Showing posts with label Timothy Morton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Timothy Morton. Show all posts

2021/08/30

Being ecological / Timothy Morton.






Being ecological / Timothy Morton.

Summary:
Why is everything we think we know about ecology wrong? Is there really any difference between 'humans' and 'nature'? Does this mean we even have a future? Don't care about ecology? This book is for you. 

Timothy Morton sets out to show us that whether we know it or not, we already have the capacity and the will to change the way we understand the place of humans in the world, and our very understanding of the term 'ecology'. 
A cross-disciplinarian who has collaborated with everyone from Bjoerk to Hans Ulrich Obrist, Morton is also a member of the object-oriented philosophy movement, a group of forward-looking thinkers who are grappling with modern-day notions of subjectivity and objectivity, while also offering fascinating new understandings of Heidegger and Kant. Calling the volume a book containing 'no ecological facts', Morton confronts the 'information dump' fatigue of the digital age, and offers an invigorated approach to creating a liveable future.
Author:
Morton, Timothy, 1968- author.
Format:
Books
Subject Term:
Human ecology.

Human ecology -- Philosophy.

Human beings -- Effect of environment on.

Nature -- Effect of human beings on.
ISBN:

9780241274231
9780241274248

Physical Description:
x, 228 pages ; 18 cm.
Publication Date:
2018


See this image
Follow the Author

Timothy B. Morton
Follow
Being Ecological (The MIT Press) Hardcover – March 9, 2018
by Timothy Morton (Author)
4.2 4.2 out of 5 stars    108 ratings 3.6 on Goodreads 620 ratings
See all formats and editions
Kindle
from $12.68
Read with Our Free App
 
Hardcover
$15.95 
4 Used from $11.95
A book about ecology without information dumping, guilt inducing, or preaching to the choir.

Don't care about ecology? You think you don't, but you might all the same. Don't read ecology books? This book is for you.
Ecology books can be confusing information dumps that are out of date by the time they hit you. Slapping you upside the head to make you feel bad. Grabbing you by the lapels while yelling disturbing facts. Handwringing in agony about “What are we going to do?” This book has none of that. Being Ecological doesn't preach to the eco-choir. It's for you―even, Timothy Morton explains, if you're not in the choir, even if you have no idea what choirs are. You might already be ecological.

After establishing the approach of the book (no facts allowed!), Morton draws on Kant and Heidegger to help us understand living in an age of mass extinction caused by global warming. He considers the object of ecological awareness and ecological thinking: the biosphere and its interconnections. He discusses what sorts of actions count as ecological―starting a revolution? going to the garden center to smell the plants? And finally, in “Not a Grand Tour of Ecological Thought,” he explores a variety of current styles of being ecological―a range of overlapping orientations rather than preformatted self-labeling.

Caught up in the us-versus-them (or you-versus-everything else) urgency of ecological crisis, Morton suggests, it's easy to forget that you are a symbiotic being entangled with other symbiotic beings. Isn't that being ecological?

Read less
   Report incorrect product information.
Print length
216 pages
Language
English
Next page
What do customers buy after viewing this item?Page 1 of 2Page 1 of 2
Previous page
Highest rated
in this set of products
Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Posthumanities)
Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the…
Timothy Morton
4.5 out of 5 stars 184
Paperback
53 offers from $16.30
Lowest Price
in this set of products
All Art is Ecological
All Art is Ecological
4.3 out of 5 stars 59
Paperback
$8.26
Get it Jun 29 - Jul 21
$3.99 shipping
Most purchased
in this set of products
The Overstory: A Novel
The Overstory: A Novel
Richard Powers
4.4 out of 5 stars 36,475
Paperback
205 offers from $2.26
This item:
Being Ecological (The MIT Press)
Being Ecological (The MIT Press)
Timothy Morton
4.2 out of 5 stars 108
Hardcover
4 offers from $11.95
Next page
Customers who viewed this item also viewedPage 1 of 2Page 1 of 2
Previous page
Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Posthumanities)
Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Posthumanities)
Timothy Morton
4.5 out of 5 stars 184
Paperback
53 offers from $16.30
All Art is Ecological
All Art is Ecological
4.3 out of 5 stars 59
Paperback
$8.26
Get it Jun 29 - Jul 21
$3.99 shipping
Spacecraft (Object Lessons)
Spacecraft (Object Lessons)
Timothy Morton
4.0 out of 5 stars 16
Paperback
$14.35
The Ecological Thought
The Ecological Thought
Timothy Morton
4.1 out of 5 stars 44
Paperback
33 offers from $8.23
Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality (New Metaphysics)
Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality (New Metaphysics)
Prof. Timothy Morton
4.6 out of 5 stars 27
Paperback
12 offers from $16.77
Next page
Editorial Reviews
Review
Morton makes an admirable effort to expand the genre into something more appealing to a wide variety of readers...Instead of anxiously trying to troubleshoot all of the hypothetical ill-effects of proposed environmental action or policies – a futile effort in our complex and dynamic world – Morton gives us permission to embrace the uncertainty.

―Massive
Review
If you're still just grooving along with Alan Watts and thinking that nature is wiggly, think again. Timothy Morton's flat ontology and his leveling of the uncanny valley contradict earlier clichés to open up new possibilities for conceptualizing a better future together. And, to tune a bit to the register of Being Ecological, it's all accomplished in a vivid discussion with excellent bookfeel.

―Nick Montfort, Professor of Digital Media, MIT; author of The Future
Read more
Product details
Publisher ‏ : ‎ The MIT Press (March 9, 2018)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 216 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0262038048
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0262038041
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 12 ounces
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5.38 x 0.81 x 8 inches
Best Sellers Rank: #1,692,252 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
#1,316 in Environmental Policy
#3,161 in Ecology (Books)
#46,536 in Philosophy (Books)
Customer Reviews: 4.2 4.2 out of 5 stars    108 ratings
Videos
Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!
Upload your video
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Follow
Timothy B. Morton
One of the most influential philosophers on earth? Apparently: http://www.thebestschools.org/features/most-influential-living-philosophers/

Timothy Morton is Rita Shea Guffey Chair in English at Rice University. They have collaborated with Laurie Anderson, Björk, Jennifer Walshe, Hrafnhildur Arnadottir, Sabrina Scott, Adam McKay, Jeff Bridges, Olafur Eliasson, Pharrell Williams and Justin Guariglia. Morton co-wrote and appears in Living in the Future’s Past, a 2018 film about global warming with Jeff Bridges. They are the author of the libretto for the opera Time Time Time by Jennifer Walshe.

Morton has written Hyposubjects: On Becoming Human (Open Humanities, 2021), All Art Is Ecological (Penguin, 2021), Spacecraft (Bloomsbury, 2021), Being Ecological (Penguin, 2018), Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People (Verso, 2017), Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence (Columbia, 2016), Nothing: Three Inquiries in Buddhism (Chicago, 2015), Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Minnesota, 2013), Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality (Open Humanities, 2013), The Ecological Thought (Harvard, 2010), Ecology without Nature (Harvard, 2007), 8 other books and 270 essays on philosophy, ecology, literature, music, art, architecture, design and food. Morton’s work has been translated into 11 languages. In 2014 they gave the Wellek Lectures in Theory. 

https://www.patreon.com/timothymorton

http://www.ecologywithoutnature.blogspot.com.

Twitter: @the_eco_thought

Read less

Sponsored 


How would you rate your experience shopping for books on Amazon today?





Very poor Neutral Great
Customer reviews
4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5
108 global ratings
5 star
 60%
4 star
 21%
3 star
 9%
2 star
 2%
1 star
 8%
How customer reviews and ratings work
Review this product
Share your thoughts with other customers
Write a customer review

Sponsored 

Top reviews
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
Pen Bay Person
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Reviewed in the United States on July 28, 2018
Verified Purchase
A must read for every rational, thoughtful person in the world!
Helpful
Report
Joshua Chavanne
5.0 out of 5 stars We are all Ecological
Reviewed in the United States on August 19, 2018
Verified Purchase
Worthwhile and thought-provoking.
Kind of inarguable
Helpful
Report
See all reviews
Top reviews from other countries
Laura
5.0 out of 5 stars A must read!
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 5, 2020
Verified Purchase
My lecturer recommended this book to me and it was definitely a wonderful read! Morton explores very deep topics in an accessible way so if you’re worried that philosophy isn’t your thing or don’t want to waste your time reading complicated philosophical texts, you honestly have nothing to worry about!! Don’t get me wrong, this is still a deeply fascinating philosophical text but everything is written in a very inclusive way and all topics are explained very well. Morton manages to be funny while also teaching us about climate change etc, which I imagine isn’t an easy task at all! Also the music/pop culture references make it so much more fun/enthralling to read. Overall, I recommend it to anyone :)
3 people found this helpful
Report
Duncan Spence
5.0 out of 5 stars A must for anybody who thinks about ecology
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 12, 2020
Verified Purchase
Most philosophy in English is translated out of German, French, Italian, Latin, Arabic, Greek and so forth. Morton's is possibly the best philosophy written in English since Wm James or maybe even Adam Smith and David Hume. The analysis spans twelve and a half thousand years, extending the origins of the current crisis of western intellectualising to the first domestic enclosures of Mesopotamia, to the moment when human beings turned from hunting and gathering to building fences round fields and manipulating crop production. Everybody should read this book.
One person found this helpful
Report
Dominikus Heil
5.0 out of 5 stars This book is a ‚must read‘!!!!!
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 20, 2021
Verified Purchase
This book is a game changer in the ecological discourse. I do not understand why there is not more of a public discussion about this groundbreaking work. If you want to really understand the issue at stake with this central issue of our time, buy this book!
One person found this helpful
Report
Shedman
5.0 out of 5 stars Veer your brain in new directions
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 4, 2018
Verified Purchase
Wonderfully challenging. Full of fascinating insights and concepts as slippery as fish. But a welcome change to so much ‘nature writing’ and very enjoyable.
2 people found this helpful
Report
Margery Een
5.0 out of 5 stars Stunning, cosy and uncanny. Morton is a genius.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 24, 2018
Verified Purchase
Stunning, cosy and uncanny. Morton is a genius. And it's short. Just go and read it. Then dissolve.
2 people found this helpful
Report
===

2021/08/20

Anthropocenes Interview with Timothy Morton and Dominic Boyer | Anthropocenes – Human, Inhuman, Posthuman

Human, Inhuman, Posthuman | Hyperobjects, Hyposubjects and Solidarity in the Anthropocene: Anthropocenes Interview with Timothy Morton and Dominic Boyer | Anthropocenes – Human, Inhuman, Posthuman





INTERVIEW
Hyperobjects, Hyposubjects and Solidarity in the Anthropocene: Anthropocenes Interview with Timothy Morton and Dominic Boyer

Author: Anthropocenes – Human, Inhuman, Posthuman ( )

Dyslexia


Abstract

On behalf of Anthropocenes journal, David Chandler interviewed Timothy Morton and Dominic Boyer in advance of the publication of their book Hyposubjects, under review with Open Humanities Press.

The authors were asked to consider whether the anthropocene is used too much as a ‘short cut’ restraining thought; regarding the evolution of hyposubjects; about speculative realism and object-oriented ontology (OOO) and the role of withdrawal in their approach to hyperobjects.

-----

Keywords: speculative realism, human, object-orientated ontology, Anthropocene, hyperobjects, hyposubjects

How to Cite:

Human, Inhuman, Posthuman A., (2020) “Hyperobjects, Hyposubjects and Solidarity in the Anthropocene: Anthropocenes Interview with Timothy Morton and Dominic Boyer”, Anthropocenes – Human, Inhuman, Posthuman 1(1). p.10. doi: https://doi.org/10.16997/ahip.5

1760VIEWS

232DOWNLOADS

PUBLISHED ON
27 MAY 2020

PEER REVIEWED

LICENSE
CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 4.0



On behalf of Anthropocenes journal, David Chandler interviewed Timothy Morton1 and Dominic Boyer2 in advance of the publication of their book Hyposubjects, under review with Open Humanities Press.3


Anthropocences:

This interview forms part of the first issue of the Anthropocenes journal, so maybe it would be useful to start with how important you both feel the conceptualisation of the Anthropocene has been to shaking up more traditional academic approaches? Many readers may be unsure how a geological claim of human impact on the Earth relates to concerns of climate change and species extinction and to the popularisation of alternative philosophical and conceptual approaches. The Anthropocene seems to be doing a lot of work in bringing everything together, or is it perhaps used too much as a short cut, limiting our thinking?Timothy Morton and Dominic Boyer:

A concept is only ever as good as the care with which it is put into the world. The very strictly scientific definition of Anthropcocene (which too many non-science scholars flat-out ignore) is, ‘There is a layer of human-made materials at the top of Earth’s crust. This layer began around 10,000 BCE, has significant markers during the time of European colonialism (early seventeenth century) and the start of fossil fuel burning (1784) and accelerates in 1945.’ Period. Science could have called it Jellyfish Surprise for all it cares about the implications of the name.

‘Anthropocene’ can be (and certainly has been) used in all manner of universalizing transcendent ways that reinscribe a general category of Human Being. That ‘we’re all in the same boat because we’ve all been very bad’ Anthropocene concept is pernicious not only because it re-writes history but also because it offers both global liberal elites and national populist elites an alibi for further programs of dispossession and domination in order to save ‘Humans’ from themselves. For us, we agree with our friend Claire Colebrook4 when she writes that recognition of the Anthropocene ought to prompt the ‘return of difference.’ There have been a variety of phase-shifts within the Anthropocene trajectory: the agrilogistics of human settlement was one, the spread of apocalyptic desert monotheisms was another, the colonization of the planet by European empires was still another. All predate and inform the petrocultural accelerationism of the mid 20th century that is usually stipulated as the chief Anthropocene vector. We talk about all these things in Hyposubjects as a way of approaching the Anthropocene in a more differentiated way.

A:

Could you say something about the evolution of your thinking of hyposubjects and the broader project of which this is a part? We like the 2016 phase that ‘hyposubjects are the native species of the Anthropocene’, could you unpack that a little – is all agency that of hyposubjects or is it explicitly contrasting with the hypersubject of the modern episteme?TM and DB:

Our motivating intuition is that the time of hypersubjects is ending because of the hyperobjective conditions they’ve created. At some level the hypersubjects are aware of their doom and they are beginning to panic about it. They are gathering hysterically behind the most grotesque exemplars of their kind—the Donald Trumps and Jair Bolsonaros—as though some angry old white lunatic or another will save them. It won’t. The earth is turning away from certain forms of life as Beth Povinelli5 likes to say. And, conversely, it is turning toward others. That’s where the hyposubjects come in. But one thing you’re not going to find in our project is a theory of hyposubjects. For the most part, we’re simply bystanders to the process of hyposubjects coming into their own in the multiphasic landscape of hyperobjects. We have some thoughts about hyposubjects’ potentiality and we share them but we’ll leave it to the hyposubjects to theorize their agency (if that’s something they’re interested in doing). Maybe they’d rather just remake their world instead. What Vaneigem6 wrote during the heyday of Situationism seems apt for the XR generation too: ‘You’re fucking around with us? Not for long!’A:

Could you say a little about your conceptual journeys? How does the development of your thinking relate to some key figures and perhaps to the more formal theorising of Speculative Realism7 and Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO)8?TM and 

DB:

Well, part of the motivation to write the book was a basic wish to curtail some of the narcissistic self-attack that seems so prevalent on the left. One of us is a deconstructive OOO kind of a thinker, the other isn’t, though we are both very inclined towards left theory of all kinds. Timothy Morton didn’t ever think he was going to use the word subject in anything at all! But as was pointed out in our answer about the Anthropocene, it’s not so much what a concept is but how you use it that counts.

Why can’t we all just get along? Solidarities have been eroded when they need to be forged and reforged, right now. If we humans can’t do it amongst ourselves, we won’t be forging any with polar bears and coral. The narcissism of small differences is why it’s so hard to see that there’s more in common between me and a $30,000 per year person and a $400,000 per year person, than there is between all of us and a $65,000,000 a year person. It’s hard to visualize such a difference in scale, which is what power is counting on.

One consequence of this is that we wrote the book like it was a Virginia Woolf novel. We use the first person singular (unlike, say, Deleuze and Guattari9), so there are sentences like: ‘I like hedgehogs. I don’t.’ We think this makes a point. We also have a rule that in five years’ time two other people have to rewrite Hyposubjects: the book as videogame. It’s a way to make some hyposubjects, for a kickoff.

A:

How do hyperobjects10 fit in with OOO? Are all objects hyperobjects?

TM and DB:

Yeah why not? A hyperobject is a relational thing. To an electron, a biro is a hyperobject.

A:

What is the role of withdrawal in your approach to hyperobjects, and indeed in the Anthropocene? One gets a sense that perhaps the Anthropocene is the time of revelation and rejoining rather than withdrawal, as the unintended consequences, the excluded relations and externalities return with a vengeance. Could you say a little more about this relation between withdrawal and appearance?

TM and DB:

It’s a common and understandable mistake to visualize something when you hear the word ‘withdraw.’ What you visualize is something shrinking back or disappearing. That’s not what the word means. What the word means is that no matter how you try to access a thing, all you ever get is thing data. It’s basic contemporary philosophy, on which Foucault, Butler, Irigaray, Derrida11 … are all based.

Think about it. When you bite a banana you obtain a banana bite. When you lick a banana you get a banana lick. When you think about a banana you get a banana thought. When you draw the banana you get a banana drawing. When the banana becomes sentient and goes on Oprah and starts to talk—‘I found myself in a paragraph about bananas by the authors of Hyposubjects … it was a traumatic self-awakening …’—all you have is banana interview. Even the banana themselves can’t fully access the banana banana. And since licking is just as good or just as bad as thinking at accessing the banana banana, snails and hurricanes are just as good or as bad as humans and there’s nothing special about humans at all. Note that this doesn’t mean that hurricanes have the same rights as humans or whatever. It’s a terrifically freeing way of thinking, politically. It means you’re free to make the kinds of political affiliations you want to make, without recourse to metaphysics. You don’t have to prove that lemurs have a self-concept or that angel fish are smart in order to forge solidarities with them. Let’s get on with it!

It’s all about appearing. Hyperobjects tell you something true about any old objects. You can think them, but you can’t quite point to all of them, not because you can’t know them, but because you can. Hyperobjects are so, so in our faces, so part of our DNA and our bloodstream, not sitting behind glass in some aestheticized ‘over yonder,’ that we can’t quite point to them. It’s not that withdraw means become distant. Withdrawal is just one word you can use for an unspeakable intimacy. You don’t have to use that word in particular to concur with OOO, if it freaks you out.

We have loads of data about things that affect us as deeply as hyperobjects. So do flocks of geese and frogspawn—everything is affected by oil corporations, for example. All lifeforms contain some Teflon.


Notes

  1. Timothy Morton is Rita Shea Guffey Chair in English at Rice University, Texas and author of Being Ecological (London: Penguin, 2018) and Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People (London: Verso, 2017). See also blog. [^]
  2. Dominic Boyer is Professor of Anthropology, Rice University, Texas. [^]
  3. Hyposubjects: Politics of the Ecological Emergency (Human Language Edition). Under revision. Open Humanities Press. [^]
  4. Professor of Philosophy, and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, Penn State College of the Liberal Arts. On the ‘return of difference’ see C. Colebrook ‘We Have Always Been Post-Anthropocene: The Anthropocene Counterfactual’ in Anthropocene Feminism edited by Richard Grusin (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2017), pp. 1–20. [^]
  5. Elizabeth A. Povinelli, Franz Boas Professor of Anthropology, Columbia University in the City of New York. See E. Povinelli Geontologies: A Requiem to Late Liberalism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016). [^]
  6. Raoul Vaneigem (1934–) author of The Revolution of Everyday Life (New York and London: Left Bank Books and Rebel Press, 1983 [1967]); see chapter 25, available at https://libcom.org/library/revlife26. [^]
  7. A philosophical movement dating back to a conference held at Goldsmiths College, University of London, April 2007. [^]
  8. Considered a subset of speculative realism initially propounded by (amongst others) Graham Harman and Levy Bryant. [^]
  9. Gilles Deleuze (1925–1995) and Pierre-Félix Guattari (1930–1992). [^]
  10. See Timothy Morton, Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2013). [^]
  11. Michel Foucault (1926–1984); Judith Butler (1956–); Luce Irigaray (1930–); Jacques Derrida (1930–2004). [^]

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

hyposubjects: on becoming human : Morton, Timothy, Boyer, Dominic

hyposubjects: on becoming human : Morton, Timothy, Boyer, Dominic: Amazon.com.au: Books


The time of hypersubjects is ending. Their desert-apocalypse-fire-and-death cults aren't going to save them this time. Meanwhile the time of hyposubjects is just beginning. 

This text is an exercise in chaotic and flimsy thinking that will possibly waste your time. 
But it is the sincere effort of
two reform-minded hypersubjects to decenter themselves and 
to help nurture hyposubjective humanity

Here are some of the things we say in this book: 

1) Hyposubjects are the native species of the Anthropocene and are only just now beginning to discover what they might be and become. 
2) Like their hyperobjective environment, hyposubjects are also multiphasic and plural: not-yet, neither here nor there, less than the sum of their parts. 

They are, in other words, subscendent (moving toward relations) rather than transcendent (rising above relations). They do not pursue or pretend to absolute knowledge or language, let alone power. Instead they play; they care; they adapt; they hurt; they laugh. 

3) Hyposubjects are necessarily feminist, colorful, queer, ecological, transhuman, and intrahuman. 

They do not recognize the rule of and roleukoheteropetromodernity and the apex species behavior it epitomizes and reinforces. 

But they also hold the bliss-horror of extinction fantasies at bay, because hyposubjects' befores, nows, and afters are many. 

4) Hyposubjects are squatters and bricoleuses. They inhabit the cracks and hollows. They turn things inside out and work miracles with scraps and remains. They unplug from carbon gridlife; they hack and redistribute its stored energies for their own purposes. 

5) Hyposubjects make revolutions where technomodern radars can't glimpse them. They patiently ignore expert advice that they do not or cannot exist. They are skeptical of efforts to summarize them, including everything we have just said.

Timothy Morton - Wikipedia

Timothy Morton - Wikipedia

Timothy Morton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Timothy Morton
Born
Timothy Bloxam Morton

19 June 1968 (age 53)
London, England
Alma materMagdalen College, Oxford
EraContemporary philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolSpeculative realism
Main interests
Metaphysicsrealismecocriticismobject-oriented ontologyBuddhism
Notable ideas
Hyperobjects, realist magic, mesh, strange strangers, symbiotic real[1]
Influences

Timothy Bloxam Morton (born 19 June 1968)[2] is a professor and Rita Shea Guffey Chair in English at Rice University.[3] A member of the object-oriented philosophy movement, Morton's work explores the intersection of object-oriented thought and ecological studies. Morton's use of the term 'hyperobjects' was inspired by Björk's 1996 single 'Hyperballad' although the term 'Hyper-objects' (denoting n-dimensional non-local entities) has also been used in computer science since 1967.[4] Morton uses the term to explain objects so massively distributed in time and space as to transcend localization, such as climate change and styrofoam.[5] Their recent book Humankind: Solidarity with Non-Human People explores the separation between humans and non-humans and from an object-oriented ontological perspective, arguing that humans need to radically rethink the way in which they conceive of, and relate to, non-human animals and nature as a whole, going on to explore the political implications of such a change.[6] Morton has also written extensively about the literature of Percy Bysshe Shelley and Mary ShelleyRomanticism, diet studies, and ecotheory.[7] Morton is faculty in the Synthetic Landscapes postgraduate program at the Southern California Institute of Architecture (SCI-Arc).[8]

Personal[edit source]

Morton received a B.A. and D.Phil. in English from Magdalen College, Oxford.[9] Their doctoral dissertation, "Re-Imagining the Body: Shelley and the Languages of Diet," studied the representation of diet, temperance, and consumption in the works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. According to Morton, the decision to study English literature, as opposed to more academically fashionable classics, stemmed from a desire to engage with modes of thought evolving internationally "including all kinds of continental philosophy that just wasn't happening much in England at the time, what with the war against 'theory' and all."[9]

Before obtaining a professorship at Rice University, in 2012, Morton previously taught at the University of California, DavisNew York University and the University of Colorado, Boulder.[9]

Theoretical works[edit source]

Morton's theoretical writings espouse an eclectic approach to scholarship. Their subjects include the poetry and literature of Percy Bysshe Shelley and Mary Shelley, the cultural significance and context of food, ecology and environmentalism, and object-oriented ontology (OOO).

Shelley scholarship[edit source]

In 1995, Morton published Shelley and the Revolution in Taste: The Body and the Natural World, an extension of the ideas presented in their doctoral dissertation. Investigating how food came to signify ideological outlook in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, Morton's book is an attempt at 'green' cultural criticism, whereby bodies and the social or environmental conditions in which they appear are shown to be interrelated.[10] Employing a 'prescriptive' analysis of various Romantic texts, especially Percy Bysshe Shelley's A Vindication of Natural Diet (1813), Morton argues that the figurative rhetorical elements of these texts should be read not simply as clever language play, but as commands to establish consumptive practices that challenge ideological configurations of how the body relates to normativity.[11] For Morton, authoritarian power dynamics, commodity flows, industrial logic, and the distinction between the domains of nature and culture are inhered in the 'discourses of diet' articulated by the Shelleys. In turn, Shelleyan prose regarding forms of consumption, particularly vegetarianism, is read as a call for social reform and figurative discussions of intemperance and intoxication as warnings against tyranny.[12]

Additionally, Morton has edited two critical volumes on the Shelleyan corpus. In 2002, they published a compilation of critical and historical reflections on Mary Shelley's Frankenstein entitled Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: A Routledge Study Guide and Sourcebook. Then, in 2006, Morton edited The Cambridge Companion to Shelley, an interdisciplinary overview of Percy Bysshe Shelley's themes, language, narrative structure, literary philosophy, and political views.

Diet studies[edit source]

From 2000 to 2004, Morton published three works dealing with the intersection of food and cultural studies. In the first of these to be published, The Poetics of Spice: Romantic Consumerism and the Exotic (2000), Morton unpacked the evolution of European consumer culture through an analysis of the figurative use of spice in Romantic literature.[13] Viewing spice as a cultural artifact that functioned "as discourse, not object, naively transparent to itself"[14] during the Romantic period, they elucidate two general characteristics of the poetics of spice: materiality and transumption.[15] The 'materiality' of spice connects its symbolic and social roles with its capacity for desire production. Morton cites the "trade winds topos" (perfumed breeze believed to waft from exotic lands in which spices are domestic) in Milton's Paradise Lost as an example, concluding that Milton prefigures the symbolic use of spice in later works by presenting Satan's journey from Hell to Chaos as a parallel to the travels of spice traders.[16] In contrast, 'transumption', following Harold Bloom's deployment of the rhetorical concept, entails the use of a metasignifier that "serves as a figure for poetic language itself."[15] According to Morton, the works of John Dryden exemplify transumption, revealing "a novel kind of capitalist poetics, relying on the representation of the spice trade...Spice is not a balm, but an object of trade, a trope to be carried across boundaries, standing in for money: a metaphor about metaphor."[17] Carrying this idea forward to the Romantic era, Morton critiques the manner in which spice became a metaphor for exotic desire that, subsequently, encapsulated the self-reflexivity of modern processes of commodification.

Later, Morton edited Radical Food: The Culture and Politics of Eating and Drinking, 1790-1820 (2000), a three-volume compendium of eighteenth century texts examining the literary, sociocultural, and political history of food, including works on intoxication, cannibalism, and slavery. They also edited Cultures of Taste/Theories of Appetite: Eating Romanticism (2004), a collection of essays that problematizes the use of taste and appetite as Romantic metaphors for bounded territories and subjectivities, while empirically interrogating the organization of Romantic cultural and economic structures around competing logics of consumption.[18]

Ecological theory[edit source]

Since 2009, Morton has engaged in a sustained project of ecological critique, primarily enunciated in two works, Ecology Without Nature (2009) and The Ecological Thought (2010), through which they problematize environmental theory from the standpoint of ecological entanglement. In Ecology Without Nature, Morton proposes that an ecological criticism must be divested of the bifurcation of nature and civilization, or the idea that nature exists as something that sustains civilization, but exists outside of society's walls.[19] As Morton states:

Ecological writing keeps insisting that we are "embedded" in nature. Nature is a surrounding medium that sustains our being. Due to the properties of the rhetoric that evokes the idea of a surrounding medium, ecological writing can never properly establish that this is nature and thus provide a compelling and consistent aesthetic basis for the new worldview that is meant to change society. It is a small operation, like tipping over a domino... Putting something called Nature on a pedestal and admiring it from afar does for the environment what patriarchy does for the figure of Woman. It is a paradoxical act of sadistic admiration.[20]

Viewing "nature," in the putative sense, as an arbitrary textual signifier, Morton theorizes artistic representations of the environment as sites for opening ideas of nature to new possibilities. Seeking an aesthetic mode that can account for the differential, paradoxical, and nonidentificational character of the environment, they propose a materialist method of textual analysis called 'ambient poetics', in which artistic texts of all kinds are considered in terms of how they manage the space in which they appear, thereby attuning the sensibilities of their audience to forms of natural representation that contravene the ideological coding of nature as a transcendent principle.[21] Historicizing this form of poetics permits the politicization of environmental art and its 'ecomimesis', or authenticating evocation of the author's environment, such that the experience of its phenomena becomes present for and shared with the audience.[22]

Art is also an important theme in The Ecological Thought, a "prequel" to Ecology Without Nature, in which Morton proposes the concept of 'dark ecology' as a means of expressing the "irony, ugliness, and horror" of ecology.[23] From the vantage point of dark ecology, there exists no neutral theoretical ground on which to articulate ecological claims. Instead, all beings always are already implicated within the ecological, necessitating an acknowledgement of coexistential difference for coping with ecological catastrophe that, according to Morton, "has already occurred."[24]

Closely related to dark ecology is Morton's concept of the 'mesh'. Defining the ecological thought as "the thinking of interconnectedness," Morton thus uses 'mesh' to refer to the interconnectedness of all living and non-living things, consisting of "infinite connections and infinitesimal differences."[25] He explains:

The ecological thought does, indeed, consist in the ramifications of the "truly wonderful fact" of the mesh. All life forms are the mesh, and so are all the dead ones, as are their habitats, which are also made up of living and nonliving beings. We know even more now about how life forms have shaped Earth (think of oil, of oxygen—the first climate change cataclysm). We drive around using crushed dinosaur parts. Iron is mostly a by-product of bacterial metabolism. So is oxygen. Mountains can be made of shells and fossilized bacteria. Death and the mesh go together in another sense, too, because natural selection implies extinction.[26]

The mesh has no central position that privileges any one form of being over others, and thereby erases definitive interior and exterior boundaries of beings.[27] Emphasizing the interdependence of beings, the ecological thought "permits no distance," such that all beings are said to relate to each other in a totalizing open system, negatively and differentially, rendering ambiguous those entities with which we presume familiarity.[28] Morton calls these ambiguously inscribed beings 'strange strangers', or beings unable to be completely comprehended and labeled.[29] Within the mesh, even the strangeness of strange strangers relating coexistentially is strange, meaning that the more we know about an entity, the stranger it becomes. Intimacy, then, becomes threatening because it veils the mesh beneath the illusion of familiarity.[29]

Object-oriented ontology[edit source]

Morton became involved with object-oriented ontology after their ecological writings were favorably compared with the movement's ideas. One way that their work can be distinguished from other variants of object-oriented thought is by its focus on the causal dimension of object relations. Against traditional causal philosophies, Morton argues that causality is an aesthetic dimension of relations between objects, wherein sensory experience does not indicate direct access to reality, but rather an uncanny interruption of the false ontic equilibrium of an interobjective system.[30] Causation, in this view, is held to be illusion-like or "magical," forming the core of what Morton terms "realist magic."

Hyperobjects[edit source]

In The Ecological Thought, Morton employed the term hyperobjects to describe objects that are so massively distributed in time and space as to transcend spatiotemporal specificity, such as global warming, styrofoam, and radioactive plutonium.[5] They have subsequently enumerated five characteristics of hyperobjects:

  1. Viscous: Hyperobjects adhere to any other object they touch, no matter how hard an object tries to resist. In this way, hyperobjects overrule ironic distance, meaning that the more an object tries to resist a hyperobject, the more glued to the hyperobject it becomes.[31]
  2. Molten: Hyperobjects are so massive that they refute the idea that spacetime is fixed, concrete, and consistent.[32]
  3. Nonlocal: Hyperobjects are massively distributed in time and space to the extent that their totality cannot be realized in any particular local manifestation. For example, global warming is a hyperobject which impacts meteorological conditions, such as tornado formation. According to Morton, though, entities don't feel global warming, but instead experience tornadoes as they cause damage in specific places. Thus, nonlocality describes the manner in which a hyperobject becomes more substantial than the local manifestations it produces.[33]
  4. Phased: Hyperobjects occupy a higher-dimensional space than other entities can normally perceive. Thus, hyperobjects appear to come and go in three-dimensional space, but would appear differently if an observer could have a higher multidimensional view.[32]
  5. Interobjective: Hyperobjects are formed by relations between more than one object. Consequently, entities are only able to perceive the imprint, or "footprint," of a hyperobject upon other objects, revealed as information. For example, global warming is formed by interactions between the sun, fossil fuels, and carbon dioxide, among other objects. Yet global warming is made apparent through emissions levels, temperature changes, and ocean levels, making it seem as if global warming is a product of scientific models, rather than an object that predates its own measurement.[32]

According to Morton, hyperobjects not only become visible during an age of ecological crisis, but alert humans to the ecological dilemmas defining the age in which they live.[34] Additionally, the existential capacity of hyperobjects to outlast a turn toward less materialistic cultural values, coupled with the threat many such objects pose toward organic matter (what Morton calls a "demonic inversion of the sacred substances of religion"), gives them a potential spiritual quality, in which their treatment by future societies may become indistinguishable from reverential care.[35]

Although the concept of hyperobjects has been widely adopted by artists, literary critics, and some philosophers, it is not without its critics. Ecocritic Ursule Heise, for example, notes that in Morton's definition, everything can be considered a hyperobject, which seems to make the concept somewhat meaningless, not to mention seemingly impossible to define clearly. As a result, Heise argues that Morton makes "so many self-cancelling claims about hyperobjects that coherent argument vanishes like the octopi that disappear in several chapters in their clouds of ink, Morton's favorite metaphor for the withdrawal of objects from the grasp of human knowledge."[36]

Bibliography[edit source]

Authored works[edit source]

Interviews[edit source]

References[edit source]

  1. ^ Timothy Morton: Ecology Without Nature – CCCB LAB
  2. ^ "Morton, Timothy, 1968-". Library of Congress. Retrieved 22 July 2014Timothy Bloxam Morton; b. 6/19/68
  3. ^ "Rice Faculty Page". Retrieved 20 June2012.
  4. ^ Noll, A. Michael (August 1967). "A Computer Technique for Displaying n-Dimensional Hyperobjects". Communications of the ACM10 (8): 469–473. doi:10.1145/363534.363544S2CID 6677741.
  5. Jump up to:a b Morton (2010), p. 130
  6. ^ Smith, P. D. (2018-01-20). "Being Ecological by Timothy Morton review – a playfully serious look at the environment"the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-10-10.
  7. ^ "UC-Davis Faculty Page". Archived from the original on 2011-11-23. Retrieved 23 November 2011.
  8. ^ "SCI-Arc launches new program on emerging topics in landscape architecture"The Architect’s Newspaper. 2019-12-05. Retrieved 2021-01-14.
  9. Jump up to:a b c "UC-Davis Faculty Page". Archived from the original on 23 November 2011. Retrieved 28 November 2011.
  10. ^ Morton (1994), p. 2
  11. ^ Morton (1994), p. 4
  12. ^ Morton (1994), p. 11
  13. ^ Morton (2000), p. 2
  14. ^ Morton (2000), p. 3
  15. Jump up to:a b Morton (2000), p. 19
  16. ^ Morton (2000), p. 68
  17. ^ Morton (2000), p. 75
  18. ^ Morton (2004), p. 9
  19. ^ Morton (2007), p. 1
  20. ^ Morton (2007), pp. 4–5
  21. ^ Morton (2007), p. 3
  22. ^ Morton (2007), p. 32
  23. ^ Morton (2010), p. 16
  24. ^ Morton (2010), p. 17
  25. ^ Morton (2010), p. 30
  26. ^ Morton (2010), p. 29
  27. ^ Morton (2010), p. 38
  28. ^ Morton (2010), p. 39
  29. Jump up to:a b Morton (2010), p. 41
  30. ^ Morton, Timothy. "Shoplifting Advice"Ecology Without Nature. Retrieved 1 December 2011.
  31. ^ Morton, Timothy. "Hyperobjects are Viscous"Ecology Without Nature. Retrieved 15 September 2011.
  32. Jump up to:a b c Coffield, Kris. "Interview: Timothy Morton"Fractured Politics. Retrieved 15 September 2011.
  33. ^ Morton, Timothy. "Hyperobjects are Nonlocal"Ecology Without Nature.
  34. ^ Morton, Timothy (2011). "Sublime Objects"SpeculationsII: 207–227. Retrieved 15 September 2011.
  35. ^ Morton (2010), pp. 131–132
  36. ^ Services, University of Chicago IT. "Critical Inquiry"criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 2018-12-24.

External links[edit source]