2020/03/24

In His Steps eBook: Sheldon, Charles Monroe: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store



In His Steps eBook: Sheldon, Charles Monroe: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store

This book was converted from its physical edition to the digital format by a community of volunteers. You may find it for free on the web. Purchase of the Kindle edition includes wireless delivery.



Audible Narration
Audible Narration

In His Steps Kindle Edition
by Charles Monroe Sheldon (Author)



4.7 out of 5 stars 603 ratings



See all 173 formats and editions

Kindle
$0.00Read with Our Free App
Audiobook
$0.00
Free with your Audible trial
Hardcover
$21.88
7 New from $21.88

Length: 152 pages Word Wise: Enabled Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Page Flip: Enabled Audible Narration: Ready Language: English

Product details

Format: Kindle Edition
File Size: 299 KB
Print Length: 152 pages
Customer reviews
4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
603 customer ratings


5 star 82%
4 star 13%
3 star 3%
2 star 1%
1 star 1%

How does Amazon calculate star ratings?

Review this product
Share your thoughts with other customers
Write a customer review

Ad feedback




Top Reviews

Cristella

TOP 1000 REVIEWER
5.0 out of 5 stars A Wonderous Read and Eye OpenerReviewed in Australia on 17 January 2015
Format: Kindle Edition
This is an old story that will always fit appropriately in any stage of time. We who call ourselves Christian will be challenged to look at ourselves and wonder if we would have acted differently to the people in the story. In all honesty, probably not! As a result of people not wishing to put themselves out, a homeless man dies from starvation and sickness. This brings the whole township to shame and they decide to completely follow Jesus example for one year. Not to give the story away, I won't say anymore, accept to challenge you to read this book.


HelpfulComment Report abuse

Raewyn

4.0 out of 5 stars Great reading.Reviewed in Australia on 19 November 2016
Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase
Whilst I enjoyed reading the well written novel. It also compelled me to reflect upon my own life and how I conducted my own affairs. It (Christianity) should infiltrate every aspect of life, at work & play. I agree WWJD. It may be in a high paid job or it may be a janitor, again to conduct your affairs in a manner fitting OUR King, work as if unto the Lord.


HelpfulComment Report abuse

See all reviews from Australia


Top international reviews

kendokeny
5.0 out of 5 stars PonderingReviewed in the United Kingdom on 10 May 2019
Verified Purchase

I read this book as a child and it led me to Christ. Re-reading it again, I still ask myself the same questions: in my present day and age, "Can I take up my cross and follow Christ?". Before I take any action, can I really do "What Christ would do" in my circumstance?.


HelpfulReport abuse

F. Moyo
5.0 out of 5 stars Inspiring & Challenging!!Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 23 November 2018
Verified Purchase

One of the most inspiring & challenging books I've ever read. I read it 1st about 20yrs ago & I felt the need to read It again to renew my commitment to follow & live my life as Jesus would in every area of my life; knowing all the while that His grace would enable me in that endeavour.
The question is, how willing & obedient is one prepared to go in living life as Jesus would???


HelpfulReport abuse

Frozbie
5.0 out of 5 stars Challenging and inspiringReviewed in the United Kingdom on 28 September 2017
Verified Purchase

Challenging and inspiring still, after a hundred years since first published.
I hadn't realised the What Would Jesus Do movement was based on this novel.
I recommend In His Steps to everyone

One person found this helpful

HelpfulReport abuse

johnhubert
5.0 out of 5 stars A must read for ChristiansReviewed in the United Kingdom on 11 October 2013
Verified Purchase

I could not stop reading this book. It challenges your comfortable lifestyle as a Christian and was the originator of the phrase "What would Jesus do." A must read book for any Christian deceived into thinking they can really be a one without caring about those who are suffering.

4 people found this helpful

HelpfulReport abuse

jacob hodges
5.0 out of 5 stars If there is any book that will make one think ...Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 26 March 2016
Verified Purchase

If there is any book that will make one think about "what they should be doing, or how they should respond to situations," this is the book. It moved me so much that I purchased one for a friend.

2 people found this helpful

HelpfulReport abuse


------------






Dec 21, 2010Stephen Escalera rated it liked it
Rarely have I come across a book that I am so torn over as to how to rate it. Usually a book will be obviously good or bad, making the ultimate conclusion in rating it a fairly easy process. While a good book may have some detractors, overall the good outweighs the bad, with the reverse also being true of bad books. However, I'm having a hard time making such a distinction in reviewing Charles Sheldon's classic, In His Steps. There are many good things about the book, but there are also many not-so-good things.

The book centers primarily on a few members of the affluent First Church of Raymond in the late 19th century who have been faced with the question of how Jesus would act if He were in their place. (In His Steps can be credited with the origin of the popularized question of "What would Jesus do?" or WWJD). A call is made for volunteers to ask the question, "What would Jesus do?" before making any decisions for one whole year. Among those who volunteer are the pastor, the local newspaper owner/editor, a gifted singer, a wealthy young woman, a writer, and an employee of the local railroad. The book follows their efforts during the course of the year as they attempt to live out their pledge of asking, "What would Jesus do?" This leads them to make decisions that aren't the most popular or even understood by some family members and the general public. It also leads them to undertake a greater involvement in their city, both in evangelical outreaches and for the good of society in general.

For a book that was written over 100 years ago, it cuts to the heart of our current culture in the majority of the Western world of materialism and even more so among Christians. Perhaps the hardest hitting teaching comes towards the end of the book when the pastor asks a congregation, "How much is the Christianity of the age suffering for Him? Is it denying itself at the cost of ease, comfort, luxury, elegance of living? What does the age need more than personal sacrifice?....The Christianity that attempts to suffer by proxy is not the Christianity of Christ." Here is found perhaps the main and best thrust of the entire book. The call to Christianity is a call to suffer for Christ. "If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake and the gospel's will save it." (Mark 8:34-35) The decision to follow Jesus, to do what He would do, is not played out in the characters' lives as something that turns out rosy. One man loses his job and as a result, his wife becomes bitter toward him. The newspaper owner/editor watches his subscribers and advertisers leave in droves because of his decision not to allow certain kinds of content. Yet another turns down what some may consider the "opportunity of a lifetime" to serve in a more humble ministry. This is no health, wealth and prosperity gospel. Wearing a bracelet that says "WWJD?" simply won't cut it. All through the book, the element of personal suffering and sacrifice is continually presented as the ultimate test of following Christ.

In His Steps gives an example of Christianity in action - how Christianity looks in the nitty-gritty, everyday stuff of life. The characters realize that Christianity is not simply an abstract idea, full of wise sayings and doctrines designed only to stimulate the intellect. Christianity is lived out Monday through Sunday. It's not only making decisions based on what Jesus might do, but telling people the reasoning behind the decision. It's getting involved in the community, reaching out to those in need, using the resources that we've been blessed with to help change a life. This is Christianity in action.

This brings me to the issues that have given me pause and not just a little concern. First, a few minor points. The writing style is very poor. Superlatives abound in the descriptions of the effects of various decisions. "For the first time ever..." or "he had never..." or "Nothing had ever..." or "Such a thing had never..." - these overused phrases become old and trite in their use. Additionally, the plot becomes rather predictable. However, that being said, this book is perhaps rarely read for its fictional and linguistic prowess.

While the characters in the narrative are seeking to follow Christ's example, much of the decisions are based very much on personal interpretation with little to no Biblical basis for their reasoning. In one sense, the subjective nature of the question at hand makes the decision one that should be and can only be decided by the person ultimately responsible. In this, the author rightly puts great emphasis on prayer and the personal nature of the pledge. However, this lends somewhat of a relativistic mindset if the decision is not based on what Scripture says. For example, the newspaper editor decides that printing a Sunday edition is not what Jesus would do since Jesus would not publish something that caused a reader to read anything else but the Bible on Sunday. While to be commended for making such a difficult decision and following his conscious, this makes me wonder what in Scripture teaches such a notion that reading anything else but the Bible on Sunday is contrary to Christ's teachings.

The biggest issue I have with the book is why the Christians go about seeking to follow Christ's steps or do what Jesus would do. Set during the heyday of the Temperance Movement, much emphasis is placed on the poorer citizens of the city and the effect that alcohol played in many of the problems that class of society faced. Further, while there seems to be much emphasis on evangelization, the improvement of life in general for the class is seen as the ultimate end of this evangelization. Oddly enough, this message of "accept Christ and everything well get better" goes against the message for the upper class citizens that Christians must suffer. The gospel that is proclaimed in In His Steps is not a gospel that comes by means of the death, burial and resurrection of Christ. Instead, it is a gospel that points to Christ as the ultimate example of how to live and reform society, but not the source of the strength to bring about that reform. And Christ's example in this case is to help the poor. Where a conflict arises is in dealing with the question, If helping the poor in bettering their society is what the gospel offers, how does this affect how the poor themselves live? This question is asked point blank of several of the pastors by a man out of work for many days and not one of them can provide an answer. One pastor ponders the question in his heart as "a question that brings up the entire social problem in all its perplexing entanglement of human wrongs and its present condition contrary to every desire of God for a human being's welfare. Is there any condition more awful than for a man in good health, able and eager to work, with no means of honest livelihood unless he does work, actually unable to get anything to do, and driven to one of three things: begging or charity at the hands of friends or strangers, suicide or starvation?"

Nowhere in the book is a person's sinful condition addressed, but only the social condition. When reform comes, it should not, it cannot come through the betterment of a person's economic wellbeing. I'm not denying that we have a responsibility to minister to others, especially those in need. I think even my own tendency is to try to ignore others' condition, like the condition of the man on the corner holding the sign. But in helping those in need, we should not do it simply for the sake of our own suffering nor in trying to help them make a better life for themselves. We should be pointing them to Christ, not as the example of who we are following, but as the source of the strength to do what we do, the source of the righteousness to overcome sin. Without Christ, without repentance, we can improve society to the last person but will not change the root of the problem and will find them just as bad as before. As John Owen so aptly puts it in The Mortification of Sin: "Poor soul! It is not thy sore finger but thy hectic fever that thou art to apply thyself to the consideration of. Thou settest thyself against a particular sin, and dost not consider that thou art nothing but sin."

In His Steps is certainly a step in the right direction of encouraging believers to challenge the way we live and think and interact with the world around us. But the reader should always keep in mind that the gospel of Christ is not an example simply to be followed in order to better society, but rather the gospel is solely and completely about Christ Himself and the righteousness we have in Him. In following Him, a person's social standing may not improve in the slightest, but his eternal standing in the sight of God will. And that's what matters. (less)
flag35 likes · Like · 11 comments · see review



Jun 10, 2009David rated it did not like it · review of another edition
Shelves: christianity, fiction
This book was given to me by a friend, and I think I told her I would read it. Otherwise, it probably would not have taken long for me to put it down. I found it badly written, and I disagree with its central message, namely that the Christian church would be revolutionized if it's members each made an honest pledge to do as Jesus would do. (I may be way off here, but I bet the WWJD movement started with this book.) The problem with this idea is that there is a real danger of subjectivism in doing what Jesus would do in any given situation. What ends up happening is people do what they THINK Jesus would do. If I remember correctly, at least one character says, "I don't think Jesus would do that." For instance, one of the things some of Sheldon's characters concentrate on is the "liquor interests." Besides the fact that alcohol per se is not sinful, the author is concentrating on the symptom, not the disease, which primarily lies within the alcoholic, not the industry. To be fair, the characters do get other things right, like ministering to the poor and outcasts.

The church doesn't need a call to make pledges. If we are Christians, we are already pledged to follow in the steps of Jesus. We need the truth of the gospel to be preached and taught in churches. Then Christians can ask themselves, "Based on what the Bible teaches, what would Jesus have me do?" (less)
flag12 likes · Like · 3 comments · see review



Feb 13, 2008Werner rated it liked it
Recommends it for: Christian fiction readers
Shelves: classics, books-i-own
If you've ever seen anyone wearing a WWJD? (standing for "What would Jesus do?") bracelet, this is the novella that first popularized that question in some Christian circles. First published in 1896, it still challenges readers to a more serious application of Jesus' principles in their daily lives. The idea of asking ourselves that question, when we make decisions about behavior, continues to strike even professed Christian readers as novel and revolutionary. (That this should be the case, of course, is itself a sad commentary on the state of the modern church, and on our general pigheadedness and egoism as a species.)

That points up the issue of the historical context of the novel, coming after a process of some two centuries of gradually increasing loss of interest on the part of many Christians in practical, Monday-through-Saturday applications of biblical principles to daily life, withdrawal from social interest or concern, and reduction of concrete Christian ethics to observation of a few man-made asceticisms and avoidance of a short list of obvious major sins. The book also comes from, or was readily associated with, the late 19th-century "Social Gospel" movement, which was complex and not monolithic, but which basically sought to buck the afore-mentioned trend. Professed Christians who were quite content with that trend found Sheldon's novella threatening; those who saw the whole Social Gospel movement as an embodiment of liberal apostasy instantly dismissed the book as Satan-inspired propaganda from the enemy. Those perceptions still shape some fundamentalist criticism of the book, such as that of Raymond St. John in American Literature For Christian Schools, which I personally find (based on actual reading of the book) to be unfair and unconvincing.

From a theological standpoint, a crucial consideration here is that the book is consciously written for Christian readers. It assumes the Christian gospel of salvation by grace through faith in Christ's redemption, and gratitude for this as the basis of obedience to God's wishes, and presupposes that the readers likewise assume it; so the focus isn't on convincing unbelievers of these points. Rather, the focus is on convincing professed believers to actually act in accord with their professed beliefs. That accounts for what some critics and reviewers regard (incorrectly, IMO) as a denial by implication of the need for initial Christian conversion, or a promotion of legalistic salvation by works. (This also, of course, tends to limit the book's appeal; a lot of fiction by Christians can engage both believers and nonbelievers, but it's hard to see many of the latter being much interested by the central question here, or feeling that they can relate.) If I would pose a theological criticism, it would be that the practical applications of Christian faith in the novel tend to be too tame, not radical enough. But in the context of 1896 evangelical Protestantism, they at least lay a basis to start with. Some might quibble about Sheldon's total-abstinence stand on alcohol (this was in the era that led up to the imposition of Prohibition); but where you're dealing, as some of his characters are here, in ministry to people who are basically alcoholics, total abstinence IS the only practical approach to advocate.

From a literary standpoint, this is very much a message-driven novel of ideas, and Sheldon succeeds somewhat better at articulating ideas than at creating involving fiction. While his characterizations aren't quite cardboard, I wouldn't call them sharp; dialogue is often devoted to delivering a message, and the book as a whole can have a tract-like quality. I think the author can be placed in the Realist tradition, but he's not one of its first-rank practitioners. That said, I found the message strong and vital enough to make the book worth a read. (Those with lower expectations for fictional quality might give it more stars.) (less)
flag9 likes · Like · 2 comments · see review



Dec 28, 2007Beth rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
My favorite verse for several months now has been 1 John 2:6: "Whoever claims to live in him must walk as Jesus did." Charles Sheldon shows in In His Steps what serious attempts to constantly "walk as Jesus did" might look like in real life. It was inspiring to read about what happened in the lives of the characters who agreed to do nothing for a whole year without first asking what Jesus would do in their situation, or how he would do it. I think it would be neat to write a book modeled after In His Steps but to change the setting to the present day, as some of the issues the characters faced in the 1890s are a bit hard to relate to. Nonetheless, Sheldon presented a lot of the timeless struggles of Christian living: How do you spend not just your money (which is relatively easy to give away), but also your time and your talent? How does your faith affect the way you do your tasks at work? How does it affect your relationships? I was especially provoked to thought by Sheldon's ideas on getting involved in politics...though I would do so--am doing so--to fight for peace, freedom, and the Constitution (yay Ron Paul!) instead of for getting rid of saloons, as Sheldon's characters did. : ) (less)
flag7 likes · Like · comment · see review



Feb 20, 2012Princesskelly rated it liked it
Recommended to Princesskelly by: Julie
I must confess that all of my life I have heard the phrase What Would Jesus Do, but was rather clueless about where it came from or what it meant. Ive seen those words while stuck in traffic on quite possibly thousands of bumper stickers over my lifetime, but honestly never understood what the heck WWJD? actually meant. It never occurred to me that it stemmed from an amazingly popular book written in the 1800s, or that it ignited a revolution in the way that people viewed Christianity and ...more
flag5 likes · Like · comment · see review



Nov 25, 2019Angela R. Watts rated it really liked it
Shelves: christian-fiction, school-reading, christian-nonfiction
3.5 stars for how much I enjoyed it as a novel, 4 stars for the great lessons.

Overall, it was thought-provoking, moving (not in the ways it *should have been* moving, always? I probably should have *felt* more often than I did... but I didn't really connect with anyone, ever), and a great read for any Christian. Christians in America could really use the lessons and themes in this novel.


flag4 likes · Like · 3 comments · see review



Jan 21, 2008Aubrey rated it liked it
An interesting and thought provoking read, though I'm not sure I agree with its definition of Christian discipleship.

As a Latter-day Saint, I believe the family is central to the plan God has for us on earth. I believe we are expected to follow Christ, while raising our families as best we can. This means our day-to-day lives are filled with nurturing our children and providing for their physical and spiritual needs, rather than devoted to humanitarian aid. (Though, I'd argue that caring for children could certainly be characterized as "clothing the naked and feeding the hungry.") There really aren't any good examples of families, as a whole, following Christ in this book and I found that frustrating.

Another thread in the book is the necessity to "suffer" for Christ. I'm not certain that the suffering should be the focus. Sacrifice is certainly a part of discipleship, but so is happiness and joy. Adam fell that men might be and men are that they might have joy. (2 Nephi 2:25) (less)
flag4 likes · Like · 2 comments · see review



Feb 01, 2008Joshua M rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: Any serious christian
I just reread this classic for the third time, and just as always it shook up my view of christianity. It is a novel about a pastor that challenges his church not to do anything without first asking "What would Jesus do?" As each of the doctors, buisnessman, authors, newspapaer editors, etc... do this very thing, it begins to shake up not only their lives but the enviroment of the town in which they live. Ultimately, the movement begins to spread to other cities and states. I wonder what would happen to this country if all of us that claim to be christians, would start acting as Jesus would act? (less)
flag4 likes · Like · comment · see review



Dec 17, 2014Madelyn rated it really liked it
Shelves: devotions
Wonderfully well written book. It changed my walk with the Lord, it made me question if I was doing enough, if I was actually walking in His steps like He would want me to. I also love the fact that it is partially a true story. The characters are also very well developed. Overall, it was an excellent book.
flag4 likes · Like · comment · see review



Aug 10, 2019Marlene rated it really liked it
Shelves: own-kindle, christian, own-audible, 2019
"What Would Jesus Do?"

Yes, this book is where that phrase comes from. This book is a classic, and the Kindle version is available for free.

4.5 stars

8/10/19:

I read In His Steps as a teen. My father was an investor in a bargain bookstore, and I enjoyed purchasing books there. I delighted in the section of Christian fiction, which jived really well with my Grace Livingston Hill fixation. I found several pretty glossy hardcover GLH books. With that same glossy appearance was the book In His Steps, so I no doubt thought it was another Christian romance. It wasn't, but I thoroughly enjoyed the book regardless.

So here I am enjoying it again because my husband bought an Audible copy. Near the beginning, the congregation of a local church is asked what it means to follow the steps of Jesus. The pastor poses a challenge to anyone in his church willing to take it on: don't take any action until first considering what Jesus would do... and then do it. No matter what.

This is quite a challenge. What if God wants you to do more than (or differently than) you want to? The answer, of course, is to do it anyway. He's God, after all. But to commit to ALWAYS obeying Him takes guts.

8/11/09: If a person has a to-do or not-to-do decision to make, determining what Jesus would do is a challenge if both possible decisions are not sins. In that type of situation, one must consider Christ's character as revealed in the stories recounted in the gospels.

8/13/09: The story lines are entertaining enough to get me to keep reading, but is obviously a a moral tale. But I'm okay with that! I avoid nonfiction because I don't want to relax with "nothing but the facts." So if I can be encouraged and/or educated while reading a fiction story, all the better. In fact, my favorite books are Christian historical romances, which enrich me with a bit of history and a bit of Biblical food for thought.

Modern readers might not relate very well to some of choices the characters make based on their perception of what Jesus would do in their shoes. However, this was published in the late 1800s, so if the reader can keep this in mind, it will serve him well. Again, this didn't bother me, because in general, I'm pretty conservative.

8/16/19: I'm at chapter 27 out of 31 chapters. A couple of chapters ago, I thought the book was going to end, but instead it seemed to reboot in a new location with new people. Unless I missed something, (which is possible due to my deafness) I don't think the author transitioned very well. It's a minor complaint, though.

8/18/19: I finished this yesterday, and am really glad I re-read this classic. I'd like to try another by this author, perhaps Born to Serve.

------------------------------------------------
“The greatest question in all of human life is summed up when we ask, 'What would Jesus do?' if, as we ask it, we also try to answer it from a growth in knowledge of Jesus himself. We must know Jesus before we can imitate Him.” (less)
flag3 likes · Like · comment · see review



Apr 19, 2008Carrie rated it did not like it · review of another edition
it's about a pastor who challenges his congregation to take a pledge to ask "what would Jesus do?" before every decision they make, then follow through regardless of the consequences.

to me, the book was a little too preachy and unrealistic. i felt the choices the characters were making, for the most part, were extreme. there was also a lot of talk amongst the characters about suffering, and bearing the burden of the cross. almost like the author was telling us that unless we are suffering we are not being as christian as we should be, or aren't dedicated enough to emulating Christ.

i don't think Jesus has asked us to choose as if we were Him living in His circumstances. i do however know He has asked us to learn His gospel and the principles He taught, then make our choices applying those principles, striving to be like Him, and working towards aligning our will with our Heavenly Father's.

i also don't think suffering and following Jesus go hand in hand. i think we should be willing to sacrifice. sometimes sacrifice is necessary, and sometimes it's harder than others. but i think there is more joy, than suffering, in following the Savior and serving one another.

there were a couple things i did like about the book. through the course of the story you hear about four different church congregations who are affected by this proposition. at least three of them were of different religions, yet they worked together for a common goal. i think it's important for us to remember that we can interact and work together with others who may not believe everything we believe, and still accomplish a lot of great things.

one of the main characters was a girl who sang, very well. her story intertwined with almost every other character, even if it was just that someone heard her sing. during book club we discussed how powerful music is. it crosses boundaries, such as language barriers, economic classes, or cultural differences, and can influence us all.

overall, i didn't love the book. but i thought many times while reading that it would make for great discussion. and when we got together, it did just that. another great book club!
(less)
flag3 likes · Like · comment · see review



Apr 14, 2012Dan Glover rated it did not like it
This is a "classic" of Christian social gospel, Finneyesque, religion. From the pretty young woman in the dimly lit tent meetings whose beautiful haunting singing makes hardened alcoholics break down weeping and come forward for an altar call to the crusading church folk whose efforts get local saloons shut down, this is the original WWJD - What Would Jesus Do? But that is the wrong question to ask. The questions disciples of Christ ought to ask are What Did Jesus Do? (in his life, death, ...more
flag3 likes · Like · 1 comment · see review



May 09, 2013Elliott rated it did not like it
This book's message is far more important than the work itself. It is the latter then that I am critiquing, not the former. As a piece of fiction, it is disillusioning to read. 'What Would Jesus do?" is the central question that all the characters have tasked themselves to asking and to make a comparison to their own actions-inspired by their pastor's words, and the words of a wandering tramp. Why this is disillusioning is that none of the characters really ever act as Jesus would act. Obviously none can turn water into wine, or feed a thousand, but all the deeds are mere half examples-great stretches to those individuals perhaps, but they do not significantly impair their own economic status. No one forsakes a life of plenty to devote themselves completely to healing the sick, or alleviating the misery of the poor-as Jesus would do, and did for that matter. They involve themselves politically to destroy a saloon, and open a break room to give lectures to workers on how to better spend their free-time and money. Considering that Jesus was ambivalent to traditional and local politics, and did not engage in any capital investing, or factory labor it's hard to create a workable analogy from this novel. The dialogue itself is rather clunky and reads as a melodrama more than anything. A novel that urges its readers to do as Christ without making any real sacrifice. (less)
flag3 likes · Like · comment · see review



Oct 13, 2015Jesseca Wheaton rated it really liked it
I had read the younger version of "In His Steps" when I was younger, but I had never read the adult version. Well, this year it was required for my English literature course, so of course I read it.
Wow.
I was not expecting to enjoy it half as much as I did. The story really brought the question "what would Jesus do" to life. It made me stop and think. What would I do differently, if, before I did anything, I asked "What would Jesus do?".
It was kinda hard to connect with the characters, primarily because they all seemed to have a lot of money they could pour into their work, but it was a book that made me stop and think none the less and definitely one I would recommend! (less)
flag3 likes · Like · 1 comment · see review



Aug 22, 2017Ivie rated it really liked it
I honestly didn't think I would like this book, but it turned out to be such a great read. The characters and their personalities were so well thought out, as well as the setting. The book shows people trying to be more like Jesus everyday for a year.

I don't like overly preachy books, but this didn't feel preachy at all. It actually showed people who make mistakes and mess up because we're human. It didn't have perfect people who never did wrong. It showed people who did wrong and either stuck ...more
flag3 likes · Like · comment · see review



Oct 30, 2009Mike (the Paladin) rated it liked it
Again a famous read that many love. This is a pretty good book, I found it a little heavy on the legalism. I read many Christian books where in discussing Grace the writer seems to be afraid that the reader might take the proclaimation of complete grace (That we find in the Bible) for license so the "moderate" it. That happens a little here. Still, read, enjoy...understand the works we do don't earn us a place with Christ. They flow from that relationship.
flag3 likes · Like · comment · see review



May 27, 2016Courtney rated it liked it · review of another edition
I stumbled across this title while looking through my library's audiobook collection. Immediately it brought to mind the 1970s book cover my mom had on her shelf which, naturally, made me nostalgic. I decided to give it a listen and within moments it felt like a comfort read as you know I am fond of pointed tales of extreme 19th century morality and doctrine. I felt like Anne of Green Gables reading the stories from my Sunday school serial.
flag3 likes · Like · see review



May 20, 2015Charity rated it really liked it
Finished listening to this as a book on tape. Excellent story, curious narrative style, sometimes a bit formulaic and meandering in its thought threads, but the message is a good one intended to challenge readers to take up the mantle of responsibility for interacting with others in godly compassion. Worth reading.
flag3 likes · Like · comment · see review



Mar 28, 2018Josie rated it did not like it
Shelves: fiction, clean, books-for-school, classic, christian, 2018-reading-challenge, skimmed
If I didn't have to read this for school, I wouldn't have finished. It was hard for me to even skim.
My main issue with this book is that as Christians, we pledge to follow Jesus's steps from the day we get saved. It's not just a year-long challenge. It's something we should be (and should have been doing) every day. I won't even touch on the writing issues.
flag3 likes · Like · 1 comment · see review

예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가 찰스 M. 셸던




예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가
찰스 M. 셸던조항래 (지은이) 예찬사 1982-11-01

원제
 in His Steps
290쪽
148*210mm (A5)
377g

ISBN 9788974390013

부록 CD 1장


책소개
만일 예수님이 목사라면 어떤 설교를 하실까? 때로는 자기 명예욕에 몰두하실까? 예수님이 직장인과 사업가라면 출세와 돈벌이를 목적으로 이기주의와 탐욕을 좇아 은밀한 방법으로 부정을 저지르실까? 주일 근무는 거절하실까? 예수님이 신문 잡지사 사장이라면 회사의 돈벌이 때문에 퇴폐 풍조와 음주 음란과 과대 선전 기사를 마구 게재하실까? 예수님이 출판인과 작가라면 어떤 책을 펴내실까? 예수님이 정치가라면 어떻게 하실까?"라는 질문에 대해 이 책은 침묵을 지키지 않을 것이며, 당신이 어떤 위치에 있든 당신에게도 명확한 답을 내려 줄 것이다.

---------------

목차


1. 고통없는 고난자

2. 예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까?

3. 한 언론인의 결단

4. 비난과 위기에 부딪히면서도

5. 성령의 인도하심 따라

6. 돈과 명예에의 유혹

7. 원수는 가족 중에

8. 소외된 사람들과 더불어

9. 비리에 눈 감을 수 없었던 사람들

10. 성령의 능력에 힘입은 사람들

11. 술집 추방 운동

12. 강도 만난 자의 이웃

13. 주님의 영광을 위한 투자

14. 어느 창녀의 죽음

15. 감동적인 장례식

16. 빈민촌을 향하여

17. 주를 부인한 자

18. 건달 청년의 회심과 사랑

19. 브루스 목사가 본 제일교회

20. 브루스 목사의 갈등

21. 두 자매의 서로 다른 꿈

22. 딸의 기도를 갈망한 어머니

23. 탐욕의 종말

24. 백만장자의 바벨탑

25. 목회자의 참회와 결단

26. 빈민촌에 심은 백합꽃

27. 길을 잃은 양

28. 어둠에 떠오른 별들

29. 죽음이 있는 곳에 생명을

30. 시험대에 놓인 기독교인

31. 기독교인에게 던지는 문제
접기



추천글
권성수: 지금부터 1년 동안 매일, "예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까?"란 질문을 던지면서 예수님의 발자취를 그대로 따르는 사람들이 있다면 오늘 우리 사회는 어떻게 될까? 이것이 바로 이 책의 주제이다.

맥스웰 목사님은, 가난 때문에 아내와 하나밖에 없는 자식마저 잃고 일자리도 없이 좌절과 슬픔에 잠긴 인쇄공을 만나게 된다. 이것이 맥스웰 목사님에게는 그리스도인이 실재 생활에서 믿음과 사랑으로 산다는 것이 과연 무엇인지를 물을 수밖에 없는 계기가 된다. 그 후 그 인쇄공이 요절하는 비극적인 사건 앞에서 맥스웰 목사님은, "예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까?"란 질문을 던지면서 삶의 매 순간을 책임지기로 각오한다. 다음 주일 교인들에게 같은 질문으로 도전을 준다. 이에 감동된 교인 수십 명이 앞으로 1년간 그렇게 살기로 작정한다. 이런 실제적인 헌신의 삶이, 연못에 던져진 조약돌 한 알이 파문을 일으키듯 사랑의 파문을 일으킨다는 내용이 이 책의 요지다.

저자 쉘돈이 이 책 초판을 발행한 것은 1896년이었다. 이 책은 발행된 이후 판을 거듭하면서 수백만부가 팔린 베스트셀러다. 이 책이 이렇게 많이 팔리게 된 것은 이 책의 내용 자체 때문이기도 하지만, 사상적으로 볼 때 기독교가 온갖 문제들로 앓고 있는 사회에 무엇인가 구체적인 말과 행동을 보여야 한다는 기독교 사회 윤리가 대중 소설의 옷을 입고 선을 보인 때문이기도 하다.

예수를 믿는 다는 것은 모름지기 구체적인 삶을 요구한다. 삶이 없는 믿음은 야고보서에 의하면 "송장 믿음"이다. 여기서 삶이라함은 개인의 영혼의 삶만이 아니라 육신의 삶도 포함하며, 개개인의 삶만이 아니라 더불어 사는 삶도 포함한다. 그러나 오늘날 우리 그리스도인의 삶이 영혼만을 강조하는 '유령적'삶이나, 영혼을 등한시하고 인간의 육신적인 것, 세상적인 것을 추구하는 삶으로 타락화 되어가는 경향이 있다. 또한 더불어 사는 세상에서 철저하게 타락화 되어가는 경향이 있다. 또한 더불어 사는 세상에서 철저하게 '나 하나'만을 고집하고 개인 구원만을 주장하는 삶과, 어떤 집단이나 사회 구원을 위해서 '나를 잃어 버리는' 개인상실의 삶으로 극단화되기도 한다.

결국 이러한 믿음은 생명이 없는 죽은 믿음이며, 구체적 삶의 열매가 없는 쭉정이 믿음인 것이다.

이러한 극단적인 삶이나, 행동없는 믿음에서 벗어나 사망에서 생명으로 옮겨진 그리스도인답게 진정으로 예수님의 발자취를 따르는 변화가 일어나기를 바라는 마음에서 이 책을 추천한다.



저자 소개

지은이: 찰스 M. 셸던
신간 알림 신청
최근작 : <예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까>,<예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까>,<예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까> … 총 37종 (모두보기)
목사이며 작가이기도 한 찰스 쉘돈은 미국 뉴욕주 웰스빌에서 태어났다. 브라운대학과 안도버신학교를 졸업하고 캔저스주 토페카에서 목회생활을, 그리고 크리스천헤럴드지의 편집장을 지내기도 했으며, 1946년 작고하기 전까지 기고편집인으로 활동했다. 특히 그는 사회사업에서 큰 활약을 했는데, 이를테면 몸소 실직한 인쇄공을 가장하여 시가지를 직접 헤매기도 했다. 이때 그는 기독교인들의 냉대와 무관심에 큰 충격을 받았다고 한다. 그가 자기 교회 성도들에게 낭독해주기 위해 쓴 이 책은 바로 그런 충격의 깊은 발산이라고 전한다. 이 소설은 1897년 초판 발행 이래 미국에서만도 3천만 부 이상 판매되었고, 오늘날까지도 세계적 베스트셀러의 자리를 차지하고 있으며, 수많은 독자들의 인생에까지 영향을 끼치고 있다.
접기



지은이: 조항래
신간 알림 신청
최근작 : <예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가> … 총 2종 (모두보기)
1939년 경남밀양 출생, 한국 외국어 대학 서반아어과를 중퇴했다. 육군 영어 번역관, 잡지사. 출판사 편집장을 역임했다. 옮긴책으로 <격변기의 생존경영(P.F. 드러커)>, <칼빈 성경주석(예레미아 편)>, <포 넘버원(로버트 J.링거)> 외에 다수가 있다.




출판사 제공 책소개

지금부터 1년 동안 매순간 "예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까?"란 질문을 던지면서 예수님의 발자취를 그대로 따르는 사람들이 있다면 오늘날 우리 사회는 어떻게 변화될까?
이것이 바로 이 책의 주제이다.

매일매일의 생활 속에서 단지 한순간만이라도 '나는 이렇게 해야지' 하는 마음보다 과연 '예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까'라는 질문을 던지면서 생활하게 된다면 이 땅의 많은 그리스도인들의 삶이, 우리 나라의 모습이, 아니 전세계가 변화되는 놀라운 역사가 일어날 것이다.

이런 의미에서 「예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가」는 말만 일삼고 크리스천 다운 진정한 행동을 하지 않는 그리스도인들에게 의미 있는 경종을 울려 주는 책이다.

"만일 예수님이 목사라면 어떤 설교를 하실까?
때로는 자기 명예욕에 몰두하실까?
예수님이 직장인과 사업가라면 출세와 돈벌이를 목적으로 이기주의와 탐욕을 좇아 은밀한 방법으로 부정을 저지르실까?
주일 근무는 거절하실까?
예수님이 신문 잡지사 사장이라면 회사의 돈벌이 때문에 퇴폐 풍조와 음주 음란과 과대 선전 기사를 마구 게재하실까?
예수님이 출판인과 작가라면 어떤 책을 펴내실까?
예수님이 정치가라면 어떻게 하실까?"라는 질문에 대해
이 책은 침묵을 지키지 않을 것이며, 당신이 어떤 위치에 있든 당신에게도 명확한 답을 내려 줄 것이다.

미국의 레이몬드 시에서 한 교회를 담임한 헨리 맥스웰 목사는 신도들로부터 존경과 신뢰를 받으며 안락한 생활을 하지만, 우연하게 실직한 한 인쇄공의 죽음을 통해 새로운 도전을 받고 '예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가'라는 질문에 야심적인 대답을 하고 그대로 실천해 나간다.
그리하여 무사안일에 빠져 있던 교인과 성직자들에게 일대 개혁과 경종을 울리게 된다는 줄거리이다.

미래의 이 나라, 더 나아가 세계를 이끌어 나갈 청소년이 책을 읽고 도전을 받아 종교적 감동과 더불어 양심의 감동을 받고, 이기적이고도 독선적인 현실 사회에서 참다운 진실한 삶의 기수가 되기를 바란다.



 kck5020 2008-07-04

내 속의 말을 다 표현할 수가 있다면.. 정말 감동적이다. 나도 그리 살자. 아멘 
공감 (1) 댓글 (0)
 


 junggani 2016-07-18

역시마찬가지로김진홍목사님께서추천해주신도서입니다.감사합니다. 
공감 (0) 댓글 (0)
 


 moxatx 2008-04-04

기독교 고전으로서 지금도 꾸준히 사랑받고 있는 도서로 생각해 볼만한 내용이다 
공감 (0) 댓글 (0)
 


 김좌형 2017-08-14

이 책은 제가 여러번 읽은 책인데, 이번에 관심가지고 도와줄 집사님, 권사님들이 계셔서 구입해서 나누어드리게 되었어요.예수 생명을 가진 자의 삶을 살아보자고요 
공감 (0) 댓글 (0)
 






마이리뷰
쓰기

구매자 (1)
전체 (4)



 이명재 2014-10-11



기독교의 추락 속에 손에 잡은 책 한 권





기독교의 위상이 날로 추락하고 있다. 누굴 탓하기 이전에 그리스도인들이 경각심을 갖고 거듭남의 각오로 임하지 않으면 교계에 희망이 없다. 이럴 즈음에 내가 이 책을 손에 잡은 것은 크나큰 축복이다. 사회복음에 대한 글을 쓰기 위해 자료를 찾던 중이었다. 미국의 월터 라우센부시(Walter Rauschenbush)를 피해갈 수 없어 그에 대한 글을 읽었다. 라우센부시가 영향 받은 사람 중 찰스 M. 쉘던(Charles M. Sheldon)이 있다는 것을 알았다.





쉘던은 미국의 회중교회(Congregational Church) 목사이자 저술가로 어떻게 하면 대중에게 복음을 효과적으로 전할 수 있을까를 늘 생각했다. 그 방법 중 하나가 소설을 쓰는 것이었다. <예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가>(조항래 역, 도서출판 예찬사, *이 책 제목이 눈에 거슬린다. 아무리 다중을 대상으로 하는 소설책이라고 하지만 예수님을 인성적 측면만 생각하고 정한 제목 같기 때문이다. 그래서 이 뒤로는 '예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까'로 표기하겠다. 실제로 10 종이 넘는 한국어 번역본 중 대부분이 이렇게 책 제목을 달았다)는 소설에 속하는 글이다. 원 제목은 In His Steps이고 부제(副題)가 'What Would Jesus Do?'이다. 그러니까 부제를 한글 역(譯)의 책명으로 삼은 것이다. '주님의 발자취를 따라'보다는 '예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까'가 더 설득력 있는 제목이라 생각했을 법하다.





책의 발단 부분에 나오지만 주인공 헨리 맥스웰(Henry Maxwell) 목사가 주일 예배 때 베드로전서 2장 21절을 본문으로 '주의 발자취를 따라서'란 제목으로 설교를 한다(*벧전 2:21 "이를 위하여 너희가 부르심을 입었으니 그리스도도 너희를 위하여 고난을 받으사 너희에게 본을 끼쳐 그 자취를 따라오게 하셨느니라" "It was to this that God called you, for christ himself suffered for you and left you an example, so that you would follow in his steps."). 이 본문이 쉘던의 소설 In His Steps에서 시종일관(始終一貫) 긴장 속에 이야기를 이끌어가는 주제이기도 하다. 사회의 가치 기준이 혼란스럽고 윤리 도덕이 추락할수록 사람들은 절대적인 잣대를 요구한다. '예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까'라는 질문은 예수님처럼 살고 싶다는 설의법적 표현이다. 19세기 말에서 20세기 초에 미국에서 성행했던 WWSD(What Would Jesus Do?) 물결은 이것을 잘 말해 주고 있다.





올바른 신앙인으로 바로 서기 위해





오늘날도 이 소설을 쓸 때와 비슷한 가치 혼란의 시대이다. 절대 진리가 발붙일 여지가 없고 나에게 유익이 되는 것이 곧 진리라는 전도(顚倒)된 가치관이 횡행하고 있는 사회아다. 따라서 찰스 쉘던의 소설 <예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까>가 독자들에게 강하게 어필할 수밖에 없는 시절이다. 그리스도인조차 예수 그리스도의 십자가 고난보다는 안락하고 부담 없는 세속적 신앙생활을 원하는 추세이고, 실제 많은 사람들이 그쪽을 행해 달려가고 있다. 예수 그리스도의 아가페 사랑은 어디론지 사라지고 그리스도가 한낱 자기 필요에 의해 달았다가 떼어내는 장식물로 전락하고 말았다면 지나친 표현일까.





이 소설은 신앙생활을 소재로 하고 있다. 찰스 쉘던의 <예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까>는 체코의 헨리크 시엔크비치(Henryk Adam Alexander Pius Sienkiewicz)가 쓴 Quo Vadis와 함께 오늘날까지 읽히고 있는 스테디셀러가 된다. 그만큼 많은 사람들에게 영향을 끼친 책이라고 보아도 좋다. 또 예수님을 본받는 삶을 강조하는 책으로는 디트리히 본회퍼(Dietrich Bonhoeffer)의 The Cost of Discipleship('나를 따르라'는 제목으로 출판)과 함께 이 책은 수많은 독자들에게 깊은 영향을 끼쳐왔다. 어떤 비평가는 본회퍼의 책은 식자층에게 그리고 쉘던의 이 소설은 다중(多衆)의 일반 그리스도인들에게 큰 도전을 주었다고 평가했다.





In His Steps의 시대 배경은 19세기 중반이다. 영국에서 일어난 산업혁명의 여파가 미국에도 몰아닥쳐 부(富)가 한쪽으로 급격히 쏠리고 있었다. 빈곤층이 양산되어 끼니와 잠자리를 걱정해야만 했다. 공간적 배경은 레이몬드(Raymond )이다. 황석영의 '삼포가는 길'의 삼포(三浦)처럼, 김승옥의 '무진기행'의 공간적 무대 무진(霧津)처럼 가상의 도시이다. 그곳을 중심으로 예수님 닮기(Imitation) 운동이 사람들을 통해 전개된다.





상류층 신앙인들의 기득권 내려놓기





이 책은 전부 31개의 장(章)으로 구성되어 있다. 각 장마다 다양한 캐릭터의 사람들이 등장해 이야기를 끌어가고 있는데 그 중에서도 중심 주인공이라고 할 만한 사람들을 열거하면 다음과 같다. 레이몬드 제일교회 담임 헨리 맥스웰 목사, 건전한 기독교 언론을 추구하는 레이몬드 데일리 뉴스(Raymond Daily News) 사장 에드워드 노만(Edward Norman), 기업의 부정을 고발하며 개혁하고 한 철도회사 간부 알렉산더 파워즈(Alexander Powers), 미성(美聲)의 성악가이며 자신의 재능으로 빈민 선교 집회 찬양 사역에 헌신하는 레이첼 윈슬로우(Rachel Winslow), 많은 재산의 상속녀이며 그 재산을 사회복지 사업에 쏟아 붓는 버지니아 페이지(Virginia Page), 링컨 대학 학장이며 이후 레이몬드 시의 금주운동을 주도하는 도날드 매쉬(Donald Mash).





면면을 살펴 볼 때 사회의 상류층 사람들임을 쉽게 알 수 있다. 세상이 어떻게 돌아가든 호의호식(好衣好食)하며 살아갈 수 있는 부류의 사람들이다. 그러나 이들에게 큰 충격을 주는 사건이 발생한다. 그것도 거룩한 주일 날, 이들이 출석하는 경건해야 할 예배당에서…. 그 이름은 잭 매닝(Jack Manning), 이 사람은 인쇄공이었는데 공장 자동화의 물결이 밀려오는 과정에서 실직을 당한 노동자이다. 즉 자동식자기(自動植字機, linotype)의 도입으로 사람의 손이 더 이상 필요 없게 되어 일자리를 잃고 말았다. 구직을 위해 백방으로 알아보았지만 허사였다. 그 사이 아내는 숨을 거두었고(영양실조에 의해였을 것) 아이는 동료 인쇄공의 집에 위탁해 놓고 있었다.





그 실직자가 예배 시간에 강대상 쪽으로 나와서 던진 말은 지금까지 평온하게 신앙생활을 해 오던 제일교회 성도들의 마음을 휘저어 놓고 말았다. 마치 바리새인들을 나무라던 예수님 같았다고나 할까. 그의 말을 직접 들어보자





"아까 여러분은 '주와 함께 가려네'라고 찬송을 부르셨는데 과연 그 뜻이 무엇일까요? 예수의 행적은, 제가 알고 있는 바로는 스스로 고난을 당하고 자신을 부정하면서 길 잃은 자와 고통 받는 자를 구원하려고 노력한 것이었는데 여러분도 그렇게 생각하는지요? 여러분은 '예수님의 발자취를 따른다'는 것을 어떻게 해석합니까? … 제 아내가 뉴욕 시의 한 셋방에서 마지막 숨을 몰아쉬면서 어린 딸을 함께 데려가게 해 달라고 하나님께 빌다가 숨을 거두었습니다. … 여러분, 예수님을 따른다는 것이 무슨 뜻일까요?"(21쪽).





산업혁명의 여파 속에 실직한 인쇄공의 죽음





믿는 자의 갈등은 여기서부터 시작되는 것이다. '예수님의 발자취를 따른다'(Following In His Steps)는 것은 무슨 뜻일까? '예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가?'(What Would Jesus Do?)는 앞의 말을 반복 강조한 것이다. 이런 말을 남기고 숨을 거둔 인쇄공 실직자의 장례를 치르고 맥스웰 목사는 획기적인 선언을 한다. 1년간 온전히 예수님의 발자취를 따르는 삶을 살아가기로. 교인들의 호응도 커 약 50 여 명이 이 운동에 동참해서 사회적 약자를 보듬고 사회의 부족한 부분을 채우는 일에 헌신하기로 서약한다. 위에 예거한 사람들이 그 운동의 주축들이다.





데일리 뉴스 사장 에드워드 노만은 주일에도 발행하던 신문을 쉬기로 하고 술과 담배 광고를 금지하며 흥미 본위의 기사를 게재하지 않기로 결정한다. 철도회사 간부인 알렉산더 파워즈는 자기 회사가 연방정부의 주간통상법(州間通商法)을 조직적으로 어기는 것을 고발함으로써 해직된다. 뛰어난 음성으로 고액의 연봉 제의를 뿌리친 레이첼 윈슬로우는 렉탱글 빈민 마을에 들어가 찬양으로 봉사한다. 고액 재산의 상속녀인 버지니아 페이지는 자신의 재산을 기독교 사회복지 사업에 쾌척했을 뿐만 아니라 그리스도 정신으로 신문을 발행해 적자 경영에 빠진 데일리 뉴스에 거금을 지원한다. 지금까지 대학 교수로 자족하던 도날드 매쉬 학장도 상아탑을 벗어나 지역의 금주 운동에 뛰어 들어 지도력을 발휘한다. 이 사람들이 내걸고 실천한 슬로건은 '예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까?'였다.





소설은 픽션(fiction)의 영역에 속한다. 즉 허구(虛構)이다. 그러나 있을 법한 허구라는 사실이 중요하다. 찰스 M. 쉘던의 In His Step이 미국뿐 아니라 전 세계적으로 성경 다음 많이 팔린 책으로 기록(30개 언어로 3천만 부 이상이 판매된 것으로 추산)되고 있으면서도 신학자들과 문학평론가들이 도외시한 것은 하나님의 말씀은 진리이고 진리는 허구와 공존할 수 없다는 인식이 작용하지 않았나 싶다. 하지만 작가 찰스 쉘던은 복음을 보다 쉽게 대중에게 전달하기 위해 소설의 방식을 택했다는 점을 분명히 했다. 그렇다면 이 소설은 재평가의 과정을 밟을 필요가 있다. 현실 안주형 그리스도인들이 다수를 점하고 있는 교계 상황을 직시할 때 이런 형식의 글로 사람들을 예수 앞에 바로 세울 수 있다면 비판이 아니라 쌍수를 들어 환영할 일이 될 것이다.





재조명되어야 할 찰스 M. 쉘던의 소설들





쉘던의 In His Steps는 17세기 존 번연(John Bunyan)이 쓴 <천로역정(Pilgrim Progress)>과도 비교된다. 존 번연도 침례교 목사이자 작가였다. <천로역정>은 우화소설로 역대 신앙서적 중 성경 다음으로 많이 읽혀졌다는 점도 그렇다. 찰스 쉘던은 미국 회중교회 목사였고, 교회의 대 사회적 역할을 강조했다. 그는 이 소설 외에도 이것의 속편에 해당하는 Jesus is Here 등 여러 권의 소설을 출판했다. 모두 교회와 사회와의 관계 속에서 예수 그리스도적 삶을 강조한 것들이다. 쉘던은 In His Steps를 쓰기 전 직접 실직한 인쇄공으로 가장하여 다수의 그리스도인들을 만났다고 한다. 그 결과는 어땠을까. 실망을 금치 못했다. 그리스도인들로부터 말과 행동과 믿음의 불일치를 보았기 때문이다.





다시 우리의 현실을 돌아보자. 신자유주의의 풍랑 속에 세상적 윤리와 질서가 교회에 그대로 이식되어 예수님이 설 자리가 점점 좁아지고 있다. 맘몬주의(Mammonism), 승자독식주의, 인본주의 등이 주님의 자리를 대신하려 하고 있다. 기독교인의 윤리 의식조차도 희미해져 무딜 대로 무디어진 상태다. 이럴 때, 그리스도인 모두가 생각과 말과 행동에서, '과연 예수님이라면 어떻게 하셨을까?'라고 묻는다면 우리의 신앙이 다시 살아날 수 있지 않을까. 미국의 대표적인 복음주의 목회자이자 저술가인 에이든 윌슨 토저(Aiden Wilson Tozer)는 현대의 그리스도인을 회색 지대의 그리스도인이라고 말한 적이 있다. 예수님처럼 사는 것도 아니고 그렇다고 세상 사람처럼 사는 것도 아닌 회색지대에서 위험한 줄타기를 하고 있다는 것이다. 그리스도인을 위한 경고의 말이다.





찰스 M. 쉘던은 이 소설의 대미를 이 땅에 이루어질 이상적 사회 건설과 함께 재림하시는 예수님의 환상을 바라보는 것으로 마무리한다. 그동안 등장했던 인물들을 총 출동시켜 맥스웰 목사가 바라고 등장인물들이 생각하고 독자들이 원하는 결말을 이끌어낸다. 해피 엔딩이다. 교회의 문간마다 성도들의 가슴마다 '예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까?'란 표어가 붙어 있는 것 같다. 이 땅에 천년왕국의 도래를 꿈꾸는 것으로 끝을 맺고 있다. 한 마디 덧붙일 것, '고통을 다른 이에게 대신 받게 하려는 기독교는 참된 기독교가 아닙니다. 진짜 기독교인이라면 사업가든 시민이든 간에 반드시 예수님에게로 가는 희생의 행로를 따라 그 분의 발자취를 밟아가야 할 것입니다. 맥스웰 목사가 마지막 설교에서 강조한 말이다. 오늘날 우리에게 시사하는 바가 적지 않으리라.





자본주의의 폐악 속에서 벗어나야 할 그리스도인





얼마간의 헌금과 몇 시간의 봉사 활동으로 그리스도인의 의무를 다 했다고 생각하는 사람들이 많다. 그것으로 주님께서 걸어가신 고난의 길을 대신할 수는 없는 일이다. 기득권을 내 놓고 가진 것을 솔선해서 나누어야 한다. 초대교회처럼 "믿는 사람이 다 함께 있어 모든 물건을 서로 통용하고 또 재산과 소유를 팔아 각 사람의 필요를 따라 나눠주고 날마다 마음을 같이 하여 성전에 모이기를 힘쓰는"(행 2:44-46) 교회로 돌아가야 한다. 이러한 초대 교회 정신이 우리 기독교가 다시 살아나는 길이다. 쉘던이 이 소설에서 강조한 것도 바로 이것이다. 상류층 사람들이 자기 것을 빈민들에게 나눠주고 함께 하라는 것이다. 목회자도 예외일 수 없다. 이 소설의 에드워드 감독(Bishop Edward)과 나사렛 에비뉴 교회의 칼빈 브루스(Calvin Bruce) 목사처럼 자신들이 온갖 정성을 다해 사역한 교회를 내려놓고 주님이 걸어가신 고통의 길을 기꺼이 기쁨으로 감당할 수 있어야 한다. 쉬운 일일까. 우리와 같은 연고주의가 뿌리 깊은 교계의 상황에서.





교계가 위기를 향해 치닫고 있다는 우려의 목소리가 높다. 돌파구를 찾아야 한다. 결국 우리 그리스도인들에게 달려 있다. 세속적 삶에 신앙을 편승시켜 나만을 위한 길을 갈 것인가 아니면 이 소설에서 시종 주창하고 있듯이 거룩한 주님의 발자취를 따라 갈 것인가의 갈림길에서 우리가 선택할 일만 남았다. 교계의 부익부 빈익빈 현상은 서구 기독교의 과거를 그대로 닮아가는 모습이다. 지금 유럽의 기독교는 어떤 상태인가. 외형만 덩그러니 남고 텅텅 빈 예배당, 생각만 해도 아찔하다. 그런 전철을 밟지 않으려면 지금 이 시간부터 '예수님이라면 어떻게 하실까?'란 물음 앞에 모두가 무릎을 꿇어야 한다. 그래서 WWJD 운동이 이 땅에 일어나기를 간절히 바란다. 그렇게 하는데 쉘던의 이 소설이 큰 도전이 될 것이다. 일독을 권할 수밖에 없는 이유가 여기에 있다. In His Steps의 마지막 '단어'로 글을 맺는다. '아멘!'
공감 (3) 댓글 (0)
 



비로그인 2001-07-18

내가 요즘 읽는 책입니다. 이책 으로 인하여 저의 삶속에 변화가 시작되고 있습니다. 우선 적으로 말하자연 감추려고 한 저의 개인 생활은 아니지만 어찌되었던 저의 이런 삶은 아는 사람은 하나님뿐....... 무관심 때문이겠죠,,,,,저도 여러분의 개인적인 삶을 모르는 것으로 봐서는 저또한 여러분에게 무관심한 사람이 아닐까하는 생각이 듭니다.

예수님이라면 이렇게 행도하시지 낳으실껄요..... 그래서 여러분에게 광고를 합니다. 무슨일일 하든지 예수라면 어떻게 하실까 하는 질문을 자신에게 하고서 행동을 하기로 어떤것보다 먼저요.. 저도 그렇게 사는 내용을 올릴것입니다. 그래서 우리들이 예수님의 삶을 닮아 가씀.....

오늘로 몇일째 <예수라면 어떻게 할것인가> 책을 읽고 있다. 오늘로 몇일째 나의 삶에 예수라면 어떻게 할것인가 하는 질문을 하고 있다 일기 시작한 날부터 다시 뒤돌아 보겠다

화요일인가 그날 낮에 비가 억수로 왔다 점심때 병원에 갔다 회사로 가는데 어르걸인이 길에서 비를 맞으면서 구걸을 하고 있었다 예수라면 어떻게 할까 하는 질문을 했다....손을 꼭 잡아주고서 에수님 믿고 구원 받으세요 그럴까....나는 그것을 행동에 옮기지 못했다 단지 지갑에서 돈을 꺼내 그분에게 주면서 예수님믿으세요 하고고 말을 했을뿐..아쉽다,,,, 그날 저녁이었다 친구인 훈혁이가 저녁 늦게 밥을 먹자고 불렀다 나의 계획이 차질이 생기려는 순가...난 다시 질문을 했다 예수라면 어떻게 할것인가....내가 친하다고 생각하는 훈혁이에게 시간을 투자 할것이다 ,,,

나는 조금의 불만을 가지고 약속장소로 욺직였다 저녁먹는 자리에서 훈혁이의 사촌 동생이(4살)...비가오는데 박으로 나가려고 하기에 내가 막었더니 검,검,검 하는 것이다 나는 무순소리야 하고 아기를 타이르다 껌하고 말을 했다 그때 아기가 고게를 끄덕였다 .... 그순가 나는 다시 질문을 했다 예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가 .....아마 아기를 위해 껌을 사오리라....나는 시당 박으로 나가서 슈퍼를 찾았다 없었다 .....물어서 슈퍼에 가서 껌을 사다가 아기에게 주었다........

프리첼의 '하나님의GOD'
http://www.freechal.com/DBGOD/
예수 라면을 같이 드시죠............


공감 (1) 댓글 (0)
 



shine 2003-11-27

지금도 이 소설은 읽히고 있다. 소설 속의 인물들이 겪어야만 했던 현실적인 어려움들은 비단 소설 속의 일만은 아니다. 오늘도 예수라면 어떻게 하셨을까를 고민하며 자기의 십자가를 지고 가는 이들이 있다. 나도 소설 속의 인물들이 했던 고민을 다시 하고자 마음먹었다. 성령님의 인도 따라 그들처럼 승리하는 자가 되길 바라며.

2003.3.17


공감 (0) 댓글 (0)
 



수호천사 2005-12-21



말세에 세상의 막막함을 보면서 그리스도인들이 믿음으로 생활하기를 고민하기 쉬우며 그런 가운데 막막한 세상에 믿음으로 생활하신 사람을 샘플로 볼 수 있다. 바로 그분이 예수님이시다.

그 예수님도 육신을 입으신지라 연약하셨으며 피곤하셨으며 고민하셨으며 아픔을 느끼셨으나 그분이 믿음으로 생활하실 수 있었던 것은 아버지가 보내신 소명을 갖고 살아가셨기 때문이다.

---------------------


오늘날도 막막하게 살아가고 있는데도 믿음으로 살아갈 수 있기란 참으로 영과 육의 갈등에 놓이며 믿음으로 살 것이냐! 죄악으로 살 것이냐! 자신과의 갈등에 놓이며 살아가가 일수이다.

때론 그리스도 안에서 생활하는 믿음의 패턴을 잃어버릴 때는 믿음으로 살아가야 하는 줄 알면서도 믿음으로 살아가지 못할 때가 많으며, 마음의 아픔을 겪으며 상대에게도 아픔을 주기도 한다.

저자가 의도하고 싶은 것은 예수님의 관점에 초점하여 예수님이 교훈하신 것에 따르며 이에 만족하며 생활해 나가는 것을 각각의 차례로 말해주고 있다. 바로 예수님이라면 어떻게 할 것인가에 고민하는 것이다.

예수님이라면 어떻게 할 수 있는 것은 먼저 예수님 안에 있어야 한다. 예수님 안에 있는 것은 생명과 평안을 공급 받는 것으로 알 수 있다. 예수님의 뜻을 좇아 살아가는 것도 이와 일반이다.

육안으로는 알 수 없으나 그리스도 영이 있느냐 없느냐로 말해준다. 마치 반석에 세운 집과 모래 세운 집이 바람과 폭풍이 몰아칠 때 알 수 있다. 그리스도 영이 없는 사람은 환경에 치우치며 힘들면 좌절하며 절망하므로 도중에 포기한다. 그리스도 영이 있는 사람은 힘들고 어려워도 예수님이 공급해 주는 생평과 평안함으로 정상을 정복한다.

종이 주인의 입장에서 주인의 일을 해야 주인의 일을 책임감 있게 할 수 있다. 만일 종이 주인의 입장보다 자신의 입장에서 주인의 일을 하면 일은 일대로 실패하며 종은 종대로 책망 받는다. 이렇듯 예수님의 입장보다 자신의 입장에서 영의 일하면 일은 실패로 자신은 아픔에 절망한다. 예수님의 입장에서 영의 일을 책임감 있게 해결할 수 있는 것이다.

예수님의 입장에서 예수님의 일을 임무완수 할 수 있는 것이 지혜이다.
------

예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가

●찰스M. 쉘돈 지음 ●조항래 옮김 ●신학박사 권성수 추천 作

유난히 비가 많았던 여름, 며칠간의 무더위는 가을이란 것이 우리들곁으로 끝내 찾아오질 못할것만 같았고 영원히 무더운 여름만이 이어질 것만 같았었는데, 어느새 코스모스가 형형색색의 자태를 뽐내며 가을바람에 요염하게 흔들리고 있다. 날마다 높아져가는 하늘,날마다 맑아지는 하늘빛, 그렇게 가을은 여름을 버티는 우리들의 피부속으로 스며들었나 보다. 계절은 이렇듯 어김없이 와야할 때를 알고 물러갈 때를 안다. 하나님의 오묘하심은 자연속에서도 세밀하게 나타내심으로 우리가 이 땅에서 살아가는데 불편함이 없도록 이끌어주신다.

꾸준하게 독서를 하고있다고 자부하는 나는 오늘 좀 솔직해지고 싶다.

1년에 50여권의 책을 읽고 있지만 그중 신앙서적은 10%를 넘기지 못한다. 신앙서적을 의식적으로 멀리하고 있음을 고백하지 않을수 없다. 내가 신앙서적을 멀리하는 이유는 부담스럽기 때문이다. 어쩌면 너무나 뻔한 이야기들이고, 읽고난후 실행하지 못하는 부담이 가슴에 짐처럼 느껴지기 때문이다.

그럼에도 이 책을 읽을 수밖에(?)없는 이유는 모처럼 목사님의 강권하심(?)이 이유일지도 모르겠고,‘예수님이라면 어떻게 할 것인

가’하는 물음표가 나도 모르게 가슴에서 지워지지가 않기 때문인지도 모르겠다.

책을 읽는 내내 난 부담감에서 벗어날 수 없었고 다 읽은 지금도 여전히 부담스럽기는 마찬가지다. 아니 읽기전보다 훨씬 부담스럽고 마음속에 돌덩이를 매단 듯이 무겁다는 것을 말하고 싶다. 이유는 물론 책에 있는 내용처럼 내가 그렇게 살지 못하기 때문이다. 무심코 행하던 일들에 스스로 ‘예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가’라는 질문이 나를 괴롭힌다. 가끔은 예수님이라면 가졌을 마음을 품어보기도 하지만 ‘역시 나는 연약한 인간’이라며 스스로를 포기하고 내 마음데로 판단할 때가 많다.그러나 내 마음속에 ‘예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가’를 되짚어 볼 수 있음이 감사하고 그런 마음을 가짐으로 조금씩 예수님께 다가서고 있다는 확신이 있어서 또한 감사한다.

이 책은 미국 레이몬드 제일교회에서 어느 주일아침 예배에서부터 시작된다. 레이몬드에서도 부유층의 사람들과 높은 직위에 있는 사람들이 모인 제일교회는 그야말로 우리가 상상할 수 없을만치 대단한 교회임을 볼 수가 있다.

헨리 맥스웰목사는 레이몬드 제일교회를 담임하면서 자부심을 갖고 있다. 맥스웰목사는 자신이 담임하는 교회의 성도들에게서도 만족을 느끼고 그들의 신분에 맞는 최고의 설교를 하고 호화로운 생활을 하면서 목회자의 일을 감당하고 있다.

맥스웰 목사를 도우며 하나님께 영광을 돌리는 레이첼 윈슬로우, 백만장자의 유산을 상속받은 버지니아, 데일리 뉴스의 신문사 사장인 에드워드 노먼 등...

제일교회는 평화로운 상태에서 예배시간이면 각자의 신분에 맞는 자리에 앉아 예배를 드린다. 어쩌면 그들은 일주일에 한번의 예배를 드림으로 스스로 해야할 일을 했다는 만족감을 느끼며(우리도 이런 마음을 가지고 살아감을 인정하자!) 레이몬드 제일교회 교인들이란 사실에 자부심마져 느끼며 살아가는 사람들이다.

그런 평화로운 교회에 어느주일아침예배에 비렁뱅이 같은 청년이 침입한다. 청년은 인쇄식자공이었지만 새로나온 주조식자기에 의하여 일자리를 잃고 말았다. 일자리를 찾기위해 찾아 다녔지만 쉽게 얻질 못한 그는 몸도 마음도 지치고 병이 들어 죽음의 문턱에서 제일교회로 찾아들었다.

청년은 교인들을 향하여 진정한 크리스챤의 모습이 어떤것일까..제시한다. 입으로만 예수님을 사랑하고 예수님을 따른다고 하면서도 우리는 어려운 이웃을 외면하고 그들에게 일자리를 제공하기 보다는 그들을 애써 외면하는 모습을 보이고 있음을 이야기 한다.

예수님의 발자취를 따르는 사람들이 행해야 할 일, 즉 ‘순종, 믿음,사랑 그리고 모방’이 있어야 진정으로 예수님의 발자취를 따르는 사람의 모습이라고 서슴없이 말한다. 우리가 쉽게 생각하는 일, 우리가 풍부하게 사용하는 물질과 풍요롭게 먹는 음식, 자부심으로 소비하는 생활의 모습들을 과연 ‘예수라면 지금의 우리처럼 하셨을까’라는 물음표를 던진다.

청년의 이 말에 맥스웰 목사는 엄청난 충격을 받는다.

지금까지 최고의 지식으로, 최상의 설교를 했던 맥스웰 목사는 자신이 설교했던 것들이 정말 예수님이라면 어떻게 하셨을까..라는 의구심을 갖는다. 밤새 무릎을 꿇어 기도하던 목사는 큰 결단을 한다.

다음주일 예배시간에 맥스웰목사는 자신과 뜻이 맞는 동역자를 찾고 목사님의 예상을 뒤엎고 수백명의 성도들이 목사님과 함께 서약을 함으로 레이몬드 제일교회에서 ‘예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가’라는 운동이 시작된다.

헨리 맥스웰 목사와 함께 이 운동에 동참한 성도들은 우선 지금까지의 자신의 모습을 버린다. 그리고 순수하게 예수님의 입장을 생각하며 예수님의 입장에서 살아가기를 소원한다. 희생과 헌신이 없이는 불가능한 일이다.

뉴스 데일리의 노먼 사장은 신문기사에서 건전하지 못하고 사람의 흥미와 재미거리들을 제거하고 일요판을 없애는 등.. 많은 부분에서 희생을 감수한다. 그로인해서 많은 독자들이 구독을 정지시키기도 하지만 노먼 사장은 끝까지 예수님의 입장에서 판단하고 밀고 나간다. 물론 훗날 뉴스 데일리신문은 더 많은 독자들을 확보했음은 두말할 나위도 없다.

레이첼 윈슬로우는 정말 아름다운 목소리로 하나님께 찬양으로 사역한다. 최고의 조건으로 불러들이는 오페라단의 유혹을 뿌리친다는 것은 상당한 일이 아닐수 없다. 기회만 주어지면 누구라도 마다않는 스타의 자리를 포기하고 주님의 일에 앞장서는 아름다운 처녀의 숭고한 결심은 상상만으로도 벅찬 기쁨인 것이다.

백만장자의 유산을 물려받은 버지니아는 시궁창같은 곳에서 봉사하며 그곳에서 레이첼과 더불어 죽어가는 영혼을 구원하는 일에 발벗고 나섰으며, 아내와 자녀들에게 버림받으면서도 예수라면..이라는 이유하나로 직장에서의 불미스러운 일을 고발하고 스스로 고달픈 길을 택한 파워즈씨 등등

이들의 헌신과 달라진 모습들은 미국전역에 서서히 확산되었다.

맥스웰 목사의 친구인 브루스 목사도 나사렛 애비뉴 교회에서 이 운동을 시작하게 되고 역시 많은 성도들이 서약을 하고 그 서약을 지켜나가는 모습을 볼수가 있다.

‘예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가?’

정말 어려운 질문이 아닐수 없다.

그럼에도 반드시 우리가 스스로 묻고 답해야 하는 질문임을 기억해야 한다.

우리는 하나님의 자녀라고, 그의 기르시는 양이라고 늘 외친다.

그러면서도 예수 그리스도의 발자취를 따라가는데는 얼마나 더딘지...

레이몬드 제일교회나 애비뉴 나사렛 교회에서 일어난 이 운동을 상상해보라.

책을 읽으면서 몇가지를 발견했다.

첫째는 하나님께서 우리와 동행하시는 기쁨이 어떤 것인지를 깨닫는 것이다.

안락한 일상을 벗어던지고 십자가를 지고 예수님의 발자취를 따르는 그들은 비록 몸이 힘들고 고달프지만 하나님께서 동행하고 계시는 축복을 맛보며 기쁨을 누리고 있다. 성령님의 운행하심을 순간순간 깨닫는 그들의 기쁨의 목소리를 들을 수가 있다.

둘째는 동역하는 즐거움을 발견할 수 있다.

무슨 일이든 혼자가 아닌 여럿이 함께 일할 때 힘을 얻는다. 서로를 권면하며 힘을 실어주는 레이첼과 버지니아를 보면 그들의 동역이 얼마나 소중한가를 깨달을 수 있다. 브루스목사와 감독이 겪어내는 동역자의 아름다운 수고는 또한 얼마나 커다란 감사의 조건을 만들어 내는지.

셋째는 나의 신앙을 점검하는 일이다.

40년간의 교회생활이 나의 자랑이 될 수 없음을 인정한다. 이유는 단 한번도 ‘예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가’라는 질문을 지금껏 해본적이 없었기 때문이다.

습관처럼 주일이면 교회에 와서 예배를 드리고 찬양으로 봉사하는 것으로 나의 임무가 다했던걸로 생각했던 어리석은 나를 발견한다. 내가 생각하는 것, 내가 판단하며 결정하는 것, 내 욕심대로 이루어지지 않을 때 쏟았던 불평과 불만들...

어쩔수 없이 모든 것이 내 중심으로만 채워졌었음을 또한 고백하지 않을수 없다.

책을 덮으며 과연 나는 이 질문에, 이 엄청난 질문에 얼마나 자유로울 수 있을까..자문하지 않을수 없다.

어느새 습관처럼 ‘예수라면 어떻게 할 것인가’라는 물음표가 마음속에 자리한다.

이 질문이 내 마음속에 있는 동안은 난 좀 더 겸손하며, 좀 더 온유할 수 있을까?



덥지도 춥지도 않은 이 가을은 책을 읽기에 더할수 없이 좋다.

책을 읽기에도 좋고 여행을 하기에도 좋고, 일을 하기에도 참으로 좋은 계절이다.

타성에 젖은채로 살아온 우리의 시간들을 지금쯤 점검하는 여유도 부려보자.

좋은 책 한 권이 우리의 마음을 풍요롭게 하고, 우리의 나태함을 반성하게 한다.

이 책을 읽음으로 나와 예수님과의 관게는 어떤 관계인지도 살펴보고, 내 속에 예수 그리스도의 발자취를 닮은 부분이 얼마나 되는지도 살펴보자.

혹시 예수님은 저 멀리로 밀어내고 중심에 내가 우뚝하게 버티고 있다면 겸연쩍은 모습으로 나를 밀어내고 그 자리에 예수님을 모셔보자.

무엇보다 내 중심적인 思考에서 ‘예수님이라면 어떻게 할 것인가’를 한번쯤 생각해 보는 성숙함을 배우도록 하자. 그러기 위해서 이 책을 집어들고 펼쳐보자.

눈물나도록 아름다운 이 가을이 다가기전에.

평내교회 이 진 옥 집사

2020/03/23

2003 Yuval Noah Harari: the world after coronavirus



Yuval Noah Harari: the world after coronavirus
This storm will pass. But the choices we make now could change our lives for years to come
© Graziano Panfili

March 20, 2020 5:00 am by Yuval Noah Harari


Humankind is now facing a global crisis. Perhaps the biggest crisis of our generation. The decisions people and governments take in the next few weeks will probably shape the world for years to come. They will shape not just our healthcare systems but also our economy, politics and culture. We must act quickly and decisively. We should also take into account the long-term consequences of our actions. When choosing between alternatives, we should ask ourselves not only how to overcome the immediate threat, but also what kind of world we will inhabit once the storm passes. Yes, the storm will pass, humankind will survive, most of us will still be alive — but we will inhabit a different world.

Many short-term emergency measures will become a fixture of life. That is the nature of emergencies. They fast-forward historical processes. Decisions that in normal times could take years of deliberation are passed in a matter of hours. Immature and even dangerous technologies are pressed into service, because the risks of doing nothing are bigger. Entire countries serve as guinea-pigs in large-scale social experiments. What happens when everybody works from home and communicates only at a distance? What happens when entire schools and universities go online? In normal times, governments, businesses and educational boards would never agree to conduct such experiments. But these aren’t normal times.

In this time of crisis, we face two particularly important choices. The first is between totalitarian surveillance and citizen empowerment. The second is between nationalist isolation and global solidarity.
Under-the-skin surveillance

In order to stop the epidemic, entire populations need to comply with certain guidelines. There are two main ways of achieving this. One method is for the government to monitor people, and punish those who break the rules. Today, for the first time in human history, technology makes it possible to monitor everyone all the time. Fifty years ago, the KGB couldn’t follow 240m Soviet citizens 24 hours a day, nor could the KGB hope to effectively process all the information gathered. The KGB relied on human agents and analysts, and it just couldn’t place a human agent to follow every citizen. But now governments can rely on ubiquitous sensors and powerful algorithms instead of flesh-and-blood spooks.

The Colosseum in Rome

Piazza Beato Roberto in Pescara © Graziano Panfili

In their battle against the coronavirus epidemic several governments have already deployed the new surveillance tools. The most notable case is China. By closely monitoring people’s smartphones, making use of hundreds of millions of face-recognising cameras, and obliging people to check and report their body temperature and medical condition, the Chinese authorities can not only quickly identify suspected coronavirus carriers, but also track their movements and identify anyone they came into contact with. A range of mobile apps warn citizens about their proximity to infected patients.

About the photography


The images accompanying this article are taken from webcams overlooking the deserted streets of Italy, found and manipulated by Graziano Panfili, a photographer living under lockdown

This kind of technology is not limited to east Asia. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel recently authorised the Israel Security Agency to deploy surveillance technology normally reserved for battling terrorists to track coronavirus patients. When the relevant parliamentary subcommittee refused to authorise the measure, Netanyahu rammed it through with an “emergency decree”.


You might argue that there is nothing new about all this. In recent years both governments and corporations have been using ever more sophisticated technologies to track, monitor and manipulate people. Yet if we are not careful, the epidemic might nevertheless mark an important watershed in the history of surveillance. Not only because it might normalise the deployment of mass surveillance tools in countries that have so far rejected them, but even more so because it signifies a dramatic transition from “over the skin” to “under the skin” surveillance.

Hitherto, when your finger touched the screen of your smartphone and clicked on a link, the government wanted to know what exactly your finger was clicking on. But with coronavirus, the focus of interest shifts. Now the government wants to know the temperature of your finger and the blood-pressure under its skin.
The emergency pudding

One of the problems we face in working out where we stand on surveillance is that none of us know exactly how we are being surveilled, and what the coming years might bring. Surveillance technology is developing at breakneck speed, and what seemed science-fiction 10 years ago is today old news. As a thought experiment, consider a hypothetical government that demands that every citizen wears a biometric bracelet that monitors body temperature and heart-rate 24 hours a day. The resulting data is hoarded and analysed by government algorithms. The algorithms will know that you are sick even before you know it, and they will also know where you have been, and who you have met. The chains of infection could be drastically shortened, and even cut altogether. Such a system could arguably stop the epidemic in its tracks within days. Sounds wonderful, right?

The downside is, of course, that this would give legitimacy to a terrifying new surveillance system. If you know, for example, that I clicked on a Fox News link rather than a CNN link, that can teach you something about my political views and perhaps even my personality. But if you can monitor what happens to my body temperature, blood pressure and heart-rate as I watch the video clip, you can learn what makes me laugh, what makes me cry, and what makes me really, really angry.

It is crucial to remember that anger, joy, boredom and love are biological phenomena just like fever and a cough. The same technology that identifies coughs could also identify laughs. If corporations and governments start harvesting our biometric data en masse, they can get to know us far better than we know ourselves, and they can then not just predict our feelings but also manipulate our feelings and sell us anything they want — be it a product or a politician. Biometric monitoring would make Cambridge Analytica’s data hacking tactics look like something from the Stone Age. Imagine North Korea in 2030, when every citizen has to wear a biometric bracelet 24 hours a day. If you listen to a speech by the Great Leader and the bracelet picks up the tell-tale signs of anger, you are done for.

Veduta della Casa Universitaria in Lodi © Graziano Panfili

Spiaggia di Porto San Giorgio, Mare Adriatico © Graziano Panfili

You could, of course, make the case for biometric surveillance as a temporary measure taken during a state of emergency. It would go away once the emergency is over. But temporary measures have a nasty habit of outlasting emergencies, especially as there is always a new emergency lurking on the horizon. My home country of Israel, for example, declared a state of emergency during its 1948 War of Independence, which justified a range of temporary measures from press censorship and land confiscation to special regulations for making pudding (I kid you not). The War of Independence has long been won, but Israel never declared the emergency over, and has failed to abolish many of the “temporary” measures of 1948 (the emergency pudding decree was mercifully abolished in 2011).

Even when infections from coronavirus are down to zero, some data-hungry governments could argue they needed to keep the biometric surveillance systems in place because they fear a second wave of coronavirus, or because there is a new Ebola strain evolving in central Africa, or because . . . you get the idea. A big battle has been raging in recent years over our privacy. The coronavirus crisis could be the battle’s tipping point. For when people are given a choice between privacy and health, they will usually choose health.
The soap police

Asking people to choose between privacy and health is, in fact, the very root of the problem. Because this is a false choice. We can and should enjoy both privacy and health. We can choose to protect our health and stop the coronavirus epidemic not by instituting totalitarian surveillance regimes, but rather by empowering citizens. In recent weeks, some of the most successful efforts to contain the coronavirus epidemic were orchestrated by South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore. While these countries have made some use of tracking applications, they have relied far more on extensive testing, on honest reporting, and on the willing co-operation of a well-informed public.

Centralised monitoring and harsh punishments aren’t the only way to make people comply with beneficial guidelines. When people are told the scientific facts, and when people trust public authorities to tell them these facts, citizens can do the right thing even without a Big Brother watching over their shoulders. A self-motivated and well-informed population is usually far more powerful and effective than a policed, ignorant population.

Consider, for example, washing your hands with soap. This has been one of the greatest advances ever in human hygiene. This simple action saves millions of lives every year. While we take it for granted, it was only in the 19th century that scientists discovered the importance of washing hands with soap. Previously, even doctors and nurses proceeded from one surgical operation to the next without washing their hands. Today billions of people daily wash their hands, not because they are afraid of the soap police, but rather because they understand the facts. I wash my hands with soap because I have heard of viruses and bacteria, I understand that these tiny organisms cause diseases, and I know that soap can remove them.

The Royal Palace of Caserta © Graziano Panfili

Lungomare di Forte dei Marmi, in Versilia © Graziano Panfili

But to achieve such a level of compliance and co-operation, you need trust. People need to trust science, to trust public authorities, and to trust the media. Over the past few years, irresponsible politicians have deliberately undermined trust in science, in public authorities and in the media. Now these same irresponsible politicians might be tempted to take the high road to authoritarianism, arguing that you just cannot trust the public to do the right thing.

Normally, trust that has been eroded for years cannot be rebuilt overnight. But these are not normal times. In a moment of crisis, minds too can change quickly. You can have bitter arguments with your siblings for years, but when some emergency occurs, you suddenly discover a hidden reservoir of trust and amity, and you rush to help one another. Instead of building a surveillance regime, it is not too late to rebuild people’s trust in science, in public authorities and in the media. We should definitely make use of new technologies too, but these technologies should empower citizens. I am all in favour of monitoring my body temperature and blood pressure, but that data should not be used to create an all-powerful government. Rather, that data should enable me to make more informed personal choices, and also to hold government accountable for its decisions.

If I could track my own medical condition 24 hours a day, I would learn not only whether I have become a health hazard to other people, but also which habits contribute to my health. And if I could access and analyse reliable statistics on the spread of coronavirus, I would be able to judge whether the government is telling me the truth and whether it is adopting the right policies to combat the epidemic. Whenever people talk about surveillance, remember that the same surveillance technology can usually be used not only by governments to monitor individuals — but also by individuals to monitor governments.

The coronavirus epidemic is thus a major test of citizenship. In the days ahead, each one of us should choose to trust scientific data and healthcare experts over unfounded conspiracy theories and self-serving politicians. If we fail to make the right choice, we might find ourselves signing away our most precious freedoms, thinking that this is the only way to safeguard our health.
We need a global plan

The second important choice we confront is between nationalist isolation and global solidarity. Both the epidemic itself and the resulting economic crisis are global problems. They can be solved effectively only by global co-operation.

First and foremost, in order to defeat the virus we need to share information globally. That’s the big advantage of humans over viruses. A coronavirus in China and a coronavirus in the US cannot swap tips about how to infect humans. But China can teach the US many valuable lessons about coronavirus and how to deal with it. What an Italian doctor discovers in Milan in the early morning might well save lives in Tehran by evening. When the UK government hesitates between several policies, it can get advice from the Koreans who have already faced a similar dilemma a month ago. But for this to happen, we need a spirit of global co-operation and trust.



In the days ahead, each one of us should choose to trust scientific data and healthcare experts over unfounded conspiracy theories and self-serving politicians

Countries should be willing to share information openly and humbly seek advice, and should be able to trust the data and the insights they receive. We also need a global effort to produce and distribute medical equipment, most notably testing kits and respiratory machines. Instead of every country trying to do it locally and hoarding whatever equipment it can get, a co-ordinated global effort could greatly accelerate production and make sure life-saving equipment is distributed more fairly. Just as countries nationalise key industries during a war, the human war against coronavirus may require us to “humanise” the crucial production lines. A rich country with few coronavirus cases should be willing to send precious equipment to a poorer country with many cases, trusting that if and when it subsequently needs help, other countries will come to its assistance.

We might consider a similar global effort to pool medical personnel. Countries currently less affected could send medical staff to the worst-hit regions of the world, both in order to help them in their hour of need, and in order to gain valuable experience. If later on the focus of the epidemic shifts, help could start flowing in the opposite direction.

Global co-operation is vitally needed on the economic front too. Given the global nature of the economy and of supply chains, if each government does its own thing in complete disregard of the others, the result will be chaos and a deepening crisis. We need a global plan of action, and we need it fast.

Another requirement is reaching a global agreement on travel. Suspending all international travel for months will cause tremendous hardships, and hamper the war against coronavirus. Countries need to co-operate in order to allow at least a trickle of essential travellers to continue crossing borders: scientists, doctors, journalists, politicians, businesspeople. This can be done by reaching a global agreement on the pre-screening of travellers by their home country. If you know that only carefully screened travellers were allowed on a plane, you would be more willing to accept them into your country.

The Duomo in Florence © Graziano Panfili

Torre San Giovanni, in Lecce © Graziano Panfili

Unfortunately, at present countries hardly do any of these things. A collective paralysis has gripped the international community. There seem to be no adults in the room. One would have expected to see already weeks ago an emergency meeting of global leaders to come up with a common plan of action. The G7 leaders managed to organise a videoconference only this week, and it did not result in any such plan.

In previous global crises — such as the 2008 financial crisis and the 2014 Ebola epidemic — the US assumed the role of global leader. But the current US administration has abdicated the job of leader. It has made it very clear that it cares about the greatness of America far more than about the future of humanity.

This administration has abandoned even its closest allies. When it banned all travel from the EU, it didn’t bother to give the EU so much as an advance notice — let alone consult with the EU about that drastic measure. It has scandalised Germany by allegedly offering $1bn to a German pharmaceutical company to buy monopoly rights to a new Covid-19 vaccine. Even if the current administration eventually changes tack and comes up with a global plan of action, few would follow a leader who never takes responsibility, who never admits mistakes, and who routinely takes all the credit for himself while leaving all the blame to others.

If the void left by the US isn’t filled by other countries, not only will it be much harder to stop the current epidemic, but its legacy will continue to poison international relations for years to come. Yet every crisis is also an opportunity. We must hope that the current epidemic will help humankind realise the acute danger posed by global disunity.

Humanity needs to make a choice. Will we travel down the route of disunity, or will we adopt the path of global solidarity? If we choose disunity, this will not only prolong the crisis, but will probably result in even worse catastrophes in the future. If we choose global solidarity, it will be a victory not only against the coronavirus, but against all future epidemics and crises that might assail humankind in the 21st century.

Yuval Noah Harari is author of ‘Sapiens’, ‘Homo Deus’ and ‘21 Lessons for the 21st Century’

Copyright © Yuval Noah Harari 2020

Follow @FTLifeArts on Twitter to find out about our latest stories first. Listen to our culture podcast, Culture Call, where editors Gris and Lilah dig into the trends shaping life in the 2020s, interview the people breaking new ground and bring you behind the scenes of FT Life & Arts journalism. Subscribe on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you listen.

Read more about the impact of coronavirus
The latest figures as the outbreak spreads
Containing coronavirus: lessons from Asia
How dangerous is the coronavirus and how does it spread?

[삶의 철학] 자연의 큰 흐름과 같이 하라?

Sejin Pak
23 March 2016 at 22:24



[삶의 철학] 자연의 큰 흐름과 같이 하라?
- 정의가 없는, 악의 세상과 같이 하라는 말이냐?
- 아, 그건 아니고 ...

---


[When my mother became seriously ill, I made many trips over great distances to help take care of her. It was nearly impossible to predict when I might be needed and when I would have to cancel professional or family plans. I often found myself ruminating on the stark uncertainty and terrible unfairness of my situation, sometimes giving in to pangs of self-pity.

But a quote from the Stoic philosopher Marcus Aurelius always came to my rescue: “Nothing will happen to you which is not conformable to the nature of the universe.” We are flesh and blood, our loved ones get sick, we take care of them. Marcus’s teaching became a sort of mantra for me—and was my way of going with the flow.

So far, so good. But what does a morally responsible person do when confronted with prejudice, injustice or hatred? Should one go with the flow, saying “Oh, well, that’s life”? What would have happened if the world had gone with the flow when Hitler threatened the annihilation of Western values and civilization? How do the Taoists, Buddhists and Stoics reply to the presence of violence or genocide in the world? In short, isn’t going with the flow a gigantic and unconscionable cop-out in the face of evil?

Philosophers throughout the ages have given their answer: we should not go to pieces in the face of evil, nor should we emulate the cruelty of our oppressors—we must do what we can to oppose injustice. We see this teaching played out in the great traditions of nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience. We see it in the lives of Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela, as well as the Buddhist monks of Chinese-occupied Tibet.

But are these not examples of people who went against the flow? Yes, in the narrow sense that they acted against the flow of ignorance, tyranny or bigotry. But when the Taoists, Buddhists and Stoics speak of going with the flow, they have in mind the great river of nature and reason, the underlying order of the universe. As Marcus Aurelius put it, “All things are woven together and the common bond is sacred . . . for there is one Universe out of all . . . one substance and one law, one common Reason of all intelligent creatures.”

The sages instruct us to accept with equanimity the reality of evil in the world, but not its sovereignty; and to accept that while cruelty is a part of life, it is not a part of our common bond as intelligent human beings. Yes, we do our best to go with the flow—but not with the torrent of injustice.]

- See more at: http://now.tufts.edu/articles/should-you-go-flow…



Should You Go with the Flow?
A Tufts psychiatrist reflects on the wisdom behind an overused saying

“A quote from the Stoic philosopher Marcus Aurelius always came to my rescue: ‘Nothing will happen to you which is not conformable to the nature of the universe.’” Photo: Depositphotos
By Ronald Pies
May 29, 2014
reddit
Print
Email


You’ve heard it a thousand times: “Go with the flow.” For many, this well-meaning advice has become a kind of pop psychology cliché, a mental bumper sticker. Properly understood, the message is one of the most profound in the entire corpus of religious and spiritual literature. But “go with the flow” can all too easily become an excuse for apathy and indifference. How do we apply the phrase wisely?

The idea of going with the flow finds strongest voice in the Taoist, Buddhist and Stoic traditions. Taoism (or Daoism) is an ancient Chinese philosophy associated with the semi-mythical figure Laozi. Tao is usually translated as “way” or “path,” but it really represents the mysterious, ineffable foundation of all being. The central teaching of Taoism is wu-wei. This, too, is difficult to translate, but it is usually rendered as “non-straining” or “effortless action.”

A Taoist practitioner, Elizabeth Reninger, nicely defines wu-wei as “a state of being in which our actions are quite effortlessly in alignment with the ebb and flow of the elemental cycles of the natural world.” (We see debased versions of this teaching in popular sayings like “When life gives you lemons, make lemonade”—or, even lower on the spiritual scale, “find some tequila.”)

The core idea of Taoism—as well as of Zen Buddhism, which Taoism influenced—is that of not forcing or grasping one’s way through life, but instead living life spontaneously, in harmony with the natural order of things. The ancient Stoics followed the similar principle of living in harmony with the “Logos”—roughly, the underlying rational order of the universe. How might this philosophy play out in our daily lives?

When my mother became seriously ill, I made many trips over great distances to help take care of her. It was nearly impossible to predict when I might be needed and when I would have to cancel professional or family plans. I often found myself ruminating on the stark uncertainty and terrible unfairness of my situation, sometimes giving in to pangs of self-pity.

But a quote from the Stoic philosopher Marcus Aurelius always came to my rescue: “Nothing will happen to you which is not conformable to the nature of the universe.” We are flesh and blood, our loved ones get sick, we take care of them. Marcus’s teaching became a sort of mantra for me—and was my way of going with the flow.

So far, so good. But what does a morally responsible person do when confronted with prejudice, injustice or hatred? Should one go with the flow, saying “Oh, well, that’s life”? What would have happened if the world had gone with the flow when Hitler threatened the annihilation of Western values and civilization? How do the Taoists, Buddhists and Stoics reply to the presence of violence or genocide in the world? In short, isn’t going with the flow a gigantic and unconscionable cop-out in the face of evil?

Philosophers throughout the ages have given their answer: we should not go to pieces in the face of evil, nor should we emulate the cruelty of our oppressors—we must do what we can to oppose injustice. We see this teaching played out in the great traditions of nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience. We see it in the lives of Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela, as well as the Buddhist monks of Chinese-occupied Tibet.

But are these not examples of people who went against the flow? Yes, in the narrow sense that they acted against the flow of ignorance, tyranny or bigotry. But when the Taoists, Buddhists and Stoics speak of going with the flow, they have in mind the great river of nature and reason, the underlying order of the universe. As Marcus Aurelius put it, “All things are woven together and the common bond is sacred . . . for there is one Universe out of all . . . one substance and one law, one common Reason of all intelligent creatures.”

The sages instruct us to accept with equanimity the reality of evil in the world, but not its sovereignty; and to accept that while cruelty is a part of life, it is not a part of our common bond as intelligent human beings. Yes, we do our best to go with the flow—but not with the torrent of injustice.

This article first appeared in the Winter 2014 issue of Tufts Magazine.

Ronald Pies is a clinical professor of psychiatry at the School of Medicine. He wishes to thank his wife, Nancy L. Butters, for inspiring this essay.

If You Like This
Better Living through Religion
July 11, 2013
What Would the Buddha Do?
August 2, 2012
Hate Speech Is Killing Us
December 7, 2018

2020/03/22

자연을닮은사람들(자닮) 강의 - 대한민국 농업의 미래와 비전

자연을닮은사람들(자닮) 강의 - 대한민국 농업의 미래와 비전:

자연을닮은사람들(자닮)이라는 인터넷 사이트와 유튜브 강의 내용을 듣고 아~~!!! 

도법자연, 성속일여.. 등의 동양철약을 기반으로 농업을 바라보는 설명..

시비와 추비 그리고 농약인 살균제와 살충제의 초저비..

자연을 닮은사람들 조영상