2021/07/24

Radiation and Reason: The Impact of Science on a Culture of Fear: Wade Allison: 9780956275615: Amazon.com: Books

Radiation and Reason: The Impact of Science on a Culture of Fear: Wade Allison: 9780956275615: Amazon.com: Books

Radiation and Reason: The Impact of Science on a Culture of Fear Paperback – October 23, 2009
by Wade Allison  (Author)
4.4 out of 5 stars    43 ratings
See all formats and editions
Paperback
AUD 37.72 

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Wade Allison Publishing (October 23, 2009)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 216 pages

Customer Reviews: 4.4 out of 5 stars    43 ratings
Videos
Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!
Upload video
More about the author
› Visit Amazon's Wade Allison Page
Wade Allison
 Follow
Biography
Wade Allison is a Fellow of Keble College and a Professor of Physics at the University of Oxford where he has studied and taught for over 40 years. His earlier research work was in high energy physics, in particular the radiation field of relativistic particles, but his interests and expertise have spread much wider. Now he is concerned with medical physics and the choices facing mankind. First he published Fundamental Physics for Probing and Imaging, an advanced textbook for his course at Oxford on physics in medicine and the wider environment. Then he published Radiation and Reason, a carefully argued popular science book aimed at the pervasive (and unjustified) fear of radiation (and all things nuclear). He recently "retired" and lectures widely, for schools, academics and the wider public, in Oxford, around the UK and abroad. Then came Fukushima - no surprises for Wade, but panic for those who had not yet read Radiation and Reason! His third book, Nuclear is for Life, gives the evidence and tells the story in a wider historical and philosophical context. The science is easy, but the reaction of human society has been science-blind. Now Wade is working on his fourth book. It is about real science, he says. It is the one he wanted to write in the first place!
 Show Less


How would you rate your experience shopping for books on Amazon today





Very poor Neutral Great
Customer reviews
4.4 out of 5 stars
4.4 out of 5
43 global ratings
5 star
 69%
4 star
 16%
3 star
 6%
2 star
 5%
1 star
 4%
How are ratings calculated?
Review this product
Share your thoughts with other customers
Write a customer review

Sponsored 
Read reviews that mention
nuclear power radiological protection wade allison nuclear industry power plants nuclear energy radiation and reason scientific effects fukushima died evidence exposure japanese workers risks based fear science current

Top reviews
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
S. Duval
5.0 out of 5 stars Seminal work on radiation and safety
Reviewed in the United States on November 22, 2014
Verified Purchase
Professor Wade has written the seminal work on radiation and safety. Prof. Wade taught and researched particle physics at Oxford for 40 years. He was not an English major or a sociology professor. In 2005 he developed a course and textbook on the use of radiation in medicine for imaging and cancer radiotherapy.

The book describes how the current fear of radiation developed. The safety standards set up in 1950 were based upon very little scientific knowledge or experience. They were designed to be very conservative and based upon the Linear No Threshold (LNT) theory. By 1990 these standards were tightened by a factor of 150. Prof Wade recommends that the safety standards be reduced by a factor of 6 from 1950 or 1000 from 1990.

Prof Wade relies upon empirical evidence to support his conclusion: medical history of survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, medical history of workers exposed to radiation, radiobiology, cancer radiotherapy, medical experiments on laboratory animals, and background radiation levels.

The nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki exposed hundreds of thousands of people to very high levels of single dose full body radiation. 280,000 survivors were tracked from 1950 to 1990 relative to a control group of 25,000 not exposed to radiation. 7.9% of the survivors died of cancer, 7.5% of natural causes and .4% from radiation induced cancer. Statistically significant radiation effects are seen for cancers but not for other causes of death or effects upon pregnancy. The level of cancer risk below 100 milli sieverts is so low that it can not be detected in a 50 year study involving 100,000 people. This contradicts the no threshold assumption of the LNT theory.

The average additional cancer rate per 1000 people over 50 years was 5 which corresponds to a 10 week reduction in life expectancy. But this number varied from 8 per thousand at 100-200 millisieverts to 90 per thousand above 2000 millisieverts.

The UK Ministry of Defense did a study of 170,000 workers exposed to an average of 25 millisievert of radiation above background radiation levels over their careers. These workers were tracked to age 85 or 2002 whichever came first. These workers suffered about 20% less cancers than the general population. This result is consistent with a threshold level at which radiation poses no danger and is suggestive of a positive effect resulting from low radiation doses.

Denver, at a high altitude, has radiation levels that are three times the safety standard set by the International Commission for Radiological Protection but a lower cancer rate than the US on average. This result is consistent with a threshold level at which radiation poses no danger and is suggestive of a positive effect resulting from low radiation doses.

Anti nuclear Greens will say that setting the radiation safety standards 1000 times lower than required is just erring on the side of safety. The problem is the effect that this standard has upon the lives of people living near a nuclear accident. No one died from radiation in Fukushima, 1600 people have died from the effects of the evacuation of Fukushima (suicides and people hospitalized at the time of the evacuation). Hundreds of thousands of people's lives have been turned completely upside down because the government will not allow them to return to their homes, their community, their businesses, and their jobs.

Green activists who whipped up the irrational fear of radiation during the Fukushima crisis have blood on their hands.
Read less
5 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
TaxiDrivin' Daddy
4.0 out of 5 stars Very basic so as not to skip any details.
Reviewed in the United States on June 6, 2016
Verified Purchase
A bit basic for many who did well in high school science, there are still many excellent insights peppered throughout which are not often articulated partly because they are taken for granted by those who already know. Radiation is certainly something to be wary of in much the same way as being out in the sun for more than an hour. Wait - that's the same thing....
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Duke of Waiheke
5.0 out of 5 stars Great book for the lay person
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2014
Verified Purchase
This book is very useful for the lay person. Whilst some of the matter is technical it still can be grasped. It provides the information with which a person can make informed judgements about nuclear power and to put its associated risks in perspective. It is of use to people who would like to be informed about the world around them.I believe this book will not be useful to those who have already made up their minds as to the unacceptability of nuclear power. If you are one of these people then do not read this book. It will challenge your beliefs.
5 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Charles F. Hawkins
5.0 out of 5 stars Pubic fear of nuclear is killing us
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2015
Verified Purchase
The book is clearly written getting to the heart nuclear reactors. It gets high marks for that. The one disappointment was thorium. There was a short summary of its magic properties, no follow up. Th deserves the detailed description of the other technologies. I kept waiting for one as I read on. Otherwise an excellent book..
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
gjellerup
5.0 out of 5 stars Puts Radiation Exposure in Perspective
Reviewed in the United States on September 21, 2012
Verified Purchase
Dr. Wade Allison has written an impressive book explaining what radiation is, how it works, and what it can and cannot do. All life developed in a sea of natural radiation and we are still continuously exposed to it today. Some studies indicate that life cannot survive without it. Other studies indicate that low-dose radiation stimulates the DNA repair system. Fear-mongering about radiation doses tinier than the ones you receive flying in a jet or visiting the American Southwest have led people to panic about nuclear power while ignoring the enormous annual death toll from fossil fuel emissions. An important book on an important topic.
9 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars The world needed this book 20 years ago
Reviewed in the United States on June 14, 2013
Verified Purchase
France has been producing electricity with nuclear power for less than 80 grams of CO2 per kilowatt hour for over
20 years. Meanwhile German electricity generates 6 times as much CO2 per kilowatt hour and Australia's generates
over 10 times more. Just imagine if the anti-nuclear movement hadn't stopped the nuclear
roll out in the 80s and 90s in the US and elsewhere. We'd all have much cleaner electricity and climate change would
be far less critical. Ignorance about radiation drove the fear mongering and we have lost, as a consequence
20 years on the battle against climate change.

The suffering at Fukushima could also have been avoided. The public could have and should have been back rebuilding
their lives. But instead they are homeless and traumatised, a savage testimony to the power of ignorance to terrify.
8 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Matt Robinson
5.0 out of 5 stars Recommended for everyone.
Reviewed in the United States on October 13, 2014
Verified Purchase
A clear and concise call to everyone to re-evaluate their position on the real dangers of radiation and consequently their feelings about nuclear power. A must- read.
3 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
See all reviews
Top reviews from other countries
Cssor
4.0 out of 5 stars Nuclear energy and global warming
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 26, 2019
Verified Purchase
I found this book useful regarding nuclear energy from my standpoint, as I'm no physic's expert, the technical detail is to some extent quite involved, however as a layman it was not to bad. However, it implies the safety regime applied to Nuclear energy appears in some areas way over the top. Given that nuclear generators do not contribute to global warming, and the waste they produced is minimal compared to carbon fuelled generators. Also it suggest's this energy source, could supply our future carbon free energy needs. Any one interested in this subject, I feel the book is worth a read.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Skote123
5.0 out of 5 stars Should be required reading for policymakers and politicians
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 22, 2015
Verified Purchase
Everyone who spouts opinion in the pub, workplace or worst of all in the media about nuclear matters, Chernobyl, Fukushima and so on should read this book and educate themselves on such an emotive subject. You don't need to be a scientist to read and understand this book and be prepared, it will change (unless you're completely close-minded) the way you think about radioactivity. Wade Allison is in his own informative way (as does the documentary "Pandora's Promise") challenging the prevailing and incorrect scaremongering cliches that surround radiation. Three eyed fish? Glowing green rods? Mass cancers? Duck and cover? Mushroom clouds above power stations? No. Read this and think again. If only our leaders who grew up in the Cold War and cut their political teeth in the CND era rad this book, there might be more reasoned debate about energy matters, public safety and climate change going on.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
William Rees
5.0 out of 5 stars Rational and Worthwhile
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 23, 2014
Verified Purchase
Wade Allison may well be a high flying academic but "Radiation and Reason" is far from being a dry academic tome. It deliberately sets out to challenge your preconceptions about radiation and nuclear power. Particularly it challenges the many bizarre old wives tales that surround nuclear radiation.

I suspect the people who are in most need of enlightenment from this book are so locked in their medieval dogma they would regard it as a heresy. Consequently they are not likely to read it. Which is a shame.

Even so, for the rest of us, it is a worthwhile and rational exploration of the issues surrounding nuclear radiation.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars Should be compulsory reading
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 30, 2016
Verified Purchase
This is a truly eye-opening book that successfully challenges the lies and deceit surrounding radiation and nuclear power. Wade Allison builds a convincing case, aptly using historical examples to highlight the disconnect between perceptions and reality. It is refreshing to see that someone decides to challenge a status quo that has been taken for granted for too long, as it has done so much damage to the nuclear cause. Until we change the way we talk and teach about radiation, everyone should read this book!
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Urs Bolt
5.0 out of 5 stars Fundamental reading to understand radiation
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 23, 2014
Verified Purchase
This book helped me to lose the irrational fear of radiation which is common in the public. But to help others the book also explains in understandable scientific terms what the facts backed by credible references, experiences and studies are.
Important reading for those with radiophobia or in general still shuddering when the word nuclear radiation is mentioned. It will certainly help you to rethink your opinion.
One person found this helpful
===

COMMUNITY REVIEWS
Showing 1-46
 Average rating4.11  ·  Rating details ·  28 ratings  ·  4 reviews

Search review text


All Languages
More filters | Sort order
Sejin,
Sejin, start your review of Radiation And Reason: The Impact Of Science On A Culture Of Fear

Write a review
charles f hawkins
Mar 23, 2015charles f hawkins rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Pubic fear of nuclear is killing us

The book is clearly written getting to the heart nuclear reactors. It gets high marks for that. The one disappointment was thorium. There was a short summary of its magic properties, no follow up. Th deserves the detailed description of the other technologies. I kept waiting for one as I read on. Otherwise an excellent book..



flag1 like · Like  · 1 comment · see review
Marie
May 10, 2015Marie rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Everything Professor Wade Allison says makes a lot of sense.

I never thought I would say this, but this book has given me much hope for the potential of nuclear power.

flag2 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Tracey Timko
Sep 06, 2019Tracey Timko rated it it was amazing
Side notes from an Oxford professor, yes, please. Anything that gives the educational side of radiation and playing down fear is a plus for me. This book adds clarity to the propaganda of radiation throughout the last century and makes me less concerned about the tiny dose we get for medical, dental, etc. reminding us that sun is also toxic in certain amounts along with many other elements that we live with everyday. A shame that one man stating that ANY dose is too much is the scale we still use to this day. He isn't alone in what level we need to raise the bar to as far as threshold and I had no idea this is utilized currently by some hospitals after doing my own research, ie. Michigan. He highlights the evolved immunity of human beings and how we are designed to deal with certain amounts of radiation perfectly fine and even healthier because of it. Without the fear and political nightmares...if there was more respect for science vs politics, we could someday live in a world that runs on nuclear and power the entire planet, make it cleaner again and feed billions of people...also, travel to other planets. I'm totally there with what this book explains. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Christopher
Jul 15, 2017Christopher rated it really liked it
A bit basic for many who did well in high school science, there are still many excellent insights peppered throughout which are not often articulated partly because they are taken for granted by those who already know. Radiation is certainly something to be wary of in much the same way as being out in the sun for more than an hour. Wait - that's the same thing.... (less)


Report abuse

알라딘: 공포가 과학을 집어삼켰다 웨이드 앨리슨

알라딘: 공포가 과학을 집어삼켰다

공포가 과학을 집어삼켰다   
웨이드 앨리슨 (지은이), 강건욱, 강유현 (옮긴이), 조규성 (감수)   
글마당   2021-03-11

원제 Radiation and Reason: The Impact of Science on a Culture of Fear
304쪽152*223mm (A5신)426g
책소개

세계적인 석학인 영국 옥스퍼드대 물리학과 웨이드 앨리슨 명예교수가 쓴『Radiation and Reason- The Impact of Science on a Culture of Fear』의 번역본으로, 일본과 중국에서도 번역되어 큰 반향을 불러일으켰다. 특별히 후쿠시마 사고 10주년을 맞아 “과연 방사선은 얼마나 두려운 것인가?” 한국의 독자들에게 그 궁금증을 풀어주는, 방사선(원자력 포함)에 관한 A~Z까지 설명한 알기 쉬운 가이드북이다.

그리고 부록편에는 [강건욱 교수의 방사선 교실]을 수록하여, ‘방사선이란 무엇인가?, 방사선량이란?, 방사능과 방사선량 관계는?, 미량의 방사능도 몸속에 계속 축적되니 위험하지 않은가?, 인공방사선은 자연방사선보다 더 유해하지 않은가? 등의 10가지 주제들에 대한 국내 방사선분야의 최고 권위자의 명쾌한 대답을 들려주고 있다.접기
------------------
목차

추천사 / 조규성(KAIST 양자학및원자력공학과 교수)
저자의 서문/ 한국어판 서문, 재판 서문, 초판 서문

제1장 인식
실수 - 개인이 체감하는 위험 - 개인 및 집단 의견 -자신감과 결정 - 과학과 안전

제2장 대기환경
대기의 크기와 구성 - 대기 변화 - 에너지와 농업

제3장 원자핵
무섭고 강력하고 그렇지만 유익한 - 크기와 척도 - 원자와 전자 – 원자핵 - 정지핵 – 태양에너지

제4장 전리방사선
방사선의 스펙트럼 – 방사선에 의한 피해 – 원자핵의 안정성 – 방사선의 측정 – 자연 환경

제5장 안전과 손상
효과는 비례하는가 – 리스크의 균형 – 인간의 방어 기능 – 손상과 스트레스와의 관계 – 복구에 걸리는 시간 – 집단 선량 – 안전 마진 – 복합적인 원인 – 이로운 효과와 적응 효과 – 체르노빌에서 날아온 놀라운 소식

제6장 방사선에 의한 급성 피폭
분자에 미치는 영향 – 세포에 미치는 영향 – 고선량 피폭 증거 – 생체 복구 메커니즘 – 저선량 및 중간 선량 – 히로시마와 나가사키의생존자 - 방사선으로 야기되는 암 – 의료 진단검사 – 핵의학 - 체르노빌 피폭자들 – 어린이 갑상선암 – 체르노빌에서의 기타 암

제7장 방사선에 의한 만성 피폭
분산된 선량 - 암 치료에 사용되는 방사선 –분할치료 – 자연환경으로부터의 피폭 – 라돈과 폐암 – 방사선 작업 종사자와 시계공장 근로자 – 생물 방어 기능의 상세

제8장 원자력
원자력에너지의 방출 – 폭발 장치 – 핵분열을 이용한 원자력 발전 - 무기가 아닌 에너지 – 폐기물

제9장 방사선과 사회
방사선의 측정 - 대중이 우려하는 것 – 핵실험과 낙진 – 억지력과방사선의 측정 - 대중이 우려하는 것 – 핵실험과 낙진 –억지력과 안심 – 방사선 안전에 대한 판단

제10장 생존을 위한 행동
규제 완화 – 신규 핵발전소 – 핵연료와 정치 – 폐기물에 대한 전략 – 원전 해체 – 핵 확산과 테러리즘 – 핵융합 발전 – 비용과 경제성 – 담수와 식량 – 교육과 이해

제11장 총괄과 결론
에필로그 / 역자서문 1, 2 / 부록 강건욱 교수의 방사선 교실 / 참고문헌

접기
추천글
중앙SUNDAY: 중앙SUNDAY 2021년 3월 27일자 '책꽂이'
저자 소개
지은이: 웨이드 앨리슨 저자파일  신간알리미 신청
최근작 : <공포가 과학을 집어삼켰다> … 총 5종 (모두보기)
현재 옥스퍼드 대학교 명예교수이자 케블 칼리지의 팰로우이며, 40년 이상을 물리학 특히, 방사선 분야를 연구하고 가르쳤다.
저서는
『Radiation and Reason: The Impact of Science on a Culture of Fear』,
『Nuclear is for Life: A Cultural Revolution』, 
최근 옥스퍼드 대학교 의료물리 강좌의 심화 교과서인
『Fundamental Physics for Probing and Imaging』에서 “핵에너지가 없다면 인류의 미래는 불투명하다”라고 원자력의 중요성을 강조하고 있다.접기

옮긴이: 강건욱 저자파일  신간알리미 신청
최근작 : <포스트 코로나 대한민국>,<포스트 코로나 대한민국 (양장)> … 총 3종 (모두보기)
서울의대를 졸업하고 같은 대학에서 의학박사를 받고 서울의대, 서울대병원 핵의학과 교수로서 방사성동위원소를 이용한 암환자 진단, 치료와 연구에 전념하고 있다. 2013년부터 국제방사선방호위원회(ICRP) 의료분과 위원으로 국제 방사선안전기준 및 가이드라인 제정에 참여하고 있으며, 교재『고창순 핵의학』,『방사능 무섭니?』,『방사선과 건강』등 여러 저술에도 참여하였다
옮긴이: 강유현 저자파일  신간알리미 신청
최근작 : … 총 1종 (모두보기)
영국 세븐옥스고등학교를 졸업하고, 현재 유럽 최고의 이공계 대학인 영국 임페리얼 칼리지 런던 물리학과 재학중이다. 강건욱 교수의 딸이며 공동 번역에 참여하였다.
감수: 조규성 저자파일  신간알리미 신청
최근작 : … 총 2종 (모두보기)
서울대 학사, 석사를 거쳐 미국 UC Berkeley대학원에서 원자력공학 박사를 받고 현재 KAIST 원자력및양자공학과 교수이다. 한국방사선산업학회 회장과 KAIST IT융합연구소 소장을 역임하였다. 저서로는 『WHY 원자력이 필요한가』(번역),『탈핵비판』(공동집필)이 있다.
출판사 제공 책소개
옥스퍼드대 석학이 말하는 기후변화와 핵발전 이야기!!

’후쿠시마 10주년을 맞아 펴낸 방사선 바로알기 책‘

시급하고도 진정한 재앙인 기후 온난화와 싸우는
가장 현실적인 방법은 방사선 허용한도를 현재 (연간 1밀리시버트 )
보다 1000배로 올려 핵발전소 건설비용을 대폭 낮추고,
무탄소 전원인 핵발전소를 빨리 증설하는 것이다.
- 저자 웨이드 앨리슨 교수

방사선 공포는 캐캐묵은 냉전의 유산이다.
신형 원자로 APR1400 4기면 2000만 가구에 무상전기 공급이 가능하다.
- 번역자 강건욱 교수

이 책의 원본은 세계적인 석학인 영국 옥스퍼드대 물리학과 웨이드 앨리슨 명예교수가 쓴『Radiation and Reason- The Impact of Science on a Culture of Fear』으로, 일본과 중국에서도 번역되어 큰 반향을 불러일으켰다.
특별히 후쿠시마 사고 10주년을 맞아 “과연 방사선은 얼마나 두려운 것인가?” 한국의 독자들에게 그 궁금증을 풀어주는, 방사선(원자력 포함)에 관한 A~Z까지 설명한 알기 쉬운 가이드북이다.

그리고 부록편에는 [강건욱 교수의 방사선 교실]을 수록하여,
‘방사선이란 무엇인가? / 방사선량이란? / 방사능과 방사선량 관계는? / 미량의 방사능도 몸속에 계속 축적되니 위험하지 않은가? / 인공방사선은 자연방사선보다 더 유해하지 않은가? / 원전에서 발생하는 삼중수소는 얼마나 위험한가? / 라돈이란 무엇이며 얼마나 위험한가? / 체르노빌이나 후쿠시마 지역에서 기형 동식물이 많이 발견된다는데… / 후쿠시마 원전에서 생성된 방사능 오염처리수를 바다로 방류한다는데… / 임신인줄 모르고 CT 촬영했는데 어째야 하나?“ 10가지 주제들에 대한 국내 방사선분야의 최고 권위자의 명쾌한 대답을 들려주고 있다.

□ 본문의 주요 구절들

Radiation And Reason 이 책이 2009년 처음 출간된 후 세계는 과학과 신뢰에 대한 세 가지 연관된 도전을 직면하였다. 2011년 일본후쿠시마에서 공포의 악마는 날뛰었고, 원자력 기술에 대한 두려움이 여러 나라를 사로잡았으며 이런 생각이 당연하다고 여겨졌다. 그 결과 탄소 배출을 더 피할 수 있게 되었다. 2019년 코로나바이러스는 모든 나라의 상황이 비슷하며, 공포가 아닌 세계적인 과학 협력만이 필요한 보호와 자신감을 제공할 수 있다는 것을 다시 한번 입증했다.
2015년 이후 끊임없는 기후 변화는 현대 문명에 가장 큰 위협으로 인식되었다. 에너지 과학은 핵 이외의 어떤 원천도 탄소연료를 대체할 수 있을 만큼 신뢰할 수 있고, 안전하며, 환경적이며, 탄력적인에너지를 제공할 가능성을 가지고 있지 않다는 것을 보여준다. 특히 이른바 재생 가능한 솔루션은 모든 테스트에서 실패하고 있다.
비록 많은 나라가 그들의 전통적인 반핵 기조를 재고하기를 여전히 두려워하고 있지만, 이 결론은 대중적인 논쟁이 아닌 오랜 과학적 원리에기초하고 있다.

이 책은 후쿠시마 사고를 에필로그에 추가했지만 대부분은 초판에서 크게 벗어나지 않았다. 후쿠시마 초기 사고로 일부 원자로는 파괴되었지만, 사람들한테 노출된 방사선은 너무 과장·왜곡되었고 중대한 영향을 끼쳤다. 후쿠시마 사고에서도 보았듯이 원자력 기술에 대한 초기대응은 나라마다 다르게 나타났다. 원자력 기술은 모든 나라에서 우리의 삶에 많은 것을 제공하였고 이는 과학에 근거해야 한다. 정치적, 지리적 불안은 국민의 삶에 많은 영향을 미치고, 원자력에 대한 문제도 예외가 아니다

방사선에 대한 안전규제의 실패로 죽은 사람은 없는 반면 쓰나미에 대한 일반적 규제의 실패는 1만 명 이상의 인명을 앗아갔다. 그런데도 쓰나미에 대한 비판은 너무 적다. 비난의 전쟁이 마치 게임처럼 전개되는 것은 무슨 일이 일어났는지를 곰곰이 따져보고, 방사선 사고와 쓰나미의 비참함을 비교하기보다 누군가의 책임을 지적하는 게 더 편하기 때문이다.
일본보다 지각이 안정된 지역에서는 자연재해가 원전에 위험을 미칠 수 없다. 그러나 비합리적인 공포, 인간에 대한 불신, 책임져야 할 조직에 대한 불신이 존재하는 사회는 지질적 불안정성 못지않은 사회적 불안정성을 갖고 있다.
- 저자의 한국어판 서문 중에서

“나는 서울대학교 원자핵공학과에서 학사와 석사를 마치고 미국버클리대학교 원자력공학과에서 원자력공학 박사학위를 받고, 현재 한국과학기술원(KAIST)에서 27년째 방사선측정 및 방사선 이용 기술에 관한 강의와 연구를 하면서 후학들을 가르치고 있다
그리고 20년째 국제 원자력및방사선 안전교육 프로그램 등을 운영해 40개국에서 온 150여 명의 외국인 석사를 배출해왔다. 이러한 나의 이력을 고려하면 누가 보더라도 원자력 및 방사선 전문가라고 해도 크게 틀리지 않을 것이다. 하지만 이 책을 통해 방사선과 우리 인류의 운명에 대해 새로운 각도에서 생각해 볼 기회를 갖게 되었고, 앨리슨 교수의 생각은 나에게 커다란 지적 충격을 안겨 주었다.
지구촌을 휩쓸고 있는 방사선과 원자력에 대한 대중의 오해와 그로 인한 공포심이 우리 세대는 물론 우리 아이들의 미래와 지구환경을 망치는 일을 더 이상 방관해서는 안 되겠다는 확신을 갖게 되었다. 소위 지식인의 사회적 책임, ‘대중과의 소통’의 중요성을 절감하게 된 것이다. 밤하늘의 아름다운 별들을 포함하여 지구에 존재하는 모든 생명과 종교의 근원인 태양은 다름 아닌 방사선 그 자체가 아닌가."
- 감수자 조규성교수의 추천글 중에서

“이 책은 2009년에 출간된 이후 앨리슨 교수가 후쿠시마 원전사고 현장을 두 차례나 방문하고 느낀 소회가 추가되었고, 본문에서 보여주는 각종 통계자료는 최근 데이터로 업그레이드되었다.
저자의 비유처럼 겉으로는 무서워 보이나 강력한 힘을 가진 노트르담의 꼽추 콰지모도가 집시 소녀 에스메랄다를 구하고 난 뒤에야 시민들은 그를 인정하였다. 현장을 경험하지 않은 환경운동가들의 ‘카더라’ 강의가 유튜브에서 각광을 받고 그들이 믿는 증거는 사고 현장에서 공포를 경험한 사람들의 인터뷰이지 실제 위험사례를 종합한 데이터가 아니다. 방사선 측정 장비도 쉽게 구할 수 있으니 보이지 않는 방사선을 경험하라. 무엇보다도 체르노빌, 후쿠시마 사고 현장을 경험하라. 생물학적 위험으로 인해서가 아니라 공포로 인해 피폐해진 것을.

방사선에 대한 지나친 공포는 이를 피하고자 더 큰 위험을 택하게 하여 개인에게는 더 많은 죽음을 불러왔고, 사회적으로는 환경 파괴를 가속화하였다. 체르노빌의 공포로 인한 서유럽 임산부의 20만여 명의 낙태와 후쿠시마 사고 직후 노약자 강제 대피로 인한 사망은 죽더라도 방사선 리스크를 제로로 해야 한다는 환상에서 나온 미필적 고의에 의한 살해 행위이다.
독일은 태양광, 풍력발전을 급격히 늘렸으나 자국에서 생산되는 갈탄을 이용한 반환경적인 석탄발전을 효과적으로 줄이지 못하고 재생에너지가 모자라면 프랑스 원전에서 생산한 전기를 수입하고 있다.

저자인 앨리슨 교수는 이러한 것이 지속되는 배경에는 이런 공포로 먹고 사는 직업과 정치인들이 있기 때문이라고 피력한다. 역자의 직업인 핵의학 역시 다른 의사들이 대신할 수 없는 면허와 공포로 보호받고 있다. 1960년부터 60년 이상 갑상선암 환자를 대량의 방사선을 인체에 투여하여 치료한 의료 현장경험이 있고, 갑상선암 생존율은 100% 이상으로 일반인보다 생존율이 높다. 원자력종사자의 암 발생 역시 일반인보다 25% 낮다.
저자가 강조한 것처럼 환경적으로도 가장 적은 쓰레기를 생산하는 에너지가 안전한 에너지다. 비과학적이고 비현실적인 공포만 극복하면. 기후변화를 막으려면 여유를 부리지 않고 가능한 모든 방법을 동원해야 한다. 모쪼록 이 책을 통해 우리 국민이 잘못된 지식으로 죽음의 길로 몰고 가는 구호와 선전에서 비롯된 집단 광기에서 빠져나와 공포에서 벗어나 현실을 바라보고 생명의 길로 가기를 바란다.
- 공동번역자인 강건욱(서울대 의대 핵의학과 교수) 역자 서문 중에서

“예상하지 못한 코로나 펜데믹사태로 영국에 들어가지 못하고 서울에 머물면서 우연한 기회에 글마당의 제안으로 핵의학을 전공으로 하는 아버지와 물리학 전공인 딸이 만나 서로의 전문성을 살려서 번역에 참여하게 되었습니다. 아버지와 서로의 전문이 아닌 주제에 대해소통을 통해 알아가고, 학문적으로 좋은 결과를 얻을 수 있었던 것은 또 하나의 큰 소득이었습니다. ”
- 공동번역자 강유현(영국 페리얼 칼리지 런던 물리학과 3학년 재학중) 역자 서문 중에서접기
2

등록
구매자 (1)전체 (2)
공감순
 세시아  2021-05-12

원서가 2009년 발행인데, 책 처음에 보면 ˝2021년 현재˝ 라고 시작합니다. 번역자들이 맘대로 손 댄 듯..거기에, 추천사에 보면 ˝우리 국민에게 큰 분노와 허탈감을 안겨 준 어느 부녀˝ 라던가, ˝현 정부의 야만적인 탈원전정책˝ 이라는 구절도 있구요. 너무 정치색이 뚜렷하여 읽는 것 포기했네요.  
공감 (0)  댓글 (0)   
 위세이프  2021-03-26

가까운 지인께서 책을 구입해서 선물로 주신다네요. 꼭 읽어보고 독후감 남기겠습니다.^^  
공감 (0)  댓글 (0)

2021/07/23

P. D. Ouspensky - Wikipedia

P. D. Ouspensky - Wikipedia

P. D. Ouspensky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
P. D. Ouspensky
P D Ouspenski(y).gif
Born
Pyotr Demianovich Ouspenskii

5 March 1878
Died2 October 1947 (aged 69)
Lyne PlaceSurrey, England, UK

Pyotr Demianovich Ouspenskii (known in English as Peter D. OuspenskyRussianПётр Демьянович УспенскийromanizedPyotr Dem'yanovich Uspenskiy; 5 March 1878 – 2 October 1947),[2] was a Russian esotericist known for his expositions of the early work of the Greek-Armenian teacher of esoteric doctrine George Gurdjieff. He met Gurdjieff in Moscow in 1915, and was associated with the ideas and practices originating with Gurdjieff from then on. He taught ideas and methods based in the Gurdjieff system for 25 years in England and the United States, although he separated from Gurdjieff personally in 1924, for reasons that are explained in the last chapter of his book In Search of the Miraculous.

Ouspensky studied the Gurdjieff system directly under Gurdjieff's own supervision for a period of ten years, from 1915 to 1924. In Search of the Miraculous recounts what he learned from Gurdjieff during those years. While lecturing in London in 1924, he announced that he would continue independently the way he had begun in 1921. Some, including his close pupil Rodney Collin, say that he finally gave up the system in 1947, just before his death, but his own recorded words on the subject ("A Record of Meetings", published posthumously) do not clearly endorse this judgement.[3]

Early life[edit source]

Ouspensky was born in Kharkov, today modern day Ukraine, in 1878. In 1890, he studied at the Second Moscow Gymnasium, a government school attended by boys aged from 10 to 18. At the age of 16, he was expelled from school for painting graffiti on the wall in plain sight of a visiting inspector. From then on he was more or less on his own.[4] In 1906, he worked in the editorial office of the Moscow daily paper The Morning. In 1907 he became interested in Theosophy. In the autumn of 1913, aged 35, he journeyed to the East in search of the miraculous. He visited Theosophists in Adyar, but was forced to return to Moscow after the beginning of the Great War. In Moscow he met Gurdjieff and married Sophie Grigorievna Maximenko. He had a mistress by the name of Anna Ilinishna Butkovsky.[5]

Career[edit source]

During his years in Moscow, Ouspensky wrote for several newspapers and was particularly interested in the then-fashionable idea of the fourth dimension.[6] His first work, published in 1909, was titled The Fourth Dimension.[7] It was influenced by the ideas prevalent in the works of Charles H. Hinton,[8] which treated the fourth dimension as an extension in space.[9][10] Ouspensky treats time as a fourth dimension only indirectly in a novel he wrote titled Strange Life of Ivan Osokin[11] where he also explores the theory of eternal recurrence.

Ouspensky's second work, Tertium Organum, was published in 1912. In it he denies the ultimate reality of space and time,[12] and negates Aristotle's Logical Formula of Identification of "A is A", concluding in his "higher logic" that A is both A and not-A.[13] Unbeknown to Ouspensky, a Russian émigré by the name of Nicholas Bessarabof took a copy of Tertium Organum to America and placed it in the hands of the architect Claude Bragdon who could read Russian and was interested in the fourth dimension.[14] Tertium Organum was rendered into English by Bragdon who had incorporated his own design of the hypercube[15][16] into the Rochester Chamber of Commerce building.[17] Bragdon also published the book and the publication was such a success that it was finally taken up by Alfred A. Knopf. At the time, in the early 1920s, Ouspensky's whereabouts were unknown. Bragdon located him in Constantinople and paid him back some royalties.

Ouspensky traveled in Europe and the East — India, Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) and Egypt — in his search for knowledge. After his return to Russia and his introduction to Gurdjieff in 1915, he spent the next few years studying with him, and supporting the founding of a school.

Prior to 1914, Ouspensky had written and published a number of articles. In 1917, he updated these articles to include "recent developments in physics" and republished them as a book in Russian entitled A New Model of the Universe.[18] The work, as reflected in its title, shows the influence of Francis Bacon and Max Müller, and has been interpreted as an attempt to reconcile ideas from natural science and religious studies with esoteric teachings in the tradition of Gurdjieff and Theosophy.[19] It was assumed that the book was lost to the Revolution's violence, but it was then republished in English (without Ouspensky's knowledge) in 1931. The work has attracted the interest of a number of philosophers and has been a widely accepted authoritative basis for a study of metaphysics.[citation needed] Ouspensky sought to exceed the limits of metaphysics with his "psychological method", which he defined as "a calibration of the tools of human understanding to derive the actual meaning of the thing itself". (paraphrasing p. 75.) According to Ouspensky: "The idea of esotericism ... holds that the very great majority of our ideas are not the product of evolution but the product of the degeneration of ideas which existed at some time or are still existing somewhere in much higher, purer and more complete forms." (p. 47) The book also provided an original discussion on the nature and expression of sexuality; among other things, he draws a distinction between erotica and pornography.[citation needed]

Ouspensky's lectures in London were attended by such literary figures as Aldous HuxleyT. S. EliotGerald Heard and other writers, journalists and doctors. His influence on the literary scene of the 1920s and 1930s as well as on the Russian avant-garde was immense but still very little known.[20] It was said of Ouspensky that, though nonreligious, he had one prayer: not to become famous during his lifetime.

Later life[edit source]

Ouspensky's gravestone
Ouspensky's grave at the Holy Trinity Church in Lyne, Surrey, England, photographed in 2013

After the Bolshevik revolution, Ouspensky travelled to London by way of Istanbul. In London, a number of eminent people became interested in his work. Lady Rothermere, wife of Harold Harmsworth, 1st Viscount Rothermere, the press magnate, was willing to promote Tertium Organum. The influential intellectual and editor A. R. Orage became deeply interested in Ouspensky's ideas and promoted their discussion in various circles. Prominent theosophist and editor G. R. S. Mead became interested in his ideas on the fourth dimension.

By order of the British government, Gurdjieff was not allowed to settle in London. Gurdjieff eventually went to France with a considerable sum of money raised by Ouspensky and his friends, and settled down near Paris at the Prieuré in Fontainebleau-Avon.[21] It was during this time, after Gurdjieff founded his Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man in France, that Ouspensky came to the conclusion that he was no longer able to understand his former teacher and made a decision to discontinue association with him. He set up his own organisation, The Society for the Study of Normal Psychology, which is now known as The Study Society.[22]

Ouspensky wrote about Gurdjieff's teachings in a book originally entitled Fragments of an Unknown Teaching, published posthumously in 1947 under the title In Search of the Miraculous. While this volume has been criticized by some of those who have followed Gurdjieff's teachings as only a partial representation of the totality of his ideas, it provides what is probably the most concise explanation of the material that was included. This is in sharp contrast to the writings of Gurdjieff himself, such as Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson, where the ideas and precepts of Gurdjieff's teachings are found very deeply veiled in allegory. Initially, Ouspensky had intended this book to be published only if Beelzebub's Tales were not published. But after his death, Mme Ouspensky showed its draft to Gurdjieff who praised its accuracy and permitted its publication.

Ouspensky died in Lyne PlaceSurrey, in 1947. Shortly after his death, The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution was published, together with In Search of the Miraculous. A facsimile edition of In Search of the Miraculous was published in 2004 by Paul H. Crompton Ltd. London. Transcripts of some of his lectures were published under the title of The Fourth Way in 1957; largely a collection of question and answer sessions, the book details important concepts, both introductory and advanced, for students of these teachings.

Ouspensky's papers are held at Yale University Library's Manuscripts and Archives department.

Teaching[edit source]

After Ouspensky broke away from Gurdjieff, he taught the "Fourth Way", as he understood it, to his independent groups.

Fourth Way[edit source]

Gurdjieff proposed that there are three ways of self-development generally known in esoteric circles. These are the Way of the Fakir, dealing exclusively with the physical body, the Way of the Monk, dealing with the emotions, and the Way of the Yogi, dealing with the mind

What is common about the three ways is that they demand complete seclusion from the world. According to Gurdjieff, there is a Fourth Way which does not demand its followers to abandon the world. The work of self-development takes place right in the midst of ordinary life. Gurdjieff called his system a school of the Fourth Way where a person learns to work in harmony with his physical body, emotions and mind. Ouspensky picked up this idea and continued his own school along this line.[23]

Ouspensky made the term "Fourth Way" and its use central to his own teaching of the ideas of Gurdjieff. He greatly focused on Fourth Way schools and their existence throughout history.

Students

Among his students were Rodney CollinMaurice NicollRobert S. de RoppKenneth WalkerRemedios Varo and Dr Francis Roles.[24]

Self-remembering[edit source]

Ouspensky personally confessed the difficulties he was experiencing with "self-remembering," which has later been defined by Osho as 'witnessing'. The present phraseology in the teachings of Advaita is to be in awareness, or being aware of being aware. It is also believed to be consistent with the Buddhist practice of 'mindfulness'. The ultimate goal of each is to be always in a state of meditation even in sleep. 'Self-remembering' was a technique to which he had been introduced by Gurdjieff himself. Gurdjieff explained to him that this was the missing link to everything else. While in Russia, Ouspensky experimented with the technique with a certain degree of success, and in his lectures in London and America he emphasized the importance of its practice. The technique requires a division of attention, so that a person not only pays attention to what is going on in the exterior world but also in the interior. A.L. Volinsky, an acquaintance of Ouspensky in Russia, mentioned to him that this was what professor Wundt meant by apperception. Ouspensky disagreed and commented on how an idea so profound to him would pass unnoticed by people whom he considered intelligent. Gurdjieff explained the Rosicrucian principle that in order to bring about a result or manifestation, three things are necessary. With self-remembering and self-observation two things are present. The third one is explained by Ouspensky in his tract on Conscience: it is the non-expression of negative emotions.[25][26]

Published works[edit source]

  • The Psychology of Man’s Possible EvolutionOnline.
  • Tertium Organum: The Third Canon of Thought, a Key to the Enigmas of the World. Translated from the Russian by Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude BragdonRochester, New York: Manas Press, 1920; New York: Knopf, 1922; London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1923, 1934; 3rd American edition, New York: Knopf, 1945. Online version.
  • A New Model of the Universe: Principles of the Psychological Method in Its Application to Problems of Science, Religion and Art. Translated from the Russian by R. R. Merton, under the supervision of the author. New York: Knopf, 1931; London: Routledge, 1931; 2nd revised edition, London: Routledge, 1934; New York: Knopf, 1934.
  • Talks with a Devil (Russian, 1916). Tr. by Katya Petroff, edited with an introduction by J. G. Bennett. Northamptonshire: Turnstone, 1972, ISBN 0-85500-004-X (HC); New York: Knopf, 1973; York Beach: Weiser, 2000, ISBN 1-57863-164-5.
  • The Psychology of Man’s Possible Evolution. New York: Hedgehog Press, 1950.
  • Strange Life of Ivan Osokin. New York and London: Holme, 1947; London: Faber & Faber, 1948; first published in Russian as Kinemadrama (St. Petersburg, 1915). Online (Russian).
  • In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1949; London: Routledge, 1947.
  • In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching London, Paul H. Crompton Ltd 2010 facsimile edition of the 1949 edition, hardcover.
  • The Fourth Way: A Record of Talks and Answers to Questions Based on the Teaching of G. I. Gurdjieff (Prepared under the general supervision of Sophia Ouspensky). New York: Knopf, 1957; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1957.
  • Letters from Russia, 1919 (Introduction by Fairfax Hall and epilog from In Denikin's Russia by C. E. Bechhofer). London and New York: Arkana, 1978.
  • Conscience: The Search for Truth. Introduction by Merrily E. Taylor. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.
  • A Further Record: Extracts from Meetings 1928–1945. London and New York: Arkana, 1986.
  • The Symbolism of the Tarot (Translated by A. L. Pogossky). New York: Dover Publications Inc., 1976. Online version.
  • The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution and The Cosmology of Man's possible Evolution, a limited edition of the definitive text of his Psychological and Cosmological Lectures, 1934–1945. Agora Books, East Sussex, 1989. ISBN 1-872292-00-3.
  • P. D. Ouspensky Memorial CollectionYale University Library. Archive notes taken from meetings during 1935–1947.

References[edit source]

  1. ^ https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/1002/2wwii_2275916-3561?pid=7408124&backurl=https://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?dbid%3D1002%26h%3D7408124%26indiv%3Dtry%26o_vc%3DRecord:OtherRecord%26rhSource%3D7579&treeid=&personid=&hintid=&usePUB=true&usePUBJs=true&_ga=2.175087010.1858548494.1562085269-1684422689.1541013528
  2. ^ "Ouspensky Foundation"ouspensky.info. 2002. Archived from the original on 20 July 2018. Retrieved 7 March 2014.
  3. ^ Miller, Timothy (1995). America's Alternative Religions. SUNY Press. p. 260ISBN 0-7914-2397-2.
  4. ^ Shirley, John (2004). Gurdjieff. Penguin Group. p. 111. ISBN 1-58542-287-8.
  5. ^ Moore, James (1999). Gurdjieff. Element Books Ltd. p. 73. ISBN 1-86204-606-9The meaning of life is an eternal search.
  6. ^ Geometry of four dimensions by Henry Parker Manning
  7. ^ P. D. Ouspensky, The Fourth Dimension, Kessinger Publishing, 2005. ISBN 1-4253-4935-8.
  8. ^ Rucker, Rudolf, editor, Speculations on the Fourth Dimension: Selected Writings of Charles H. Hinton, Dover Publications Inc., 1980. ISBN 0-486-23916-0.
  9. ^ Scientific Romances by Charles Howard Hinton
  10. ^ A new era of thought by Charles Howard Hinton
  11. ^ P. D. Ouspensky, Strange Life of Ivan Osokin, Lindisfarne Books, 1947. ISBN 1-58420-005-7.
  12. ^ Ouspensky, P. D. (1912). Tertium Organum (2nd ed.). Forgotten Books. ISBN 1-60506-487-4.
  13. ^ Ouspensky, P. D. (2003). Tertium Organum. Book Tree. p. 266. ISBN 1-58509-244-4A is both A and Not-A
  14. ^ Gary Lachman In Search of P. D. Ouspensky, p. 174, Quest Books, 2006 ISBN 978-0-8356-0848-0
  15. ^ Claude Bragdon, A Primer of Higher Space, Omen Press, Tucson, Arizona, 1972.
  16. ^ A primer of higher space (the fourth dimension) by Claude Fayette Bragdon, plates 1, 20 and 21 (following p. 24)
  17. ^ Rudolf Rucker, Geometry, Relativity and the Fourth Dimension, Dover Publications Inc., 1977, p. 2. ISBN 0-486-23400-2.
  18. ^ A New Model of the Universe: Principles of the Psychological Method in Its Application to Problems of Science, Religion and Art. Translated from the Russian by R. R. Merton, under the supervision of the author. New York: Knopf, 1931; London: Routledge, 1931; 2nd revised edition, London: Routledge, 1934; New York: Knopf, 1934.
  19. ^ Josephson-Storm, Jason (2017). The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 123. ISBN 978-0-226-40336-6.
  20. ^ Gary Lachman In Search of P. D. Ouspensky, pp. 177-8, Quest Books, 2006 ISBN 978-0-8356-0848-0
  21. ^ Alex Owen The Place of Enchantment, p. 232, University of Chicago Press, 2004 ISBN 978-0-226-64201-7
  22. ^ Brian Hodgkinson (2010). In Search of Truth. Shepheard-Walwyn (Publishers). ISBN 978-0-85683-276-5. p. 34
  23. ^ Bruno de Panafieu-Jacob Needleman-George Baker-Mary Stein Gurdjieff, p. 218, Continuum International Publishing Group, 1997 ISBN 978-0-8264-1049-8
  24. ^ "1947–1960 Dr F.C. Roles: New Beginnings – Ouspensky Today"www.ouspenskytoday.org. Retrieved 2017-09-12.
  25. ^ P. D. Ouspensky Conscience, p. 126, Routledge, 1979 ISBN 978-0-7100-0397-3
  26. ^ Gary Lachman In Search of P. D. Ouspensky, p. 121, Quest Books, 2006 ISBN 978-0-8356-0848-0

Further reading[edit source]

  • Bob Hunter: "P.D.Ouspensky, Pioneer of the Fourth Way", Eureka Editions, 2000. [www.eurekaeditions.com] ISBN 90-72395-32-8. Later republished as: Don't Forget: P.D. Ouspensky's Life of Self-Remembering, Bardic Press, 2006. ISBN 0-9745667-7-2.
  • Cerqueiro, Daniel: "P.D.Ouspensky y su teoría Espacio-Temporal Hexadimensional". Ed.Peq.Ven. Buenos Aires 2010. ISBN 978-987-9239-20-9
  • Gary LachmanIn Search of P. D. Ouspensky: The Genius in the Shadow of Gurdjieff. Quest Books, 2004, ISBN 0-8356-0840-9.
  • J. H. ReynerOuspensky, The Unsung Genius. George Allen & Unwin, London, 1981, ISBN 0-04-294122-9.
  • Colin WilsonThe Strange Life of P. D. Ouspensky. The Aquarian Press, 1993, ISBN 1-85538-079-X.
  • The Study SocietyThe Bridge No. 12, P. D. Ouspensky Commemorative Issue.
  • Gerald de Symons Beckwith (2015). Ouspensky's Fourth Way: The story of the further development and completion of P D Ouspensky's work by Dr Francis Roles. Starnine Media & Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978-0-9931776-0-6.
  • Centers~ Influences From Within: The Essential Wisdom of Mindfulness and the Fourth Way by Cheryl Shrode-Noble (2017) ISBN 1974034062

External links[edit source]