2024/04/07

쿠시티 모한 센 - Wikipedia Kshitimohan Sen

쿠시티 모한 센 - Wikipedia

쿠시티 모한 센

출처 : 무료 백과 사전 "Wikipedia (Wikipedia)"
쿠시티 모한 센
쿠시티 모한 센 (왼쪽)과 마하 토마 건디 (오른쪽)
인물 정보
탄생1880년 12월 2일 영국령 인도 제국(현 방글라데시 다카 )
영국 국기 방글라데시의 국기
사망1960년 3월 12일 (79세)
학문
연구분야인도학 · 철학 · 문학
연구기관비슈바 바라티 대학
템플릿 보기

쿠시티 모한 센 [1] ( 벵골어 : ক্ষিতিমোহন সেন , 영어 : Kshitimohan Sen , 1880년 12월 2일 - 1960년 3월 12일 )는 인도 벵골 지방을 연구하고 산스크리트어 교수, 비슈바 바라티 대학(현 타고르 국제대학 )의 부학장 [2] 등을 역임했다.

경력 편집 ]

1880년 당시 영국령 인도 제국 (현 방글라데시 )이었던 다카 지구의 소나란 마을(Sonarang)에서 태어났다. 아버지는 의사였다고 한다.

라빈드라나트 타고르 가 설립한 비슈바 바라티 대학 의 부학장이 되어, 산스크리트어 교수도 겸임하여 교학에 임했다. 센은 다골이 사학을 설립했을 때 교장으로 초청된 인물이었고, 다골의 부하보다는 '동료'라고 해서 좋은 입장이었다. 간디와도 사이가 좋았던 것 같고, 함께 촬영한 사진이 남아 있다.

실적 · 연구 내용 편집 ]

  • 타골과 공동으로, 바울 의 방대한 가집을 수집, 출판함과 동시에 연구를 발표했다. 그것에 의하면 바울이 목표로 하는 것은 자유이며 「모든 외견적인 강제로부터의 자유」라고 했다. 그 때문에 바울은 인간을 차별하는 카스트 제도를 인정하지 않고 우상숭배나 사원숭배도 하지 않는다고 했다. 또한, 바울의 사상을 '인간 속에 하나님이 살고 있다'며 인간 속에 숨어 있는 고차원적 존재인 '모넬 마누쉬(마음의 사람)'를 주장했다 [3] .
  • 어학에 능숙하고 산스크리트어 , 벵골어 , 힌디어 외에 구자라트어 , 라자스탄 어, 아랍어 , 페르시아어를 조종, 힌두교 관련, 인도의 중세 신비주의, 고대 인도의 문화와 인종 차별에 관해서도 책을 기재했다. 50년 이상에 이르는 연구 기간에 많은 저작을 남겼다. 특히 '힌두교'는 프랑스어, 독일어, 네덜란드어, 그리고 일본어 등으로 번역되었다.

가족·친족 편집 ]

저작 편집 ]

일본어 번역된 출판물 편집 ]

  • 쿠시티모한센(나카가와 마사유역) 『힌두교』 코단샤 현대신서, 코단샤, 1999년. ISBN 978-4061494695

각주 편집 ]

  1. ^ 키시티 모한 센, 쿠시티 모한 센, KM 센, KM 센 등이라는 일본어 표기도 볼 수 있다.
  2. ↑ Kshitimohan Sen - visva bharati university
  3. ^ 무라세 토모저 「풍광의 우타비와 바울의 문화 인류학적 연구」P131


===

Kshitimohan Sen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kshitimohan Sen
Photo of Kshitimohan Sen with Rabindranath Tagore
Kshitimohan Sen with Rabindranath Tagore
Born30 November 1880
Died12 March 1960 (aged 79)
NationalityIndian
Occupation(s)Professor, writer

Kshitimohan Sen (2 December 1880 – 12 March 1960) was an Indian scholar, writer, a Sanskrit professor and an M.A. in Sanskrit from Queen's College, Benares. He was born in a family hailing from Sonarang in Bengal Presidency (now in Bangladesh). He started his working life at the Department of Education, Chamba State. In 1908, at the call of Rabindranath Tagore, he joined Brahmacharyashram. Later he performed responsibility of Adhyaksha of Vidyabhaban. He was the first Deshikottam (1952) of Vishwa Bharati. He was an acting Upacharyas of Visva-Bharati University (1953–1954).[1] He is the maternal grandfather of Amartya Sen.[2]

Books[edit]

  • Kabir (1910–11)
  • Bharatiya Madhyayuger Sadhanar Dhara (1930)
  • Dadu (1935)
  • Bharater Sangskrti (1943)
  • Banglar Sadhana (1945)
  • Yuga Guru Rammohan (1945)
  • Jatibhed (1946)
  • Banglar Baul (1947)
  • Hindu Sangskrtir Svarup (1947)
  • Bharater Hindu-Mussalman Yukta Sadhana (1949)
  • Prachin Bharate Nari (1950)
  • Chinmay Banga (1957)
  • Hinduism (1961)
  • Sadhak O Sadhana (2003)

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Kshitimohan Sen (1880-1960)". Visva-Bharati University. Archived from the original on 1 July 2011. Retrieved 18 October 2012.
  2. ^ "Honorary Degree Citation: Amartya Sen". University of the Witwatersrand. Archived from the original on 13 August 2012. Retrieved 18 October 2012.

External links[edit]


===
A teacher of many talents
Read more below
CHANDREYEE CHATTERJEE Published 27.12.09, 12:00 AM



Amartya Sen remembers his grandfather Kshiti Mohan (below) at the programme in Bolpur. (Sanjoy Chattopadhyaya)
He was a thinker, researcher, writer, teacher and a friend, philosopher and guide, and on his 130th birth anniversary Acharya Kshiti Mohan Sen was remembered as all these and more.

A close associate of Rabindranath Tagore, Sen was instrumental in giving shape to the poet’s dream in Santiniketan.

“He was an example of Tagore’s farsightedness and ability to understand human nature and Kshiti Mohan lived up to that dream,” said Bhabatosh Dutta, one of the speakers at a commemorative programme organised by the state information and cultural affairs department at the Gitanjali theatre in Santiniketan on Monday.

Born on December 2, 1880, in Varanasi, Sen completed his masters in Sanskrit from Maurice College and took up a teaching job in Chamba in the foothills of the Himalayas. In 1908 he came to Santiniketan on the invitation of Tagore and stayed on till his death 52 years later.

Paying homage to the multifaceted personality were his family members — grandsons Amartya Sen, Somshankar Dasgupta, Kalyan Kumar Dasgupta, Santabhanu Sen and granddaughter Supurna Dutta — and his student Somendranath Bandyopadhyay.

Amartya Sen remembered Kshiti Mohan not as a researcher, writer and teacher but as a guardian.

From early morning training in grammar and discussions on various topics to inculcating a sense of punctuality, the economist’s portrait of his grandfather captured it all.

“He used to set the watch in the house 15 minutes forward. When I asked him why, he told me that it made me reach places on time. It is something that I still do now,” said the Nobel Laureate.

According to Amartya Sen, his grandfather was open-minded and his explanation of the distinction between good and bad was more “epistemological than ethical”.

Anup Motilal, the director of the information and cultural affairs department, spoke about Sen as a writer of books like Dadu, Hindu Mushalmaner Jukto Sadhana and Kabir.

===


===

Hinduism: with a New Foreword by Amartya Sen : Sen, K. M.: Amazon.com.au: Books

Hinduism: with a New Foreword by Amartya Sen : Sen, K. M.: Amazon.com.au: Books


Roll over image to zoom in




K. M. SenK. M. Sen
Follow





Hinduism: with a New Foreword by Amartya Sen Paperback – 19 January 2021
by K. M. Sen (Author)
4.6 out of 5 stars 50

Hinduism provides an invaluable introduction to its schools of thought and the very different ways in which it is practised and interpreted.

K. M. Sen discusses the evolution of Hinduism's central systems of belief and codes of conduct, as well as popular cults and sects such as Bhakti, Tantrika and the mystics of North India, and describes the varying incarnations of its supreme deity, Krishna and Rama among them. He recounts its history from the Indus Valley civilization c.2500 BC and the Vedic age nature gods to its relationship with Buddhism and Jainism and the impact of western culture. And he describes the day-to-day practice of Hinduism - customs, festivals and rituals; the caste system; and its philosophies and exponents. In a new foreword, the author's grandson Professor Amartya Sen brings his work right up to date, examining the role of Hinduism in the world today.


Report an issue with this product


Print length  176 pages
19 January 2021
 



Product description

Book Description
Hinduism provides an invaluable introduction to its schools of thought and the very different ways in which it is practised and interpreted.


About the Author
Kshiti Mohan Sen was educated at the traditional Sanskrit schools of Banaras, which had been a centre of Indian learning for many centuries. He mastered Sanskrit and a large collection of modern Indian languages, and also became an expert on Indian religious texts at a young age. Along with a study of folk culture, Sen wrote several volumes on different aspects of Hinduism, including a treatise on the caste system, and a textual study of the position of women in ancient India. Following Kshiti Mohan Sen's death in March 1960, this book was prepared for publication by his grandson, Amartya Sen, who has also contributed a substantial new introduction for this edition.

Product details
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Penguin Press; 1st edition (19 January 2021)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 176 pages 
4.6 out of 5 stars 50




About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
 
Follow

K. M. Sen



Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs, and more



 


Top reviews

Top reviews from Australia

There are 0 reviews and 0 ratings from Australia


Top reviews from other countries

Abredjones
5.0 out of 5 stars Five StarsReviewed in Canada on 19 January 2017
Verified Purchase

The book is very informative and removes too many mis-conception about Hinduism.
Report

Dr Asoke Chakraborty
5.0 out of 5 stars An invaluable book to understand and know about Hinduism.Reviewed in India on 14 November 2015
Verified Purchase

My knowledge and idea about Hinduism would have remained incomplete and distorted without reading this book.This book helped me to develop a very broad and comprehensive notion about Hinduism.

One person found this helpfulReport

JRC
5.0 out of 5 stars A basic, yet elegant account of Hinduism.Reviewed in the United States on 8 September 2013
Verified Purchase

This is a classic book written by an eminent scholar of Hinduism and rendered into English by a non-observing Nobel-Laureate economist, who has presented the facts neutrally in an engaging, but non-judgmental manner. The initial chapters would be informative to newcomers to the study of Hinduism, but not to those who already have some knowledge of this religion/culture. However, the later chapters chronicle the evolution of Hinduism from the prehistoric times through the middle ages to the present time. This journey through the periods of history is educative, inspiring and even startling to even those who were raised as Hindus in modern India and are reasonably knowledgeable about Hinduism. The author has consciously kept the book short, which is good. The only regret is that more quotations from the Sanskrit scriptures were not used in support of the conclusions made by the author. This is a slight disappointment in view of the author's vast and deep scholarship in this field.
Overall, this is a historical account of a religion, which is as captivating as a classic novel. In the opinion of this reader, this book is not to be missed, whether one is an observing Hindu or merely curious about the great cultural-spiritual phenomenon known as Hinduism.

One person found this helpfulReport

j tattersall
5.0 out of 5 stars excellent bookReviewed in the United Kingdom on 13 November 2012
Verified Purchase

As I am off to India again I thought I would read a little on Hinduism - beautifully written and is easy to read
Report

Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars Easy to read - explains all concepts clearly and a ...Reviewed in the United States on 31 January 2018
Verified Purchase

Easy to read - explains all concepts clearly and a non biased expose on the foundations, history and development of Hinduism and Hindu thought in India and the world.
Report
See more reviews

===
Community Reviews
3.78
199 ratings32 reviews
5 stars
54 (27%)
4 stars
64 (32%)
3 stars
67 (33%)
2 stars
12 (6%)
1 star
2 (1%)
Search review text

Search review text

Filters
Displaying 1 - 10 of 32 reviews
Profile Image for Hinch.
Hinch
62 reviews
1 follower

Follow
February 18, 2023
Really nice overview, as someone who knew nothing about Hinduism before I feel like this was a very accessible, readable introduction. It's definitely more about broad themes than anything specific, though.

10 likes

Like

Comment


Profile Image for Critical.
Critical
26 reviews
120 followers

Follow
March 11, 2021
Ok, so let me first say that I'd never have read this book if not for this one friend, who whenever presented with a caste-based critique of anything to do with Hinduism, always had only one thing to say - "Hinduism is not just Sanatana Dharma. Read that book.". Well, now I've read that book.

Now Hinduism is complicated. You have to start with, what is Hinduism? Who is a Hindu? Who self-identifies as Hindu? Where does the category of "Hindu" come from? With a category as broad as that, how come the same narratives of Hinduism are the only ones you hear everywhere? All of these questions are not only important questions, they're absolutely essential to look at if we're going to put things into context, especially when considering the history of a large majority of the subcontinent. Not everyone is going to find liberation within that category. Not everyone will have the need to engage with it. Maybe some will even articulate their struggles within their category. But you know what? Those are politics. And politics are important. My friend's politics are pretty warped, however, and that is only confirmed by this book and his glorification of it.

Let me start by saying that this book is far from what one should base their understanding of Hinduism on. Of course, you may read this book if you'd like to get a very high level view into various concepts presented in scripture, which for the intellectually curious mind can't be a bad thing. However, be very careful about making conclusions about how these ideas have applied through history and how they apply today based on this book. I'll say once again, the politics are important.

This book, written by a Bengali Brahmin, takes the highly glorified Brahminical view of Hinduism. While the author acknowledges that divisions of varna and caste are built into Brahminic scripture, he very conveniently always comes back to the "greatness" of Hinduism, in that it can "assimilate" local traditions into itself. Now Brahmin savarna Hindu liberals love this grand narrative, because they are interested in ownership of the narrative. Much like my friend, they acknowledge the diversity of local traditions that exists under the present day classification of "Hindu", but they refuse to see that it is only through a simultaneous process of appropriation and suppression that dominant castes maintain hegemony over Dalits, Adivasis, and other oppressed castes. For the author K.M. Sen, this is a beautiful thing. For him, it is sufficient to have the odd example of a woman or a Shudra gaining some kind of power. For the hundreds of millions of people that this particular view continues to oppress, it's a horrible thing.

For the reader interested in a critical view, books like Debrahmanizing History by Braj Ranjan Mani, Why I am not a Hindu by Dr. Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd might provide better perspectives.

For those interested in the political construction of the "Hindu" identity, this article is a great reference: https://caravanmagazine.in/religion/h...

For those curious to understand the ongoing process of appropriation in constructing Hindu mythology while wiping out local traditions, this is a solid resource: https://www.raiot.in/can-we-challenge...

For those who want to know why local caste politics matters so much more in order to build nuanced understandings, this should be a reference: https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/i...

Overall, I would say that this book is not worth your time. I'm still glad I read it, if only to type this not-angry-but-feeling-hmph review.

Show more

7 likes

Like

Comment

Profile Image for Nahid Hasan.
nahid hasan
129 reviews
20 followers

Follow
January 13, 2020
A very informative book.

Almost nothing of what I actually knew about Hinduism so far matched this book.

In this book, the author has basically discussed the history of a religion from its origin to its continuation Hinduism is a fleet of Vishal Bapur, and it is a very difficult task to capture him in only one and a half hundred pages, which needs at least 5 words to express the expression, the author has done it there in 1 word.

The first thing that came to my mind after reading this book is that Islam does not have many conflicting elements with the original Hindu religion. Original Hinduism also speaks of a formless, all-pervading, One God. It is mentioned several times in this book

I think this is an underrated book. Hindu brothers should recommend this book to those who want to get a basic idea about Hinduism. And Muslims should also read this book, to know the concept of Hinduism. Because both religions are living side by side in this subcontinent, but they don't know each other well.

I am surprised when Krishna himself talks about worshiping a Supreme Lord to Arjuna, ignoring himself. But now I see that everyone has left the Supreme Lord and made Krishna their deity.
And I did not find any mention of Ram Rama was a simple but daring prince, not a god

But what game is being played by placing the poor man in the seat of God.

However, I think the book is a must-read The opening verse is written by Amartya Sen That is another story.
classic
 
general-knowledge
 
informational
 
...more

5 likes

Like

Comment

Profile Image for Riju Ganguly.
Riya Ganguly
Author 
36 books
1,587 followers

Follow
January 23, 2021
Few people know that this book was originally written in English and that the version in question is a translation by Somendranath Banerjee. Perhaps the simplicity of the translation is responsible for that. It may also be that this translated form is more widely known and read than Acharya Kshitimohan Sen's original text.
But lately the book has been unnecessarily maligned for its 'Introduction' section—where Kshitimohan's Douhitra discusses the relevance of the original book as he does. In today's political landscape, that gentleman is judged by other criteria than his wisdom or recognition. But that's it. Let us return to the book instead.
The original book, written in 1961, had an intended audience of English speakers—people who either knew nothing about 'Hinduism', or knew it wrongly. In this situation, Kshitimohan arranged his book in the form of a primer which was novel from the point of view of the time. The book was divided into three parts. They are ~
Part I: Nature and Fundamentals of Hinduism
1. Introduction
2. Nature and Development of Hinduism
3. Social ideals and values
​​4. Caste or caste system
5. Folklore and festivals
6. Solidarity Not Independence
Part II: Historical Evolution of Hinduism
7. Indus Valley Civilization
8. Vedic Age
9. Vedic culture and education
10. Upanishad and Gita
11. Cultural integration and its impact on Indian life
12. Jainism and Buddhism
13. Some other Vedic verses
14. Ramayana, Mahabharata and Purana
15. Conspiracy
16. Hinduism outside India
17. Bhakti-Dharmalondan
18.
19. The Medieval Murmiya Pursuit of North India . Bowl
20. Modern Stream
Part III: Selections from Hindu Scriptures
a. Rikveda
b. Atharvaveda
c. Upanishad
d. At the end of the Bhagavad Gita
there are instructions.

The biggest problem with this book is its size. A library is not enough for all that it tries to cover in just one hundred and sixty pages.
The aim of the whole text on it is to show that the essence of Hinduism is not conflict but harmony. We already know that this idea is not only illusory, but the dream of the 'happy heaven beyond' group of downtrodden refugees. The Vedic and pre-Vedic background of Hinduism is merely glossed over to show this synthesis. Even how Indra-Varuna-Agni was replaced by Vishnu-Brahma-Rudra in the tension of power, how the protestant religion quickly transformed from symbol to paganism—there was no opportunity to tell in this book. Rather, the so-called devotional and syncretistic religious movements gained most importance here in the Middle Ages. But Chaitanya and his cultural movement have only one paragraph!
On top of that, in view of what has been learned about the Indus-Saraswati civilization in the last sixty years, it has become necessary to re-read most of the ideas about the so-called Hindu religion.
All in all, after reading the book, I felt that we are not the target audience of this book. It is the product of a particular time and a particular thought.
But it is also admitted that such a book could probably not be written now. The ocher color has been hijacked by monks like Kshitimohan for a long time. When a book like this calm, serene pond is published today, the crowd gathers not for fishing, but for frogging.
If you know a Bengali who doesn't know anything about Hinduism, let him read this book. It is good as a primer full of simplifications written in simple language.

5 likes

Like

Comment

Profile Image for Chant.
Chant
279 reviews
12 followers

Follow
May 11, 2021
1965? Dated? I would say to some degree but for the most part, it's a good introduction to Hinduism, if you haven't read anything on the subject before.

Chapters are concisely written, which is another way of saying that the chapters in this book are short. Usually, I am not a huge fan of short chapters but in the case of an introductory text, I feel it gives the reader a better breadth of knowledge for further exploration.

If you find this little 60s pelican text I would say give a read-through. I personally have a bunch of these pelican texts from the 60s and 70s purely for graphic design (I have a thing for this type of minimal graphic design that the 21st century tends to poo-poo).

4 likes

Like

Comment


Profile Image for Erik Graff.
Erik Graf
5,061 reviews
1,224 followers

Follow
June 4, 2015
This book was employed in Harold Kasimow's Major Eastern Religions course at Grinnell College. Not knowing much about the traditions of the Asian subcontinent, I found it very enlightening.
religion

4 likes

Like

Comment

Profile Image for Vampire Who Baked.
Vampire Who Baked
148 reviews
97 followers

Follow
February 5, 2019
This is an incredible book by an erudite (yet not at all elitist) scholar that gives an intimate and insightful glimpse into probably the most complicated (and syncretic) system of religious and social philosophy in the world. Kshiti Mohan Sen's introduction spans a satisfying breadth in focus, from the history (and historiography) of South Asia, to philosophical discourse on Vedanta metaphysics, to a sociological study of the intersection of class and religion (and to a lesser extent, gender) in India. It answers basic questions about the constituent entities of Hinduism places them in its proper context.

You will learn, for example, what the Vedas are, and how relevant they are (in theory, less in praxis, except for scholars and the elites) and where they came from (Aryans? Dravidians? Both?). You will learn that the word "Brahman" is one of the most overloaded words, referring (separately) to the caste/varna, the Vedanta ideal of the all-pervading abstract Supreme Being, as well as one of the three parts of the Vedas (together with the Upanishads, as well as the four Samhitas-- Rik, Sam, Atharva and Yajur).

You will get a crash course not only on various heterodoxies within Hinduism (including atheistic and agnostic sects) but also on the complicated position of women, the ir/relevance of the caste system (no foundation in scripture, but historically prevalent), and the sociological impact of the Bhakti movement in bringing religion to the masses rather than restricting it to dogma and elite priestly classes (a lovely chapter on the "Bauls" of Bengal stands out in particular).

You will learn that most modern gods and goddesses are conglomerations of distinct deities from different sects-- the sect of Pashupati, the lord of animals, and the Aryan lord of storms Rudra, together with phallic/lingam worshipping tribes/sects led to Shiva, who is for the most part non-Vedic/non-Aryan in origin. Similarly, Krishna and Vishnu were worshipped as separate entities and only later identified as one and the same.

You will get a crash course on metaphysical ideas like "Brahman", "Atman", "Purusha", "Prakriti", "Maya", and so on.

You will learn interesting facts, like how the first anthropomorphic religious images that were created within Hinduism were actually the Gandharva staues of Buddha, by Greek sculptors who were patronised by the Buddhists in Afghanistan. Temples and human-like idols of Hindu gods came much later.

Even if you are not interested in religion, this book is a great read-- if nothing else, it's a way to get a glimpse into how religion works, the foundational philosophical ideas, and the way it adapts and changes over time to fit sociological needs. And for Hinduism, the most syncretic religion in the world, it's a particularly fascinating story.

Show more
favourites
 
nfic
 
name
 
...more

3 likes

Like

Comment

Profile Image for Mel.
Mel
88 reviews
3 followers

Follow
August 9, 2011
A pithy, humane and intelligent account of an extremly complicated subject with a myriad of historical and regional variations. Highly recommended introduction to the subject.
myth-and-religion
 
the-sub-continent

3 likes

Like

Comment

Profile Image for r0b.
r0b
173 reviews
45 followers

Follow
March 13, 2020
Delightfully accessible introduction to the subject. Not perfect but recommended for those interested.

2 likes

===
https://archive.org/details/hinduism00senk/mode/2up

===

Amartya Sen's Memoir Is Rich in Detail - Rudrangshu Mukherjee 2021

From Influences to Friendships and Intellectual Concerns, Amartya Sen's Memoir Is Rich in Detail

From Influences to Friendships and Intellectual Concerns, Amartya Sen's Memoir Is Rich in Detail

In the 'Home in the World', the clarity of Sen’s thought and the lucidity of his prose are delightful and entertaining.


It is entirely apposite that the title of Amartya Sen’s memoir Home in the World echoes the title of one of Rabindranath Tagore’s more famous novels, The Home and the World (Ghare Baire). Not only was the name Amartya given by Rabindranath, but Sen’s life was closely associated with Santiniketan from his earliest days. Sen was born in Santiniketan, in his mother’s parental home, but much of his childhood was spent in Dhaka and in Mandalay (where his father was a professor of chemistry). His earliest memories go back to his journey to what was then called Burma and his days there. He visited Santiniketan when he was a child but began to go to school there when he was about eight years old. Before that, he went to St Gregory’s in Dhaka where he was by no means an outstanding student. Sen makes a very significant observation in this context. He writes, “I became what would count as a good student only when no one cared whether I was a good student or not.” He began to blossom in Tagore’s school, which he describes as “School without Walls”: “I absolutely loved,” Sen remembers, “not having to perform well.”

Amartya Sen
Home in the World: A Memoir
Allen Lane (July 2021)

Sen writes fondly about his teachers in Santiniketan, especially his mathematics teacher Jagabandhuda who encouraged him to think independently about mathematical problems, and about Gosainji (Nityananda Binod Goswami) who was a much-loved figure among students in Santiniketan. While Sen cherishes the unique education – education in the true sense of the word of opening up the mind – he received in Santiniketan, the most formative intellectual influence came from his maternal grandfather, Kshiti Mohan Sen. The latter is now an almost forgotten figure, even though his book Hinduism – a little gem of a book – continues to remain in print from Penguin. Sen writes on his maternal grandfather in the spirit of a homage. What he writes about Kshiti Mohan also tells us about the evolving relationship between a grandfather and a favourite grandson.

Kshiti Mohan was profoundly learned in Sanskrit and Pali; he was also proficient in Hindi and Gujarati and of course in Bengali. He was an authority on the bhakti poets, especially Kabir and Dadu and the philosophy underlying their poetry and their songs. It was his erudition that made Tagore bring him to Santiniketan where he worked as one of Tagore’s closest associates. As a schoolboy in Santiniketan, Sen lived with his grandparents and had many conversations with them. His growing relationship with Kshiti Mohan, often marked by the latter’s “gentle humour”, is best illustrated by one incident. When the young Amartya informed his grandfather, a pious man, about his growing indifference to and scepticism regarding religion, Kshiti Mohan told him, “…you have placed yourself, I can see, in the atheistic – the Lokayata – part of the Hindu spectrum.” He followed this up by giving his grandson a long list of references to atheistic and agnostic treatises in ancient Sanskrit. This incident reveals not only the relationship between grandfather and grandson but also Kshiti Mohan as an outstanding teacher. Amartya Sen’s outlook on life and the world of ideas was formed by such catholicity.

While a student in Santiniketan, Sen wanted to pursue mathematics and Sanskrit in college but his meeting with Sukhamoy Chakravarty and the immediate friendship between the two of them altered Sen’s plans. He decided, almost at Chakravarty’s request, to study economics at Presidency College. He and Chakravarty embarked on an intellectual companionship together – a journey that would end only with Chakravarty’s untimely death in 1990. Calcutta, Presidency College and the College Street Coffee House opened up new vistas for Sen – intellectual debates and discussions, a growing circle of friends, immersion in the world of ideas, especially the ideas of Marx. Sen recollects those days with an obvious sense of enjoyment. But during his undergraduate days in Presidency, something else happened to Sen: his battle with oral cancer.

Sen noticed a lump on his hard palate, the size of a split pea. Since doctors were prone to dismissing it, Sen decided to read up on cancer and came up with the diagnosis that he was suffering from squamous cell carcinoma. This diagnosis was confirmed by a biopsy. He had to undergo seven days of high intensity radiation under very primitive and gruesome conditions. The treatment was relatively painless but the aftermath was terrible. Sen recounts this episode with an almost stoic detachment. When the family received the biopsy report, there was intense emotional distress verging on despair. On going to bed Sen, had a profound insight into his own situation: he was an agent (since he had made the diagnosis) and the victim of his own agency since he was also the patient. This was a unique, if problematic, predicament. His sense of agency – sheer human will – prevailed and triumphed. The emperor of maladies failed, and has failed, to subjugate the prowess of Amartya Sen.

From Presidency, Sen moved to Trinity College, Cambridge and continued his study of economics. He had been an outstanding student at Presidency but it was by the river Cam that Sen began to come into his own, intellectually. Maurice Dobb, Piero Sraffa, Joan Robinson and Dennis Robertson were the four teachers/mentors in Cambridge who nurtured the originality of Sen. At Trinity, he was as outstanding a student as he had been at Presidency. With characteristic modesty, Sen does not mention his examination results. In Calcutta, he had stood first in the first class in economics; and at Cambridge in his tripos in economics, he received (this I have been told by some of Sen’s closest friends) what in Cambridge is called a “starred first”. After his BA degree, Sen began his career as a research student and within one year, June 1956, he had in his view “a set of chapters that looked as they could form a dissertation”. Sraffa agreed with Sen’s assessment of the chapters or what Sen calls his “putative thesis”. If this is remarkable, what happened next was even more remarkable, if not unprecedented at least in the Indian academic world. Just as Sen was about to fly back to India to do empirical research to apply to his theory, he received a letter from the vice chancellor of Jadavpur University (which had just started) inviting him to head and establish the economics department at the university. Sen was then a little short of 23.

After some initial and entirely understandable hesitation, Sen decided to take on the challenge. He set up the syllabus, did the first round of recruitment of faculty and bore a very heavy teaching load (in one particular week, he gave 28 full length lectures!). It was during this phase in Calcutta that Sen made a new friendship. This was with Ranajit Guha, who was then teaching at Jadavpur. The affinity between the two was immediate. Sen found Guha to be innovative and original in his ideas and approach to history. Guha then lived in a small flat on Panditya Road in south Calcutta where many left-leaning intellectuals gathered for political debates and intellectual interaction. Guha’s flat became one of Sen’s haunts. Looking back on those addas, Sen considers them to have been important for him: “I feel that as academic discussions go, it would be hard to match those in the small unassuming apartment in Panditya Road in the mid-1950s.”

While teaching at Jadavpur, Sen met Nabaneeta Dev in 1956, became engaged to her in 1959 and they were married in 1960. They had two daughters, Antara and Nandana. When they met and married, Nabaneeta was “a successful young poet, and would later become one of the most well-known creative writers in Bengali literature.” She became one of the best known and respected professors at Jadavpur University.

Teaching at Jadavpur and the addas in Calcutta, both of which Sen thoroughly enjoyed, turned out to be an interlude since Sen returned to Trinity as a Prize Fellow in the spring of 1958. He was a Prize Fellow for four years and was free to pursue his own intellectual and academic interests. It was this period that saw the deepening of Sen’s relationship with Sraffa, Dobb, Robinson and Robertson. Of particular importance for Sen was the daily walks he had with Sraffa – the conversations during these long walks covered economics, philosophy and Sraffa’s relationship with Ludwig Wittgenstein and Antonio Gramsci. Cambridge in the early 1960s was a very lively place for discussions on economic theory. Through these interactions, Sen came to form friendships with a number of economists who made major contributions in their chosen fields. Sen also travelled across the pond to teach at MIT, Harvard and Stanford. In the US, his encounters with Kenneth Arrow, Paul Samuelson and John Rawls were especially significant and intellectually formative.

Sen returned to India to take up a professorship at the Delhi School of Economics and it is at the D-School around 1963 that Sen brings down the curtain on his remembrance of things past. There is one comment that Sen makes regarding his teaching days at D-School that is telling. He writes, “It is hard to describe how joyful it is when the performance of your students draws global attention – no matter what you yourself are doing.” Only a dedicated teacher could write such a sentence. Amartya Sen’s heart is in his teaching, which he sees as being integral to his scholarship.

Amartya Sen in 2010. Photo: GODL-India/Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain

Through the preceding paragraphs, I have tried to present a chronological outline of Sen’s life (up to 1963) and of some of the formative influences and friendships. To reduce his memoirs to just this would be to diminish its significance and denude it of its richness. Within the chronological contours at the appropriate places, Sen reflects on some of his principal intellectual concerns. There are excursions in this book on aspects of Tagore’s ideas which have always engaged Sen, on the nature of ancient Indian culture, on some of the ideas of Adam Smith, on some aspects of Marx’s thought – especially its more problematic areas, on the nature of British rule in India, the anguished relationship of Sraffa and Wittgenstein, social choice theory, the Bengal famine of 1943, the idea of Bangladesh and so on. On many of these, Sen has written more extensively in his essays and books. But there are two themes on which Sen reflects in this book that merit attention. One is an illuminating chapter on the rivers of Bengal and the other is on the Buddha and his teachings.

As a child in Dhaka, Sen with his parents travelled on boats across rivers that are so much of the landscape of deltaic Bengal – the Padma, the Meghna and the Dhaleshwari. These journeys stoked Sen’s curiosity about the rivers, the lives around them, the fish and the enthralling landscape. Even as a boy, he began to study maps and discovered that the Brahmaputra and the Ganges originate at the same point – Manas Sarovar – and then take different routes to meet and merge north-west of Dhaka. As a student in Santiniketan and Presidency, Sen came to know the rivers of West Bengal, some of them with beautiful names like Mayurakshi, Ajoy, Rupnarayan, Ichamati and of course the Bhagirathi (commonly known as the Hooghly). As a student, he became aware of the importance of rivers and the economy of the hinterland which Tagore had noted in his essays and poems; when Sen read Adam Smith, these links acquired greater salience.

From such observations, to be expected from a brilliant student of economics, Sen, in his memoirs, moves to how the rivers have fascinated some of the major literary figures of Bengal, not just Tagore. This fascination has a long and distinguished lineage. Sen was thrilled to read in the text known as Charyapad – circa 10th to 12th century CE, and perhaps the earliest set of identifiable Bengali writing – a reference to the Padma and to pirates on it. He read the Manashamangal Kavya (c. late 15th century) which narrates the story of the merchant Chand and is set almost entirely on the Bhagirathi. The fascination continued and Sen draws attention to the 1945 novel Nadi O Nari (literally “Rivers and Women” but translated into English as “Men and Rivers”) by Humayun Kabir which tells the story of landless families whose life and livelihood are rendered precarious by a shifting river. The families were Muslim but their struggle cut across religious divisions: “We are men of the river. We are peasants. We build our homes on sand and the water washes them away. We build again and again, and we till the earth and bring the golden harvest out of the waste land.”

Sen underlines the shared nature of the predicament and the struggle which were particularly relevant in 1945 when Bengal was being ripped apart by religious separatism incited by narrow-minded politicians and British policy-makers. The river was “indifferent,” Sen notes poignantly, “to religion-based separateness both in creation and in destruction.”

Sen first encountered the thoughts of the Buddha when he was about ten or eleven years old from a book given to him by his grandfather. Recollecting that first exposure, Sen writes, “I was completely bowled over by the clarity of reasoning Buddha used and his accessibility to anyone who could reason.” Over the years, his appreciation and attachment to the Buddha grew. Sen brings out four aspects of the ideas of the Buddha to explain his attraction. First, the Buddha focused on reason to reject or accept a given position; he made no appeal to unargued beliefs. All his ethical conclusions – equality of all human beings, kindness towards living beings, replacement of hatred by universal love – were based on reasoning. Second, the Buddha was human and he shared the same anxieties as all human beings – death, disease and disability. Third, the Buddha was making a radical departure by not asking, “Is there a God?” but by posing the question, “How should we behave?” irrespective of whether there was a God or not. The Buddha emphasised good behaviour and good action. And, finally, the Buddha made the rather important point that doing good should not be transactional. One should engage in good actions because it was ethical to do so. Many of Sen’s ideas came to be anchored on these ideas.