Tuncay Özdemir rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sociology, nonfiction, philosophy, politics, history
"Modernliğin Sonuçları", soyut sistemlerin giderek daha fazla hayatımızın bir parçası olarak ontolojik güvenlik algımızı radikal bir şekilde değiştirmesini konu ediyor. Geleneksel toplumlardaki güvenlik unsurları ve tehditler, bugünün toplumunda artık geçersiz olsa da modern toplumların çok daha farklı güven unsurları ve tehlikeleri mevcuttur. Giddens, tüm bunları postmodernliğe bir geçiş olarak değil de modernliğin radikalleşmesi olarak yorumluyor ve alternatif bir perspektif sunuyor. Dili bira ...more
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Ayesha
Mar 30, 2021Ayesha rated it liked it
Like, yeah it’s fine. It’s sociological theory what more can I say 🥴
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Perdana
Feb 02, 2018Perdana rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Some parts of my review for the class (yes, I cheat the reading challenge).

Giddens’ The Consequences of Modernity gives an interesting take on how we should scrutinize from modernity. He elaborates the reasons behind the dynamism of modernity; the reorganization and/or the separation of time and space, the disembeddedness, and the reflexivity of modernity (p. 53). Rather than jump into the debate whether the situation that we have now is post-modern(ism), thus implies the break from “modernity”, Giddens focuses on the more fruitful discussion on the consequences of modernity, whether they are intended or not. These consequences also signify how knowledge plays role in the process of transition to modernity, until the modernity itself creates those unintended and intended effects. “the circulation of social knowledge… that alters the circumstances to which the knowledge originally referred” (p. 54). In our discussion, I would like to focus on Giddens’ explanation on risk and would like to connect to his historical investigation.

Giddens writes that the most classical thinkers “did not see how extensive the darker side of modernity would turn out to be” (p.7), implying that no one had predicted the “negative” side of modernity. I would like to dig the question to what extend we should do this risk calculation? What gave birth to the risk speculations that fuel our modern need to rigorously calculate risk and danger; using statistics, mega planning, high-modernist development, overcoming existential crisis, etc. And why should we? What systemic benefit that ones could gain by keep predicting the unstable world – especially when the modern knowledge (this means the statistics, modern urban planning, heavy industrialization) contributes to this instability (p.45)? The reason we have risks calculated in certain manners, because we already plan something ahead in a grandiose universal manner. Rather than answering the question, Giddens justifies the spectrums of risk, that we all now have, which are closely tied to modernity. In pre-modern era, risk was already available, but more to “natural causes”, i.e., earthquake or “natural” disasters (p. 102, p. 110) and how it did not evolve to more structured manner, for example systemic risk – a scapegoat that was to blame for the 2008 economic crisis by the British economists.

How was the spectrum of risk different in pre-modern/traditional time? Especially when the tradition, according to Giddens, never really fades away and even co-exists with the modernity (p…). Trust in the abstract system and confidence in risk calculation, for example, have become the replacement of fate/fortuna (p. 111). Giddens says that the risk in modernity tends to have more future-oriented rather than the past. Although it is convincing enough if we look at the current system from Wall Street to Chicago Climate Exchange, it does not really explain the once-existing future-oriented behavior in traditional society, especially in the concept of survivability, e.g., inheritance, food storing, the expectations from offerings for the elder and dead people. Giddens’ take on this, for me, is quite high-modernistic. Although it is true that risk is not just about “danger and peril” (Hacking, p. 199) and more about “probability, eventuality” (ibid), it is still unclear for me what brings to more sophisticated risk management (like insurance).

In the most “acultural” (or material-based) sense, we might investigate this emergence of modern risk through the scale of the constituted risk, or the problem of accumulation – whether it is in the system of capitalism (Weber and Marx) or industrialism (Durkheim). Growth–be it personal (overcoming the existential crisis/ontological security), economic, or cultural (globalization)—has been a key feature in modernity. Growth can mean anything that gradually or not expands, but to put in the definition, growth is an enlarged accumulation (Levebfre, 1981). Although Giddens did not explain anything specific about growth (I assume it is both in the darker and brighter side of modernity), the idea that we need to expand for better or worse (as unintended consequences?) contribute to the modern management of risk. In the spectrum of capitalism, risk is critical in sustaining the system.

In the 2008 financial crash, a lot of economists explained that housing bubble in China and the market crash occurred due to the “systemic risk” – a risk that is in-built within a system that is highly speculative like financial and stock markets. If imaginary investments are the fuel for this systemic risk, that what would it be for general modern spectrums of risk? We did not have this systemic and complicated system to handle risk in pre-modern society because the idea of growth was still rudimentary; a peasant dared not to imagine being a successful merchant whose wealth was as many as the Dutch King, for example—let alone in the colonial society during the colonialization. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Elizabeth
Sep 14, 2011Elizabeth rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2011
This book's greatest contribution (likely what causes it to be cited with such regularity) is in some ways also its biggest drawback. Giddens is doing such high level theorizing that his examples, themselves, are also largely grounded in theory. This makes for a fully understandable and (especially at the time it was published in 1990) a relevant intervention into theories of modernity and postmodernity; nonetheless, it also makes for an argument that is less grounded in specific empirics than it might be. This seems especially relevant as Giddens is most interested in society-level critiques, which both (necessarily) define and situate modernism and modernity as they relate to specific social processes and functions (rather than aesthetics or taste). Giddens is honest about this, and his role as a sociologist certainly justifies the centrality of his critique. However, it is difficult to know how much could be abstracted beyond the large-scale social domains that he defines and describes. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Marcos Henrique Amaral
Apr 23, 2019Marcos Henrique Amaral rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Nesta obra, Giddens mantém sua postura crítica em relação não somente à sociologia clássica, como também à sociologia contemporânea. De forma geral, o autor traz diversos escritos sobre a modernidade, que se caracterizaria — segundo Giddens — pelo “descontinuísmo”, ou seja, seria diferente, sob alguns aspectos, completamente diferente tradição. A tradição seria a “cola que une as ordens sociais pré-modernas”, integrando a ação à organização tempo-espacial dessas “sociedades pré-modernas”. Sumariamente, a tradição seria uma orientação contínua ao passado, de modo que tal passado é constituído para ter pesada influência no presente. O descontinuísmo que caracteriza a modernidade, segundo Giddens, é o rompimento com esta tradição genuína, ou seja, com valores vinculados ao passado pré-moderno, “criando” novas tradições. A modernidade apresenta essa descontinuidade como ruptura entre o que se apresenta como “novo” e o que persiste como herança do “velho”. Com isto, ele quer romper com qualquer influência que o evolucionismo social possa ter sobre sua sociologia, de modo que busca fugir das concepções que mostram a história humana como um grande enredo que traz a idéia de organização.
Para ele, é importante notar que as descontinuidades que separam as instituições sociais modernas das ordens sociais tradicionais têm peculiaridades próprias à modernidade: (i) o ritmo de mudança — já que a rapidez da mudança em condições modernas é extrema —; (ii) o escopo da mudança, se considerarmos que as transformações na modernidade perpassam todo o globo terrestre; e (iii) a natureza intrínseca das instituições modernas. É válido ressaltar que, nesta concepção de modernidade, já estão inseridos elementos por meio dos quais autores como Lyotard caracterizam uma suposta pós-modernidade, tais como a “evaporação do enredo” por meio do qual somos inseridos na história como tendo um passado perene e um futuro predizível e a “pluralidade de reivindicações heterogêneas de conhecimento”. Para ele, o tema sobre o qual se debruçam os pós-modernas nada são senão as próprias conseqüências da modernidade.
A crítica que ele faz à sociologia clássica — de Marx, Durkheim e Weber, essencialmente — se coloca em três pilares: (i) o diagnóstico institucional da modernidade; (ii) a concepção de sociedade para estes autores — que tratavam sociedade como sinônimo do Estado-Nação moderno —; (iii) as conexões entre conhecimento sociológico e as características da modernidade.
Outra noção que, para Giddens, parece central para a compreensão da modernidade é a noção de desencaixe. Para ele, nas sociedades pré-modernas — ou tradicionais —, as relações sociais estão encaixadas no eixo espaço-tempo. O tempo, para os indivíduos dessas sociedades, é cíclico e local, de modo que ele orienta toda a organização social, gerando a noção de encaixe. A modernidade seria caracterizada por um tempo social e artificial: um tempo linear, e não cíclico como na pré-modernidade, de modo que não pode servir como referência para previsões. Mais ainda, a noção de tempo na modernidade é universal e não local. Isto gera a impressão de uma diminuição das distâncias entre os espaços, uma vez que o tempo calibra a organização de sociedades espalhadas em diferentes parte do globo. Assim, a modernidade “desencaixa” o indivíduo de sua identidade fixa no tempo e no espaço. Dois trechos da obra elucidam esse mecanismo de desencaixe: “Por desencaixe me refiro ao ‘deslocamento’ das relações sociais de contextos locais de interação e sua reestruturação através de extensões indefinidas de tempo-espaço” (p. 29). “Este [desencaixe] retira a atividade social dos contextos localizados, reorganizando as relações sociais através de grandes distâncias tempo-espaciais” (p. 58). (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Andrew
Aug 10, 2018Andrew rated it liked it
Quite a short book, written in 1989, and a pretty good window into Giddens' sociology.
Anthony Giddens' is an interesting thinker and a talented writer. I find his work accessible and thought provoking. However, tends to present quite a neat picture of the direction society is headed - away from tradition and towards a kind of cosmopolitan and progressive liberal individualism. Obviously it's not all rosy, and he spends some time discussing environmental problems, as well as the anxieties produced by our "runaway world".
However generally speaking, there's a more or less optimistic tenor to this book - and as I finished it I could definitely envisage Tony Blair's slick grin and hear D:Ream's 1993 hit "Things Can Only Get Better" playing in my head. I do find this good foil for more lopsidedly pessimistic writers - such as Zygmunt Bauman. But it's also a bit hard to reconcile with the state of the world as it is now. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Jimmy Jonecrantz
Nov 24, 2019Jimmy Jonecrantz rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sociology
Hade svårt att komma in i boken, kanske för att den genomgående förhåller sig ganska abstrakt och inte direkt tar exempel eller diskuterar faktiska händelser i någon större utsträckning. Efter att jag läst den är jag lite osäker på vad jag egentligen läst, vad det betyder, och hur jag ska använda detta i min förståelse av samhället. Samtidigt finns vissa observationer, såsom globaliseringens effekter, som är intressanta att diskutera vidare.
flagLike  · comment · see review
David
Aug 15, 2020David rated it really liked it
This book was outstanding! I finished it one day. I would recommend taking more time, but I was reading it for writing a paper. If you want to get a good idea of how Anthony Giddens thinks, this is a great primer. I highly recommend for any Sociology student interested in the topics of globalism or modernity.
flagLike  · comment · see review
Abby
Feb 24, 2019Abby rated it it was amazing
Shelves: books-for-school, sociology, in-library
Scholarly work that's written to actually be understood, and that's a nice change...I have more thoughts on the argument itself, but for now I'll just say that it wasn't an absolute misery to read this. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review