2018/06/23

Why We Run: A Natural History: Bernd Heinrich: 9780060958701: Amazon.com: Books

Why We Run: A Natural History: Bernd Heinrich: 9780060958701: Amazon.com: Books
by Bernd Heinrich (Author)

4.0 out of 5 stars 88 customer reviews






A Year In The Maine Woods


Bernd Heinrich

4.3 out of 5 stars 42

Paperback

$14.12 Prime


Mind of the Raven: Investigations and Adventures with Wolf…


Bernd Heinrich

4.5 out of 5 stars 170

Paperback

$11.18 Prime

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

The author of numerous bestselling and award-winning books, Bernd Heinrich is a professor of biology at the University of Vermont. He divides his time between Vermont and the forests of western Maine.


Product details
Paperback: 304 pages
Publisher: Ecco (May 7, 2002)
Language: English

------------
Biography

Bernd Heinrich is a biologist and author of numerous books on the natural world. He lives in Richmond, VT, and in a cabin in the forests of western Maine.
------------------
Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
88


4.0 out of 5 stars


Top customer reviews


Bernie GourleyTop Contributor: Fantasy Books


TOP 1000 REVIEWER

5.0 out of 5 starsPart autobiography of a runner, part comparative biology, part evolutionary biology, and part guide to ultramarathoningNovember 13, 2015

Format: Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase



This book is actually several different books woven together. It’s part autobiography of the author’s running life, it’s part a study of comparative biology between various creatures with an endurance bent and humans, it’s part an examination of the evolutionary biology of humanity’s proclivity to run, and it’s part guide to preparing to engage in ultramarathons.

Often I pan such books as being unfocused, ill-planned, and—most often—attempts to whip an article’s worth of material into a book length piece. However, Heinrich keeps it interesting enough that I don’t feel it necessary to level these criticisms.

Still, my first warning to readers is that one has to read on for quite a while before one gets to the book that one thought one bought—i.e. one that answers the title question of “why WE (i.e. people in general and not the author specifically) run.” In short, you’ll need to have an eclectic set of interests to get through the whole book, but some may find reading only part of it gives them all they wanted from the book.

It should be noted that the book is on its second title. The original title was: “Racing the Antelope: What Animals Can Teach Us about Running and Ourselves.” The author explains in the front matter why the original name was changed (apparently some loud and obnoxious writer had a similarly titled book on a different subject and whined about it.) Changing the title wasn’t required because: a.) titles cannot be copyrighted, and b.) it wasn’t exactly the same title anyway. Still the new, more succinct, title may lead one to expect a succinct book, which this isn’t so much.

Some readers will enjoy Heinrich’s writing style; others will find that it ventures too far into flowery territory on occasion. I did enjoy it. However, I can see how a reader might find some of the descriptive sequences to be excessive--particularly toward the beginning of the book.

While there’s some overlapping and interweaving, one can think of the book in three sections. It’s written in twenty chapters.

The first six tell the author’s story of getting into running and his youth.

The next eight chapters deal in comparative and evolutionary biology. In general, these chapters look at the biology of other creatures as they pertain to said animals’ ability to engage in running (or activities that are like running in that they involve endurance of muscles and the cardiovascular system.) Also included in this section is the evolutionary biology of humans as it relates to becoming a species of runners. This is the core of the book and was the most interesting section for me. In it, Heinrich considers the endurance activities of insects, birds, antelopes, camels, and frogs.

Each of these has a particular relevance. For example, camels are masters of endurance under harsh conditions. Frogs tell the story of the difference between fast and slow twitch musculature (relevant to sprinters versus distance runners.) Antelopes are, of course, the exemplars running in the animal kingdom, but the nature of their running is so different from that of humans (i.e. making quick escapes versus pursuing wounded prey.) The last six chapters can be seen as a guide to preparing for ultramarathon races, but it’s also a continuation of the author’s self-examination of his running life from the time he began ultramarathoning.



I’d recommend this book for readers who are interested in the science of human performance. It’s well written, and the insights it offers into the biology of other animals are fascinating. Whether you read the whole book or just the part that pertains to your interests, you’ll take something away from this book.

Read less

6 people found this helpful



Michael Lacombe


5.0 out of 5 starsWhy I RunFebruary 21, 2017

Format: Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase

This was a different type of book about running. I have fun for over forty years and have read hundreds of books about running and runners, but none like this book. As I have matured as a runner, I have become more interested in the physiology of running, rather than psychology. The author describes the science behind the birds migratory flights and animals of the plains hunting expeditions in terms I could relate to the physiology of my running; though their great feats of endurance and speed far exceed that of humans! A well written, easy to understand book about why we run from a refreshing perspective.



Michael A. Nelson


5.0 out of 5 starsBernd Heinrich's Why We Run is an excellent resource for those interested in both research and personal ...April 9, 2018

Format: Paperback|Verified Purchase

Bernd Heinrich's Why We Run is an excellent resource for those interested in both research and personal account. It is quite detailed, and for those who run, it is also quite personal. I learned a lot about the human body and other species in relation to the hunt. A species' anatomy, diet, metabolism, heat management, and more evolutionary adaptations have enabled all species to survive



Jay McLaughlin


5.0 out of 5 starsMr. Heinrich is a captivating writerOctober 2, 2016

Format: Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase

I loved as always his scrupulous attention to detail. His continuous attention to the effects of natural selection and the "survival of the fittest."

I'd recommend this to anyone interested in endurance or evolution or living by their wits.

I chose this rating because the gratification I experienced reading this book far outweighed the paltry few dollars I spent on it.



John


3.0 out of 5 starsWhy do we really run???September 19, 2012

Format: Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase

I saw this book in an airport and decided to check to see if it was available as a Kindle Version. It was and I ordered it. I got halfway through the book when I realized, it really hasn't said anything about, "Why we Run". It is mainly a story about the author and his life, which includes running. I was hoping it would be more scientific than just another story about a guy who likes to run and how much of it he did as a kid and into adulthood. It also throws in a reference here and there to insects and animals and how they are designed for endurance. Oh yeh, and how the title started out as something different until he got harassed enough to change it. I have set it aside until I have one of those rainy days where I am bored and have nothing else more exciting to read.


Don's Thoughts on the Matter


5.0 out of 5 starsBiographical, informative, and practical. A unique perspective...May 11, 2013

Format: Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase

What do you get when you mix an evolutionary field biologist and a distance runner? Amazing insights, unparalleled research applications, and a unique set of personal stories which serve as an illustrative backdrop. The author's unique life experiences and academic knowledge were allowed to percolate for a decade or two before he put the story to paper. Not only is the story of "the race" compelling, but the opportunity to travel along with a great mind weaving knowledge and application together into becoming a smarter runner was a delight. (I learned a lot of science along the way as well; plus, I got an appreciation of evolutionary biology as a useful scientific paradigm. A pretty diverse set of gleanings from a book on running.) ;-)


Albert Reingewirtz

5.0 out of 5 starsFantastic book as usual from Bernd HeinrichAugust 23, 2014

Format: Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase

Fantastic book as usual from Bernd Heinrich. I could not believe it this biologist has plenty of explanations and examples that would make an anthropologist successful in any university. I am not a runner but I had to buy a book for a visiting relative who runs Marathons as a present. This is how much I love this book. I did not recommend it I bought it as a present.
=======================


Why We Run

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Why We Run: A Natural History is a non-fiction book by author and biologist Bernd Heinrich and was originally published as Racing the Antelope: What Animals Can Teach Us About Running and Ourselves.

Synopsis[edit]

The narrator, Heinrich, writes about the challenges that he faced in his life and in writing the book. It explains why humans endure ultramarathons. One segment focuses on the time Heinrich came first in the Golden Gate Marathon in the 1980s. During the ultra-marathon, Heinrich drank Ocean Spray cranberry juice rather than water, stating that it was sugar that kept him running throughout the 100 kilometres (62 mi).
The book is organised into chapters detailing different animals and their ability to use their natural advantages for greatest endurance and explains how Heinrich used this knowledge to become an ultra-runner. Why We Run focuses on how antelope, deer, wolves, bees, frogs, camels and other animals exhibit endurance techniques that humans later adopted. For example, antelopes travel in packs and "leap frog" from back to front to conserve energy and escape predators. Deer are natural sprinters and sprint to escape predators. Wolves, like endurance runners, chase sprinting prey to tire them. Camels are adapted to fat storage and usage in order to conserve water in their harsh environment. Birds have a majority of slow twitch fibrous muscles that are adapted for long travel times as well as the ability to simultaneously inhale and exhale. The book concludes as Heinrich completes an ultra-marathon and reflects on the biology, anthropology, psychology and philosophy that affected his life along with the animals and their metabolic functions.

Racing the Antelope[edit]

Why We Run: A Natural History was originally released as Racing The Antelope, What Animals Can Teach Us about Running and Ourselves. The title was changed due to a complaint from Sean Gibbon, author of Run Like the Antelope, a book about the rock band Phish. In order to distinguish his work from that work, Heinrich and his editor Daniel Halpern switched. Bernd Heinrich stated that this new title worked just as well since a new book had been released titled Running after Antelope by Scott Carrier. With an influx of antelope-titled books, Heinrich stated that the new title was more appropriate.[citation needed]

Critical Response[edit]

Why We Run: A Natural History gained mostly favorable reviews from Google Booksand Barnes & Noble. Reviewers stated that Heinrich's writing is passionate and engaging, with many comments that he leads an interesting life. However, the focus on animal physiology was found convoluted and little tied to other chapters until the end. Other reviewers found that many facts were "mushy" and are not integrated. Positive reviews from New York Times,[1] Publishers Weekly,[2] and positive aggregated reviews earned Why We Run: A Natural History best-seller status on Amazon.com, where it reached 19th place in popularity for science and wildlife books.[unreliable source?]
Aggregate Reviews
SourceRating
Amazon.com3.8/5
Barnes & Noble3.5/5
Google books3/5

References




























性欲 - Wikipedia



性欲 - Wikipedia


出典は列挙するだけでなく、脚注などを用いてどの記述の情報源であるかを明記してください。記事の信頼性向上にご協力をお願いいたします。(2017年3月)



この項目には性的な表現や記述が含まれます。免責事項もお読みください。


性欲(せいよく、: luxure、: Lust)は、人間の欲求の一つで的な満足を求める本能である。

----

目次 [非表示]
1概要
2宗教での伝統的な位置づけ
3精神分析学における性的欲求
3.1性衝動の固着
4近年の生物学的・医学的な説明
4.1男性の場合
4.2女性の場合
4.3男女のギャップ
5犯罪と性欲
6脚注
7参考文献
8文献
9関連項目

---

概要[編集]

一般に二次性徴を迎え生殖能力を獲得したとき「性の目覚め」が起きるとされるが、それ以前から明確な性欲を抱く人もいる。性欲の高まる時期や強さは個人差や性差が大きい。多くの伝統的な宗教で、性欲は慎むべきもの、忌避すべきもの、警戒すべきもの、とされている(#宗教での伝統的な位置づけ)。

近年の医学的研究によって、性欲には男女で異なった周期性やピークの時期があることが明らかになっている。(#近年の生物学的・医学的な説明

「性的欲求は動物の生殖本能の現れであり、性行為を行い子孫を残すためにある[要出典]」などとも言われる。「故に一般に、生殖相手としてふさわしい同種の異性に対して抱くものだ[要出典]」とも言う。ただし、人間の性欲は多彩な欲求との相互作用により変化し、学習によって様々なフェチズムが生まれる。そのため一口に性欲といっても個人によって様々な形がある。人間だけが変態になる[1][信頼性の低い医学の情報源?]などとも言われる。もっとも、「多くの動物で同性愛など生殖に結びつかない性行動もある」という[2]
---

宗教での伝統的な位置づけ[編集]

この節の加筆が望まれています。


多くの宗教で、不適切な性欲をとしている。

モーセの十戒では姦淫の禁止を戒のひとつに数えるため、ユダヤ教およびキリスト教イスラム教もこれにならう。また新約聖書記者とされる使徒パウロは、実際に性交に及ぶ姦淫のみならず、行為や外面に現わさない内心における姦淫も罪であると強調した。ただし必ずしも性欲自体を全面否定するものではなく、たとえばカトリック教会七つの大罪の一つとする色欲は、婚姻関係の外にあるものや、生殖から切り離されそれ自体の快楽を追求するもののことであると説明される。性欲もまた神の創造の一部とされ、適切な充足は罪とはされないことが一般的である。グノーシス主義のひとつであるカタリ派ではこの点が逆転し、生殖は人間を創造したサタンの意図として忌まれ、生殖を目的としない性欲の方が罪が少ないとされた。

仏教では煩悩の一つとされ、不邪淫戒という戒律も存在する。ただし不邪淫戒は、妻以外の女性と性交渉をしてはならない、という戒である。釈迦の従弟である孫陀羅難陀が、出家後でも妻に惹かれてなかなか悟りを開けなかったエピソードなどがある。このように多くの宗教では、性欲とは女性の容姿に男性が惑乱させられて起こるものと考えられている。

密教はその出現以前の仏教を顕教として低く見るが、密教での性欲の捉え方も従来仏教と大きく異なる。密教経典の理趣経には、「男女の欲望や交合(性交)の妙なる恍惚、また欲望などもすべて清浄なる菩薩の境地である」などと説かれる。真言宗主流などによる解釈では、これは「自性清浄」といい、本来人間は汚れた存在ではなく、欲望は人間として自然なものである、といった煩悩即菩提という思想を表すものであり、修行者に性交を勧めるような意味ではないとされる。一方で、無上瑜伽タントラや真言宗立川流などは直接的に性交を取り入れるなどしたが、聖俗からの排撃も強く、タントラは性的概念を抽象概念とみなした教派が残り、立川流は途絶している。

密教以外の仏教では、天台宗に興った玄旨帰命壇が同様に性交を儀式に取り入れていたが、これも弾圧され途絶している。なお立川流や玄旨帰命壇については焚書が行われたため弾圧側の文書に依拠するが、それらの記述には誇張があるのではないかとする見方がある。浄土真宗では親鸞の夢告に基づき僧の妻帯が認められるが、性欲は許されるにせよあくまでとされ、肯定的な意義は与えられていない。
精神分析学における性的欲求[編集]

19世紀末から20世紀初頭にフロイトが創始した精神分析学(およびフロイト派の精神分析学)では、性欲とは、性的欲求を充足させることを目的とした強い衝動である「リビドー」 (libido) であると考えられた。個々にどのような欲求が生まれ、どのような方法で充足させるかは、個人差が大きく一般化することは困難である。同派の性欲の研究について言えば、まずフロイトによる小児性欲エッセイが著名である。フロイトは未発達の小児にも性欲があると考え、口唇期肛門期男根期(エディプス期)、性器期などという段階に分類した。こうした性行動をともなわない性欲を充足させるか否かが後の人格形成に大きく関わると考えたフロイトは、こうした性欲の抑圧欲求不満)をヒステリーの原因と想定した。またそうした性欲を根源的な性欲と名付けた。フロイトはこうして人格形成をすべて性欲に起因する欲求で説明しようと考えた。これを汎性欲論と呼ぶが、近年では多くの批判を受け、妥当性に欠けるとされる。

性衝動の固着[編集]

リビドーの考え方を前提とした場合、性欲そのものは非常に単純であり根源的な欲求である。ただしその性衝動をどう充足するかによって、性的指向は個々に変化する、と考える。例えばフロイト的な解釈によれば、口唇期の欲求不満が固着した場合は、悲劇的で不信感に満ち、皮肉屋で攻撃的なパーソナリティが形成される可能性がある、とされる。逆に過剰であった場合は、タバコやアルコール摂取意欲の増加や爪を噛むなどの行為がでる可能性がある、とされる。

女性が、自分に執着しパートナーに大切にしてもらえることを望むという性的指向が固着した場合、そのような価値観を持つ社会集団に属していた、あるいは一切執着をされなかった反動形成と捉えることができ、男性が容姿の優れたパートナーを所有することを望むという場合も社会的欲求の変形と見なすこともできる。

好奇心から性的指向を顕在化させるケースもあり、窃視症痴漢など、異性の秘密に対する好奇心から、異性の衣服の下の体を見たい・触れたいという欲求を抱き、特に人目につかない部分(股間、腋の下など)に興味を示すこともある。男尊女卑的な社会では女性が頼れるパートナーに体を預け、秘所を開くことで孤独感を癒したいという欲求が生まれることもある。

性的嗜好」および「ジェンダー」も参照

一般に性的欲求が強まるのは、思春期以降と言われるが、個人差が大きく必ずしもそうとは言えない。性的好奇心は年齢を問わずにおこり、発現の仕方も多様である。
子供の性」も参照

固着の状況によっては、関係性への欲求や所有欲、共感欲といった別の欲求に置き換わる場合もしばしばである。性的な欲求を一生自覚せずに過ごす場合もある。
近年の生物学的・医学的な説明[編集]

近年の生物学的な説明では性欲が脳内物質と関連づけて説明されることもある。

----

男性の場合[編集]

一般論として言えば、男性の性欲は睾丸精子をつくるリズムと連動している[3]。睾丸で分泌されるテストステロンに左右される。(そのため、去勢を行うと性欲は低下する)。『ボディ・リズム』の著者リン・ランバーグの指摘によると、男性の性欲は年周期で変化しており、10月にもっとも多く精子がつくられ性欲もピークを迎える[3]。複数の研究者ら[4]の研究でもセックスマスターベーションの回数が多いのも10月だといい、結果、女性の妊娠も増えるという。逆にテストステロンの分泌が減るのは3月である[3]。ピークの10月と最も低い3月の差は25%に達するという[3]。男性の性欲と年齢の関係について言えば、思春期がもっとも性欲が強いと言われ(より具体的には精子製造では15歳前後。テストステロンの分泌量では19歳がピークだとされ[3])、ピーク以降年齢とともに毎年低下する。

---
女性の場合[編集]

オナニーする女性(クリムト画。1913年)

一般論として言えば、女性の性欲は排卵期間(卵抱期)を頂点として高まり、月経の周期で変化していると言われている[3]。 つまり(月経が順調な女性であれば) 1ヶ月前後周期で増減を繰り返している。ただし現代の女性はホルモンバランスの乱れやストレス等によって個人差が大きいため、この一般論に当てはまる人がどの程度の割合なのかということははっきりしない。

女性の性欲の年齢的な面について言えば、35歳ころにピークを迎えその後10年間ほど続くという[3]。というのは、性欲を覚えさせるテストステロンのピークがその時期なのだという[3]
---

男女のギャップ[編集]

上記の通り、性欲のピークの時期は男性と女性の間で、15年から20年もずれている[3]
---
犯罪と性欲[編集]

精神分析学などで言うところの「“固着した”性行動」は個々の性生活に影響を及ぼし、法律が定めることから逸脱した行動を引き起こすこともしばしばである。TPOを無視した過度な露出や逸脱した性的アプローチは、嫌がらせセクシュアル・ハラスメント)や性犯罪とされることもある。

---
脚注[編集]
^ 佐藤晴夫『異常性欲:人間だけが変態である』ベストセラーズ、1994 ISBN 4-584-19107-7
^ Bruce Bagemihl, Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity, St. Martin's Press, 1999; ISBN 0312192398
^ a b c d e f g h i 日本博学倶楽部 『「人体の謎」未解決ファイル』 PHP研究所、2009年。
^ ロスチャイルド財閥アラン・ラインバーグパリ大学のミシェル・ラゴギー
ーーー
参考文献[編集]
佐藤晴夫『異常性欲:人間だけが変態である』ベストセラーズ、1994 ISBN 4-584-19107-7
文献[編集]
大島清『脳と性欲 快楽する脳の生理と病理』共立出版、1989年4月、ISBN 4-320-05367-2
河添恵子『セクシャルトリープ 性欲動-30歳の女たち』恒友出版、1994年3月、ISBN 4-7652-4074-6
大島清『性欲 日本人はなぜこんなにスケベになったのか』ごま書房、1997年8月、ISBN 978-4-341-01792-7
ウィリー・パジーニ (Willy Pasini)『ありすぎる性欲、なさすぎる性欲』草思社、2002年4月、ISBN 4-7942-1130-9
朝倉喬司『毒婦の誕生 悪い女と性欲の由来』洋泉社、2002年2月、ISBN 4-89691-608-5
ホーキング青山『UNIVERSAL SEX : 性欲に身障健常もない』海拓舎, 2002、ISBN 4-907727-25-9
キム・ミョンガン『ヘンタイの哲学 ヒトの性欲と快感のしくみを探る』日本文芸社、2005年8月、ISBN 4-537-25312-6
性犯罪業カタログ:性欲あるところに商売あり』データハウス、2005、ISBN 4-88718-819-6
井上章一(編集)、永井良和、澁谷知美原武史、唐権、三橋順子、川井ゆう、西村大志、露木玲(共著)『性欲の文化史 1』(講談社選書メチエ)、2008年10月、ISBN 978-4-06-258424-1
井上章一(編集)、梅川純代、申昌浩、劉建輝、原田信男、平松隆円田中貴子、松田さおり(共著)『性欲の文化史 2』(講談社選書メチエ)、2008年11月、ISBN 978-4-06-258425-8
岩見照代『性と“悪”(2)性欲の研究(抄)/女給日記 (近代日本のセクシュアリティ 女性の描かれ方に見るセクシュアリティ)』ゆまに書房、2007年4月、ISBN 978-4-8433-2197-3
今一生『奪われた性欲』毎日コミュニケーションズ、2009年12月、ISBN 978-4-8399-3315-9
守如子『女はポルノを読む 女性の性欲とフェミニズム青弓社、2010年2月、ISBN 978-4-7872-3310-3
関連項目[編集]
オナニー
性的指向
性的嗜好
性依存症
異常性欲
変態性欲
カテゴリ:
性的感情
感情
七つの大罪
セクシャリティの哲学
性的魅力
欲求

Lust - Wikipedia


Lust - Wikipedia

This article is about the carnal desire.

Detail: Luxuria (Lust), in The Seven Deadly Sins and the Four Last Things, by Hieronymus Bosch
Part of a series on

Emotions

Affection
Anger
Angst
Anguish
Annoyance
Anticipation
Anxiety
Apathy
Arousal
Awe
Boredom
Confidence
Contempt
Contentment
Courage
Curiosity
Depression
Desire
Despair
Disappointment
Disgust
Distrust
Ecstasy
Embarrassment
Empathy
Enthusiasm
Envy
Euphoria
Fear
Frustration
Gratitude
Grief
Guilt
Happiness
Hatred
Hope
Horror
Hostility
Humiliation
Interest
Jealousy
Joy
Loneliness
Love
Lust
Outrage
Panic
Passion
Pity
Pleasure
Pride
Rage
Regret
Rejection
Remorse
Resentment
Sadness
Saudade
Schadenfreude
Self-confidence
Shame
Shock
Shyness
Sorrow
Suffering
Surprise
Trust
Wonder
Worry


Lust is a craving, it can take any form such as the lust for sexuality, lust for money or the lust for power. It can take such mundane forms as the lust for food as distinct from the need for food. Lust is a psychological force producing intense wanting for an object, or circumstance fulfilling the emotion.[1]



Contents [hide]

1In religion

1.1Buddhism
1.2Christianity
1.2.1New Testament
1.2.2Catholicism
1.3Hinduism
1.3.1Brahma Kumaris
1.4Islam
1.5Judaism
1.6Paganism
1.7Sikhism
1.8Meher Baba's teachings

2In culture
2.1Medieval prostitutes

3In art
3.1Literature

4In philosophy

4.1Schopenhauer
4.2St. Thomas Aquinas

5Contemporary spiritual perspective

6In psychoanalysis and psychology

7See also

8References
9Further reading
10External links

===

In religion

Religions, especially Christianity, separate the definition of passion and lust by further categorizing lust as an inappropriate desire or a desire that is inappropriately strong, therefore being morally wrong, while passion for proper purposes is maintained as something God-given and moral.
----
1.1] Buddhism[edit]
Main article: tanha

Lust holds a critical position in the philosophical underpinnings of Buddhist reality. It is named in the second of the Four Noble Truths, which are that
Suffering (dukkha) is inherent in all life.

Suffering is caused by lust.
There is a natural way to eliminate all suffering from one's life.
The Noble Eightfold Path is that way.

Lust is the, attachment to, identification with, and passionate desire for certain things in existence, all of which relate to the form, sensation, perception, mentality, and consciousness that certain combinations of these things engender within us. Lust is thus the ultimate cause of general imperfection and the most immediate root cause of a certain suffering.

The passionate desire for either non-existence or for freedom from lust is a common misunderstanding. For example, the headlong pursuit of lust (or other "deadly sin") in order to fulfill a desire for death is followed by a reincarnation accompanied by a self-fulfilling karma, resulting in an endless wheel of life, until the right way to live, the right worldview, is somehow discovered and practiced. Beholding an endless knot puts one, symbolically, in the position of the one with the right worldview, representing that person who attains freedom from lust.

In existence are four kinds of things that engender the clinging: rituals, worldviews, pleasures, and the self. The way to eliminate lust is to learn of its unintended effects and to pursue righteousness as concerns a worldview, intention, speech, behavior, livelihood, effort, mindfulness, and concentration, in the place where lust formerly sat.

Detail of Lustat the Sankt Bartholomäuschurch (Reichenthal), Pulpit (1894)

1.2] Christianity[edit]

New Testament[edit]

In many translations of the New Testament, the word "lust" translates the Greek word ἐπιθυμέω, particularly in Matthew 5:27-28:


Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust (ἐπιθυμέω) after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

In English-speaking countries, the term "lust" is often associated with sexual desire, probably because of this verse. But just as the English word was originally a general term for desire, the Greek word ἐπιθυμέω was also a general term for desire. The LSJlexicon suggests "set one's heart upon a thing, long for, covet, desire" as glosses for ἐπιθυμέω, which is used in verses that clearly have nothing to do with sexual desire. In the Septuagint, ἐπιθυμέω is the word used in the commandment to not covet:


You shall not covet your neighbor's wife; you shall not covet your neighbor's house or his field or his male slave or his female slave or his ox or his draft animal or any animal of his or whatever belongs to your neighbor.
— Exodus 20:17, New English Translation of the Septuagint

While coveting your neighbor's wife may involve sexual desire, it's unlikely that coveting a neighbor's house or field is sexual in nature. And in most New Testament uses, the same Greek word, ἐπιθυμέω, does not have a clear sexual connotation. For example, from the American Standard Version the same word is used outside of any sexual connotation:
Matthew 13:17: For verily I say unto you, that many prophets and righteous men desired to see the things which ye see, and saw them not; and to hear the things which ye hear, and heard them not.
Luke 22:15-16: And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer: for I say unto you, I shall not eat it, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God.
Acts 20:33: I coveted no man's silver, or gold, or apparel. Ye yourselves know that these hands ministered unto my necessities, and to them that were with me.
Luke 15:14-16: And when [the prodigal son] had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that country; and he began to be in want. And he went and joined himself to one of the citizens of that country; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine. And he would fain have filled his belly with the husks that the swine did eat: and no man gave unto him.

Catholicism[edit]

A demon satiating his lust in a 13th-century manuscript

Romanesque capitalrepresenting lust

According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, a Christian's heart is lustful when "venereal satisfaction is sought for either outside wedlock or, at any rate, in a manner which is contrary to the laws that govern marital intercourse".[2] Pope John Paul II said that lust devalues the eternal attraction of male and female, reducing personal riches of the opposite sex to an object for gratification of sexuality.[3]

Lust is considered by Catholicism to be a disordered desire for sexual pleasure, where sexual pleasure is "sought for itself, isolated from its procreative and unitive purposes".[4] In Catholicism, sexual desire in itself is good, and is considered part of God's plan for humanity. However, when sexual desire is separated from God's love, it becomes disordered and self-seeking. This is seen as lust.

The Latin for extravagance (Latin: luxuria) was used by St Jerome to translate a variety of biblical sins, including drunkenness and sexual excess.[5] Gregory the Greatplaced luxuria as one of the seven capital sins (it is often considered the least serious of the seven deadly sins), narrowing its scope to disordered desire,[6] and it was in this sense that the Middle Ages generally took luxuria, (although the Old Frenchcognate was adopted into English as luxury without its sexual meaning by the 14th century[citation needed]).

In Romanesque art, the personified Luxuria is generally feminine,[7] often represented by a siren or a naked woman with breasts being bitten by snakes. Prudentius in his Psychomachia or Battle of the Soul had described[8]


Luxury, lavish of her ruined fame, Loose-haired, wild-eyed, her voice a dying fall, Lost in delight....

For Dante, Luxuria was both the first of the circles of incontinence (or self-indulgence) on the descent into hell, and the last of the cornices of Mount Purgatory, representing the excessive (disordered) love of individuals;[9] while for Spenser luxuria was synonymous with the power of desire.[10]

The daughters (by-products) of Luxuria, for Gregory and subsequent Thomism, included mental blindness, self-love, haste and excessive attachment to the present:[11] Marianne Dashwood has been seen as embodying such characteristics for a later age – as a daughter of Luxuria.[12]

1.3] Hinduism[edit]

In the Bhagavad Gita, Lord Krishna, an Avatar of Vishnu, declared in verse 21 that lust is one of the gates to Naraka or hell.


Arjuna said: O descendant of Vrsni, by what is one impelled to sinful acts, even unwillingly, as if engaged by force? Then Krishna said: It is lust only, Arjuna, which is born of contact with the material mode of passion and later transformed into wrath, and which is the all-devouring sinful enemy of this world. As fire is covered by smoke, as a mirror is covered by dust, or as the embryo is covered by the womb, the living entity is similarly covered by different degrees of this lust. Thus the wise living entity's pure consciousness becomes covered by his eternal enemy in the form of lust, which is never satisfied and which burns like fire. The senses, the mind and the intelligence are the sitting places of this lust. Through them lust covers the real knowledge of the living entity and bewilders him. Therefore, O Arjuna, best of the Bharatas, in the very beginning curb this great symbol of sin—(lust) by regulating the senses, and slay this destroyer of knowledgeand self-realization. The working senses are superior to dull matter; mind is higher than the senses; intelligence is still higher than the mind; and he [the soul] is even higher than the intelligence. Thus knowing oneself to be transcendental to the material senses, mind and intelligence, O mighty-armed Arjuna, one should steady the mind by deliberate spiritualintelligence and thus—by spiritual strength—conquer this insatiable enemy known as lust. (Bhagavad-Gita, 3.36–43)

In this ancient manuscript the idea behind the word 'Lust' is best comprehended as the psychological force called 'Wanting'.
Brahma Kumaris[edit]

According to Brahma Kumaris, a spiritual organization which is based on Hindu philosophy, sexual lust is the greatest enemy to all mankind[13] and the gateway to hell.[14]

For this reason followers do not eat onions, garlic, eggs, or non-vegetarian food, as the "sulphur" in them can excite sexual lust in the body, otherwise bound to celibacy.

The physical act of sex is "impure", leading to body-consciousness and other crimes. This impurity "poisons" the body and leads to many kinds of "diseases".

The Brahma Kumaris teach that sexuality is like foraging about in a dark sewer. Students at Spiritual University must conquer lust in order to find the Golden Age, a heaven on earth, where children are conceived by an asexual power of mind, and lasting for 2,500 years in the peace and purity of a holy swan moving on earth, over water, and in air.[15][16]
Islam[edit]

In Islam, intentional lascivious glances are forbidden. Lascivious thoughts are disliked, for they are the first step towards adultery, rape and other antisocial behaviors. Prophet Muhammad also stressed the magnitude of the "second glance", as the first glance towards an attractive member of the opposite sex could be just accidental or observatory, the second glance could be that gate into lustful thinking.[citation needed]Islam does not advocate celibacy but it requires marriage to conduct sex legally.
Judaism[edit]
Main article: Yetzer hara § The evil inclination in Jewish tradition

In Judaism, all evil inclinations and lusts of the flesh are characterized by Yetzer hara(Hebrew, יצר הרע, the evil inclination). Yetzer hara is not a demonic force; rather, it is man's misuse of the things which the physical body needs to survive, and is often contrasted with yetzer hatov (Hebrew, יצר הטוב, the positive desire).

Yetzer HaRa is often identified with Satan and the angel of death,[17] and there is sometimes a tendency to give a personality and separate activity to the yetzer. For the yetzer, like Satan, misleads man in this world, and testifies against him in the world to come. The yetzer is, however, clearly distinguished from Satan, and on other occasions is made exactly parallel to sin. The Torah is considered the great antidote against this force. Though, like all things which God has made, the yetzer hara (evil inclination) can be manipulated into doing good: for without it, man would never marry, beget a child, build a house, or occupy himself in a trade.
Paganism[edit]

Few ancient, pagan religions actually considered lust to be a vice.[citation needed] The most famous example of a widespread religious movement practicing lechery as a ritual is the Bacchanalia of the Ancient Roman Bacchantes. However, this activity was soon outlawed by the Roman Senate in 186 BC in the decree Senatus consultum de Bacchanalibus. The practice of sacred prostitution, however, continued to be an activity practiced often by the Dionysians.
Sikhism[edit]

In Sikhism, lust is counted among the five cardinal sins or sinful propensities, the others being Wrath, ego, greed and attachment. Uncontrollable expression of sexual lust, as in rape or sexual addiction, is an evil.
Meher Baba's teachings[edit]

The spiritual teacher Meher Baba described the differences between lust and love:


In lust there is reliance upon the object of sense and consequent spiritual subordination of the soul to it, but love puts the soul into direct and co-ordinate relation with the reality which is behind the form. Therefore lust is experienced as being heavy and love is experienced as being light. In lust there is a narrowing down of life and in love there is an expansion in being...If you love the whole world you vicariously live in the whole world, but in lust there is an ebbing down of life and a general sense of hopeless dependence upon a form which is regarded as another. Thus, in lust there is the accentuation of separateness and suffering, but in love there is the feeling of unity and joy....[18]

2] In culture[edit]
Medieval prostitutes[edit]

Medieval prostitutes lived officially sanctioned in "red light districts." In Ruth Mazo Karras' book Common Women, she discusses the meaning of prostitution and how people thought the proper use of prostitutes by unmarried men helped contain male lust. Prostitution was thought of as having a beneficial effect by reducing the sexual frustration in the community.[19]

3] In art[edit]

Goya's Man Mocked by Two Women (Dos Mujeres y un hombre), c. 1820
Literature[edit]

From Ovid to the works of les poètes maudits, characters have always been faced with scenes of lechery, and long since has lust been a common motif in world literature. Many writers, such as Georges Bataille, Casanova and Prosper Mérimée, have written works wherein scenes at bordellos and other unseemly locales take place.

Baudelaire, author of Les fleurs du mal, had once remarked, in regard to the artist, that:
“ The more a man cultivates the arts, the less randy he becomes... Only the brute is good at coupling, and copulation is the lyricism of the masses. To copulate is to enter into another—and the artist never emerges from himself. ”


The most notable work to touch upon the sin of lust, and all of the Seven Deadly Sins, is Dante's la Divina Commedia. Dante's criterion for lust was an "excessive love of others," insofar as an excessive love for man would render one's love of God secondary.

In the first canticle of Dante's Inferno, the lustful are punished by being continuously swept around in a whirlwind, which symbolizes their passions. The damned who are guilty of lust, like the two famous lovers, Paolo and Francesca, receive what they desired in their mortal lives, their passions never give them rest for all eternity. In Purgatorio, of the selfsame work, the penitents choose to walk through flames in order to purge themselves of their lustful inclinations.

5] In philosophy[edit]

The link between love and lust has always been a problematic question in philosophy.
Schopenhauer[edit]

Schopenhauer notes the misery which results from sexual relationships. According to him, this directly explains the sentiments of shame and sadness which tend to follow the act of sexual intercourse. For, he states, the only power that reigns is the inextinguishable desire to face, at any price, the blind love present in human existence without any consideration of the outcome. He estimates that a genius of his species is an industrial being who wants only to produce, and wants only to think. The theme of lust for Schopenhauer is thus to consider the horrors which will almost certainly follow the culmination of lust.

St. Thomas Aquinas[edit]

St. Thomas Aquinas defines the sin of Lust in questions 153 and 154 of his Summa Theologica. Aquinas says the sin of lust is of "voluptuous emotions," and makes the point that sexual pleasures, "unloosen the human spirit," and set aside right reason (Pg.191). Aquinas restricts lust's subject matter to physical desires specifically arising from sexual acts, but Aquinas does not assume all sex-acts are sinful. Sex is not a sin in marriage, because sex is the only way for humans to reproduce. If sex is used naturally and the end purpose is reproduction there is no sin. Aquinas says, "if the end be good and if what is done is well-adapted to that, then no sin is present," (Pg.193). However, sex simply for the sake of pleasure is lustful and therefore, a sin. A man who uses his body for lechery wrongs the Lord.

Sex may have the attributes of being sinless; however, when a person seeks sex for pleasure, he or she is sinning with lust. Lust is best defined by its specific attribute of rape, adultery, wet dreams, seduction, unnatural vice, and simple fornication.

Wet dreams: St. Thomas Aquinas defined and discussed the topic of nocturnal emission, which occurs when one dreams of physical pleasure. Aquinas argues those who say that wet dreams are a sin and comparable to the actual experience of sex are wrong. Aquinas believes that such an action is sinless, for a dream is not under a person's control or free judgment. When one has a "nocturnal orgasm," it is not a sin, but it can lead to sins (Pg. 227). Aquinas says that wet dreams come from a physical cause of inappropriate pictures within your imagination, a psychological cause when thinking of sex while you fall asleep and a demonical cause where by demons act upon the sleepers body, "stirring the sleeper's imagination to bring about a orgasm," (Pg. 225). In the end, though, dreaming of lustful acts is not sinful. The "mind's awareness is less hindered," as the sleeper lacks right reason; therefore, a person cannot be accountable for what they dream while sleeping, (Pg. 227).

Adultery: One of the main forms of lust seen frequently during the Middle Ages was the sin of adultery. The sin of adultery occurs when a person is unfaithful to his or her spouse, hence "invading of a bed not one's own," (Pg.235). Adultery is a special kind of ugliness and many difficulties arise from it. When a man enters the bed of a married woman it not only is a sin, but it "wrongs the offspring," because the woman now calls into question the legitimacy of children. (Pg.235). If a wife has committed adultery before, then, her husband will question if all his wife's children are his offspring.

Simple fornication: Simple fornication is having sex with one's wife for enjoyment rather than for bearing children. Fornication is also sex between two unmarried people, which is also a mortal sin. Aquinas says, "fornication is a deadly crime," (Pg.213). Fornication is a mortal sin, but as Aquinas notes, "Pope Gregory treated sins of the flesh as less grievous than those of the spirit" (Pg. 217). Fornication was a grave sin such as that against property. Fornication, however, is not as grave as a sin directly against God and human life; therefore, murder is much worse than fornication. Property in this case means that a daughter is the property of her father, and if you do wrong to her, you then do wrong to him; therefore seducing a virgin or seeking pleasure from an unmarried woman is an invasion of a father's property.

Rape: Rape is a kind of lust that often coincides with seduction and is defined as a type of lechery. Rape comes with force and violence: Rape occurs when a person craves the pleasures of sex so intensely that he uses force to obtain it. Rape is committed when violence is used to seduce, or deflower a virgin. Rape harms both the unmarried girl and her father, because the girl is property of her father. Rape and seduction can be discussed together, because both sins involve the deflowering of a virgin; however, rape can happen without seduction, as when a man attacks a widow or a sexually experienced woman and violates her. Therefore, wherever violence accompanies sex, you have the quality of rape and the sin of lust.

Seduction: Seduction is a type of lust, because seduction is a sex act, which ravishes a virgin. Lust is a sin of sexual activity, and, "…a special quality of wrong that appears if a maid still under her father's care is debauched" (Pg.229). Seduction involves a discussion of property, as an unmarried girl is property of her father. A virgin, even though free from the bond of marriage, is not free from the bond of her family. When a virgin is violated without a promise of engagement, she is prevented from having honorable marriage, which is shameful to herself and her family. A man who performs sexual acts with a virgin must "endow her and have her to wife," and if the father, who is responsible for her, says no, then a man must pay a dowry to compensate for her loss of virginity and future chance of marriage. (Pg.229)

Unnatural vice: Unnatural vice is the worst kind of lust because it is unnatural in act and purpose. Unnatural vice happens variously, but Aquinas provides several examples including bestiality or intercourse with a "thing of another species," for example animals. Aquinas said, "bestiality goes beyond the bands of humanity" and is therefore, unnatural.

6] Contemporary spiritual perspective[edit]

Barry Long states that lusting is simply thinking or fantasising about an imagined sexual scene and private parts of the body. The action of thinking or fantasising stirs the natural, pure sexual energy into a coarser, more degraded emotional form (lust).[20][21][22] Long encourages lovemaking as the practice of converting sexual energy into the knowledge of love: "You don’t need a celibate body, you need a celibate mind".[23]

7] n psychoanalysis and psychology[edit]

Main article: libido

Lust, in the domain of psychoanalysis and psychology, is often treated as a case of "heightened libido".

A person is more likely to lust after someone who does not resemble themself. Self-relatedness is a cue of kinship and causes an instinctual reaction to not be attracted. Therefore, self-resemblance decreases attractiveness and sexual desire in a person, while less resemblance increases attractiveness and sexual desire, creating a higher possibility of lust.[24]

See also[edit]

Concupiscence
Fornication
Kam
Kama
Libido
Love
Masturbation
Matthew 5:27–28
Religious views on masturbation
Religious views on pornography
Sexual attraction
Tanha

References[edit]

Jump up^ Richard Lazarus with Bernice N Lazarus, Passion and Reason: Making Sense of Our Emotions, 1994, New York: Oxford University Press ISBN 978-0-19-510461-5
Jump up^ Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Lust". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
Jump up^ Pope John Paul II, Mutual Attraction Differs from Lust.L'Osservatore Romano, Weekly Edition in English, 22 September 1980, p. 11. Available at http://www.ewtn.com/library/papaldoc/jp2tb39.htm .
Jump up^ 'Catechism of the Catholic Church, n° 2351 sq.
Jump up^ Mark D. Jordan, The Invention of Sodomy (1994) p. 37
Jump up^ Mark D. Jordan, The Invention of Sodomy (1994) p. 39-40; Julien Théry, "Luxure cléricale, gouvernement de l’Église et royauté capétienne au temps de la 'Bible de saint Louis'", Revue Mabillon, 25, 2014, p. 165-194
Jump up^ J. Jerman/A. Weir, Images of Lust (2013) p. 30
Jump up^ Helen Waddell, The Wandering Scholars (1968) p. 48
Jump up^ Dante, Hell' (1975) p. 101; Dante, Purgatory (1971) p. 67 and p. 202
Jump up^ C. J. Berry, The Idea of Luxury (1994) p. 97-8
Jump up^ Mark D. Jordan, The Invention of Sodomy (1994) p. 37-9
Jump up^ Robert Liddell, The Novels of Jane Austen (London 1963) p. 22
Jump up^ Through open doors: a view of Asian cultures in Kenya. Cynthia Salvadori, Andrew Fedders, 1989
Jump up^ Exploring New Religions. p. 196, George D. Chryssides, 1999
Jump up^ Peace & purity: the story of the Brahma Kumaris : a spiritual revolution By Liz Hodgkinson
Jump up^ A history of celibacy, p. 172. Elizabeth Abbott, 2001
Jump up^ Bava Bathra. pp. 16a.
Jump up^ Baba, Meher (1967). Discourses. Volume I. San Francisco: Sufism Reoriented. pp. 159–160. ISBN 978-1880619094.
Jump up^ Karras, Ruth Mazo. Common Women: Prostitution and Sexuality in Medieval England. New York: Oxford UP, 1996. Print.
Jump up^ "Barry Long Foundation International". Barrylong.org. Retrieved 2011-11-21.
Jump up^ 'MAKING LOVE Sexual Love the Divine Way' Barry Long, Book ISBN 978-1-899324-14-9
Jump up^ Barry Long, Gold Coast Talks audio, February 1997
Jump up^ Gold Coast Talks audio April 1998
Jump up^ Debruine, L. M. (2005). "Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: Context-specific effects of facial resemblance". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 272(1566): 919–22. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3003. PMC 1564091. PMID 16024346.
Further reading[edit]
Froböse, Gabriele, Rolf Froböse, and Michael Gross (translator). Lust and Love: Is it more than Chemistry? Royal Society of Chemistry, 2006. ISBN 0-85404-867-7.
-------------

External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Lust.

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Lust

The dictionary definition of lust at Wiktionary
"The Seven Deadly Sins: Lust" National Public Radio feature
"A New Look at Lust: The Secular View"
The Catholic Encyclopedia: Lust
Catechism of the Catholic Church: The Sixth Commandment
The Jewish Encyclopedia: Yeẓer ha-Ra

show

v
t
e
Emotions (list)


show

v
t
e
Seven deadly sins


show

v
t
e
Seven virtues in Christian ethics


show

v
t
e
Hamartiology


Authority control

NDL: 00570471